Table of Contents
Introduction: The Dead End of a Flawed Map
In my mid-twenties, I hit a wall.
It wasn’t a sudden crash, but a slow, grinding halt at the end of a road I thought was leading somewhere meaningful.
On the surface, I was doing everything right.
I was a devout follower of the gospel of self-improvement, my shelves groaning under the weight of books that promised to unlock my potential, manifest my dreams, and help me “find myself.” I was chasing my one true passion with the fervor of a zealot, convinced that if I just aligned my life with this singular, burning purpose, everything would click into place.
This conviction led me to pour my life savings and two excruciating years into a business venture built entirely on that supposed passion.
It failed.
Spectactularly.
The collapse left me not just broke, but existentially shattered.
I was adrift in what psychologists call an existential crisis, a state of inner conflict characterized by the overwhelming impression that life lacks meaning.1
The questions that haunted me were relentless: Who am I, if not this passion? What is my purpose now? Have I made all the wrong choices?.2
My failure felt total, a damning verdict on my character and worth.
The anxiety was a constant hum, often spiking into a panic that disturbed my ability to function in everyday life.3
My personal failure story was not unique; it was a symptom of a much larger problem.
I had been navigating the complex territory of my life with a fundamentally flawed map.
This map, handed down by a culture saturated with simplistic self-help narratives, promises that the “self” is a static object, a hidden treasure waiting to be discovered.
It tells you to find your one passion, to think positively until reality bends to your will, and to unearth a singular, authentic “true self.” My journey into that dead end, and the long, difficult road out, forced me to question everything I thought I knew about identity.
It led me to realize that my failure wasn’t a result of insufficient effort or a lack of worthiness, but of using the wrong map entirely.
The very industry designed to help was, in fact, perpetuating the problem.
It profits by selling easily marketable, but ultimately ineffective, roadmaps to this mythical destination of a “found self”.5
This model is rooted in much older philosophical ideas of a fixed, essential soul.6
When these simple answers inevitably fail to address the complexity of a real human life, the consumer doesn’t blame the faulty map; they blame themselves for being bad navigators.
This was my experience precisely.
I felt my inability to achieve the promised results was my own personal failing, a sign of my inadequacy.7
This creates a toxic cycle: a feeling of failure prompts the search for a new self-help solution, which offers a temporary high of hope before its own inevitable failure, leading to an even deeper sense of worthlessness.8
This article is the story of how I escaped that cycle.
It is the story of tearing up the old map and, through a series of discoveries in the most unlikely of places, learning to draw a new one.
Part I: The Architecture of My Failure: Deconstructing the Myth of the “Findable Self”
Before I could draw a new map, I had to understand why the old one led me so profoundly astray.
I had to deconstruct the very architecture of my failure, to see that the popular advice I had followed so diligently wasn’t just a collection of unhelpful tips, but the pillars of a deeply flawed and unstable worldview.
Each pillar supported the others, creating a prison of thought that kept me trapped in a cycle of striving and shame.
The Tyranny of the One True Passion
The first and most seductive pillar was the mandate to “follow your passion.” This advice is woven into the fabric of our culture, presented as the golden ticket to a fulfilling life.
The problem, as I learned the hard way, is that for most people, it’s a ticket to a mythical destination.
The advice presupposes that we all have a pre-existing, singular, and clearly defined passion just waiting to be unearthed.9
This assumption is fundamentally wrong.
Research shows that most people, especially when young, simply don’t have an identifiable passion to follow.9
We are told to look inward for this grand purpose, but for many, the search yields only silence, creating anxiety and a sense of inadequacy.
We feel like we’re failing some imaginary life test before we’ve even begun.11
My failed business was a monument to this myth.
I had mistaken a fleeting interest for a divine calling.
I ignored the practical realities—market demand, financial planning, the sheer drudgery of administrative work—because I believed passion alone was enough.
But once you try to monetize a passion, it often ceases to be one.
It becomes work, subject to deadlines, client demands, and financial pressures.
The very thing that once brought you joy becomes a source of profound stress and, eventually, resentment.12
The deeper truth I was missing is that passion is rarely the cause of a fulfilling career; it is the effect.
It is the feeling that emerges after you’ve cultivated a valuable skill, put in the hard work to achieve mastery, and begun to see the impact of your competence in the world.11
By telling us to start with passion, the conventional wisdom gets the formula backward.
It encourages us to chase a feeling rather than build a foundation.
The Hollow Promise of Positive Thinking and Manifestation
When my passion-fueled business imploded, I didn’t question the map.
I concluded I had failed to navigate it correctly.
So, I doubled down on the second pillar of the self-help gospel: the power of positive thinking and the Law of Attraction.
If I could just fix my mindset, I believed, I could fix my reality.
I filled journals with affirmations, visualized success with ferocious intensity, and tried to banish every negative thought.
This, too, was a dead end.
Instead of feeling better, I felt worse.
The relentless pressure to “think positive” is often a form of toxic positivity.
It’s invalidating.
When you’re in real pain, being told to simply “look on the bright side” feels like your suffering is being dismissed.15
It became a tool for avoidance, a way to spend enormous amounts of time reading about how to overcome trauma and grief without actually doing the necessary work of sitting with my feelings and processing the loss.7
Furthermore, for people with low self-esteem, forced positive affirmations like “I am a success” can backfire.
When a statement is too dissonant with your deep-seated beliefs, your mind actively rejects it, reinforcing the very feelings of inadequacy you’re trying to overcome.16
The Law of Attraction, as popularly conceived, is particularly pernicious.
It suggests that our thoughts are the primary cause of everything in our lives, from wealth to health.18
This not only ignores the crucial role of action 19 but also devolves into a cruel form of victim-blaming.
If you are sick, poor, or have been abused, this philosophy implies it is your fault—a result of your “negative vibrations”.18
As I sat in the wreckage of my life, trying to “manifest” a different reality, this philosophy provided the perfect explanation for my failure: it was all my fault.
My inability to conjure a better life through sheer force of will wasn’t evidence that the method was flawed; it was proof that I was flawed.
This pillar, meant to empower, became another brick in the wall of my self-loathing.
The Philosophical Root of the Problem: The Arborescent Self
For a long time, I saw these two issues—the passion myth and the positivity trap—as separate problems.
The real breakthrough came when I realized they were merely branches of a much older, deeper philosophical tree.
The unstated assumption undergirding almost all popular self-help is what the philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari called an “arborescent” model of identity.21
Think of a tree.
It has a single point of origin (the seed), a central trunk, and a hierarchical structure of branches growing linearly toward the sky.
This is the default model we use to think about the self.
It posits a single root or core, a stable, unified, and coherent identity that persists through time.23
Philosophically, this echoes for centuries, from Plato’s immaterial soul to John Locke’s theory that personal identity consists of a continuous consciousness or memory.6
This model creates the expectation of a “true self” that can be known as a “bounded, unique individual”.23
Any deviation, contradiction, or multiplicity within us feels like a failure of authenticity, a sign that we have strayed from our one true path.
This unconscious mental model was the hidden operating system for my entire failed project of self-discovery.
The “follow your passion” mantra was my attempt to find the “root” of my tree.
The “positive thinking” was my attempt to force the trunk to grow straight and tall toward a pre-determined vision of success.
I was looking for my single, solid, linear identity.
The problem was that my life, like all lives, wasn’t a tree at all.
It was a messy, tangled, interconnected network.
The arborescent model is not just an abstract idea; it is the source code for the faulty advice that plagues us.
It demands a single point of origin, and the passion myth provides a simple, marketable answer.
It demands a method for linear growth, and the Law of Attraction offers a simple, marketable technique.
By understanding this deep, structural error, I could finally see that the problem wasn’t my inability to follow the map.
The problem was the map itself.
Part II: The Epiphany: The Self as a Rhizome
My escape from this intellectual prison didn’t come from another self-help book.
It came from a radical detour into a field that seemed, at first, to have nothing to do with personal identity.
Burnt out and disillusioned, I abandoned the “gurus” and simply followed my curiosity.
This led me, unexpectedly, to the fascinating world of complexity science.
A Glimmer from an Unlikely Field: Self-Organization and Emergence
I began reading about how complex systems in nature—ant colonies, bustling cities, neural networks, entire ecosystems—create intricate, intelligent order without any central command or pre-existing blueprint.25
This phenomenon is called
self-organization.
It’s a process where overall order arises spontaneously from local interactions between the individual parts of a system.
The resulting structure is wholly decentralized, distributed, robust, and capable of repairing itself after being damaged.26
From this process of self-organization, something incredible happens: emergence.
Emergence is when coherent patterns, properties, and behaviors appear at the macro-level (the system as a whole) that are novel and cannot be found in or reduced to the properties of the micro-level parts.27
A single water molecule isn’t “wet.” Wetness is an emergent property of billions of molecules interacting.
A single neuron isn’t “conscious.” Consciousness is an emergent property of a complex network of neurons firing together.
The whole is truly more than, and different from, the sum of its parts.29
This was my epiphany.
The thunderclap moment that changed everything.
What if the self isn’t a pre-designed object to be found, like a diamond in a mine? What if the self is an emergent property of a complex, self-organizing system? What if “I” am the coherent, macro-level pattern that dynamically arises from the billions of micro-level interactions between my thoughts, my memories, my relationships, my skills, my experiences, and my physical body?
This reframing was revolutionary.
It meant that the entire project of “finding yourself” through introspection was doomed from the start.
It was like trying to understand “wetness” by studying a single H2O molecule.
The self isn’t in the parts; it is the ever-changing pattern of relationships between the parts.
You don’t find it.
You can’t.
You can only cultivate the system from which it emerges.
Discovering a New Language: From Arborescence to the Rhizome
Complexity science gave me a new way to see, but I needed a new language to describe what I was seeing.
This is when my journey led me to the work of those same philosophers, Deleuze and Guattari.
While their writing is notoriously dense, their central metaphor for this kind of non-hierarchical, emergent system was breathtakingly clear and perfectly matched what I had learned from science: the rhizome.30
A rhizome is a botanical term for an underground stem system like ginger, bamboo, or an iris bed.
Unlike a tree with its single trunk and top-down hierarchy (arborescence), a rhizome grows horizontally and sideways.
It has no center, no beginning, and no end.
Any point of a rhizome can be connected to any other point.21
It is defined by principles of connection and heterogeneity.
It is a multiplicity, not a unity.21
Crucially, a rhizome can be broken or ruptured at any point, but it doesn’t die.
It simply starts up again along one of its old lines or sprouts entirely new ones.21
It is a map (a cartography) that is constantly being made and remade, not a tracing (a decalcomania) of a pre-existing form.
In this model, identity is not a fixed state of being, but a fluid process of becoming, constantly negotiated and redefined through its endless interactions and connections.23
Here was the language I had been searching for.
The self is not a tree, striving for singular, linear perfection.
The self is a rhizome—a resilient, adaptive, decentralized network of connections, constantly growing, changing, and finding new pathways.
The Paradigm Shift Visualized
The difference between these two models isn’t just a minor tweak; it’s a fundamental paradigm shift in how we understand our own existence.
To make this shift concrete, consider the following comparison:
| Feature | The Arborescent Self (Old Paradigm) | The Rhizomatic Self (New Paradigm) |
| Core Metaphor | Tree 21 | Underground Root System (Rhizome), Ecosystem 25 |
| Structure | Hierarchical, Centered, Linear | Decentralized, Non-hierarchical, Networked 21 |
| Goal | Find your “root” or “true self” | Cultivate connections and explore new territories 32 |
| View of Identity | A static thing to be discovered (Being) 6 | A dynamic process of construction (Becoming) 30 |
| View of Failure | A deviation from the correct path | A “rupture” that creates new lines of growth 21 |
| Primary Action | Introspection, Tracing a pre-set map | Engagement, Cartography (making the map) 21 |
Seeing my life through this new rhizomatic lens was liberating.
The pressure to find my one “true self” vanished, replaced by the freedom to cultivate a complex, multifaceted, and ever-evolving system.
The goal was no longer to arrive at a final destination, but to become a better gardener of my own becoming.
Part III: Living the Rhizomatic Life: A Practical Guide to Cultivating an Emergent Self
This new paradigm—the self as a rhizome—is not just an abstract philosophical toy.
It is a profoundly practical guide for living.
It shifts our focus from the futile search for a static “being” to the empowering work of cultivating a dynamic “becoming.” When I began to apply this model to my own life after my business failure, everything changed.
The following principles are not a prescriptive formula, but a set of navigational tools for tending to your own emergent self.
They are the tools that allowed me to build a new, far more resilient and authentic life from the ruins of the old one.
It turns out that many of the most effective therapeutic and philosophical frameworks, when viewed through this lens, are not disparate techniques but are, in fact, practical methodologies for applying the principles of a rhizomatic, emergent system.
They are the “how-to” guide for becoming a skilled cartographer of your own soul.
Principle 1: Practice Cartography, Not Tracing (Map Your Becoming)
The first principle of a rhizomatic life is to abandon the idea that there is a pre-drawn map of your life that you must find and follow.
You are not a tracer; you are a cartographer.
Your job is to actively explore the territory of your life as it unfolds and draw the map as you go.21
This means shifting your primary question from an internal, static one (“Who am I?”) to an external, dynamic one (“What connections can I make? What path is meaningful now?”).
Two powerful tools for this kind of cartography are Logotherapy and Ikigai.
Logotherapy as a Compass: Psychiatrist and Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl developed logotherapy on the profound insight that the primary human drive is not for pleasure or power, but for meaning.34
Frankl argued that meaning is not something we invent out of thin air; it’s something we
discover in the world.36
He identified three primary avenues for this discovery:
- Creative Values: By creating a work or doing a deed; by contributing something to the world.
- Experiential Values: By experiencing something or encountering someone; through nature, art, or love.
- Attitudinal Values: By the attitude we take toward unavoidable suffering.35
Logotherapy provides a compass for your map-making.
Instead of asking, “What is my passion?” you ask, “What is meaningful to me right now, in this situation?” It directs your attention to the potential for meaning in your current territory, whether through a project, a relationship, or your response to a challenge.
Ikigai for Identifying Fertile Ground: The Japanese concept of Ikigai, often translated as “a reason for being,” offers another cartographic tool.38
While the Westernized Venn diagram of Ikigai is a simplification, its four overlapping circles are incredibly useful for identifying promising intersections on your map 40:
- What you love
- What you are good at
- What the world needs
- What you can be paid for
Instead of viewing Ikigai as a single, perfect destination you must find, use it as a framework to survey your landscape.
Where do these circles overlap for you now? That intersection is fertile ground, a place where a meaningful connection is likely to sprout.
After my business failed, I used these tools.
I stopped looking for a grand, singular passion.
I asked, “What is meaningful to me now?” The answer was understanding the very crisis I was in.
I asked, “Where is the fertile ground?” The intersection was my love of reading and writing, my budding skill for analysis, and a world full of people who, like me, were struggling with these same questions.
This act of cartography led me directly to the path of becoming a philosophical psychologist—a path I never could have “found” through introspection alone.
Principle 2: Embrace Multiplicity (You Are a Network of Stories)
The arborescent model pressures us to have a single, coherent identity.
We feel we must be “authentic” to one true self.
The rhizome frees us from this tyranny.
It shows us that we are inherently multiple, a network of countless connections.
Narrative psychology provides the perfect tools to embrace this multiplicity.
Its central tenet is that we construct our identities through the stories we tell about our lives.41
We are not single characters; we are “multistoried” beings.42
Externalization: The Problem is the Problem: Narrative therapists Michael White and David Epston developed a powerful technique called “externalization”.43
The core idea is simple but profound: the person is not the problem; the problem is the problem.42
By giving our problems names (“The Anxiety Fog,” “The Self-Critic”), we separate them from our identity.
We stop saying “I am a failure” and start saying “I am a person struggling with the effects of failure.” This creates distance, allowing us to see the problem as something we can act upon, rather than a fixed part of who we are.43
Re-authoring Your Life: We all have “problem-saturated” stories that come to dominate our sense of self.
These are often “thin descriptions” that leave out our complexities, strengths, and moments of resilience.42
Narrative therapy’s goal is to “re-author” our lives by actively searching for “unique outcomes”—moments, however small, that contradict the dominant negative story.44
The therapist acts as a collaborator, but you are always positioned as the expert in your own life.42
Applying this, I stopped identifying as “the failed entrepreneur.” That was just one story, and a thinly described one at that.
I started searching for unique outcomes.
I remembered moments of resilience during the collapse, the curiosity that led me to new fields of study, the compassion I felt for others in similar situations.
I began to re-author my identity, weaving in other, more empowering stories: “the resilient learner,” “the curious investigator,” “the empathetic future therapist.” None of these was my “one true self.” They were all valid threads in the complex, rhizomatic tapestry of who I was becoming.
Principle 3: Value Rupture and Detour (Growth Happens at the Breaks)
In the tree model of the self, a crisis is a catastrophe.
A broken branch or a split trunk signals damage and deviation from the ideal path.
In the rhizome model, a crisis is an opportunity.
A rupture is not the end of the story; it is precisely where new growth begins.
As Deleuze and Guattari wrote, a rhizome may be broken, but “it will start up again on one of its old lines, or on new lines”.21
This principle completely reframes life’s most difficult moments.
An existential crisis—often triggered by major life events like job loss, divorce, illness, or simply reaching a significant age 2—is not a sign that you are lost or have failed.
From a complexity science perspective, it is an indicator that your system has reached a critical state, a point “far from equilibrium” where it is ready for a phase transition.27
It is the system’s way of signaling that its old patterns have become too rigid and it is ready to self-organize into a new, more complex, and more adaptive state.
My business failure was the ultimate rupture.
It was the most painful period of my life, a complete shattering of my arborescent identity.
But it was also the single most important event.
It was the break that forced me off the single, linear path I thought I had to follow.
It was the rupture that allowed all the other connections—to complexity science, to philosophy, to psychology, to a new career—to form.
The detour became the Way. By valuing the break, I allowed a far more interesting and resilient self to emerge from the pieces.
Principle 4: Cultivate Your Connections (Identity is Relational)
A rhizome is nothing but its connections.
An emergent self is not an isolated atom; it is a node in a vast network.
This leads to the final, and perhaps most crucial, principle: the work of self-cultivation is not primarily an act of solitary introspection but of tending to your connections with the world.
Identity is relational.
It is formed, sustained, and transformed through your lines of flight and points of contact.
This means shifting your energy outward.
Instead of spending all your time looking inside for answers, focus on building and strengthening your connections to:
- People: Meaningful relationships and communities are not just accessories to a good life; they are constituent parts of your identity. They provide the feedback, support, and stimulation necessary for interests to thrive.36
- Ideas: Actively engage with new knowledge. Read widely. Study subjects that spark your curiosity. As the connections between ideas form in your mind, the structure of your self changes with them.46
- Skills: A skill is a connection to the world, a way of acting upon it effectively. Deliberate practice and the pursuit of mastery are powerful ways to build a more capable and confident self. As Cal Newport argues, passion follows skill, not the other way around.11
- Places & Experiences: Art, nature, travel—these are not mere diversions. They are ways of forming new connections, of seeing the world and yourself from different perspectives, of adding new nodes to your network.47
This is the essence of my success story.
The new, more fulfilled version of me didn’t emerge from sitting in a room “finding myself.” It emerged from action and engagement.
It was built connection by connection: by enrolling in a new field of study, by forging relationships with professors and peers, by wrestling with new and challenging ideas, and by building the skills to contribute to a conversation I found deeply meaningful.
I didn’t find myself.
I built myself, one connection at a time.
Conclusion: The Joy of the Unfinished Self
My journey began at a dead end, with a map that promised a single destination: a fixed, final, “true self.” The pursuit of that destination left me broke, anxious, and lost.
The question “me myself and why” felt like an impossible riddle, and my inability to solve it felt like a profound personal failure.
The great liberation came from realizing the riddle itself was based on a false premise.
The self is not a noun to be found, but a verb to be lived.
It is not a static object but a dynamic process.
It is not a perfect, singular tree to be climbed, but a messy, resilient, and endlessly fascinating rhizome to be cultivated.
This shift from being to becoming changes everything.
The anxiety of not having “found yourself” is revealed for what it is: a symptom of a flawed and stressful cultural narrative.
When you embrace the self as a complex, emergent, and ever-unfinished system, you trade the immense pressure of perfection for the quiet freedom of cultivation.
The goal is no longer to arrive at a final answer, but to get better at living the questions.
My life is no longer a search for a fixed point of identity.
It is a process of cartography—of mapping the meaningful connections that emerge from my engagement with the world.
Failure is no longer a verdict, but a rupture from which new growth sprouts.
My identity is not a monolith, but a rich multiplicity of stories, any of which I can choose to nurture and re-author.
The answer to “me myself and why” is not a destination.
It is the joy of tending the garden, of drawing the map, of living in the beautiful, unfinished process of becoming.
Works cited
- Existential crisis – Wikipedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_crisis
- Existential Crisis: Symptoms and Possible Causes – WebMD, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.webmd.com/balance/what-is-existential-crisis
- What is an existential crisis? – Medical News Today, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/327244
- Existential Crisis: What It Is and How to Cope – Verywell Mind, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/coping-with-existential-anxiety-4163485
- Here’s What’s Wrong with Self-Help – Scott H Young, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2010/09/01/whats-wrong-with-self-help/
- Personal Identity | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 3, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/person-i/
- Self-help was meant to make me feel better. Instead it turned toxic – and borderline dangerous | Emily Goddard | The Guardian, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/01/self-help-toxic-books-courses-apps
- 5 Problems With the Self-Help Industry – Mark Manson, accessed August 3, 2025, https://markmanson.net/self-help
- On Passion and Its Discontents – Cal Newport, accessed August 3, 2025, https://calnewport.com/on-passion-and-its-discontents/
- Is ‘Follow Your Passion’ Terrible Advice? – Global Leadership Network, accessed August 3, 2025, https://globalleadership.org/articles/leading-yourself/is-follow-your-passion-terrible-advice/
- Why “Follow Your Passion” Is Bad Career Advice (Especially for College Students), accessed August 3, 2025, https://career.kzoo.edu/2025/02/20/stop-chasing-unicorns-why-follow-your-passion-is-bad-career-advice-especially-for-college-students/
- “Follow your passion” is the worst piece of career advice and it can ruin your life in the long run – Reddit, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/findapath/comments/1bcu70f/follow_your_passion_is_the_worst_piece_of_career/
- Why ‘Follow Your Passion’ is the Worst Advice You’ll Ever Get : r/selfimprovement – Reddit, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/selfimprovement/comments/1d6r7va/why_follow_your_passion_is_the_worst_advice_youll/
- Cal Newport: “Follow Your Passion” Is Bad Advice – YouTube, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIMu1PGbG-0
- The Problem with Positive Thinking – Nick Wignall, accessed August 3, 2025, https://nickwignall.com/problem-with-positive-thinking/
- Why Positive Thinking Doesn’t Work And What To Do Instead – The Geeky Leader, accessed August 3, 2025, https://thegeekyleader.com/2024/06/16/why-positive-thinking-doesnt-work-and-what-to-do-instead/
- The Problem With Positive Thinking | Psychology Today, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/cbt-and-me/201608/the-problem-positive-thinking
- The “law of attraction” is dangerous nonsense – | Kinsale CBT, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.kinsalecbt.com/2024/02/08/the-law-of-attraction-is-dangerous-nonsense/
- The Real Reason The Law Of Attraction Isn’t Working For You | by Giorgia G – Medium, accessed August 3, 2025, https://medium.com/@thetreasureswithin/the-real-reason-the-law-of-attraction-isnt-working-for-you-10be7f2e1aed
- I absolutely despise the “Law of Attraction” and similar new age philosophies. : r/CPTSD – Reddit, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/CPTSD/comments/122o02s/i_absolutely_despise_the_law_of_attraction_and/
- Rhizome (philosophy) – Wikipedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhizome_(philosophy)
- The Philosophical Concept of Rhizome – Literary Theory and Criticism, accessed August 3, 2025, https://literariness.org/2017/04/26/the-philosophical-concept-of-rhizome/
- Exploring the Rhizomal Self, accessed August 3, 2025, https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/NW/article/download/28920/1882521756/1882522715
- Personal identity – Wikipedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_identity
- Emergence and Self-Organization – Complex social-ecological systems: linking theory and reality, accessed August 3, 2025, http://www.complexity.soton.ac.uk/theory/_Emergence_and_Self-Organization.php
- Self-organization – Wikipedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-organization
- (PDF) Complexity and Self-organization – ResearchGate, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228893485_Complexity_and_Self-organization
- Emergence Versus Self-Organisation: Different Concepts but Promising When Combined, accessed August 3, 2025, https://pdodds.w3.uvm.edu/teaching/courses/2009-08UVM-300/docs/others/2005/dewolf2005a.pdf
- CHAOS, COMPLEXITY, EMERGENCE, AND SELF-ORGANIZED CHANGE | Lakeside Learning, accessed August 3, 2025, https://learn.lakesidetraining.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Chaos-Complexity-Emergence-and-Self-Organized-Change.pdf
- Understanding Rhizome in Modern Philosophy – Number Analytics, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-rhizome-modern-philosophy
- The Power of Rhizomatic Identity – Number Analytics, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/rhizomatic-identity
- Rhizome | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature, accessed August 3, 2025, https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-1112?d=%2F10.1093%2Facrefore%2F9780190201098.001.0001%2Facrefore-9780190201098-e-1112&p=emailA0PbSzK3PTWFk
- Personal Identity between Philosophy and Psychology – Cambridge Scholars Publishing, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.cambridgescholars.com/resources/pdfs/978-1-5275-6352-0-sample.pdf
- Logotherapy | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/logotherapy
- Logotherapy – Wikipedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logotherapy
- About Logotherapy – viktorfranklinstitute.org, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.viktorfranklinstitute.org/about-logotherapy/
- Logotherapy: Viktor Frankl’s Theory of Meaning – Positive Psychology, accessed August 3, 2025, https://positivepsychology.com/viktor-frankl-logotherapy/
- Ikigai – Wikipedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ikigai
- Ikigai Meaning: How to Find Your Life Purpose – 2025 – MasterClass, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.masterclass.com/articles/ikigai-meaning
- Ikigai: The Japanese Secret to a Joyful Life | The Government of …, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.japan.go.jp/kizuna/2022/03/ikigai_japanese_secret_to_a_joyful_life.html
- Narrative psychology – Wikipedia, accessed August 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narrative_psychology
- What is Narrative Therapy? – The Dulwich Centre, accessed August 3, 2025, https://dulwichcentre.com.au/what-is-narrative-therapy/
- Narrative Therapy: Definition, Techniques & Interventions – Simply Psychology, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.simplypsychology.org/narrative-therapy.html
- What Is Narrative Therapy? Overview, Principles, & Benefits – Thriveworks, accessed August 3, 2025, https://thriveworks.com/help-with/beginning-therapy/narrative-therapy-overview/
- Existential Crisis: What It Is and How to Cope – Resilience Lab, accessed August 3, 2025, https://www.resiliencelab.us/thought-lab/existential-crisis
- Analogies between Biology and Deep Learning [rough note] – Colah’s Blog, accessed August 3, 2025, https://colah.github.io/notes/bio-analogies/
- A visual artist compares the way scientists and artists see a world of discovery | Yale News, accessed August 3, 2025, https://news.yale.edu/2017/04/03/visual-artist-compares-way-scientists-and-artists-see-world-discovery
