Table of Contents
Part I: The Failure of Numbers and the Power of a Voice
For years, I have carried a particular ache—a disquiet that settles in the space between the world as I have known it and the world as it is most often described.
As a lifelong observer of rural life, I have watched the fields turn from green to gold and back again, season after season.
I have seen the quiet dignity of calloused hands and the profound, unspoken connection between a person and their land.
And I have also watched as a chasm of understanding has widened into a canyon, separating the America that tills the soil from the America that walks on pavement.
My deepest pain point has been witnessing the foundational, often invisible, contributions of the farmer being flattened into economic abstractions, misunderstood, or simply overlooked by a society accelerating away from its agrarian roots.1
This is not merely a professional observation; it is a personal grief for a connection I fear is being irrevocably lost.
This grief once propelled me into a fool’s errand.
Armed with charts and statistics, I stood before a group of bright, well-meaning city dwellers, determined to bridge this canyon with a suspension bridge of pure data.
I spoke of productivity, of how a single U.S. farmer today feeds 155 people, a staggering increase from just 26 people in 1960.3
I detailed the economic engine of agriculture, its more than $100 billion in exports, its vital role in the national GDP.2
I laid out the numbers on land use, water efficiency, and the shrinking percentage of the population—less than 2%—responsible for feeding the other 98%.2
It was a logical, fact-based, and utterly airtight argument.
And it failed completely.
Their eyes glazed over.
They were polite, of course, but there was no spark of recognition, no flicker of genuine connection.
The numbers, meant to impress, instead created distance.
They were abstract, sterile, and ultimately incapable of conveying the human essence of the work.
I had tried to describe a soul using a spreadsheet, and in doing so, I had proven only the inadequacy of my language.
The failure was profound because it revealed a deeper truth: the disconnect between urban and rural America is not an information gap.
It is a narrative gap.
We are trying to measure a foundational human role with the metrics of a factory floor, and the translation is failing.
We value farmers, but we lack the vocabulary to articulate why in a way that resonates beyond nostalgia.
The turning point, my personal epiphany, did not come from a new data set or a sociological study.
It came, as these things often do, late one night, from the familiar cadence of a voice from the past.
I stumbled upon a recording of Paul Harvey’s 1978 address to the Future Farmers of America, “So God Made a Farmer”.4
I had heard it before, of course, most notably during the 2013 Super Bowl, but this time was different.3
This time, I heard it not as a piece of folksy Americana, but as an answer to the question I had failed so miserably to address.
Harvey used no statistics.
He cited no economic reports.
Instead, with his iconic, rhythmic delivery, he painted a portrait of a human archetype.
He spoke of a person defined not by output, but by character; not by profit, but by purpose.5
He described someone with “arms strong enough to rustle a calf and yet gentle enough to deliver his own grandchild”.3
He spoke of a resilience that could watch a newborn colt die and still say, “Maybe next year”.3
In that moment, I understood.
Harvey’s speech was not a description of a job; it was the articulation of a foundational principle, a set of virtues and functions that society intuitively understands it needs but can no longer easily name.
It was a field guide to an endangered, essential species.
It reframed my entire understanding not just of farming, but of how we measure value itself.
It gave me a new paradigm, a new language to bridge the canyon.
Part II: The New Paradigm – The Farmer as a Cultural Keystone Species
To truly grasp the insight offered by Harvey’s speech, one must look beyond sociology and economics to the world of ecology.
In any ecosystem, from a coral reef to a sprawling forest, not all species are created equal in terms of their structural importance.
Ecologists have a term for a species whose influence on its environment is disproportionately large relative to its abundance: a “keystone species”.6
The term is an architectural analogy.
The keystone is the central, wedge-shaped stone in an arch that locks all the other stones in place.
Though it may not be the largest or heaviest stone, its removal causes the entire structure to collapse.6
The classic example is the sea star
Pisaster ochraceus on the rocky shores of the Pacific.
When the starfish is removed, its primary prey, mussels, proliferate uncontrollably, crowding out other species and causing the diverse 15-species ecosystem to collapse into a monoculture of just a few.6
The sea star isn’t the most numerous creature, but its function—controlling a dominant species—is essential to the system’s integrity.
This powerful concept has been extended to understand human societies.
Researchers have identified what they call “Cultural Keystone Species,” plants or animals that are fundamental to the identity, stability, and spiritual life of a particular culture.8
For the cultures of the Pacific Northwest, the western red-cedar is such a species, providing materials for housing, canoes, clothing, and tools, while also featuring prominently in language and ceremony.9
For many Plains tribes, it was the bison.
These are not just resources; they are the contextual underpinnings of a way of life.
Their absence would render the culture unrecognizable.
This is the heart of the epiphany that Harvey’s speech unlocked for me.
The American farmer is not merely a profession; it is a human role that functions as our society’s most vital, and most overlooked, cultural keystone species.
Consider the definition: a species whose effect is “disproportionately large relative to its abundance”.6
With farmers making up less than 2% of the population, their numerical presence is small.2
Yet their impact—on the physical landscape, the food system, the national economy, and, most critically, the American cultural psyche—is immense and foundational.
Like the sea otter in a kelp forest that controls the urchins, the farmer performs functions that maintain the health and structure of the entire social ecosystem.7
They are the gardener in the forest, the often-unseen hand that prunes, weeds, and shapes the environment, allowing a diversity of other life to flourish.7
This analogy resolves the central paradox of the farmer in modern America: their simultaneous economic and demographic marginalization on one hand, and their persistent, romanticized centrality in the national narrative on the other.
The public’s intuitive, often sentimental, reverence for the farmer—a reverence powerful enough to make a two-minute truck commercial the most talked-about ad of the Super Bowl 11—is not simply misplaced nostalgia.
It is, I believe, a subconscious recognition of a keystone function.
People may not know the statistics of rural poverty or the complexities of the Farm Bill, but they sense, on a primal level, that the “caretaker” Harvey described is essential.
They feel that if this keystone role were ever truly removed, the arch of American identity would not just sag, but crumble.
Paul Harvey’s speech, then, is not a poem.
It is the definitive field guide to identifying the characteristics and functions of this essential human role.
Part III: Deconstructing the Keystone Role – The Four Pillars of the Farmer
To understand the farmer’s keystone function, we must move beyond a single image and deconstruct the role into its constituent parts.
Paul Harvey’s speech, when read as a field guide, provides a perfect framework.
It outlines four distinct but interconnected pillars that define the farmer’s disproportionate impact on the American ecosystem.
Each pillar represents a core function—ecological, cultural, economic, and social—that is essential for the system’s stability and health.
Pillar 1: The Steward – Architect of the Foundation (The Ecological Function)
Harvey begins his secular genesis at the most elemental point: “And on the 8th day, God looked down on his planned paradise and said, ‘I need a caretaker'”.3
He later adds a crucial detail about the nature of this care: “It had to be somebody who’d plow deep and straight and not cut corners”.3
This first pillar establishes the farmer’s primary and most tangible function: serving as the direct interface between human civilization and the natural world.
The farmer is the steward of the land, the architect of the very foundation upon which our physical survival rests.
The success of this stewardship, in modern terms, is staggering.
The productivity of the American farmer is a modern marvel, with today’s farmer growing twice as much food as their parents did, using less land, energy, and water to do so.3
This efficiency allows a tiny fraction of the population to feed the entire nation and a significant portion of the world, producing 40% of the world’s corn on just 20% of the land harvested for it.3
This productive capacity is the bedrock of national security and prosperity.
Public sentiment reflects an intuitive understanding of this importance, with overwhelming majorities of Americans expressing support for farming practices that are sustainable and produce healthy food, and showing deep concern for the well-being of farmers themselves.2
However, this idealized image of the “caretaker” who plows “deep and straight” exists in stark tension with the complex realities of modern agriculture.
The very phrase “plow deep” is now viewed critically by proponents of no-till and conservation agriculture, who see it as a practice that can lead to soil erosion and degradation.13
This highlights a central conflict: the methods that have driven incredible productivity gains have often come at a significant ecological cost.
Critics argue forcefully that the romanticized family farmer has been largely supplanted by a system of industrial agribusiness that can be extractive and environmentally damaging.14
This critique suggests that the post-WWII push to industrialize agriculture was a “colossal offense” against both land and people, prioritizing corporate profit over the holistic stewardship Harvey’s words evoke.14
The “caretaker” ideal remains the cultural touchstone, but the practice of caretaking is now a site of intense debate, caught between the demands of global markets and the principles of ecological sustainability.
Pillar 2: The Moral Center – The Paradox of Strength and Gentleness (The Cultural/Psychological Function)
Harvey’s description of the farmer’s character is built on a series of powerful paradoxes.
God needed, he intones, “somebody with arms strong enough to rustle a calf and yet gentle enough to deliver his own grandchild”.3
This is the same person who will later “stop his mower for an hour to splint the broken leg of a meadow lark”.3
This second pillar defines the farmer’s keystone function as a cultural and psychological anchor.
The farmer archetype, as rendered by Harvey, embodies a set of virtues—strength tempered with gentleness, pragmatism balanced with compassion, rugged individualism paired with deep-seated duty—that serve as a perceived moral repository for the nation.
This function is most visible in the context of the well-documented “values gap” between urban and rural America.
A 2018 Pew Research study found that a majority of rural residents (58%) believe the values of people in urban areas are different from their own, a sentiment echoed by 53% of urbanites looking back at their rural counterparts.16
This perceived divide goes beyond politics, touching on core beliefs about community, family, and morality.18
Some psychological research even suggests potential differences in personality traits, with rural populations tending to score higher in neuroticism and lower in openness to experience, possibly due to factors like resource scarcity and fewer diverse cultural experiences.19
The farmer, in this landscape, becomes a symbol—a projection of the “traditional” values that one side feels it is preserving and the other side feels has been lost.
Yet, this narrative of two fundamentally different Americas, while potent, is an oversimplification.
The cultural divide is often amplified by partisan political framing, where partisan affiliation can become a more powerful shaper of priorities than geographic identity itself.21
Furthermore, while differences exist, key aspects of life are converging.
Marriage rates in rural and urban areas have grown more similar over time, as have the shares of children living in two-parent households.23
The idea of a monolithic, unchanging rural “moral center” is a myth that erases the dynamism and diversity within these communities.
The farmer’s role as a cultural keystone is therefore complex; it is as much about serving as a symbolic anchor for a nation grappling with change as it is about the actual, lived values of rural people.
The archetype provides a sense of stability, even if the reality is far more fluid and interconnected than the simple binary suggests.
Pillar 3: The Resilient Innovator – Engine of Endurance and Adaptation (The Economic Function)
The economic life of Harvey’s farmer is one of profound struggle and astonishing creativity.
This is a person “willing to sit up all night with a newborn colt.
And watch it die.
Then dry his eyes and say, ‘Maybe next year'”.3
This is a person of incredible ingenuity, who “can shape an ax handle from a persimmon sprout, shoe a horse with a hunk of car tire, who can make harness out of haywire, feed sacks and shoe scraps”.3
This third pillar establishes the farmer’s keystone function as an economic agent defined by a relentless work ethic, resilience in the face of loss, and a genius for innovation born from pure necessity.
This portrait of endurance and self-reliance resonates deeply because it reflects the harsh economic realities that have long characterized rural America.
Contrary to some urban perceptions, rural areas have historically had higher rates of poverty than urban ones.24
While the gap has narrowed, rural poverty remains higher, and rural workers are more likely to be poor than their urban counterparts even when employed full-time.24
Rural economies are often less diversified, with greater dependence on the volatile primary goods and manufacturing sectors, and rural residents are consistently less optimistic about their financial futures.16
The farmer’s need to “tame cantankerous machinery,” as Harvey put it, has evolved into a distinctly modern struggle.
Today, farmers are on the front lines of the “right to repair” movement, fighting against equipment manufacturers who use proprietary software and technological protection measures (TPMs) to monopolize repair services, forcing farmers to pay exorbitant dealer fees for fixes they could once handle themselves.28
This is the 21st-century version of making a harness out of haywire.
The critical nuance here lies in the tension between the ideal of “rugged individualism” and the overwhelming power of systemic economic forces.
The resilience Harvey celebrates is not just a virtuous character trait; it is a mandatory survival mechanism in an economic ecosystem often tilted against the primary producer.14
Long-term trends like automation, globalization, and the consolidation of agribusiness have had disproportionately negative effects on non-metropolitan areas.27
The farmer’s innovative spirit is constantly tested not just by weather and markets, but by a global economic structure that often extracts wealth from rural communities while leaving them to bear the risks.21
The farmer’s economic function, therefore, is not just to produce; it is to endure within a system that makes endurance a daily, heroic act.
Pillar 4: The Community Linchpin – Weaver of the Social Fabric (The Social Function)
Harvey’s farmer is not an isolated individual.
This person is deeply embedded in a web of social obligations that extend far beyond the fenceline.
He will “go to town and stay past midnight at a meeting of the school board”.3
He will, without hesitation, “stop in mid-field and race to help when he sees the first smoke from a neighbor’s place”.3
Most importantly, he will “bale a family together with the soft strong bonds of sharing”.3
This final pillar defines the farmer’s keystone function as the social linchpin of the rural community.
The farm is not merely an economic enterprise; it is the central organizing principle around which family, neighborhood, and civic life are woven.
This depiction aligns with research showing that rural life is often characterized by stronger local ties.
Rural adults are more likely to live near their families and to know their neighbors than their urban counterparts.16
This dense network of relationships forms the basis of the mutual support system Harvey describes—the unspoken agreement to drop everything to help a neighbor in need.
The farm itself acts as a multi-generational anchor, a place of shared work and shared identity that can “bale a family together.” The speech’s poignant conclusion—the farmer’s smiling reply when his son wants to spend his life “doing what dad does”—speaks to this role as a transmitter of legacy and purpose.3
However, this idyllic social fabric is under immense strain.
The very forces that challenge the farmer economically also threaten the community socially.
Decades of population decline, the “rural brain drain” of young, educated people moving to cities, and the systematic under-investment in rural infrastructure have weakened these communities from within.21
The closure of rural hospitals, schools, and local businesses rips holes in the social safety net, making the work of holding the community together that much harder.29
Furthermore, the romantic image of a single, unified rural community is a dangerous oversimplification.
This narrative often renders the 21% of rural residents who are people of color invisible, ignoring their unique experiences and needs.30
Academic critiques point out that the nostalgic vision in Harvey’s speech and the Ram commercial can serve to naturalize a social order based on white supremacy and heteropatriarchy, overlooking the complex and often contested social dynamics within these areas.31
The farmer’s role as a community linchpin is real, but it is performed against a backdrop of demographic change, economic extraction, and a national narrative that frequently fails to capture the full, diverse reality of the rural social landscape.
Part IV: The Great Disconnect – When a Keystone is Overlooked
The 2013 Ram Trucks Super Bowl commercial, featuring Harvey’s speech laid over a montage of stunning photographs, was more than just an advertisement.
It was a cultural Rorschach test, a two-minute event that laid bare the profound and painful disconnect at the heart of American society.
It perfectly illustrated what happens when a keystone role is so widely misunderstood.
The ad became a flashpoint, generating both immense praise and sharp condemnation, with both reactions stemming from the same source: the vast chasm between the public’s perception of the farmer and the complex, often fraught, reality of American agriculture.32
For millions of viewers, the commercial was a “retro heart-tugger,” a “breath of fresh air” that touched a deep, emotional nerve.11
In a sea of loud, cynical, and celebrity-driven ads, its earnestness and simple, powerful aesthetic stood O.T.11
It was praised for making an emotional connection, celebrating hard work, family, and community in a way that felt authentic and unifying.35
The ad’s creators noted that they wanted to honor generations of farmers and reintroduce Harvey’s powerful words to a new audience on the biggest stage possible.11
The overwhelmingly positive social media response, which made it the top-ranked ad of the night, showed that the archetype of the farmer still holds a powerful, almost sacred, place in the American psyche.11
It filled a narrative vacuum, giving voice to a feeling of respect and admiration that many people hold but struggle to express.
Simultaneously, the ad was met with swift and pointed criticism.
It was derided as a “whitewash” that completely erased the reality of America’s farm labor force, which is predominantly Latino.14
Critics pointed out the irony of using a nostalgic ode to the family farm to sell trucks in an era dominated by corporate agribusiness, a system that many argue has destroyed the very way of life the ad purports to celebrate.14
The speech’s romantic vision was seen as a dangerous myth, one that papers over the environmental consequences of industrial farming, the economic desperation of many farmers, and the racial hierarchies that structure the agricultural system.15
This backlash was not just cynical “snark,” as some suggested, but a legitimate critique from those who saw the ad as a distortion of a reality they knew all too well.32
The following tables are designed to dissect this disconnect, placing the idealized archetype from Harvey’s speech in direct, data-driven conversation with the modern reality of agriculture and the broader urban-rural divide.
Table 1: The Ideal vs. The Real – Deconstructing the Farmer Archetype
This table contrasts the core elements of the farmer archetype as presented in Harvey’s speech with the statistical and structural realities of 21st-century American agriculture.
It demonstrates how the powerful, simple image celebrated in the commercial diverges from the complex and often contradictory facts on the ground.
| Harvey’s Archetype | Modern Agricultural Reality |
| The Self-Sufficient Caretaker | Demographics: The visual narrative centers on a white family farm. In reality, while 96% of farm managers are white, an estimated 70% of farmworkers in the U.S. were born in Mexico. The archetype effectively erases the labor force that underpins the system.36 |
| The Family Farm | Farm Structure: While 97% of U.S. farms are technically family-owned, this statistic can be misleading. Large-scale corporate farms, many of which are family-owned entities, account for a disproportionate share of agricultural output. The term “family farm” obscures the vast differences in scale, capitalization, and business structure.2 |
| The Traditional Practitioner | Primary Practices: The speech evokes traditional methods (“plow deep and straight”). Modern agriculture is a high-tech industry reliant on GPS-guided tractors, genetic engineering (GMOs), complex chemical inputs, and data analytics. The core practices are subjects of intense scientific and public debate.13 |
| The Independent Yeoman | Economic Status: The archetype is one of rugged independence. The reality for many farmers involves high levels of debt, significant dependence on federal subsidies and insurance programs, and extreme vulnerability to global market fluctuations and corporate consolidation.14 |
Table 2: Anatomy of a Divide – Four Dimensions of Two Americas
This table synthesizes the extensive data on the urban-rural divide across four key dimensions.
It provides the essential context for understanding why the farmer’s keystone role is so difficult to see and articulate across cultural lines.
The communication failure described in Part I is a direct symptom of these deep, structural, and perceptual differences.
| Dimension | Urban Reality | Rural Reality |
| Economic | Higher median household incomes overall ($54,296 vs. $52,386 nationally), driven by high-paying producer service industries. Lower poverty rates than rural areas in some regions, but have seen sharper increases in the number of people in poverty since 2000.16 | Lower median incomes in the South and West, higher poverty rates overall (16.7% vs. 13.0% urban in 2015), and greater economic dependence on more volatile sectors like manufacturing, mining, and agriculture. Residents are significantly less optimistic about their financial future.16 |
| Cultural & Values | More racially and ethnically diverse, with nonwhites being a clear majority. More likely to hold progressive social views. Residents feel their values are different from and misunderstood by rural communities. 53% of urbanites say rural values differ from their own.16 | Predominantly white, though becoming more diverse. More likely to hold conservative social views. Residents feel a strong values gap with urbanites and believe they are negatively perceived by them. 58% of rural residents say urban values differ from their own.16 |
| Political | An increasingly solid stronghold for the Democratic Party. Twice as many urban voters identify as or lean Democratic compared to Republican.16 | An increasingly solid stronghold for the Republican Party. Many rural areas are effectively governed by one-party rule. Partisan identity is a powerful lens for policy priorities, sometimes outweighing geographic identity.16 |
| Health & Well-being | Generally better access to specialized healthcare services and a wider variety of health information sources. Population density is associated with higher levels of openness to experience.19 | Higher all-cause mortality rates, lower life expectancy, and significantly less access to both physical and mental healthcare professionals. Residents tend to score higher on neuroticism and lower on conscientiousness and psychological well-being.19 |
Part V: Conclusion – Reconnecting the Ecosystem
My journey began with a failure—a failure to communicate the value of a way of life using the dominant language of our time: data.
It led me back to a voice from the past, and through that voice, to a new framework for understanding.
The epiphany was not that Paul Harvey’s speech was a perfect or unproblematic text, but that it intuitively grasped a profound truth: the farmer’s importance is not measured in numbers, but in function.
The concept of the farmer as a “cultural keystone species” resolves the paradox of their role in America.
It explains how a group so small in number can cast such a long shadow on the national psyche.
It is their disproportionate impact on the stability of the entire social ecosystem—as stewards of the land, anchors of community, engines of resilience, and symbols of a particular moral code—that grants them this foundational status.
To move forward, we must escape the sterile binary that has defined the conversation for too long.
The debate cannot simply be between those who uncritically celebrate the farmer myth and those who cynically deconstruct it.
The nostalgic champion who ignores the environmental and social costs of modern agriculture is missing the point.
The cynical critic who dismisses the entire archetype as a racist, patriarchal fiction is also missing the point.
Both reactions are symptoms of the same disconnect; both fail to see the forest for the trees.
The real task is to recognize, understand, and support the essential functions of this keystone role, wherever and by whomever they are performed.
It means supporting policies that promote genuine stewardship of our land and water, not just maximizing yield.
It means investing in the economic and social infrastructure of rural communities so that the resilience Harvey described is not merely a requirement for survival against impossible odds.
It means fostering a social fabric that is inclusive and strong, capable of “baling a family together” regardless of that family’s background.
It means building bridges across the urban-rural divide that are based on a shared understanding of our mutual dependence on these foundational functions.
Paul Harvey ended his radio broadcasts for decades with the same iconic sign-off: “And now you know…
the rest of the story”.40
His “So God Made a Farmer” speech was an attempt to tell the rest of the story of a role he saw as divinely essential.
This analysis has been my own attempt to uncover a different kind of “rest of the story”—one that acknowledges the power of Harvey’s archetype while confronting the complex and often painful realities that the myth obscures.
The story of the American farmer is not one of simple, bygone perfection.
It is a story of a complex, vital, and indispensable keystone role.
Recognizing that role, in all its complexity, is the first and most critical step toward healing the fractures in our ecosystem and ensuring its health for generations to come.
Works cited
- “The Perceptions of Media Portrayals of Agriculture” by Bailey Hoerbert – ISU ReD, accessed August 4, 2025, https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/ursagr/7/
- THE LANDSCAPE OF PUBLIC THINKING ABOUT FARMING – FrameWorks Institute, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.frameworksinstitute.org/app/uploads/2020/06/FRAJ7735-Red-Tomato-Farming-Report-191216-WEB-1.pdf
- ‘So God Made a Farmer’ Speech – Collier Soil and Water Conservation District, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.collierswcd.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2013_02_Gazetteer.pdf
- Paul Harvey — So God Made A Farmer FFA … – American Rhetoric, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/paulharveysogodmadeafarmer.htm
- So, God Made a Farmer… – Utah Farm Bureau, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.utahfarmbureau.org/Article/So-God-Made-a-Farmer
- Keystone species: the concept and its relevance for conservation management in New Zealand, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.doc.govt.nz/documents/science-and-technical/sfc203.pdf
- Keystone Species Role → Term – Climate → Sustainability Directory, accessed August 4, 2025, https://climate.sustainability-directory.com/term/keystone-species-role/
- Culturally Defined Keystone Species1 – Human Ecology Review, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her112/cristanchovining.pdf
- Cultural Keystone Species: Implications for Ecological Conservation and Restoration, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42763872_Cultural_Keystone_Species_Implications_for_Ecological_Conservation_and_Restoration
- climate.sustainability-directory.com, accessed August 4, 2025, https://climate.sustainability-directory.com/term/keystone-species-role/#:~:text=Simple%20Analogy%20%E2%86%92%20The%20Forest%20Gardener&text=Most%20species%20are%20like%20individual,however%2C%20is%20like%20the%20gardener.
- “So God Made a Farmer” | Communication Arts, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.commarts.com/columns/so-god-made-a-farmer
- Public Opinion Poll: Vast Majority of US Voters Prioritize Sustainable Food Production – Aligning Agricultural Policies to Support Healthy Food – Center for a Livable Future, accessed August 4, 2025, https://clf.jhsph.edu/about-us/news/news-2023/public-opinion-poll-vast-majority-us-voters-prioritize-sustainable-food
- So God Created A Farmer, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.no-tillfarmer.com/blogs/1-covering-no-till/post/3564-so-god-created-a-farmer
- The Real “Farmer” Story: So God Made High-Fructose Corn Syrup – Dissent Magazine, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.dissentmagazine.org/blog/the-real-farmer-story-so-god-made-high-fructose-corn-syrup/
- The Real “Farmer” Story: So God Made High-Fructose Corn Syrup …, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.dissentmagazine.org/blog/the-real-farmer-story-so-god-made-high-fructose-corn-syrup
- What Unites and Divides Urban, Suburban and Rural Communities, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/05/22/what-unites-and-divides-urban-suburban-and-rural-communities/
- How Urban, Suburban, and Rural Communities View One Another: Pew Research Study, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/how-urban-suburban-rural-communities-view-one-another-pew-research-study
- Connected or Divided: Urban vs. Rural Culture – Amigo Energy, accessed August 4, 2025, https://amigoenergy.com/blog/connected-or-divided-urban-vs-rural-culture/
- Rural-Urban Differences in Personality Traits and Well-Being in Adulthood – PMC, accessed August 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10390645/
- The psychological challenges of rural living – The Source – WashU, accessed August 4, 2025, https://source.washu.edu/2023/05/the-psychological-challenges-of-rural-living/
- The Divide — Rural Urban Bridge, accessed August 4, 2025, https://ruralurbanbridge.org/the-rural-urban-divide
- The urban–rural divide in policy priorities across time and space | Political Science Research and Methods, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods/article/urbanrural-divide-in-policy-priorities-across-time-and-space/5929AF5E87ED9F3DAD252336EA5232FB?utm_date=20250526&utm_id=1748250628&utm_campaign=Open+Access,RAM&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_content=
- Family Life in Rural and Urban Areas, More Similar Over Time | Psychology Today, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-fabric/202401/family-life-in-rural-and-urban-areas-more-similar-over-time
- 6 charts that illustrate the divide between rural and urban America | PBS News, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/six-charts-illustrate-divide-rural-urban-america
- Many Rural Americans Are Still “Left Behind” – Institute for Research on Poverty, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.irp.wisc.edu/resource/many-rural-americans-are-still-left-behind/
- Differences between rural and urban economies reflect differences in their industrial composition | Economic Research Service – ERS USDA, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/charts-of-note/chart-detail?chartId=80851
- The Fed – Changes in the U.S. Economy and Rural-Urban Employment Disparities, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/changes-in-the-us-economy-and-rural-urban-employment-disparities-20240119.html
- Before the – Library of Congress, accessed August 4, 2025, https://cdn.loc.gov/copyright/1201/2015/comments-020615/InitialComments_longform_USC_Class21.pdf
- Gaps in U.S. rural and urban economic growth widened in the post-Great Recession economy, with implications amid the coronavirus recession, accessed August 4, 2025, https://equitablegrowth.org/gaps-in-u-s-rural-and-urban-economic-growth-widened-in-the-post-great-recession-economy-with-implications-amid-the-coronavirus-recession/
- The ‘rural-urban divide’ furthers myths about race and poverty—concealing effective policy solutions | Brookings, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-rural-urban-divide-furthers-myths-about-race-and-poverty-concealing-effective-policy-solutions/
- ‘So God Made a Farmer’: The US Agrarian Imaginary and the Lived Assemblages of Settlement and Empire – ResearchGate, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334513358_’So_God_Made_a_Farmer’_The_US_Agrarian_Imaginary_and_the_Lived_Assemblages_of_Settlement_and_Empire
- ‘So God Made A Farmer’ Commercial Mocked Without Mercy: ‘There Is A Real Premium On Snark’ | IBTimes, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.ibtimes.com/so-god-made-farmer-commercial-mocked-without-mercy-there-real-premium-snark-1060244
- Consumer Perceptions of the U.S. Agriculture Industry Before and After Watching the Film Food, Inc. – New Prairie Press, accessed August 4, 2025, https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1115&context=jac
- Dodge Super Bowl Commercial: So God Made a Farmer ⋆ Western Pleasure Guest Ranch, accessed August 4, 2025, https://westernpleasureranch.com/dodge-super-bowl-commercial-so-god-made-a-farmer/
- Dodge Ram Truck “God Made a Farmer” – My Favorite Super Bowl Commercial, accessed August 4, 2025, https://markdhogan.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/dodge-ram-truck-god-made-a-farmer-my-favorite-super-bowl-commercial/
- “So God Made a Farmer” – Rhetoric and Civic Life Blog – Sites at Penn State, accessed August 4, 2025, https://sites.psu.edu/arg234/2017/10/26/48/
- A Comparison of Rural and Urban America: Household Income and Poverty, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2016/12/a_comparison_of_rura.html
- Perspectives | Reexamining Rural And Urban Bridging Cultural Divides – FCB North America, accessed August 4, 2025, https://fcbchi.com/perspectives/reexamining-rural-and-urban-bridging-cultural-divides/
- Differences in Rural and Urban Health Information Access and Use – PMC, accessed August 4, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6522336/
- Paul Harvey’s ‘So God Made A Farmer’ Speech Goes Viral During, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.ibtimes.com/paul-harveys-so-god-made-farmer-speech-goes-viral-during-super-bowl-2013-videofull-1060422
