Table of Contents
Introduction: A Letter from the Tower
In 1668, a young man of immense privilege found himself in the desolate confines of the Tower of London.1
This was William Penn (1644-1718), son of the celebrated naval hero Admiral Sir William Penn, a man born and bred for the upper echelons of English society.2
Yet, he was not imprisoned for treason or debt, but for the perceived blasphemy of his religious convictions.
Having been expelled from Oxford for his nonconformity and later converting to the radical faith of the Religious Society of Friends, or Quakers, Penn had published tracts that questioned the core doctrines of the established Anglican Church, including the Trinity.1
For this, the state sought to silence him.
Confined to his cold cell, facing the threat of indefinite imprisonment, Penn did not recant.
Instead, he took up his pen and wrote what would become his most famous work, No Cross, No Crown.1
This book was more than a theological treatise; it was an act of profound defiance and the crucible in which the vision for a new kind of society was forged.
The title itself became a powerful political statement: that true, legitimate authority (the “Crown”) could not be attained without enduring suffering and protecting the rights of the persecuted (the “Cross”).
Penn’s imprisonment was not merely a biographical detail; it was the genesis of his life’s great project.
The colony of Pennsylvania was not founded simply as a land deal or a commercial enterprise; it was the physical manifestation of the answer Penn discovered in that prison cell.
It was conceived as a solution to the brutal, systemic persecution he and his fellow Quakers endured, an attempt to build a government on the very principles of liberty of conscience for which he was incarcerated—a “Holy Experiment” born from suffering.3
Part I: The Crucible of Conscience: The World That Demanded a Haven
To understand why Pennsylvania was founded, one must first understand the world that made it a desperate necessity.
The 17th century was a time of intense religious and political turmoil, and for the Quakers, it was an age of relentless persecution.
Their beliefs, which seem progressive today, were seen as a mortal threat to the established order in both England and its American colonies.
The Nature of the “Problem”
In England, Quakers were branded as “dangerous radicals”.6
Their core tenets placed them in direct opposition to the authority of both the Church and the Crown.
They refused to swear oaths of loyalty, a cornerstone of the legal system, believing their word should be their bond at all times.7
They refused to pay tithes to the Church of England, denying its spiritual authority and financial power.7
This rejection of the state church classified them as Nonconformists, barring them from public office and university education.7
The government responded with swift and brutal force.
The Quaker Act of 1662 specifically outlawed their faith.8
By 1689, an estimated 15,000 Quakers had been imprisoned in England, often in horrifyingly squalid conditions, and hundreds died from torture and mistreatment.9
Across the Atlantic, in the fledgling American colonies, the situation was often worse.
The Puritans of Massachusetts Bay, who had themselves fled England to establish a society of religious purity, proved savagely intolerant of any who dissented from their orthodoxy.9
They viewed the Quakers as a “cursed set of heretics” and enacted a series of escalating laws to punish them.
These laws sanctioned severe whipping, the cutting off of ears, and the boring of tongues with hot irons for the crime of being a Quaker.11
Between 1659 and 1661, four Quakers, including a woman named Mary Dyer, were executed by hanging on Boston Common for persistently returning to the colony to preach their faith.10
Even in Virginia, anti-Quaker laws were enacted that included the penalty of death for those who refused to leave.10
The Philosophical Threat
The ferocity of this persecution stemmed from the fact that Quakerism was not just a different set of religious rituals; it was a fundamental challenge to the entire hierarchical structure of 17th-century society.
Each of their beliefs was a direct critique of an existing pillar of power.
- The “Inner Light”: The central Quaker tenet is the belief that every individual, regardless of gender, race, or social status, possesses an “Inner Light,” a direct connection to God.12 This radical idea rendered the entire clerical hierarchy—priests, bishops, and the king as head of the Church—unnecessary. It was a profound democratization of faith that threatened the very institution of a state church.8
- Radical Egalitarianism: Quakers put their belief in equality into practice in ways that scandalized their contemporaries. They refused to practice “hat honor,” the custom of removing one’s hat to a social superior, arguing that such reverence was due only to God.9 They used the familiar pronouns “thee” and “thou” when addressing everyone, from a commoner to a king, rejecting the linguistic markers of a rigid class system.9 Furthermore, their belief that the Inner Light could move anyone to speak meant that women were often prominent preachers in their meetings, a revolutionary concept in a patriarchal world.8
- Pacifism and Civil Disobedience: Stemming from their belief that all life is sacred, Quakers were committed pacifists, refusing to serve in the military or engage in violence.8 In a world of near-constant warfare, this was seen as deeply disloyal and a threat to the security of the state. Their refusal to swear oaths was not only a religious conviction but also an act of civil disobedience that challenged the authority of the courts and the Crown.7
The authorities correctly identified that Quakerism was not merely a heresy but a competing socio-political system.
Their persecution was a violent, systemic reaction to protect the interlocking powers of the church, the state, and the aristocracy.
This context makes it clear that Penn’s solution could not be a minor reform.
To solve the problem, he had to build an entirely new system from the ground up—a counter-society designed to protect the very principles for which Quakers were being punished.
Table 1: A Tale of Three Colonies: Contrasting Founding Principles
The stark differences between Penn’s vision and the existing colonial models in Massachusetts and Virginia highlight the radical nature of his undertaking.
Pennsylvania was not just another English colony; it was a deliberate and profound rejection of the norms that governed its neighbors.
| Feature | Massachusetts Bay (The Puritan Theocracy) | Virginia (The Commercial Enterprise) | Pennsylvania (The Holy Experiment) |
| Primary Motivation | Religious purity; create a Puritan “City upon a Hill.” 11 | Economic profit; land and resource exploitation (tobacco). 15 | Religious freedom and a haven from persecution for all. 4 |
| Religious Policy | Intolerant; established Puritan church. Dissenters (Quakers, etc.) banished or executed. 10 | Established Anglican Church; less overtly zealous than MA but still the state religion. 15 | Radical tolerance; no established church. Freedom of conscience for all who believe in God. 17 |
| Native Relations | Volatile; viewed natives as “savages” to be converted or displaced. Led to wars like the Pequot War. 14 | Initially pragmatic, devolved into conflict and a policy of extermination/removal driven by land hunger for tobacco. 20 | Principled peace; land to be purchased fairly. Acknowledged native ownership. 17 |
| Government & Society | Theocratic and hierarchical; church membership required for political participation. 14 | Aristocratic and hierarchical; power held by large plantation owners (planter class). 15 | Participatory and egalitarian (in theory); wide franchise, focus on individual liberties and rule of law. 22 |
Part II: The “Holy Experiment”: A New Blueprint for a Commonwealth
Faced with the structural failures of European society, William Penn did not seek to merely patch the old system.
He conceived of a new one entirely.
In 1681, King Charles II, seeking to settle a substantial debt of £16,000 owed to Penn’s late father, granted him a charter for a vast expanse of land in America—over 45,000 square miles, making Penn the largest non-royal landowner in the world.24
Penn saw this not just as a financial opportunity but as a divine providence.
He wrote to a friend, “There may be room there, though not here…
for such a holy experiment”.3
This “Holy Experiment” was Penn’s grand solution, a commonwealth designed like an architectural blueprint, where every element was derived from his core Quaker principles.
The foundation of this blueprint was the Quaker belief in the “Inner Light”.8
If God’s spirit resides in every person, then the primary purpose of government must be to protect that sacred, internal space of conscience.
From this foundation rose the load-bearing walls of the state: the Quaker “Testimonies,” which are spiritual convictions expressed through action.27
These were not just personal virtues but the functional principles of Penn’s new society.
The Testimony of Peace would dictate foreign policy, resulting in a state with no standing army.17
The Testimony of Integrity would shape the legal system, allowing for affirmations instead of oaths.28
The Testimony of Equality would inform social policy, leading to a broader franchise and greater rights for citizens than existed anywhere else in the world at the time.17
Penn’s vision was a unique fusion of the sacred and the secular.
While Enlightenment thinkers like his contemporary John Locke were developing theories of natural rights based on reason and a hypothetical state of nature, Penn was building a government on similar liberal principles, but his justification was explicitly theological.
He believed government was a “venerable ordinance of God” and that liberty of conscience was a right owed not to a social contract, but to “Almighty God being the only Lord of Conscience”.18
Pennsylvania, therefore, represents a parallel track in the development of modern democracy.
It was not merely an application of English political theory but an attempt to construct a state directly from the theological premise of universal, indwelling divinity.
It was to be a theocracy of the individual, where God ruled through the conscience of each citizen, rather than a theocracy of the state, where a ruling clergy imposed God’s law on the populace.
Part III: The Frame of Government: Engineering Liberty in Law
The first and most critical pillar of Penn’s blueprint was the political and legal structure he designed.
His Frame of Government of 1682, and its subsequent revisions, were remarkable attempts to translate his philosophical ideals into concrete law.23
A Philosophy of Governance
The preamble to the 1682 Frame reveals Penn’s core political philosophy.
He famously wrote, “Governments, like clocks, go from the motion men give them; and as governments are made and moved by men, so by them they are ruined too.
Wherefore governments rather depend upon men, than men upon governments.
Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad”.25
For Penn, government’s purpose was not merely the “coarsest part” of punishing evil, but the “more soft, and daily necessary” work of creating a society where virtue could flourish.32
He saw a symbiotic relationship between a good constitution and a virtuous citizenry, believing that good laws could be abolished or evaded by “ill men,” but that “good men will never want good laws, nor suffer ill ones”.31
Innovations Reflecting Quaker Principles
The laws themselves were a direct and deliberate response to the injustices Quakers had faced:
- Absolute Religious Freedom: The very first chapter of the “Great Law” passed in 1682 established a revolutionary principle: no person would be “Compelled to frequent or Maintaine any Religious Worshipp place or Ministry whatever”.29 This guarantee of freedom of conscience, extended to all who believed in one God, was the most liberal in the Western world and the antithesis of the compulsory Anglicanism that had led to his imprisonment.18
- Humane Justice and Penal Reform: In an era when England listed hundreds of crimes punishable by death, Penn’s code reserved capital punishment for only two offenses: murder and treason.33 Reflecting the Quaker belief in redemption and their own horrific experiences in English jails, prisons in Pennsylvania were to be “Workhouses” or “houses of Correction,” designed for reform and teaching a trade, not merely for punitive suffering.17
- Fair Trials and Legal Rights: The Frame guaranteed the right to a trial by a jury of one’s peers and established procedures for fair elections.23 Crucially, it made provisions for citizens to make a solemn affirmation rather than swear an oath, directly accommodating a core Quaker testimony and removing a major barrier to civic participation that had plagued Friends in England.28
Idealism Meets Reality: The Stress Test
Penn’s “Holy Experiment,” however, quickly became a real-world experiment in the complexities of governance.
His original 1682 Frame, while liberal in its protections of rights, was surprisingly paternalistic in its structure.
It established a 72-member Provincial Council, composed of the colony’s elite landowners, which held the exclusive power to propose legislation.
A larger, 200-member General Assembly could only vote to approve or reject the Council’s bills.33
The settlers, many of whom were not Quakers and were drawn by the promise of liberty and land, immediately chafed under this top-down system.
Empowered by the very freedom Penn had granted them, they used that freedom to demand a more democratic government with a more powerful assembly.33
The ensuing political struggles lasted for nearly two decades.
This tension reveals a fascinating dynamic: Penn’s idealism about a government led by the “wise and virtuous” clashed with the reality that free men, regardless of their virtue, desire to govern themselves.
The conflict was finally resolved with the Charter of Privileges in 1701.
This new constitution dissolved the legislative power of the Council and created a powerful, unicameral Assembly with the full right to initiate its own laws.18
This marked a significant shift from an aristocratic model to a more populist one.
The ultimate success of Pennsylvania’s government was not that it perfectly matched Penn’s original design, but that his design was flexible enough to be radically altered by its citizens without collapsing into chaos.
The experiment’s greatest triumph was its own evolution.
Part IV: The Peaceable Kingdom: Land, Treaties, and the Lenape
The second pillar of Penn’s blueprint for his new society was its relationship with the original inhabitants of the land, the Lenni Lenape people.
Here, his Quaker principles led him to adopt a policy that was utterly revolutionary for its time.
A Radical Stance on Sovereignty
Unlike other colonial founders who viewed royal charters as granting them absolute ownership, Penn held a more nuanced view.
He believed the King’s grant gave him title to the land against other European claims, but that true ownership resided with the native peoples who lived there.17
Therefore, he insisted that all land must be honorably purchased from the Lenape before it could be settled by colonists.6
This policy was a direct application of the Quaker belief in “that of God in every one,” which extended to the Lenape, viewing them not as “savages” to be displaced, but as fellow human beings with whom one must deal fairly.12
This commitment was symbolized by the legendary Treaty of Shackamaxon in 1682.
While no formal written document of this specific treaty survives, the tradition of a peaceful meeting under a great elm tree, where Penn and the Lenape leader Tamanend exchanged promises to live in peace and friendship “as long as the waters run in the rivers and creeks and as long as the stars and moon endure,” became a powerful founding myth for the colony.35
This approach worked.
For over 50 years, while other colonies like Virginia and Massachusetts were embroiled in bloody conflicts with Native Americans, Pennsylvania enjoyed a “long peace,” a period of remarkable coexistence and mutual respect.6
The Fragility of the Peace
The tragedy of Pennsylvania is that this “Peaceable Kingdom” did not last.
The experiment’s success was critically dependent on the personal integrity and moral authority of William Penn himself.
After his death in 1718, his sons and agents, particularly Thomas Penn, found themselves beset by family debts and driven by a desire for profit that overshadowed their father’s principles.36
The ultimate betrayal of Penn’s legacy was the infamous Walking Purchase of 1737.
Penn’s heirs produced a dubious, possibly forged, draft of a deed from 1686, which they claimed ceded a tract of land extending as far as a man could walk in a day and a half.37
The Lenape, honoring what they believed to be an agreement made by their ancestors, consented.
However, instead of the leisurely walk they anticipated, Penn’s agents had a path cleared in advance and hired three of the fastest runners in the colony to race along it.38
One runner covered an astonishing 64 miles, allowing the Penns to seize 1.2 million acres of Lenape land—an area roughly the size of Rhode Island.37
This fraudulent act shattered the trust Penn had painstakingly built over decades.
It displaced the Lenape, destroyed the “long peace,” and unleashed the very frontier violence that Penn’s policies had so successfully prevented.24
The relationship between settlers and Native Americans deteriorated rapidly, culminating in horrific events like the 1763 massacre of peaceful Conestoga Indians by a vigilante group known as the Paxton Boys.40
This tragic outcome is the most devastating proof of Penn’s own theory: “Governments rather depend upon men, than men upon governments.” The “good government” he designed could not withstand the actions of “ill men” who executed its policies.
The success of the Holy Experiment’s peace was personal to Penn, and so its failure was also personal, resting on the shoulders of his less scrupulous heirs.
Part V: The Lure of Liberty: The Economic and Social Engine
The third and final pillar of Penn’s blueprint was his socio-economic design.
While the “Holy Experiment” was undeniably a moral and religious project, it was also a massive entrepreneurial venture designed to be both prosperous and just.
The Business of a Colony
The colony’s very existence was rooted in a financial transaction: the settlement of a £16,000 debt the Crown owed to Admiral Penn.6
From this starting point, Penn acted as a shrewd developer.
He launched a brilliant marketing campaign, publishing at least nine promotional tracts that were translated into German and Dutch to attract a wide range of immigrants.4
These pamphlets advertised the colony’s unique virtues: not just its fertile soil, but its promise of religious freedom and a government that protected individual rights.
Critically, Penn’s land policy was designed to foster a society of independent landowners rather than a landed aristocracy.
He sold land at the reasonable rate of £100 for 5,000 acres and offered smaller plots for more humble purchasers.41
He also implemented a headright system, offering 50 acres of land to indentured servants upon the completion of their term of service.42
This created a powerful engine for immigration and ensured a high degree of social mobility, laying the groundwork for what would later be called the “American Dream.”
The Economic Fruits of Tolerance
Pennsylvania’s stunning economic success was a direct consequence of its liberal principles.
The policy of religious toleration was not just a moral good; it was a powerful economic advantage.
It created a magnet for human capital, drawing a flood of skilled, industrious, and often persecuted people from across Europe.
English and Welsh Quakers, German Mennonites and Lutherans, and Scots-Irish Presbyterians all flocked to the colony, bringing with them diverse skills and a powerful work ethic.6
This diversity fueled a dynamic and resilient economy.
Unlike the tobacco monoculture of Virginia, Pennsylvania developed a diversified economic base.
Its fertile lands produced a surplus of wheat and other grains, making it the “breadbasket” of the colonies.44
This agricultural bounty supported a flourishing milling industry and a robust export trade.
Philadelphia, the “City of Brotherly Love,” quickly grew into the largest city and busiest port in British North America, a hub of commerce, shipbuilding, and skilled artisans.6
The colony’s success proved a powerful socio-economic formula: tolerance plus opportunity equals prosperity.
Penn set out to build a haven for the persecuted, and in doing so, he inadvertently created a blueprint for one of the most dynamic and prosperous societies in the world.
Conclusion: The Enduring Echo of Penn’s Woods
William Penn’s “Holy Experiment” was not the perfect utopia he had envisioned.
It was a human enterprise, and it bore the marks of human imperfection.
The promise of absolute equality was compromised by the exclusion of non-Christians from office and the existence of slavery, which persisted despite the reservations of many Quakers.6
The government was beset by political conflict, and the sacred peace with the Lenape was tragically and shamefully broken by his own sons.37
Yet, to judge the experiment solely by its failures is to miss its profound and enduring success.
The core principles that Penn embedded in the foundation of his colony—liberty of conscience, government by the consent of the governed, the rule of law, and a belief in peaceful coexistence—not only survived but thrived.
They became foundational pillars of a distinctly American identity.
The ideas tested in Pennsylvania resonated throughout the other colonies and deeply influenced the generation of founders who would later craft the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.
The journey of Pennsylvania’s founding begins and ends with the image of William Penn in his prison cell.
The dream he forged in the darkness of the Tower of London—a government that would protect the “Inner Light” of conscience rather than seek to extinguish it—cast a beam of light far into the future.
While the “Holy Experiment” itself was a complex and transient chapter in history, its radical ideals became a permanent and essential part of the American political soul.
The echo of Penn’s vision, born in a crucible of suffering and hope, can still be heard in the ongoing, imperfect, but essential American experiment to form a “more perfect Union.”
Works cited
- All who believed in God were welcome | Christian History Magazine, accessed August 4, 2025, https://christianhistoryinstitute.org/magazine/article/all-who-believed-in-god-were-welcome
- William Penn | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/william-penn
- William Penn | Biography, Religion, Significance, & Facts – Britannica, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Penn-English-Quaker-leader-and-colonist
- Holy Experiment | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/holy-experiment
- Holy Experiment – Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/themes/holy-experiment-2/
- William Penn, founding of Pennsylvania, U.S. history, Quaker beliefs …, accessed August 4, 2025, https://billofrightsinstitute.org/essays/william-penn-and-the-founding-of-pennsylvania
- Why and how were the Quakers persecuted? – YouthQuakeNow (YQN), accessed August 4, 2025, https://youthquakenow.com/why-and-how-were-the-quakers-persecuted/
- Development of Quakerism | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/development-quakerism
- Quakers: A Silent Influence – LEGACY, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.racc.edu/sites/default/files/imported/StudentLife/Clubs/Legacy/vol_1/Quakers.html
- America as a Religious Refuge: The Seventeenth Century, Part 2 – Religion and the Founding of the American Republic | Exhibitions (Library of Congress), accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel01-2.html
- Persecution of Quakers by the Puritans – Historic Ipswich, accessed August 4, 2025, https://historicipswich.net/2022/11/29/persecution-of-quakers-by-the-puritans/
- William Penn (1644-1718) – Annenberg Learner, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.learner.org/series/american-passages-a-literary-survey/utopian-promise/william-penn-1644-1718/
- What is a Quaker? A Brief History of Quakerism – Friends Academy, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.friendsacademy.org/blog/a-brief-history-of-quakerism
- Compare And Contrast Virginia And Massachusetts Bay Colonies – 1039 Words | Bartleby, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Compare-And-Contrast-Virginia-And-Massachusetts-Bay-71EC0583955036A8
- American colonies – Land Policy, New England, Virginia | Britannica, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/American-colonies/Land-policy-in-New-England-and-Virginia
- Thirteen Colonies – Wikipedia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteen_Colonies
- The Holy Experiment, in Pennsylvania – Quakers in the World, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.quakersintheworld.org/quakers-in-action/8/The-Holy-Experiment-in-Pennsylvania
- Charter of Privileges – American Philosophical Society, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.amphilsoc.org/exhibits/treasures/charter.htm
- Politics and native relations in the New England colonies (video …, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-history/period-2/interactions-between-american-indians-and-europeans/v/politics-and-native-relations-in-the-new-england-colonies
- Virginia’s Early Relations with Native Americans | Colonial …, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/colonial-settlement-1600-1763/virginia-relations-with-native-americans/
- The Original People and Their Land: The Lenape, Pre-History to the 18th Century, accessed August 4, 2025, https://collaborativehistory.gse.upenn.edu/stories/original-people-and-their-land-lenape-pre-history-18th-century
- Penn’s Holy Experiment – (AP US History) – Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed August 4, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/apush/penns-holy-experiment
- Analysis: Frame of Government of Pennsylvania | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/analysis-frame-government-pennsylvania
- Holy Experiment – Wikipedia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Experiment
- Pennsylvania, A Holy Experiment – Graeme Park, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.graemepark.org/pennsylvania-a-holy-experiment/
- Pennsylvania (Founding) – Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/essays/pennsylvania-founding/
- Quaker Values | QUNO, accessed August 4, 2025, https://quno.org/quaker-values
- Frame of Government of Pennsylvania – 1696 – The Avalon Project, accessed August 4, 2025, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/pa06.asp
- The Great Law | PHMC > Our Documentary Heritage, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.phmc.state.pa.us/portal/communities/documents/1681-1776/great-law.html
- en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_of_Government_of_Pennsylvania#:~:text=The%20Frame%20of%20Government%20of,of%20American%20and%20world%20democracy.
- Founding Doucments: Pennsylvania Frame of Government | Pepperdine School of Public Policy, accessed August 4, 2025, https://publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu/academics/research/faculty-research/american-founding/founding-documents/pa_frame.htm
- Frame of Government of Pennsylvania – May 5, 1682 – The Avalon Project, accessed August 4, 2025, https://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/pa04.asp
- Frame of Government of Pennsylvania – Wikipedia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_of_Government_of_Pennsylvania
- PA Government – PA House of Representatives – PA House of …, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/SpeakerBios/PAGovernment.cfm
- Treaty of Shackamaxon – Wikipedia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Shackamaxon
- The Legend of Penn’s Treaty with the Lenape – Haverford College, accessed August 4, 2025, http://ds.haverford.edu/penn-treaty-elm/essays/lenape/
- Walking Purchase | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/walking-purchase
- The Walking Purchase – Delaware Tribe of Indians, accessed August 4, 2025, https://delawaretribe.org/blog/2013/06/27/the-walking-purchase/
- Walking Purchase – Wikipedia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking_Purchase
- Native American-Pennsylvania Relations, 1754-89 – Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia, accessed August 4, 2025, https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/essays/native-american-pennsylvania-relations-1754-89-2/
- Today in History – October 14 – The Library of Congress, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.loc.gov/item/today-in-history/october-14/
- First Purchasers of Pennsylvania – Encyclopedia of Greater …, accessed August 4, 2025, https://philadelphiaencyclopedia.org/essays/first-purchasers-of-pennsylvania/
- Quakers in colonial Pennsylvania, accessed August 4, 2025, https://www.quakersintheworld.org/quakers-in-action/282/Quakers-in-colonial-Pennsylvania
- Colony Of Pennsylvania Economy | former-students.imperial.edu, accessed August 4, 2025, https://former-students.imperial.edu/060-Catalog/article?docid=RjA35-8211&title=colony-of-pennsylvania-economy.pdf
