The Cut That Binds: A Historian’s Journey into the Many Origins of a Global Ritual

Part I: The Historian’s Dilemma: Chasing a Single River to its Source

The historical investigation of a practice as ancient and widespread as circumcision often begins with a deceptively simple premise: that it represents a single tradition, a cultural river flowing from a single, identifiable source through the millennia. The initial search for this source inevitably leads to the sands of ancient Egypt, where the earliest unambiguous evidence for the procedure resides. This starting point, however, marks not the beginning of a clear answer, but the start of a profound intellectual puzzle.

The journey into the past commences at the Saqqara necropolis, within the Mastaba of Ankhmahor, an official who served under King Teti of the Sixth Dynasty.¹ Dated to approximately 2340 BCE, a bas-relief on a doorway in this tomb presents the oldest known depiction of a surgical procedure in human history: a circumcision.¹ The scene is stark and informative. It shows what appear to be mortuary priests using flint knives to operate on a group of boys, one of whom is being physically restrained while an operator is instructed in hieroglyphs to “hold him still. Don’t let him faint”.¹ This is not a casual act; it is a formalized ritual, a clear indication that over 4,300 years ago, circumcision was an established practice. The physical evidence from mummified remains, such as that of the nobleman Maiherpri and the Pharaoh Amenhotep I, confirms that this was not merely an artistic representation but a physical reality for at least some portion of the Egyptian population.³

Here, at what seems to be the river’s headwaters, the linear narrative immediately begins to fracture. The fundamental question of “why” the Egyptians performed this rite yields not a single, clear motive but a confusing cascade of possibilities. Ancient sources and modern analyses propose a range of overlapping and sometimes conflicting reasons. The Greek historian Herodotus, writing in the 5th century BCE, claimed the Egyptians practiced it “for the sake of cleanliness, considering it better to be cleanly than comely”.⁵ This hygienic explanation is often linked to a broader Egyptian obsession with purity, where physical cleanliness was seen as an extension of spiritual and intellectual development.¹ Other evidence suggests it may have been a mark of distinction for the elite; the Egyptian

Book of the Dead describes the sun god Ra as having circumcised himself, a divine precedent that priests and nobles might have sought to emulate.¹ Yet, there is no conclusive proof that the practice was restricted by social class.¹ Still other theories point to its function as a rite of passage, performed on pre-adolescent boys to mark their transition into manhood and emphasize the continuation of family and fertility.¹ The sheer variety of these explanations reveals that even at its earliest documented point, the practice was likely a complex cultural phenomenon without a single, simple purpose.¹

This complexity deepens into outright contradiction when the historical lens pulls back to a global view. The neat model of a practice originating in Egypt and diffusing outward struggles to account for the evidence. Some anthropologists have proposed that circumcision is far older, a feature of a “heliolithic culture” that spread across the globe more than 15,000 years ago.³ More concretely, the practice has been documented among Australian Aborigines and various peoples of the New World encountered by Columbus, groups geographically and culturally isolated from the ancient Near East.³ A single river of culture could not have reached all these disparate shores simultaneously.

Furthermore, the traditions that emerged in the same region presented a stark redefinition of the practice. The Abrahamic faiths, particularly Judaism, took what was a common custom in the area and imbued it with a theological weight and specificity entirely absent from Egyptian sources.⁹ If, as some theories suggest, circumcision in Egypt could be a mark of degradation or slavery for captured warriors ³, it is difficult to reconcile how the neighboring Israelites could adopt it as the ultimate sign of their covenantal freedom and chosen status. The quest for a single, linear history had led not to clarity, but to a landscape of contradictions. The data points did not connect; they conflicted, suggesting the initial premise of a single origin—a concept known as monogenesis—was fundamentally flawed.¹¹ The problem was not with the evidence, but with the framework being used to interpret it.

Part II: The Epiphany: It’s Not a River, It’s a Rainstorm

The resolution to this historical puzzle lies not in finding a more obscure source, but in abandoning the search for a single source altogether. A shift in perspective is required, one that moves away from the model of linear diffusion and toward a paradigm of independent invention. Insight into this new framework can be found by examining the history of other fundamental human innovations, particularly the origins of agriculture and writing.

For centuries, it was assumed that agriculture was “invented” in one location—likely the Fertile Crescent—and then spread across the globe. Modern archaeology, however, has demonstrated this to be false. The Neolithic Revolution was not a single event but a global phenomenon. Agriculture arose independently in at least 11 separate centers of origin, from Mesopotamia and China to Mesoamerica and the Andes.¹³ It was a convergent solution that different human groups arrived at when similar environmental and social conditions—namely, the end of the last Ice Age and rising population pressures—made it a viable strategy.¹⁶ Agriculture was not a single seed that was passed from hand to hand, but a crop that sprouted independently wherever the soil and climate were right.

A similar pattern is evident in the history of writing. It was long believed that this transformative technology was invented once in Sumer and then diffused. Yet, scholarship has now conclusively established that writing was invented independently on at least four separate occasions: cuneiform in Mesopotamia, hieroglyphs in Egypt, oracle bone script in China, and Mayan glyphs in Mesoamerica.¹² Each of these systems emerged from a local proto-writing tradition as societies reached a level of complexity that required a more robust method of information management.¹² They were parallel responses to the shared challenge of administering a complex state.

This model of independent invention provides the key to unlocking the circumcision puzzle. The practice is not a single river flowing from Egypt. It is a cultural rainstorm—a behavior that has precipitated independently in different cultures at different times whenever a specific set of social, religious, or even medical “atmospheric conditions” were present. This new paradigm dissolves the contradictions of the linear model. The varied motivations and geographically disparate locations are no longer problematic anomalies; they are distinct data points for separate, parallel phenomena.

Adopting this framework fundamentally shifts the analytical question. The inquiry moves from a historical “where did it start?” to a more profound anthropological “why did it start here, and here, and here?” The focus shifts from the physical act itself—which is merely the vessel—to the locally constructed meaning it carried in each specific context. This approach reveals that while the procedure may look the same, it was invented and reinvented to solve entirely different problems. In Egypt, the problem may have been one of ritual purity and social stratification. For the ancient Israelites, it was about forging an unbreakable group identity tied to a divine promise. In many tribal societies, it was a solution to the social challenge of managing the transition from boyhood to manhood. And in 19th-century America, it was a response to a complex mixture of sexual anxiety and the professional aspirations of a newly scientific medical class. The history of circumcision is not the story of a single invention, but a comparative analysis of at least four distinct cultural inventions that happen to share the same physical form.

Part III: The Nile Valley Seedbed: Purity, Power, and the Gods

Viewing ancient Egypt through the lens of the independent origins model allows for a richer understanding of the practice, not as the sole progenitor of a global tradition, but as the first and most clearly documented “ecosystem” where the cultural seeds of circumcision found fertile ground. Here, in the Nile Valley, the procedure emerged as a complex nexus of ritual, surgery, and social signaling.

The primary evidence remains the bas-relief in the Tomb of Ankhmahor, which has been nicknamed the “doctor tomb” for its depiction of medical scenes.¹ The carving is a remarkable historical document, capturing the essence of the practice in this early context. The use of a flint or stone knife, the presence of what are believed to be priests as operators, and the sacred setting of a tomb all point to an act deeply embedded in a ritual framework.¹ The procedure was not merely a folk custom but a formalized operation conducted by religious authorities. The depicted dialogue—”hold him still. Don’t let him faint”—underscores the reality of an operation performed on conscious individuals, possibly without anesthetics, though some scholars speculate that a pain-killing substance like the “Stone of Memphis” may have been used.²

The motivations behind this ritual-surgical act were multifaceted, likely forming a web of interlocking beliefs rather than a single, primary cause. These motivations can be understood as a cultural complex serving several functions simultaneously:

Purity and Hygiene

The most frequently cited reason, recorded by Herodotus, was a dedication to cleanliness.⁵ In the arid, sand-swept environment of Egypt, practical hygiene was a significant concern. However, this practical aspect was inseparable from a powerful ideological and religious obsession with purity (

wabet). The ancient Egyptians believed that physical purity was a direct reflection of spiritual purity, a prerequisite for proper engagement with the gods and for intellectual development.¹ Circumcision, by removing a part of the body that could harbor impurities, was thus an act of ritual cleansing, a way to align the physical self with a divine ideal of cleanliness.⁷

Status and Elite Identity

The practice also appears to have functioned as a marker of social status, distinguishing the elite from the common populace.⁵ That the procedure was performed by priests and depicted in the tombs of high officials like Ankhmahor suggests it was endowed with honor and importance.¹ This is further supported by mythological accounts in the

Book of the Dead, which describe the sun god Ra performing an act of self-circumcision, from which two minor deities were created from the drops of his blood.¹ By undergoing the same procedure, the earthly elite—pharaohs, priests, and officials—could symbolically emulate the gods and affirm their elevated position in the social hierarchy. While evidence does not suggest the practice was universally exclusive to the upper classes, its association with priests and divine figures clearly marked it as a sign of distinction.⁵

Rite of Passage

The fact that the operation was typically performed on boys or pre-adolescents points strongly to its role as a rite of passage.¹ In a public or semi-public ceremony, the act would have served as a formal initiation from boyhood into manhood, a transition that emphasized the continuation of family generations and the importance of fertility.¹ By enduring the procedure, a young man was integrated into the adult community, his new status permanently marked upon his body.

One speculative but intriguing theory even proposes that circumcision was introduced by a mythical king, Osiris, as a religious substitute for human sacrifice.²² In this view, the offering of a small, symbolic part of the body to a deity was a way to fulfill a sacrificial obligation without taking a life.

What emerges from the Egyptian evidence is not a single explanation but the birth of a ritual-surgical nexus. The act was simultaneously religious (performed by priests for purity), social (marking status and adulthood), and surgical (an alteration of the body with knives). This primordial fusion of meanings is the foundational “DNA” of the practice. It established a precedent where the lines between medicine, religion, and social identity were inherently blurred. This complex origin helps explain how, in later cultures, different elements of this nexus could be isolated and emphasized, pulling the practice in more specialized directions—becoming purely theological in Judaism, or almost entirely medical in the modern United States.

Part IV: The Covenantal Graft: Forging Identity in the Abrahamic Traditions

The emergence of circumcision within the Abrahamic faiths represents not an invention from scratch, but a profound act of cultural and theological transformation. The practice was already common in the ancient Near East; the Israelites’ neighbors, including the Egyptians, Edomites, Ammonites, and Moabites, all performed it.²³ In this context, the Philistines were the notable exception, the “uncircumcised” outsiders against whom the Israelites defined themselves.²³ The genius of the Abrahamic tradition was to take this familiar regional custom—an existing cultural branch—and graft it onto a new theological rootstock, producing an institution with an entirely new and far more potent meaning.

Judaism: The “Token of the Covenant”

The narrative in Genesis chapter 17 marks a revolution in the significance of circumcision. The act is removed from the realm of custom and elevated to the status of divine law. The Lord commands the 99-year-old Abraham to circumcise himself and every male in his household as a brit, or “token of the covenant,” between God and Abraham’s descendants.⁹ This transformed a physical mark into the outward sign of an exclusive, eternal, and deeply personal relationship with a single deity. It was no longer about general purity or social status; it was the seal of a chosen people.

This theological reframing was deliberate and multifaceted:

• A Link to Posterity: The covenant with Abraham was fundamentally about posterity—the promise that his descendants would be as numerous as the stars and would inherit the land of Canaan.⁹ By locating the sign of this covenant on the organ of procreation, the ritual forged an unbreakable symbolic link between the divine promise and the physical act of generation.⁹ It was only after Abraham’s circumcision that his covenant heir, Isaac, was conceived.⁹
• The Significance of the Eighth Day: The commandment to perform the rite on the eighth day of a male infant’s life was also theologically precise. It served as a reminder that children are born “whole” and not culpable for sin, and that parents are gifted a sacred period to prepare them for a life of covenantal responsibility.⁹ This stood in contrast to other customs and established a unique theological framework for childhood and accountability.
• An Evolving Rite: The physical procedure itself evolved in response to historical pressures. The original biblical rite, milah, was likely a minimal cutting of the tip of the foreskin.²⁴ However, during the Hellenistic period (c. 3rd-1st centuries BCE), some Jews sought to assimilate into Greek culture, where nudity in gymnasia was common and circumcision was viewed as a mutilation. These individuals would attempt to stretch the remaining foreskin to appear uncircumcised. In response, Rabbinic authorities introduced a second, more radical step called
  periah—the complete peeling back and removal of the entire foreskin—to make the mark of the covenant permanent and unmistakable.²⁴ A third step,
  metzitzah, the sucking of blood from the wound, was added during the Talmudic period, likely as a primitive form of antisepsis, though it sometimes had the opposite effect.²⁴

Islam: The Inheritance of Fitrah

Islam, too, positions circumcision within the Abrahamic lineage. Muslim tradition holds that the prophet Abraham was the first to perform the act and that it has been a highly recommended practice of God’s messengers ever since.¹⁰ However, the core meaning and context of the practice, known as

khitan, differs significantly from that of Judaism.

In Islam, circumcision is primarily understood as an act of Fitrah. This Arabic term refers to the innate, pure, and natural disposition with which humans are created.¹⁰ Circumcision is one of several practices, including clipping nails and shaving certain body hair, that are considered essential for maintaining this state of physical and spiritual cleanliness.¹⁰ It is a symbol of adherence to Islam and its emphasis on purity, but it is not a “covenant” in the same contractual sense as the Jewish

brit milah. While many Muslim scholars view it as an obligatory necessity, others classify it as a highly recommended practice (sunnah) rather than a divine commandment with spiritual penalties for non-observance.¹⁰

This difference in theological framing is reflected in the practical application of the rite:

• Flexible Timing: While performing the circumcision on the seventh day after birth is recommended, the timing is far more flexible than in Judaism. It can be carried out up to 40 days after birth or even later in childhood, depending on the health of the child.¹⁰
• A Non-Sacramental Act: Crucially, khitan is not considered a religious ceremony or sacrament in itself. Therefore, it does not require a specific religious official like the Jewish mohel. Any appropriately qualified person, typically a medical professional in modern times, can perform the procedure.¹⁰ This highlights its status as a matter of purification and adherence to prophetic tradition, rather than a foundational ritual act.

The following table provides a clear comparison of these two distinct Abrahamic frameworks:

Feature	Judaism	Islam
Primary Theological Meaning	A “token of the covenant” (brit) between God and the Jewish people.	An act of Fitrah (innate purity) and a rule of cleanliness.
Biblical/Quranic Basis	Genesis 17, a direct commandment from God to Abraham.	Hadith/Sunnah (traditions of the Prophet Muhammad) and the inherited tradition of Abraham.
Status	A divine commandment; a fundamental religious obligation (mitzvah).	Highly recommended (sunnah); viewed as obligatory by many scholars but not all.
Timing	Strictly on the eighth day of life, unless postponed for health reasons.	Recommended on the seventh day, but with significant flexibility.
Performer	Must be performed by a mohel, a religiously trained and qualified individual.	Can be performed by any appropriately qualified person (e.g., a doctor).
Ritual Nature	The act itself is a sacred religious ritual (brit milah).	The act is not a religious ceremony itself, but a practice of purification.

Part V: The Global Sprouts: Manhood, Endurance, and Social Cohesion

Far from the theological landscapes of the Near East, the cultural “rainstorm” of circumcision precipitated in entirely separate ecosystems, driven by a different set of social pressures. Across Africa, the Pacific, and Australia, the practice emerged independently as a powerful solution to a fundamental social challenge: how to formally and unambiguously mark the transition from boyhood to manhood. In these contexts, the primary function of circumcision is not theological but sociological—it is the centerpiece of elaborate rites of passage designed to forge adult identity, test endurance, and ensure social cohesion.

This widespread, independent appearance of circumcision as a male initiation rite is a striking example of convergent cultural evolution. While female biological maturation is often clearly marked by menarche, male maturation is a more gradual process without a single, definitive biological event. Manhood, therefore, is a status that must be socially conferred. For societies without complex state institutions, the “problem” of how to make this transition meaningful, public, and binding is a significant one. A painful, permanent, and symbolically potent alteration of the body—specifically the organ of procreation—proved to be a remarkably effective solution that was “discovered” repeatedly by different cultures facing this same social need.⁸

The African Rite of Passage

In numerous societies across the African continent, circumcision is the physical climax of initiation ceremonies that serve as the primary mechanism for educating young men and integrating them into the adult community.²⁵

• The Core Function: For groups such as the Xhosa in South Africa, the Kikuyu in Kenya, and the Dogon in Mali, the procedure is far more than a physical act. It is a gateway to adult responsibilities and social status.²⁵ The focus is not on a covenant with a deity, but on a social contract with the community.
• The Test of Endurance: A key element of these rites is the test of bravery. The operation is often performed on adolescents without anesthetic, and the initiate is expected to endure the pain without showing fear.³ This stoicism is considered a primary marker of manhood, demonstrating the individual’s readiness for the hardships of adult life.
• The Transmission of Culture: These rituals are not merely about enduring pain. They typically involve a period of seclusion where the initiates are taught the sacred histories, laws, moral codes, and responsibilities of their people.²⁵ This ensures the systematic transmission of cultural values from one generation to the next, reinforcing collective identity and social solidarity. Among the Kikuyu, for example, the ceremonies instill discipline and unity, while for the Dogon, they connect young men to ancestral traditions through storytelling and dance.²⁵

Parallel Practices Around the Globe

This pattern of using circumcision as a social initiation is not confined to Africa. Similar practices emerged in geographically and culturally distant regions:

• The Philippines: The practice of tuli is a near-universal rite of passage for Filipino boys, viewed as an essential step toward social manhood (pagkalalaki).²⁶ It is largely a secular tradition, separate from religious belief, and is often performed in group settings during school holidays, fostering a sense of shared identity and belonging among peers.²⁵
• Australian Aborigines and Pacific Islanders: Among various Indigenous Australian communities, circumcision is a fundamental component of complex initiation ceremonies that mark a boy’s transition to adulthood.³ These rituals are steeped in ancestral traditions and serve as a test of bravery and self-control, signifying the boy’s acceptance into the community of men and his readiness to assume adult responsibilities.²⁵ Similar rites of passage exist in some Pacific Island cultures, where they function to strengthen social bonds and preserve cultural heritage.²⁵

In all these cases, circumcision functions as a powerful social technology. It makes an abstract social transition—becoming a man—concrete, visible, and irreversible. It uses shared pain to create powerful bonds among initiates and serves as a public spectacle that affirms the social order and the authority of the elders who preside over it. The independent emergence of this practice across the globe demonstrates a common human solution to the universal challenge of constructing and maintaining social identity.

Part VI: The Modern Greenhouse: Morality, Medicine, and the Making of an American Norm

The final and most recent “ecosystem” where circumcision took root is perhaps the most peculiar. Its emergence in the modern Anglosphere, particularly the United States, was not an evolution of ancient religious or tribal traditions but a de novo invention of the late 19th century. This medicalized form of circumcision was born from a unique confluence of Victorian moral anxiety, the professional ambitions of a burgeoning medical class, and a cultural faith in surgical solutions.

The Birth of Medical Circumcision

The story of medical circumcision can be traced to a precise moment: February 9, 1870, in New York City.²⁷ On that day, Dr. Lewis A. Sayre, a prominent orthopedic surgeon, was consulted on the case of a five-year-old boy with paralyzed legs.²⁷ During the examination, Sayre noted the boy had a tight, irritated foreskin (phimosis). He hypothesized that this localized genital irritation was the source of the boy’s systemic paralysis, transmitted through the nervous system via a now-discredited theory known as “reflex neurosis”.²⁷ After Sayre performed a circumcision, the boy’s condition reportedly improved dramatically.

Buoyed by this “success,” Sayre became a zealous champion of the procedure, claiming it could cure a vast array of ailments, from hip-joint disease and hernias to epilepsy and even lunacy.²⁷ His theory quickly found fertile ground in a medical culture deeply preoccupied with the perceived dangers of sexuality. The focus rapidly shifted to what was seen as the most pernicious result of genital irritation: masturbation. In the Victorian mindset, masturbation was not a harmless act but a “vile habit” linked to a terrifying list of pathologies, including insanity, epilepsy, and moral decay.²⁷ Circumcision was thus promoted as a powerful therapeutic and, more importantly, prophylactic measure to curb this dangerous impulse by removing the “source” of irritation.

The Shift from Morality to Hygiene

As the theory of reflex neurosis began to lose scientific credibility, the justification for routine circumcision did not fade. Instead, it seamlessly pivoted to a new rationale rooted in the era’s other great obsession: germs. With the rise of germ theory, the foreskin was successfully rebranded as an unhygienic flaw in the male anatomy—a “harbor of infection” where dirt and disease-causing smegma could accumulate.²⁷

This shift transformed circumcision from a moral intervention into a sanitary one. It became a mark of modernity, scientific enlightenment, and social class.²⁷ The procedure moved from the home to the hospital, performed by doctors using modern surgical techniques. For Gentiles, having one’s son circumcised became a sign of having been delivered by a physician rather than a midwife, a symbol of belonging to the educated, clean, and progressive class, distinct from the “filth and pollution” often associated with new immigrant populations.²⁷

The Great Divergence: An “American Exceptionalism”

This medicalization of circumcision led to a remarkable divergence between the United States and the rest of the industrialized world. While the practice became a routine, almost universal procedure for male infants in the U.S., Canada, and Australia, it was largely rejected as medically unnecessary in the United Kingdom and continental Europe.²⁷ After Britain’s National Health Service stopped covering the procedure due to a lack of evidence for its medical efficacy, rates there plummeted.²⁷

Several factors fueled this “American exceptionalism.” The private, fee-for-service insurance system in the U.S. created a financial incentive for physicians to perform the elective surgery.²⁷ The powerful American medical establishment, once convinced of its benefits, was slow to reverse course, even after the American Academy of Pediatrics concluded in the 1970s that there were no valid medical grounds for routine infant circumcision.²⁷ Furthermore, there was a broader American cultural predisposition toward technological and surgical interventions to solve perceived health and social problems.

The history of medical circumcision is a compelling case study in how a medical practice can be constructed and sustained by social forces. Its survival has depended on a remarkable adaptability, with its justifications constantly shifting to align with prevailing scientific and cultural concerns. The rationale has evolved from curing reflex neurosis, to preventing masturbation, to promoting hygiene, and more recently to contested claims about reducing the risk of urinary tract infections, penile cancer, and HIV.²⁷ The practice has proven more durable than any single reason given for it. This reveals that routine infant circumcision in the American context is not simply a medical procedure, but a complex socio-medical construct, built and maintained by a powerful combination of historical momentum, cultural norms, and professional incentives.

Part VII: Conclusion: A Mosaic of Meaning

The journey that began with the search for a single, ancient river has led instead to the discovery of a vast and varied landscape, watered by many different streams. The initial assumption of a simple, linear history for circumcision dissolved under the weight of evidence, replaced by a more complex and ultimately more revealing paradigm of independent origins. The history of this global ritual is not one story, but many. It is a mosaic of meanings, a testament to the diverse ways human societies have used the body as a canvas to inscribe their deepest values, anxieties, and aspirations.

Synthesizing the findings reveals at least four distinct “inventions” of circumcision, each emerging in a unique cultural ecosystem to solve a different kind of problem:

1. The Egyptian Purity/Power Model: The earliest documented form emerged in the Nile Valley as a ritual-surgical nexus. It was a complex act of the elite, blending practical concerns of hygiene with religious ideals of purity and the social signaling of status and power.
2. The Abrahamic Covenantal Model: In the ancient Near East, the practice was theologically transformed. It was grafted onto the rootstock of monotheistic revelation to become the physical “token of the covenant” in Judaism and a fundamental act of Fitrah, or natural purity, in Islam, in both cases forging an unbreakable sense of group identity.
3. The Global Manhood Model: Across disparate cultures in Africa, Australia, and the Pacific, circumcision arose through convergent evolution as a powerful social technology. It provided a stark, public, and irreversible solution to the challenge of marking a boy’s transition into the socially constructed status of manhood.
4. The Anglo-American Medical Model: The most recent invention occurred in the late 19th century, born not of ancient tradition but of Victorian moral panic and the professionalization of scientific medicine. It has persisted by continuously adapting its justifications, becoming a unique socio-medical construct in the modern world.

Ultimately, there is no single “where” and no single “why” for the origin of circumcision. The physical act is a constant, but its meaning is profoundly variable, shaped by the specific cultural context in which it appears. To ask why circumcision began is to ask why humans seek purity, why they forge covenants, why they create social order, and why they strive for health. The answers are as numerous and as complex as humanity itself. The cut that binds one group in covenantal identity serves in another to separate boys from men, and in yet another to signify a commitment to a modern, scientific ideal of health. This multifaceted history is far more profound than the simple story of a single river, revealing instead the remarkable creativity of culture in shaping the human body to reflect the soul of a society.

Works cited

1. Circumcision in ancient Egypt – Egypt Museum, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://egypt-museum.com/circumcision-in-ancient-egypt/
2. Egyptian Tomb Carving May Be Earliest Depiction Of Circumcision… Or Something Far More Painful | IFLScience, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.iflscience.com/egyptian-tomb-carving-may-be-earliest-depiction-of-circumcision-or-something-far-more-painful-67270
3. The History of Circumcision, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.cirp.org/library/history/dunsmuir1/
4. EGYPTOLOGIST EXPLAINS PROOF OF PHAROAH AMENHOTEP’S CIRCUMCISION, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHwskT98auc
5. History of circumcision – Wikipedia, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_circumcision
6. Circumcision in ancient Egypt | Fiona Deal, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://fionadeal.com/2020/08/16/circumcision-in-ancient-egypt/
7. Circumcision in Ancient Egypt | Beschneidung im alten Ägypten – YouTube, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FudpvCR41eI
8. Why do you think Circumcision originated? : r/religion – Reddit, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/religion/comments/188j6k7/why_do_you_think_circumcision_originated/
9. Circumcision in the Old Testament | Religious Studies Center, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/vol-20-no-3-2019/circumcision-old-testament
10. Circumcision: a religious obligation or ‘the cruellest of cuts’? – PMC, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2801794/
11. Cultural diffusion – Wikipedia, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_diffusion
12. History of writing – Wikipedia, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_writing
13. The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution and the Origins of Private Property | Journal of Political Economy: Vol 127, No 5, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/701789
14. Agriculture – Wikipedia, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture
15. Early civilizations (article) | Khan Academy, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/world-history/world-history-beginnings/birth-agriculture-neolithic-revolution/a/introduction-what-is-civilization
16. The Origins of Agriculture as a Natural Experiment in Cultural Evolution, accessed on August 6, 2025, http://www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/richerson/origins_ag_iv3.htm
17. Are there any theories regarding why agriculture (or civilization) emerged independantly multiple times recently? – Reddit, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1qtfqk/are_there_any_theories_regarding_why_agriculture/
18. Visible Language: Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East – Fall 2010, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://isac.uchicago.edu/museum-exhibits/visible-language-inventions-writing-ancient-middle-east-fall-2010
19. Writing Systems – Linguistics – Oxford Bibliographies, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780199772810/obo-9780199772810-0221.xml
20. The Evolution of Writing | Denise Schmandt-Besserat – University of Texas at Austin, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://sites.utexas.edu/dsb/tokens/the-evolution-of-writing/
21. The History and Philosophy of Circumcision Along With A Few Facts, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://seattlebris.com/blog/the-history-and-philosophy-of-circumcision-along-with-a-few-facts
22. Circumcision: History, Scope, and Aim: Part I – Scientific Research Publishing, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=97868
23. Origins of circumcision, particularly those relating to Abraham? : r/AcademicBiblical – Reddit, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicBiblical/comments/qddmn8/origins_of_circumcision_particularly_those/
24. Circumcision: Then and Now, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.cirp.org/library/history/peron2/
25. Religious and Traditional Circumcision: Practices & Significance, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://ggomed.co.uk/religious-and-traditional-circumcision/
26. Journey Through History & Benefits of Male Circumcision – Mirage News, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.miragenews.com/journey-through-history-benefits-of-male-1015720/
27. From Ritual to Science: The Medical Transformation of Circumcision …, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.cirp.org/library/history/gollaher/
28. Circumcision Revisited: An Historical Perspective | Advanced Urological Care P.C., accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.urologicalcare.com/circumcision-revisited-an-historical-perspective/
29. Circumcision: A History of the World’s most Controversial Surgery – PMC, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1119872/