The Branch of Victory, The Path of Suffering: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Palm on Palm Sunday

Part I: The Event and Its Immediate Context

The commemoration of Palm Sunday is rooted in a pivotal event in the Christian narrative: the Triumphal Entry of Jesus into Jerusalem.

This singular moment, occurring just days before his crucifixion, serves as the dramatic overture to Holy Week, the most sacred period in the Christian liturgical calendar.¹

It is an event of profound theological complexity, layering royal acclamation upon prophetic fulfillment and popular expectation upon divine purpose.

To comprehend the significance of the palm branches that give the day its name, one must first examine the foundational narrative as presented in the canonical Gospels and the volatile socio-political landscape in which this sacred drama unfolded.

Section 1: The Triumphal Entry into Jerusalem: A Synoptic and Johannine Analysis

The Triumphal Entry is one of the few episodes in the life of Jesus that is recounted in all four canonical Gospels: Matthew 21:1-11, Mark 11:1-11, Luke 19:28-44, and John 12:12-19.³

This universal attestation underscores its central importance to the early Christian communities and their understanding of Jesus’s identity and mission.

When harmonized, these accounts depict a carefully orchestrated event.

Approaching Jerusalem for the Passover festival, a time of heightened nationalistic and religious fervor, Jesus, from the vicinity of the Mount of Olives near Bethany and Bethphage, dispatches two disciples with specific instructions.³

They are to procure a young donkey, or in Matthew’s account, a donkey and her colt, that has never been ridden, informing any questioners that “The Lord has need of it”.³

Upon the disciples’ return with the animal, they place their cloaks upon it, and Jesus begins his procession into the city.

As he rides, a great crowd, composed of his followers and pilgrims arriving for the feast, greets him with ecstatic adoration.

They spread their own cloaks and freshly cut branches upon the road, an ancient gesture of honor reserved for royalty.¹

The air fills with messianic acclamations drawn from the Psalms, chiefly “Hosanna! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!”.²

This public spectacle, a clear messianic claim, stirs the city and alarms the religious authorities, setting the stage for the final confrontation of Holy Week.⁸

While the core narrative is consistent, a comparative analysis of the four Gospels reveals that each account is not a raw historical transcript but a carefully crafted theological interpretation.

The evangelists select, shape, and supplement details to emphasize distinct aspects of Jesus’s identity and the significance of his entry.

These variations are not contradictions but deliberate narrative choices that illuminate the multifaceted meaning of the event from the earliest days of the Christian faith.

• Matthew’s Emphasis: The King of Prophecy
  Writing for a predominantly Jewish-Christian audience, Matthew consistently frames the event as the direct fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy. He explicitly quotes Zechariah 9:9: “Say to Daughter Zion, ‘See, your king comes to you, gentle and riding on a donkey, and on a colt, the foal of a donkey'”.10 Matthew’s controversial inclusion of two animals—a donkey and a colt—on which he states Jesus sat, is widely understood by scholars as a highly literal interpretation of the Hebrew poetic parallelism in Zechariah’s prophecy, where a single animal is described in two ways.3 This meticulous, if perhaps awkward, detail underscores Matthew’s primary objective: to present Jesus as the legitimate, long-awaited Messianic King whose life fulfills the scriptures to the letter. His report that “the whole city was stirred up” (Matthew 21:10) further highlights the public, disruptive, and unavoidable nature of Jesus’s royal claim.8
• Mark’s Emphasis: The Assertive King
  Mark’s account, characterized by its fast-paced narrative, focuses on Jesus’s authority and the political undertones of his actions. The crowd’s cry in Mark is uniquely specific: “Blessed is the coming kingdom of our father David!” (Mark 11:10).9 This acclamation carries a more overtly political and nationalistic charge than the other accounts, reflecting the popular hope for a restoration of the Davidic monarchy.9 Furthermore, Mark includes a unique detail: after entering the city, Jesus proceeds to the Temple, “looked around at everything,” and then, as it was late, returned to Bethany (Mark 11:11).3 This act of quiet inspection portrays Jesus not as a mere visitor but as a king surveying his royal domain, foreshadowing the authoritative cleansing of the Temple that follows in Mark’s narrative.8
• Luke’s Emphasis: The Compassionate and Universal King
  Luke, writing for a largely Gentile audience, adapts the narrative for those less familiar with Jewish specifics. He omits the Hebrew term “Hosanna” and translates the messianic hope into the more universal title “King,” having the disciples proclaim, “Blessed is the king who comes in thename of the Lord!” (Luke 19:38).9 Luke’s account contains two powerful and unique episodes. First, when some Pharisees in the crowd demand that Jesus rebuke his disciples, he delivers a stunning retort: “I tell you, if they keep quiet, the stones will cry out” (Luke 19:40).3 This statement elevates the proclamation beyond human choice, framing it as a cosmic event of unavoidable significance. Second, and most poignantly, Luke depicts Jesus weeping over Jerusalem (
  Flevit super illam), lamenting its failure to recognize “the time of God’s coming” and prophesying its future destruction (Luke 19:41-44).³ This infusion of profound sorrow into a moment of “triumph” introduces the theme of judgment and compassion that is central to Luke’s portrayal of Jesus.
• John’s Emphasis: The King Over Death
  John’s Gospel, the most theologically distinct, places the Triumphal Entry in a unique context. He is the only evangelist to explicitly state that the crowd used “branches of palm trees” (John 12:13), the detail that gives the day its name.2 More significantly, John directly links the crowd’s fervor to Jesus’s most recent and spectacular miracle: the raising of Lazarus from the dead (John 12:17-18).5 For John, the people hail Jesus as king not simply out of a vague messianic hope, but because they have witnessed his ultimate power over death. This frames the entry not merely as a prelude to the Passion, but as a procession of the one who is, himself, “the resurrection and the life.” John also highlights the escalating conflict by recording the Pharisees’ despair—”Look how the whole world has gone after him!” (John 12:19)—and the disciples’ own initial lack of understanding, which was clarified only after Jesus was glorified (John 12:16).3

The following table provides a structured summary of these key narrative distinctions, illustrating how the four evangelists, while recounting one event, preached four distinct sermons on its meaning.

Feature	Matthew (21:1-11)	Mark (11:1-11)	Luke (19:28-44)	John (12:12-19)
Animal(s)	Donkey and a colt	A colt	A colt	A young donkey
Prophetic Fulfillment	Explicitly quotes Zechariah 9:9	Implied	Implied; alludes to messianic prophecies	Explicitly quotes Zechariah 9:9
Crowd’s Acclamation	“Hosanna to the Son of David!”	“Hosanna! Blessed is the coming kingdom of our father David!”	“Blessed is the king who comes in the name of the Lord!”	“Hosanna! Blessed is… the King of Israel!”
Items Strewn	Cloaks and tree branches	Cloaks and branches from fields	Cloaks	Palm branches
Unique Elements	Whole city is “stirred.”	Jesus inspects the Temple, then leaves.	Pharisees object; Jesus weeps over Jerusalem.	Crowd’s action linked to raising of Lazarus; disciples’ delayed understanding.

Section 2: The Political and Religious Climate of First-Century Jerusalem

The Triumphal Entry was not performed in a vacuum.

It was a public act of immense symbolic weight, staged in one of the most politically and religiously volatile settings of the ancient world.

To understand the crowd’s ecstatic welcome and the authorities’ alarmed reaction, one must grasp the tense atmosphere of first-century Judea.

The land was under the thumb of the Roman Empire.

While Galilee was governed by a client tetrarch, Herod Antipas, Judea and its capital, Jerusalem, were under the direct authority of a Roman prefect, Pontius Pilate.¹⁴

Roman legions were stationed nearby, and the prefect himself would often come to Jerusalem during major Jewish festivals like Passover to ensure order and suppress any potential uprisings.¹⁴

The daily governance of the city, however, was delegated to the Jewish high priest—at this time Caiaphas—and his council, the Sanhedrin.

This created a delicate and often fraught power structure where the high priest had to mediate between the demands of his Roman overlords and the aspirations of a populace that chafed under foreign, pagan rule and the burden of Roman taxation.¹⁴

Into this crucible of resentment and occupation, the centuries-old Jewish hope for a Messiah—the Meshiach, or “anointed one”—took on an intensely political and militaristic character.¹⁵

For many, the promised deliverer was envisioned not as a spiritual teacher, but as a mighty warrior-king, a new David who would expel the hated Romans by force and restore Israel to sovereign glory.²

The crowd’s acclamation of Jesus as the “Son of David” was therefore not a mere genealogical observation; it was a loaded political and royal title.⁹

It invoked God’s covenant with King David and was widely understood as a direct claim to the throne of Israel, a prerequisite for any figure aspiring to be the people’s king.¹⁷

This messianic expectation was not uniform, however, and the Jewish society of the time was fragmented into several influential sects, each with its own approach to Roman rule and messianic hope:

• The Sadducees: This group comprised the wealthy, priestly aristocracy who controlled the Temple and the Sanhedrin. Their power depended on maintaining the status quo and collaborating with Rome. They were theologically conservative, rejecting newer doctrines like the resurrection of the dead, and viewed any popular movement that could provoke Roman intervention as a direct threat to their position and the nation’s stability.²⁰ Jesus’s Triumphal Entry would have been, in their eyes, a dangerously seditious act.
• The Pharisees: A more popular group, the Pharisees were lay experts in the Torah, focused on applying its precepts to everyday life. They believed in the resurrection, angels, and divine providence, and held significant influence over the common people.²¹ While often depicted in the Gospels as theological opponents of Jesus, they shared some common ground. Their primary concern was religious purity and fidelity to the law in the midst of pagan occupation.²⁰
• The Zealots: This was less a formal sect and more a revolutionary political movement. The Zealots believed that God alone was the ruler of Israel and that any submission to a pagan emperor was idolatry. They advocated for the violent overthrow of Roman rule and embodied the most extreme version of the popular hope for a military messiah.²⁰ For them, a good Roman was a dead Roman, and they would have seen the Triumphal Entry as the potential start of the long-awaited rebellion.
• The Essenes: This ascetic and separatist group, often associated with the community at Qumran that produced the Dead Sea Scrolls, had withdrawn from what they considered a corrupt Temple establishment in Jerusalem. They lived in disciplined communities, practicing ritual purity and awaiting a divine intervention that would vindicate them as the true remnant of Israel, possibly led by one or two messianic figures (a priestly and a royal one).²⁰

The Triumphal Entry, therefore, was an act of profound political theater performed on a stage set for revolution.

Jesus’s deliberate actions and the crowd’s enthusiastic response were legible to all these factions.

It was a messianic claim that the populace could interpret as the beginning of liberation, the authorities would see as a dangerous provocation, and the Romans would view as potential sedition.

The meaning of the palms waved on that day is inseparable from this context of oppression, expectation, and simmering rebellion.

Part II: The Semiotics of the Spectacle

The Triumphal Entry was a spectacle rich with symbolic language.

Every element—the branches, the animal, the garments, the shouted words—was a signifier drawing from a deep well of shared cultural and religious meaning.

To understand why palm branches were used is to decode this ancient semiotic system and appreciate how these symbols converged to create a moment of powerful, albeit temporary, unity.

Section 3: The Palm Frond: A Cross-Cultural Emblem of Triumph and Immortality

The choice of the palm branch, specified in John’s Gospel, was not arbitrary.

It was arguably the most potent and universally understood symbol of victory, triumph, and life available in the ancient world.¹³

Its power stemmed from its polyvalence; its meaning was reinforced across multiple, overlapping cultural streams, allowing it to resonate with the diverse crowd in Jerusalem.

• Ancient Near Eastern and Egyptian Roots: The palm’s symbolic history is ancient. In Mesopotamian religions, it was revered as a sacred tree, a cosmic axis connecting heaven and earth, and was associated with deities like Ishtar.²³ For the ancient Egyptians, the palm’s ability to thrive in the arid desert made it a powerful symbol of eternal life and renewal. Palm stems represented long life, and fronds were carried in funeral processions to signify the victory of the soul over death and its journey into the afterlife.²³
• The Greco-Roman Symbol of Victory: In the Greco-Roman world that dominated the political landscape of Jesus’s time, the palm was the preeminent symbol of triumph. A palm branch was the highest prize awarded to victorious athletes in the Greek games.²³ In Rome, it was a primary attribute of the goddess Victory (Nike). The association was so strong that the Latin word for the branch,
  palma, became a metonym for “victory” itself.²³ When a triumphant general returned from a successful military campaign, the celebratory parade would feature palm fronds. Thus, for anyone familiar with Roman custom, waving palm branches was an unambiguous sign of hailing a conqueror.²⁴ As victory signals the end of conflict, the palm also developed a secondary meaning of peace—the peace that follows a decisive triumph.²³
• The Jewish Symbol of Celebration and Liberation: The palm branch held a specific and powerful place in Jewish tradition as well. The lulav, a frond from the date palm, is one of the Four Species that God commanded the Israelites to use during the Feast of Tabernacles (Sukkot), a joyous week-long festival celebrating the harvest and God’s provision during the Exodus (Leviticus 23:40).¹³ The waving of the
  lulav was an act of festive worship and thanksgiving. Crucially, palm branches were also associated with Jewish nationalistic and military victory. In a potent historical precedent, the Jewish people hailed the conquering hero Judas Maccabeus in the second century BCE by entering a liberated Jerusalem “with praise and palm branches” (1 Maccabees 13:51).²⁶ He was the kingly figure who had cleansed the Temple and freed them from foreign oppression. By waving palms for Jesus, the crowd was explicitly echoing this historic moment, casting Jesus in the role of a new Maccabeus, a liberator-king.
• Early Christian Adoption: The early Christians seamlessly adopted this multivalent symbol. The palm came to represent the victory of the faithful over the spiritual enemies of the soul, and most especially, the triumph of the martyrs over suffering and death.²³ This is powerfully depicted in the Book of Revelation, where a great multitude of the redeemed from every nation stands before the throne of God and the Lamb, “wearing white robes and holding palm branches in their hands” (Revelation 7:9), a definitive image of their final victory and eternal peace.¹³

The extraordinary power of the palm branch on that Sunday lay in this symbolic convergence.

It was a single symbol that could be read simultaneously in multiple ways by the heterogeneous crowd.

Those with nationalistic hopes saw the coming of a new Judas Maccabeus to expel the Romans.

Those influenced by Greco-Roman culture saw the procession of a triumphant conqueror.

Those with more spiritual sensibilities saw a sign of divine favor and eternal life.

This symbolic overlap allowed a diverse populace with divergent messianic expectations to unite in a single, powerful gesture of acclamation.

This same ambiguity, however, contained the seeds of the week’s later events.

When Jesus failed to fulfill the military and political interpretation of the palm’s symbolism, those who held that view were left disillusioned, their shouts of triumph poised to turn to cries of condemnation.

Section 4: The Humble King: Deconstructing the Symbolism of the Donkey and Cloaks

While the palms signified a recognizable form of triumph, the central image of the procession—Jesus riding a donkey—presented a radical and subversive counter-symbol.

In this deliberate choice of mount, and in the crowd’s corresponding act of homage, Jesus simultaneously accepted the mantle of a king while fundamentally redefining the nature of kingship.

The contrast between a donkey and a horse was stark and would have been lost on no one in the ancient world.

The horse, particularly a fine steed or stallion, was an animal of war, power, and imperial conquest.²

It was the mount of kings, generals, and emperors, a symbol of might and military dominion.¹²

Some historians suggest that at the very same time Jesus was entering Jerusalem from the east on a donkey, the Roman prefect Pontius Pilate may have been entering from the west, riding from his coastal palace to oversee the festival, at the head of a column of cavalry and legionaries, on a warhorse—a clear projection of Roman power.³¹

In direct opposition to this image, Jesus chose a donkey.

The donkey was an animal of peace, commerce, and domestic life.

It was a beast of burden, a symbol of humility, meekness, and service.²⁵

This choice was not a matter of convenience but a direct, public, and living enactment of the prophecy of Zechariah 9:9: “Rejoice greatly, Daughter Zion! Shout, Daughter Jerusalem! See, your king comes to you, righteous and victorious, lowly and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey”.⁴

The prophecy itself inextricably links the coming king with gentleness and humility.

By embodying this prophecy so precisely, Jesus was making a public declaration about the nature of his kingdom.

It was not a kingdom to be established by force, armies, or political domination, but a spiritual kingdom founded on peace, love, and servanthood.⁴

He was actively subverting the crowd’s fervent expectation of a warrior-messiah and presenting himself as a king of peace.¹²

The crowd’s response, laying their cloaks on the road, was an equally potent symbol.

This was not a random act of enthusiasm but a recognized gesture of homage and submission to royalty.⁴

The act is a direct echo of the moment in 2 Kings 9:13 when the commanders of the army acknowledged Jehu’s anointing as king of Israel: “They hurried and each man took his cloak and put it under him on the bare steps.

Then they blew the trumpet and shouted, ‘Jehu is king!'”.⁷

To spread one’s garment on the path of an approaching figure was to carpet their way, to honor them as royalty, and to symbolically lay one’s own life and allegiance at their feet.⁷

While John’s Gospel emphasizes the palms, the Synoptic Gospels, particularly Luke, highlight the cloaks as the primary expression of the crowd’s adoration.³

This act of homage also contained a practical element of “thoughtful reverential service,” providing a makeshift saddle for Jesus on the back of the unridden colt.⁷

The Triumphal Entry thus presents a profound paradox of kingship.

Jesus simultaneously accepts the traditional symbols of royalty—the procession, the acclamations, and the homage of the cloaks—while fundamentally subverting the contemporary understanding of royal power through his choice of a humble donkey.

He is both king and anti-king.

The crowd performs acts befitting a worldly monarch, but the monarch himself embodies a different set of values.

The spectacle becomes a living parable, a physical manifestation of the principles of the Sermon on the Mount: the meek inheriting the earth, the peacemakers being called children of God.

Jesus is a king, but his kingdom’s values are an inversion of the world’s.

Power is located in humility, victory is found in service, and reign is established through peace.

Section 5: “Hosanna!”: The Ambiguous Cry for Salvation

At the heart of the soundscape of the Triumphal Entry is the crowd’s repeated, thunderous cry: “Hosanna!”.²

This single word, more than any other, encapsulates the hope, the expectation, and the ultimate, tragic misunderstanding of the day.

To dissect its meaning is to uncover the dramatic pivot upon which the entire narrative of Holy Week turns.

The word “Hosanna” is not originally a word of praise.

It is the English transliteration of a Hebrew phrase, Hoshiah Na (הוֹשִׁיעָה נָּא), found in Psalm 118:25.²⁵

The phrase is an imperative, a command, meaning “Save, we pray!” or, more urgently, “Save now!”.³⁵

Psalm 118 was a key part of the Jewish festival liturgy, particularly associated with pilgrimage feasts like Passover, and was rich with messianic overtones.

At its root, therefore, “Hosanna” is an urgent plea for salvation, a desperate cry for deliverance from a people suffering under the political and economic weight of Roman occupation.³⁶

When the crowd shouted “Hosanna” to Jesus, they were acknowledging him as the potential Messiah and imploring him to act as their savior—to save them now.²⁵

Over time, however, as this liturgical plea was used in joyful festival processions, its meaning had broadened.

It had evolved from a pure supplication into a shout of acclamation and praise, akin to “Hail!” or “Hallelujah!”.³⁶

The full phrase shouted by the crowd, “Hosanna! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord!” combines the plea from Psalm 118:25 with the welcome from Psalm 118:26.

This combined phrase was a traditional greeting for a king or a noble pilgrim arriving at the Temple in Jerusalem.⁵

Thus, the cry was inherently ambiguous, functioning simultaneously as a desperate plea for help and a jubilant shout of royal praise.

This ambiguity is the key to the day’s drama.

The crowd cried “Save us!” but their definition of salvation was overwhelmingly temporal and political.

They longed for a deliverer who would lead a massive revolt and liberate them from the Roman occupiers.²

They did not, for the most part, grasp that Jesus had come to bring a radically different kind of salvation—a spiritual redemption from the more profound bondage of sin and death.⁴

Jesus accepted their cry and their acclamation, but he proceeded to define “salvation” on his own terms.

The word “Hosanna” thus becomes the fulcrum of Holy Week.

It is a conditional acclamation, a cheer predicated on a specific set of expectations.

The story of the week that follows is the story of those conditions not being met in the way the crowd demanded.

The same desperate energy that fueled the shouts of “Save us!” on Sunday, when thwarted and disappointed, would curdle into betrayal and rage by Friday.

The cry for a savior, when that savior refuses to be the kind of savior demanded, can all too easily become a cry for his destruction.

“Hosanna” is therefore not just a simple cheer; it is the articulation of a profound and ultimately fatal misunderstanding between the king and his would-be subjects.

Part III: The Theological Core: Kingship, Passion, and Paradox

Beyond the historical event and its rich symbolism lies the theological heart of Palm Sunday.

The day is not merely a historical commemoration but a profound theological statement about the nature of God, the identity of Christ, and the path of salvation.

It is defined by a central paradox: the celebration of a triumphant king whose path leads not to a throne but to a cross.

This section will synthesize the symbolic elements into the core theological arguments that emerge from the Triumphal Entry, exploring the collision of divine purpose and human expectation that defines the beginning of Holy Week.

Section 6: The Misunderstood Messiah: The Collision of Expectation and Reality

The central dramatic irony of the Triumphal Entry is the profound chasm between the crowd’s perception and Jesus’s divine purpose.

The people hailed a king, but they fundamentally misunderstood the nature of his kingship and the purpose of his coming.²

They laid palms for a political conqueror, while he rode toward a spiritual conquest over sin and death.²

This collision of expectation and reality is the theological engine of Palm Sunday and the entire Passion narrative.

The crowd’s hopes were fixed on a temporal ruler.

Living under Roman oppression, their cries of “Hosanna to the Son of David!” were imbued with the longing for a military leader who would overthrow their enemies and re-establish a sovereign Jewish state.⁴

Jesus, however, came to inaugurate a different kind of kingdom—a spiritual reality not defined by earthly power, but by love, sacrifice, and redemption.⁴

His victory was not to be won over Roman legions but over the ultimate enemies of humanity: sin, death, and the devil.¹⁰

The donkey he rode was a deliberate, prophetic sign of this peaceful, humble mission, a sign the crowd celebrated but did not fully comprehend.¹²

This moment marks a critical turning point in Jesus’s public ministry.

Throughout the Gospels, he had often quieted those who would proclaim him Messiah, stating that his “hour had not yet come”.⁴

On Palm Sunday, this policy of messianic secrecy is decisively cast aside.

By not only permitting but actively orchestrating this public, royal demonstration, Jesus is making a sovereign and deliberate choice to set in motion the final, climactic events of his life.³⁸

He is not a passive victim swept up by the tides of popular opinion; he is the divine agent orchestrating his own Passion.

His entry into Jerusalem is the calculated act that makes his arrest and execution by the threatened authorities—both Jewish and Roman—a virtual certainty.

A deeper layer of theological interpretation, favored by commentators like Matthew Henry, sees this event in light of Jewish sacrificial law.

The Triumphal Entry occurred on the tenth day of the Jewish month of Nisan.³⁸

According to the law for Passover in Exodus 12:3-6, the sacrificial lamb for the feast was to be selected on the tenth day of the month and then kept until the fourteenth day, when it would be sacrificed.

In this reading, as Jesus rode into Jerusalem and the people hailed him as their chosen one, they were, unbeknownst to themselves, fulfilling this prophetic type.

They were selecting the unblemished Lamb of God who would take away the sin of the world.³⁸

The crowd, in acclaiming their king, was unwittingly choosing their sacrifice.

The Triumphal Entry was therefore not simply a parade that went wrong; it was the deliberate presentation of the Paschal victim, the first step on the path to the altar of the cross.

Section 7: From “Hosanna” to “Crucify Him”: An Examination of Fickle Crowds and Fulfilled Prophecy

One of the most enduring and troubling questions of Holy Week is how the jubilant cries of “Hosanna!” on Sunday could transform into the murderous shouts of “Crucify Him!” by Friday.

This dramatic reversal has been interpreted in several ways, moving beyond a simplistic narrative of a fickle mob to more nuanced historical and theological explanations.

The most common and traditional interpretation posits that it was indeed the same crowd, or at least the same current of public opinion, that underwent this radical shift.

This view emphasizes the fickleness of human loyalty and the dangers of a faith built on misplaced expectations.⁴

The people praised Jesus as long as they believed he would be the warrior-king they desired.

When, over the course of the week, it became clear that he would not lead a political insurrection against Rome, their adoration soured into bitter disappointment and rage.

Their hero had failed them, and their frustrated hopes made them easily swayed by the religious leaders who cast Jesus as a blasphemer and a charlatan.³⁷

A compelling alternative hypothesis, however, suggests that the “Hosanna” crowd and the “Crucify Him” crowd were likely two distinct groups of people.³⁹

The crowd on Sunday was largely composed of Jesus’s devoted followers and enthusiastic Galilean pilgrims who had traveled with him to Jerusalem, a group predisposed to view him favorably.³⁷

The trial before Pilate, however, took place in the pre-dawn hours of Friday.

The “crowd” present then was likely a smaller, local Jerusalem mob, perhaps composed of partisans of the chief priests and Temple authorities who had been deliberately gathered and incited to demand Jesus’s execution.³⁹

According to this view, the Sanhedrin may have intentionally scheduled the trial at an unusual hour precisely because they feared the larger, pro-Jesus “Hosanna” crowd and wanted to avoid a popular backlash.³⁹

A third, mediating view seeks to synthesize these two positions.

It suggests that while Jesus’s core group of disciples remained loyal, the broader public sentiment in Jerusalem did indeed shift dramatically during the week.

The messianic fervor whipped up on Sunday dissipated as Jesus failed to perform the expected political actions.

This created a vacuum of disappointment that the chief priests and elders skillfully exploited, turning the general mood of the city against Jesus.

Thus, while not every individual who shouted “Hosanna” also shouted “Crucify,” the collective voice of “the crowds” as a narrative force in the Gospels did turn against him.³⁷

Regardless of which historical reconstruction is most accurate, the theological power of the narrative remains.

The story of the shifting cries serves as a profound cautionary tale about the nature of true faith.

It acts as a mirror, forcing believers in every generation to examine the foundation of their own allegiance to Christ.

Is it a conditional faith, based on personal expectations of what Jesus should do for them—provide health, wealth, comfort, or political victory? Or is it an unconditional faith that accepts Jesus on his own terms: as a humble, suffering servant whose kingship is revealed not in worldly power but in sacrificial love? The journey from “Hosanna” to “Crucify Him” illustrates the tragic outcome of a faith that demands a savior of its own making rather than submitting to the Savior who truly Is.

Section 8: The First Day of the Great Week: Palm Sunday as the Overture to the Passion

Palm Sunday cannot be understood as a standalone festival of triumph.

Its full theological significance is realized only when it is seen as the indispensable beginning of Holy Week, the overture that introduces all the major themes of the Paschal Mystery—the unified event of Christ’s suffering, death, and resurrection.¹

The day is defined by a powerful tension, a juxtaposition of glory and suffering that sets the trajectory for the week to come.

This inherent duality is explicitly recognized in the liturgical traditions of many Christian denominations, which formally name the day “Sunday of the Passion, with the Procession of the Palms,” often shortened to “Palm and Passion Sunday”.⁴⁰

The structure of the liturgy itself embodies this paradox.

The service typically begins with an act of joyous celebration: the blessing of the palms and a vibrant procession, often with children waving branches and the congregation singing hymns of praise like “All Glory, Laud, and Honor,” echoing the “Hosannas” of the Jerusalem crowd.²⁹

This opening rite allows the faithful to participate in the exultant moment of the Triumphal Entry.

However, the mood of the service then makes a stark and deliberate shift.

The joyous procession gives way to a solemn, often dramatic, and complete reading of the Passion narrative from one of the Synoptic Gospels.²⁹

The congregation, still holding the palms of victory, stands to hear the story of Jesus’s betrayal, arrest, trial, mockery, torture, and crucifixion.

This liturgical whiplash is intentional.

It prevents Palm Sunday from being misconstrued as a simple, naive celebration of worldly success.

It insists, through its very structure, that in the Christian understanding, the path to the glory of the Resurrection leads directly and inexorably through the suffering of the Cross.

In this way, Palm Sunday serves as a crucial spiritual preparation for the faithful.

It invites them into the complex emotional and theological journey of Holy Week, allowing them to experience the peak of Jesus’s popular acclaim and simultaneously forcing them to confront the depths of the suffering that is to come.³³

The liturgy of Palm Sunday is a microcosm of the entire Christian life, which is lived in the constant tension between the “already” of Christ’s victory over sin and death and the “not yet” of a world still marked by pain, struggle, and the shadow of the cross.

It teaches that these two realities, suffering and victory, are not contradictory but are mysteriously held together in the person of Jesus Christ, the king whose throne was a cross and whose crown was made of thorns.⁴⁴

Part IV: The Legacy in Liturgy and Tradition

The memory of the Triumphal Entry did not remain a static story in an ancient text.

From the earliest centuries of the Church, Christians have sought to participate in this pivotal event, to walk with Christ into Jerusalem and acclaim him as king.

This desire has given rise to a rich and evolving history of liturgy and a vibrant global tapestry of cultural traditions.

The legacy of that first Palm Sunday is found not only in the pages of the Gospels but in the diverse ways its memory is kept alive in Christian worship around the world.

Section 9: From Reenactment to Ritual: The Historical Development of the Palm Sunday Liturgy

The history of the Palm Sunday liturgy is a fascinating case study in how Christian worship develops over time, moving from concrete, place-based reenactment to an abstract, universalized ritual that can be celebrated anywhere.

The earliest evidence for a formal commemoration comes from fourth-century Jerusalem, most famously documented in the diary of the Spanish pilgrim Egeria.²⁸

Her account describes a literal, topographical reenactment.

The bishop and the faithful would gather on the Mount of Olives, the actual site where the event began.

There, they would sing hymns and hear the Gospel account of the entry.

Then, in the late afternoon, they would process down the Mount of Olives and into the city of Jerusalem, carrying palm and olive branches and singing, “Blessed is He that comes in the name of the Lord,” retracing the very steps of Jesus and the original crowd.²⁸

As Christianity spread beyond the Holy Land, the desire to participate in this powerful event remained, but the geography was no longer accessible.

The ritual had to be detached from its original location to become universal.

By the fifth century, the practice had spread to Constantinople.⁴³

The next major developments appear to have originated in the Frankish Kingdom in the seventh and eighth centuries: the formalization of a ritual for the blessing of the palms and the shifting of the procession from the evening to the morning.⁴¹

The earliest liturgical book to contain these ceremonies is the eighth-century Sacramentary of the Abbey of Bobbio in northern Italy.⁴¹

From the Franks, these rites were adopted by Rome and incorporated into its liturgy, forming the basis for the Western celebration of the day.⁴¹

The Middle Ages saw the liturgy embellished with elaborate and dramatic elements.

The procession became a major civic event, moving from a shrine outside the town walls to the main cathedral.

Christ’s presence was represented symbolically, either by a crucifix adorned with flowers or, most solemnly, by the Blessed Sacrament carried by the priest.⁴¹

In many parts of Europe, particularly Germany, a quaint custom arose of wheeling a life-sized wooden statue of Jesus on a donkey, known as a

Palmesel (“Palm Donkey”), in the center of the procession.³⁰

It was for these processions that the great hymn

Gloria, laus et honor (“All Glory, Laud, and Honor”) was composed by Bishop Theodulph of Orleans in the ninth century.⁴¹

Over time, especially after the Reformation and with the rise of modernity, these grand outdoor theatricals were often simplified.

The procession was frequently reduced to a circuit around the churchyard or, more commonly, a purely symbolic procession of the clergy and congregation from the back of the church to the altar at the beginning of Mass.²⁹

This trajectory illustrates a classic pattern of liturgical development.

What began as a concrete, historical reenactment tied to a specific place evolved into an abstracted, symbolic ritual that could be celebrated in any church, anywhere in the world.

The physical journey into Jerusalem became a spiritual metaphor for the beginning of Holy Week and the entry of Christ into the hearts of the faithful.

Section 10: A Global Tapestry: Palm Sunday Customs Around the World

The legacy of the Triumphal Entry is today a vibrant, global tapestry, demonstrating the principle of inculturation, whereby a universal theological truth is expressed through the particular languages, materials, and artistic sensibilities of local cultures.

While the core elements of blessing branches and acclaiming Christ remain, their expression is wonderfully diverse.

A primary driver of this diversity is climate.

Since palm trees are native to tropical and subtropical regions, Christians in colder climates had to adapt, demonstrating that the symbolic act of waving a branch of honor was more important than the specific botanical species.⁴⁰

This principle of substitution has led to a rich variety of local traditions:

• In much of Eastern and Central Europe, particularly Poland (Niedziela Palmowa), Russia, and Belarus (Verbnitsa), branches of pussy willow, with their soft, furry catkins, are the branch of choice. This has given the day popular names like “Willow Sunday”.²⁸
• In other parts of Europe, branches of boxwood, yew, olive, or sallow are used.⁴³
• In Georgia, the day is called Bzoba, from the native Colchis boxwood that is blessed and distributed.⁴⁹
• In Armenia, the feast is Tsakhkazard (“Decorated with Flowers”), and the blessed branches are typically from young willow and olive trees.⁴⁹

Beyond simple substitution, many cultures have developed unique artistic and social customs that enrich the celebration:

• Poland is famous for its Palm Sunday contests, especially in the Lipnica Murowana region, where artisans create towering, intricate “palms” (palmy) from dried flowers, grasses, and paper, some reaching heights of over 30 meters. These are not trees but monumental works of folk art.⁴⁷
• In the Philippines, the day is marked by the blessing of intricately woven palm fronds called palaspas. These are waved during a procession, which may feature a priest on horseback re-enacting Jesus’s entry, and are then taken home and hung over doorways and windows as symbols of divine protection, believed to ward off evil spirits.²⁹
• In Spain, especially in Andalusia, Palm Sunday begins a week of enormous public procesiones (processions). Bleached white palm fronds, harvested from the great palm grove of Elche, are fashioned into elaborate sculptures and carried through the streets.⁴⁸
• In India, some Eastern Orthodox communities strew the sanctuary with marigold flowers when “Hosanna” is shouted during the liturgy.²⁹
• In England, a charming old tradition in some regions involves the distribution of “Pax Cakes” (from the Latin for “Peace”). Dating to the 16th century, these small cakes were given out with the blessing “Peace and good neighborhood” to encourage reconciliation among parishioners before the Easter communion.²⁹

A widespread and theologically profound tradition connects the end of one liturgical year to the beginning of the next.

The blessed palms taken home by the faithful are often kept for the entire year, placed behind crucifixes or holy pictures as a sacramental—a reminder of Christ’s victory and a token of blessing.⁴³

Then, on the eve of the next Lenten season, these old, dried palms are returned to the church.

They are burned, and their ashes are used for the imposition on Ash Wednesday.⁴³

This practice creates a powerful and tangible link between triumph and penitence.

The palms of victory become the ashes of mortality, beautifully closing the liturgical circle and reminding the faithful that entry into the victory of Easter comes only through the penitential journey of Lent, which begins with the acknowledgment that “you are dust, and to dust you shall return.”

Conclusion

The use of palm branches on Palm Sunday is an act deeply embedded in layers of historical context, cross-cultural symbolism, and profound theological paradox.

It is far more than a simple reenactment of a historical event; it is a complex ritual that encapsulates the core drama of the Christian faith.

The analysis reveals that the Triumphal Entry was a deliberate and provocative act of political and theological theater.

In a city simmering with messianic expectation and resentment of Roman rule, Jesus’s public acceptance of royal honors was an undeniable claim to kingship.

The crowd’s response, waving palm branches, drew upon a rich symbolic vocabulary shared by Jewish and Greco-Roman cultures, where the palm universally signified victory, triumph, and life.

They hailed a conquering hero, a new Maccabeus, a liberator-king.

Yet, the event is defined by its central paradox.

While accepting the symbols of a king, Jesus fundamentally subverted the contemporary understanding of power.

By choosing to ride a humble donkey—the animal of peace—rather than a warhorse, he declared his kingdom to be one of service, not force.

The spectacle presented a new kind of monarch: a king of humility, whose path to glory led not to a palace but to a cross.

The crowd’s cry of “Hosanna” (“Save us now!”) captured this tragic misunderstanding; their demand for political salvation went unmet, turning their adoration into condemnation.

This theological tension between triumph and suffering, kingship and passion, is the enduring legacy of Palm Sunday.

It is a legacy that has been preserved and interpreted through two millennia of liturgical development, evolving from a literal reenactment on the slopes of the Mount of Olives to a universalized ritual.

Today, it is expressed in a vibrant global tapestry of customs, where the substitution of local foliage like willow and boxwood for palms, and the creation of unique folk art and traditions, demonstrate the dynamic principle of inculturation.

The ultimate liturgical expression of this paradox is the burning of the previous year’s palms to create the ashes for Ash Wednesday, a powerful symbol that inextricably links Christ’s victory with human mortality and the necessity of the penitential journey.

Ultimately, the palm branch is the emblem of a victory that was profoundly misunderstood by those who first waved it.

It represents a triumph achieved not through force, but through sacrifice; a kingship established not by conquering others, but by surrendering oneself.

The continued use of palms in Christian worship is an annual invitation to enter into this paradox, to acclaim Christ as king while simultaneously embracing the way of the cross as the only true path to resurrection and life.

Works cited

1. magazine.web.baylor.edu, accessed August 4, 2025, https://magazine.web.baylor.edu/news/story/2025/palm-sunday-remembering-jesus#:~:text=Palm%20Sunday%20marks%20the%20beginning,proclaimed%20him%20as%20their%20Savior.
2. Palm Sunday | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/palm-sunday
3. Triumphal entry into Jerusalem – Wikipedia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triumphal_entry_into_Jerusalem
4. What is the significance of the triumphal entry? – Got Questions, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.gotquestions.org/triumphal-entry.html
5. Jesus’ Triumphal Entry into Jerusalem (Luke 19:28-40 and 12:12-19) – Scott LaPierre, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.scottlapierre.org/jesus-triumphal-entry-into-jerusalem/
6. The Triumphant Entry – Harmonizing the Gospel Accounts – Helpmewithbiblestudy.org, accessed August 4, 2025, http://helpmewithbiblestudy.org/5Bible/HermHarmonizeTriumphantEntry.aspx
7. Laying Down Our Cloaks for Jesus | Carmelite Sisters of the Most Sacred Heart of Los Angeles, accessed August 4, 2025, https://carmelitesistersocd.com/2025/laying-down-our-cloaks-for-jesus/
8. The Triumphal Entry in All Four Gospels – Watermark Church in Union, accessed August 4, 2025, https://watermarkchurchinunion.com/2024/08/31/the-triumphal-entry-in-all-four-gospels/
9. Triumphal Entry acclamations in the four Gospels – BRETT YARDLEY, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.brettyardley.com/theology-blog/triumphal-entry-acclamations-in-the-four-gospels
10. What Is the Meaning of Palm Sunday and Why Celebrate it? – Bible Study Tools, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.biblestudytools.com/bible-study/topical-studies/what-is-the-meaning-of-palm-sunday-and-why-celebrate-it.html
11. Jesus rode into Jerusalem on a donkey. But Matthew says he rode 2 donkeys. How could he get that detail wrong if he was there to witness it? – Reddit, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAChristian/comments/syot5l/jesus_rode_into_jerusalem_on_a_donkey_but_matthew/
12. Why Did Jesus Ride a Donkey for His Triumphant Entry? – Bible Study Tools, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.biblestudytools.com/bible-study/topical-studies/why-did-jesus-ride-donkey-triumphant-entry.html
13. Topical Bible: Palm-branches, accessed August 4, 2025, https://biblehub.com/topical/p/palm-branches.htm
14. Jesus – Jewish Palestine, Messiah, Nazareth | Britannica, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jesus/Jewish-Palestine-at-the-time-of-Jesus
15. The Messianic Hope in Ancient Israel – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/old-testament-student-manual-kings-malachi/enrichment-c?lang=eng
16. The promise to David and the son of David – Living Faith, accessed August 4, 2025, https://livingfaith.blog/2023/02/16/the-promise-to-david-and-the-son-of-david/
17. What was more offensive to the Jewish leaders, Jesus being called the Son of Man or being called the Son of David? – Quora, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.quora.com/What-was-more-offensive-to-the-Jewish-leaders-Jesus-being-called-the-Son-of-Man-or-being-called-the-Son-of-David
18. medium.com, accessed August 4, 2025, https://medium.com/hope-youre-curious/what-does-son-of-mean-in-ancient-jewish-contexts-how-should-we-really-understand-son-of-god-5d0c5e787fd2#:~:text=The%20Davidic%20king%2C%20God’s%20anointed,to%20rule%20on%20God’s%20behalf.
19. “Son of David” as an anachronism (or metaphor?) in the Gospels, Paul and Acts? – Vridar, accessed August 4, 2025, https://vridar.org/2011/07/21/son-of-david-as-an-anachronism-in-the-gospels-paul-and-acts/
20. Politics in the Time of Jesus – How Should Christians Vote, accessed August 4, 2025, https://howshouldchristiansvote.com/2024/03/19/politics-in-time-of-jesus/
21. The Political and Religious Structure in Jesus’ Time Sadducees – Life Together, accessed August 4, 2025, https://lifetogether.group/download/Jewish-Life.pdf
22. The Political and Religious Structure in Jesus’ Time – Saint Mary’s Press, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.smp.org/dynamicmedia/files/0fd53742db7ecdea61a6b02c15ad6150/TX001327_1-Background-Political_and_Religious_Structure_in_Jesus_Time.pdf
23. Palm branch – Wikipedia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm_branch
24. The Symbolism of Palm Trees in Different Cultures – landscaping company in Saudi Arabia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.greenwavs.com/the-symbolism-of-palm-trees-in-different-cultures/
25. Palm Sunday Prayer: The symbolism of the palms and donkey – Orange County, CA, accessed August 4, 2025, https://orangecounty.salvationarmy.org/orange_county_ca/news/palm-sunday-prayer-the-symbolism-of-the-palms-and-donkey/
26. Why palm branches waved when Jesus entered Jerusalem. – JesusAlive.cc, accessed August 4, 2025, https://jesusalive.cc/palm-branches-waved-for-jesus/
27. Uncovering the Myths and Legends Surrounding Palm Trees in Ancient Civilizations, accessed August 4, 2025, https://islandgardens.com/uncovering-the-myths-and-legends-surrounding-palm-trees-in-ancient-civilizations
28. The History of Palm Sunday – St. Volodymyr Cathedral of Toronto, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.stvolodymyr.ca/parish-news-updates/palm-sunday
29. The Liturgical Home: Palm Sunday – Anglican Compass, accessed August 4, 2025, https://anglicancompass.com/the-liturgical-home-palm-sunday/
30. CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Palm Sunday – New Advent, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11432b.htm
31. A Donkey or a White Horse? | The Significance of the Triumphal Entry and Which Kingdom We Desire – Matt Ham, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.mattham.com/2024/03/a-donkey-or-a-white-horse-the-significance-of-the-triumphal-entry-and-which-kingdom-we-desire/
32. Why Did Jesus Ride a Donkey? – Encounter Church, accessed August 4, 2025, https://encounterchurchfw.org/blog/why-did-jesus-ride-a-donkey
33. Palm Sunday—Remembering Jesus – Baylor Magazine, accessed August 4, 2025, https://magazine.web.baylor.edu/news/story/2025/palm-sunday-remembering-jesus
34. Sermon: “Laying Down Our Cloaks” (Luke 19:28-40) [4/14/19] | reallifepastor, accessed August 4, 2025, https://reallifepastor.com/2019/04/14/sermon-laying-down-our-cloaks-luke-1928-40-4-14-19/
35. The Meaning of Hosanna in the Bible and on Palm Sunday – YouTube, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EL2ijhR6Jvs
36. Hosanna in the Highest: The Meaning and Message of Palm Sunday – St. Anne’s of the Heights, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.stannesjerseycity.com/eventsandannouncements/hosanna-in-the-highest-the-meaning-and-message-of-palm-sunday
37. Did the Same People Shout “Hosanna” and “Crucify?” – SBC Voices, accessed August 4, 2025, https://sbcvoices.com/did-the-crowds-really-turn-on-jesus/
38. 3 Reasons Palm Sunday is Important – Christian Theology – WordPress.com, accessed August 4, 2025, https://christiantheology.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/3-reasons-palm-sunday-is-important/
39. Jewish Context for Matthew 27: Crying “Hosanna!” One Day and “Crucify Him!” The Next, accessed August 4, 2025, https://centerforisrael.com/video/jewish-context-for-matthew-27/
40. Palm Sunday – Wikipedia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palm_Sunday
41. Library : History of Palm Sunday | Catholic Culture, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=105
42. Palm Sunday | A Guide to Religious Observances | Resources | Center for Spiritual Life, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.brandeis.edu/spiritual-life/resources/guide-to-observances/palm-sunday.html
43. The History of Palm Sunday – Carbury Parish, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.carburyparish.ie/the-history-of-palm-sunday/
44. Palm Sunday: Suffering and Victory – St. Aidan’s Episcopal Church, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.saint-aidans.org/sermons-1/2025/4/13/palm-sunday-suffering-and-victory
45. The UNTOLD STORY of PALM SUNDAY: WHY DID THEY ACCLAIM JESUS as KING and THEN REJECT HIM? – YouTube, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTBP0DA-Bc0
46. www.catholicculture.org, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=105#:~:text=This%20Palm%20Sunday%20procession%2C%20and,beginning%20of%20the%20eighth%20century).
47. Palm Sunday or Niedziela Palmowa – Chicago History Museum, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.chicagohistory.org/palm-sunday-or-niedziela-palmowa/
48. Palm Sunday customs around the world – chrispearce52, accessed August 4, 2025, https://chrispearce52.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/palm-sunday-customs-around-the-world/
49. Palm Sunday Names around the World and Reasons behind Them, accessed August 4, 2025, https://obitel-minsk.org/en/palm-sunday-names-around-the-world-and-their-reasons
50. In pictures: Palm Sunday around the world | Art and design | The Guardian, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2025/apr/13/in-pictures-palm-sunday-around-the-world
51. Palm Sunday – FishEaters, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.fisheaters.com/customslent11.html