Table of Contents
Introduction: The Anatomy of a Downfall
The case of Aaron Hernandez presents one of the most stark and disturbing paradoxes in modern professional sports.
At his peak, Hernandez was a celebrated tight end for the New England Patriots, a rising star who had helped his team reach a Super Bowl and was rewarded with a $40 million contract extension.1
He possessed immense talent, wealth, and public adoration.
Yet, beneath this veneer of success, a different reality festered—one of paranoia, unchecked aggression, and ultimately, lethal violence.
This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the criminal acts that led to Hernandez’s downfall, meticulously dissecting the two homicide trials he faced.
It moves beyond the legal verdicts to explore the complex and deeply troubling question of “why.” The narrative of Aaron Hernandez is not merely a chronicle of crimes; it is a tragic case study at the intersection of criminal law, forensic science, sports culture, and neurobiology, revealing how a confluence of psychological trauma, a history of institutional enablement, and severe brain disease likely contributed to the destruction of multiple lives, including his own.3
Part I: The Murder of Odin Lloyd and the Certainty of Circumstance
The conviction of Aaron Hernandez for the murder of Odin Lloyd stands as a landmark case in the use of circumstantial evidence.
Without a confession, a murder weapon, or an eyewitness to the killing itself, prosecutors built an irrefutable case by weaving together a dense tapestry of digital footprints, forensic science, and behavioral patterns that left a jury with no reasonable doubt of his guilt.
The Crime in the Industrial Park
On June 17, 2013, the body of Odin Leonardo John Lloyd, a 27-year-old semi-professional linebacker for the Boston Bandits, was discovered by a jogger in a remote industrial park in North Attleborough, Massachusetts.2
The location was less than a mile from Hernandez’s sprawling mansion.3
An autopsy revealed Lloyd had been shot six times with a.45-caliber handgun, an execution-style killing.1
The investigation immediately zeroed in on Hernandez due to a crucial piece of evidence found in the victim’s pocket: a set of keys to a Nissan Altima that was rented in Hernandez’s name.6
This discovery was the first thread in unraveling the NFL star’s direct involvement.
The connection between the two men was not random; it was personal and intimate.
Lloyd was dating Shaneah Jenkins, the sister of Hernandez’s fiancée, Shayanna Jenkins.3
They had met at a family function, and by all accounts, Lloyd, a man described as humble and hard-working, was somewhat “star-struck” by his proximity to an NFL superstar, though he was not consumed by the celebrity lifestyle.11
This familial tie provided Hernandez with a level of access and trust that he would exploit on the night of the murder.
The Case Against a Superstar: An Unbreakable Chain of Evidence
The prosecution, led by Assistant District Attorney Patrick Bomberg, faced the significant legal challenge of proving first-degree murder without the three elements often considered essential: a murder weapon, a confession, or a direct eyewitness.1
Their strategy was to construct a timeline so detailed and corroborated by independent sources of evidence that it would form an unbreakable chain of guilt.1
The strength of the case was not in a single piece of “smoking gun” evidence, but rather in the establishment of an undeniable pattern of behavior indicative of guilt.
The prosecution meticulously layered technological, forensic, and behavioral evidence, demonstrating that these were not isolated, coincidental acts but a concerted effort to commit murder and then conceal it.
This convergence transformed a collection of disparate facts into a coherent and damning narrative that left little room for an alternative hypothesis.
Key evidence presented at trial included:
- Surveillance Footage: Video from Hernandez’s own comprehensive home security system was a cornerstone of the prosecution’s case. It captured his associates, Ernest Wallace and Carlos Ortiz, arriving at his home before the murder and the trio returning together shortly after the time of the killing.8 Critically, footage from the six to eight hours immediately following the murder was missing, strongly suggesting it had been intentionally destroyed.6 Other clips from earlier in the evening showed Hernandez inside his home holding a black object that appeared to be a Glock pistol, the same type of weapon believed to have been used in the murder.12
- Digital and Forensic Evidence: The prosecution presented a wealth of digital and forensic evidence that placed Hernandez with Lloyd at the time of the murder.
- Cell Phone Data: Cell tower pings and GPS data from the rented Nissan Altima meticulously tracked the group’s movements from Boston, where they picked up Lloyd, to the industrial park in North Attleborough, creating a precise digital timeline of the crime.7
- Text Messages: A series of text messages revealed Hernandez’s state of mind. On the night of the murder, he urgently summoned his associates from out of state, texting “hurry your ass up,” and expressed a growing paranoia, writing to one, “You can’t trust anyone anymore”.6 In the minutes before his death, Lloyd sent a series of chilling texts to his sister, including “Did you see who I am with,” followed by “NFL,” and finally, “Just so you know”.6 While the content of the messages was initially excluded as hearsay, the judge later allowed testimony about their existence, linking Lloyd’s phone activity directly to the timeline established by cell tower data.7
- DNA and Physical Evidence: Forensic evidence tied Hernandez directly to the crime scene. DNA from both Hernandez and Lloyd was found on a marijuana blunt left near the body.7 A piece of blue bubble gum, which Hernandez was seen purchasing on gas station surveillance video shortly before the murder, was found stuck to a spent.45-caliber shell casing at the scene, with Hernandez’s DNA on it.6 Furthermore, investigators matched shoe prints found in the soft dirt near Lloyd’s body to the distinctive pattern of Nike Air Jordan XI Retro Low sneakers, the same type Hernandez was seen wearing on his home surveillance video that night.6
- The Cover-Up: Hernandez’s actions in the hours and days after the murder demonstrated a profound consciousness of guilt. The day after Lloyd’s body was discovered, Hernandez hired a professional cleaning service to scrub his home.6 He turned his personal cell phone over to police, but only after it had been smashed “in pieces”.6 Most significantly, his fiancée, Shayanna Jenkins, testified that Hernandez instructed her to remove a heavy box from their basement and dispose of it. Prosecutors contended this box contained the.45-caliber Glock used to kill Odin Lloyd.13
The Defense: Reasonable Doubt and Alternative Theories
The defense team, led by attorney James Sultan, mounted a multi-pronged attack.
They argued that the investigation suffered from “tunnel vision,” claiming police and prosecutors were so blinded by Hernandez’s celebrity that they immediately targeted him and failed to pursue other leads or suspects.3
Their primary strategy was to deflect blame onto Hernandez’s associates, Ernest Wallace and Carlos Ortiz, suggesting one of them may have killed Lloyd in a drug-fueled rage, possibly under the influence of PCP.13
In a dramatic and high-risk maneuver during closing arguments, the defense made a stunning concession: they admitted Hernandez was present at the murder scene.6
They attempted to reframe him not as a perpetrator but as a terrified bystander, a “23-year-old kid who witnessed something…
a shocking killing, committed by someone he knew” and simply “didn’t know what to do”.6
This strategic admission, however, proved to be a fatal miscalculation.
While it attempted to account for the overwhelming evidence placing Hernandez at the scene—evidence the defense could not credibly refute—it simultaneously provided the prosecution with the necessary elements to secure a conviction under Massachusetts’ “joint venture” doctrine.16
This legal theory allows for a murder conviction even if the defendant did not pull the trigger, as long as they knowingly participated in the crime with shared criminal intent.
By admitting Hernandez was there, after having summoned his associates, driven the car to the secluded location, and then actively participated in the extensive cover-up, the defense inadvertently confirmed his role in the joint venture.
This made the question of who fired the fatal shots legally irrelevant to the charge of first-degree murder.
Verdict and Legal Aftermath
On April 15, 2015, a Bristol County jury found Aaron Hernandez guilty of first-degree murder and all five associated weapons charges.3
The conviction carried a mandatory sentence in Massachusetts of life in prison without the possibility of parole.10
The case took another bizarre legal turn following Hernandez’s suicide in his prison cell on April 19, 2017.10
His conviction was initially erased under a little-known and archaic Massachusetts legal doctrine called
abatement ab initio.
This principle held that if a defendant dies before exhausting all their legal appeals, the conviction is vacated, and the case legally reverts to its pretrial status, as if the trial and verdict never occurred.5
This outcome, which would have rendered Hernandez legally innocent, was met with outrage from the Lloyd family and prosecutors.
They appealed the decision, and in 2019, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court sided with the prosecution, reinstating Hernandez’s murder conviction posthumously and prospectively abolishing the doctrine of
abatement ab initio for all future cases.10
Part II: The 2012 Double Homicide: An Acquittal Built on a Witness’s Credibility
While serving a life sentence for the murder of Odin Lloyd, Aaron Hernandez stood trial for a separate, brutal crime: a 2012 double homicide in Boston.
The outcome of this trial would stand in stark contrast to his first, hinging almost entirely on the credibility of a single witness and illustrating the profound difference between a case built on circumstantial science and one built on compromised human testimony.
The Spilled Drink and the Drive-By
The crime occurred in the early morning hours of July 16, 2012.
Daniel de Abreu, 29, and Safiro Furtado, 28, were killed when a gunman in a silver SUV opened fire on their vehicle as it was stopped at a red light in Boston’s South End.18
The prosecution’s theory of motive was shockingly trivial: Hernandez’s rage had been ignited hours earlier at the Cure Lounge nightclub when de Abreu accidentally bumped into him, causing him to spill part of his drink.18
According to prosecutors, de Abreu’s failure to offer a sufficiently respectful apology sent the NFL star into a fury.18
They alleged that Hernandez, accompanied by his friend Alexander Bradley, later hunted down the victims’ car and committed the drive-by shooting.18
The State’s Star Witness on Trial
The prosecution’s case was almost entirely dependent on the testimony of one man: Alexander Bradley, a former close friend of Hernandez and an admitted drug dealer.18
Bradley was the state’s linchpin witness, testifying that he was behind the wheel of the SUV when an enraged Hernandez reached across him from the passenger seat and fired five shots into the victims’ car.18
To bolster Bradley’s narrative and provide a motive for his cooperation, prosecutors detailed a subsequent act of violence.
They alleged that seven months after the double murder, in February 2013, Hernandez shot Bradley in the face and left him for dead near a Florida strip club.18
The state framed this shooting as a cold-blooded attempt to permanently silence the only witness to the Boston killings.21
Hernandez’s defense team, led by renowned attorney Jose Baez, deployed a classic and effective strategy: they put the witness on trial.
Baez largely ignored Hernandez and focused his efforts on methodically dismantling Alexander Bradley’s credibility.
He relentlessly attacked Bradley’s character, painting him as a “liar, perjurer, and parasite” and a violent criminal in his own right.21
The defense argued that Bradley was the real killer and had fabricated the entire story about Hernandez to secure a “deal of a lifetime”—an immunity agreement from prosecutors that protected him from being charged for his own extensive criminal activities, including his potential role in the murders.21
The Not Guilty Verdict
On April 14, 2017, after more than 30 hours of deliberation, the jury delivered its verdict: Aaron Hernandez was found not guilty of the murders of Daniel de Abreu and Safiro Furtado.10
He was also acquitted of the witness intimidation charge for the shooting of Alexander Bradley.21
His only conviction was for unlawful possession of a firearm, which added a four-to-five-year sentence to his existing life term.18
The verdict underscored the fragility of the prosecution’s case.
Unbeknownst to the jury, two of the surviving passengers from the victims’ car had later identified Hernandez as the shooter after seeing news coverage of his arrest for the Odin Lloyd murder, but this evidence was suppressed and not presented at trial.25
The dueling verdicts in Hernandez’s two murder trials serve as a powerful illustration of the burden of proof in the American legal system.
The Lloyd conviction demonstrated that a meticulously constructed web of objective, verifiable evidence can be more compelling than direct testimony.
In that case, the jury was presented with a story told by technology and science—cell towers, surveillance cameras, and DNA—which could not be impeached on cross-examination.
The evidence itself created the narrative of guilt.
Conversely, the 2012 acquittal showed that a case resting on the credibility of a single, compromised eyewitness is fundamentally weak.
The defense’s task was not to prove Hernandez’s innocence, but merely to create reasonable doubt about the reliability of the state’s star witness.
By exposing Bradley’s criminal history, his motives for lying, and his immunity deal, Baez successfully eroded the jury’s confidence in his testimony.
The acquittal was not necessarily a declaration that Hernandez was innocent, but rather a statement from the jury that they could not be certain of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt based solely on the word of an admitted criminal who had every reason to lie.
It was a failure of the evidence presented, not a vindication of the defendant.
Part III: Deconstructing Motive: A Confluence of Pathology
While the courts delivered verdicts on Aaron Hernandez’s actions, they left the deeper question of “why” largely unanswered.
The motives behind his homicidal violence were complex, stemming from a confluence of psychological triggers, deep-seated paranoia, a history of unchecked aggression, and, as would later be discovered, profound neurological damage.
The Prosecutorial Narrative: Disrespect and Distrust
In the Odin Lloyd trial, prosecutors presented a motive rooted in Hernandez’s extreme sensitivity to perceived disrespect and his obsessive need for control.
The official theory centered on an incident at a Boston nightclub two nights before the murder.13
Witnesses testified that Hernandez became enraged when he saw Lloyd casually conversing with a group of people with whom Hernandez had “troubles”.8
For a man described as secretive and easily provoked by even minor slights, this act of “disloyalty” was enough to destroy his trust in Lloyd and trigger a murderous rage.6
A more complex and compelling motive, explored by investigators but not fully presented to the jury, was that Hernandez killed Lloyd to silence him.16
This theory posits that Lloyd had learned incriminating information about Hernandez’s life, specifically his involvement in the 2012 double homicide.26
Hernandez’s paranoia was already escalating after he had shot Alexander Bradley to silence him; he may have come to view Lloyd, who was now part of his inner circle, as another liability who needed to be eliminated.
The prosecution’s decision to argue the simpler “disrespect” motive over the more plausible “witness silencing” motive was a calculated legal tactic.
To prove the latter, they would have had to introduce evidence of the 2012 murders, a crime for which Hernandez had not yet been tried.
This would have created a “trial within a trial,” a legally precarious strategy that could have confused the jury and opened the door for a successful appeal, especially since the judge had already ruled to exclude such evidence.7
With overwhelming circumstantial evidence already proving Hernandez’s actions in the Lloyd killing, prosecutors opted for a straightforward motive that fit Hernandez’s known personality without jeopardizing their solid case.
The Unspoken Fear: Sexuality, Secrecy, and Paranoia
A persistent theory, widely reported but never proven in court, suggests that a powerful underlying motive for Lloyd’s murder was Hernandez’s deep-seated fear of being outed as bisexual.23
As the boyfriend of his fiancée’s sister, Lloyd was in a unique position to observe Hernandez’s private life, making him a potential threat to the carefully constructed hyper-masculine persona Hernandez projected to the world.11
This theory is supported by several pieces of information gathered by investigators.
Co-defendant Ernest Wallace reportedly told detectives that Lloyd had called Hernandez a “schmoocher,” a term interpreted as a gay slur.23
Wallace was also recorded during a jailhouse visit saying he would not have helped dispose of the murder weapon if he had known Hernandez was a “limp wrist”.23
Furthermore, law enforcement discovered that shortly before his arrest, Hernandez had transferred a significant amount of money to a male high school friend with whom he allegedly maintained a long-term intimate relationship.23
While this motive remains speculative, it offers a potent explanation for the extreme paranoia and violent overreaction that characterized Hernandez’s behavior, especially within the cultural context of the NFL at the time.24
A Pattern of Violence: Charting the Red Flags
The murders Hernandez committed were not sudden, inexplicable acts of violence.
They were the tragic culmination of a long-developing and escalating pattern of aggression that was repeatedly ignored or enabled by the institutions that should have intervened.24
- A Traumatic Childhood: Hernandez’s early life was reportedly rife with trauma, including physical abuse at the hands of his domineering father and sexual abuse by a neighbor. This forced him to live a “double secret life” from a young age.29
- College Impunity (2007): As a star football player at the University of Florida, he was involved in a violent bar fight that left a man with a burst eardrum and was questioned in connection with a double shooting in Gainesville. He faced no serious consequences for these incidents, shielded by his athletic status.20
- The Boston Double Murder (2012): Months before signing his $40 million contract, he allegedly committed the drive-by shooting that killed de Abreu and Furtado.20
- The Silencing of a Friend (2013): Just four months before killing Odin Lloyd, Hernandez shot his friend Alexander Bradley in the face in an attempt to silence him.20
This timeline reveals a clear and disturbing progression.
Hernandez’s violence was consistently insulated from accountability.
The University of Florida allegedly overlooked his legal troubles and drug use because he was a valuable asset.29
The NFL drafted him despite known character concerns.24
Even the New England Patriots were aware of his volatility; months before the Lloyd murder, Hernandez confessed to head coach Bill Belichick that he feared for his life and his family’s safety, a warning that was never relayed to law enforcement.29
This pattern of institutional enablement created a dangerous feedback loop: his aggression was never punished, so it escalated.
He learned that the rules that governed others did not apply to him, a lesson that paved his path toward murder.
The Damaged Brain: Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE)
The final, and perhaps most critical, piece of the puzzle was discovered only after Hernandez’s death.
His family donated his brain to Boston University’s CTE Center, where researchers led by Dr. Ann McKee made a shocking discovery.
Hernandez’s brain was ravaged by Stage 3 (out of 4) Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, a neurodegenerative disease caused by repeated head trauma.
Dr. McKee described it as the worst case of CTE she had ever seen in a person so young, noting that the level of damage was comparable to that found in players in their 60s.31
The examination revealed catastrophic damage to key areas of his brain.
His frontal lobes, which are essential for judgment, decision-making, and impulse control, were “riddled” with the tau protein deposits that are the signature of CTE.31
His amygdala, which regulates emotion, fear, and anxiety, was also severely affected.32
The brain itself showed significant atrophy (shrinkage), with enlarged ventricles and a damaged fornix, a bundle of nerves critical for memory.32
While Dr. McKee and other neuroscientists are careful not to draw a direct legal line between CTE and criminal culpability, the biological evidence provides a powerful explanatory framework for Hernandez’s behavior.
The specific brain regions destroyed by the disease are precisely those responsible for the functions he so clearly lacked: emotional regulation, sound judgment, and the ability to inhibit aggressive impulses.29
| Stage | Neuropathological Findings | Associated Clinical Symptoms | |
| I | Isolated deposits of tau protein in the cerebral cortex. | Mild headache, loss of attention and concentration. | |
| II | Multiple tau deposits in superficial cortical layers. | Depression, mood swings, short-term memory loss, impulsive behavior. | |
| III | Widespread tau pathology in frontal and temporal lobes; damage to amygdala and hippocampus. | Progressive cognitive decline, executive dysfunction (poor judgment), memory loss, aggression, apathy, potential suicidality. | |
| IV | Severe and widespread tau pathology affecting most brain regions, significant brain atrophy. | Profound dementia, severe memory loss, movement disorders (Parkinsonism), speech impediments. | |
| Data synthesized from sources.31 |
The CTE diagnosis offers a potential unifying theory for Hernandez’s otherwise inexplicable actions.
It does not excuse his crimes, but it helps to explain them.
It provides a biological reason for the shocking disproportionality of his reactions.
A healthy, well-regulated brain does not respond to a spilled drink or a perceived slight with homicidal rage.
However, a brain with severe damage to its emotional and executive control centers may be physiologically incapable of such regulation.
The CTE diagnosis reframes the narrative from one of a purely evil man making calculated choices to that of a deeply troubled individual whose pre-existing psychological wounds were catastrophically amplified by a progressive and devastating brain disease.
Conclusion: The Inextricable Legacy of Aaron Hernandez
To attribute the tragic downfall of Aaron Hernandez to a single cause would be a gross oversimplification.
His story is not one of a good man who was broken by a single factor, but rather a cautionary tale about the devastating confluence of multiple pathologies.
He was a product of a violent and traumatic childhood that instilled in him a life of secrecy and aggression.
He was a commodity in a sports culture that repeatedly enabled his behavior, valuing his athletic talent far more than his character and teaching him that he existed above the rules.
He was a man plagued by deep-seated paranoia and insecurities, possibly related to his sexuality, that drove him to lash out at any perceived threat.
Crucially, these profound psychological and environmental factors were layered upon a brain that was being progressively destroyed by disease.
The severe Stage 3 CTE discovered in his brain provides a biological context for his catastrophic lack of judgment, his inability to control his rage, and his impulsive violence.
It is the element that connects his erratic behavior to a tangible, physical ailment.
The legacy of Aaron Hernandez is therefore an inextricable knot of nature and nurture, of personal demons and physical decay.
It stands as a grim warning at the intersection of criminal justice, mental health, and the violent, hidden costs of America’s most popular sport.
Works cited
- Legal Analysis of Aaron Hernandez’s Guilty Verdict: First-Degree Murder, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.lipsitzgreen.com/in-the-news/legal-analysis-of-aaron-hernandezs-guilty-verdict-first-degree-murder/
- Aaron Hernandez Murder Trial: Who’s Who – CBS Boston – CBS News, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/aaron-hernandez-murder-trial-whos-who/
- Aaron Hernandez Murder Trial: A Tail of Fame, Fall, and Tragedy, accessed August 6, 2025, https://johndrogerslaw.com/aaron-hernandez-murder-trial-a-tail-of-fame-fall-and-tragedy/
- Making a murderer: Media renderings of brain injury and Aaron Hernandez as a medical and sporting subject – PubMed Central, accessed August 6, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6964160/
- The Odin Lloyd Case – Sheff Law, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.shefflaw.com/the-odin-lloyd-case/
- Murder of Odin Lloyd – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Odin_Lloyd
- Aaron Hernandez: A victim of circumstance or circumstantial evidence?, accessed August 6, 2025, http://campbelllawobserver.com/aaron-hernandez-a-victim-of-circumstance-or-circumstantial-evidence/
- Full account of the evidence against Hernandez. : r/nfl – Reddit, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/1h6euh/full_account_of_the_evidence_against_hernandez/
- Key pieces of evidence at center of Day 8 of Aaron Hernandez trial – Sports Illustrated, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.si.com/nfl/2015/02/14/aaron-hernandez-trial-day-8
- Aaron Hernandez – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Hernandez
- Who Was Odin Lloyd And Why Did Aaron Hernandez Kill Him?, accessed August 6, 2025, https://allthatsinteresting.com/odin-lloyd
- Aaron Hernandez Trial, Part 1: The Opening Statements – Massachusetts DUI Lawyer, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.massduidefenselawyer.com/articles/aaron-hernandez-trial-part-1-the-opening-statements/
- First-Degree Murder Conviction for NFL Star Aaron Hernandez | Risk Free Consultation, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.sevenslegal.com/criminal-attorney/firstdegree-murder-conviction-nfl-star-aaron-hernandez/314/
- Aaron Hernandez v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts: The Case Study | Law Paper Example – LawBirdie, accessed August 6, 2025, https://lawbirdie.com/aaron-hernandez-v-commonwealth-of-massachusetts-the-case-study/
- Footprints Tie Aaron Hernandez to Murder Scene | How to Become …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.crimesceneinvestigatoredu.org/2015/03/footprints-tie-aaron-hernandez-to-murder-scene/
- Aaron Hernandez’s Attorney Admits He Was Present When Odin …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.springandspring.com/aaron-hernandezs-attorney-admits-he-was-present-when-odin-lloyd-was-murdered/
- Arrest Record: Aaron Hernandez | USA TODAY Databases, accessed August 6, 2025, https://databases.usatoday.com/nfl-arrests/708/
- Aaron Hernandez found not guilty of Boston double murder – Sports Illustrated, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.si.com/nfl/2017/04/14/aaron-hernandez-not-guilty-boston-murder
- Aaron Hernandez Trial Jury Tours Key Locations In Double Murder Case – CBS Boston, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/aaron-hernandez-trial-jury-to-view-double-murder-site/
- Before arrest, Aaron Hernandez no stranger to violence – CBS News, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/before-arrest-aaron-hernandez-no-stranger-to-violence/
- Aaron Hernandez not guilty of 2012 double homicide – CBS News, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/aaron-hernandez-not-guilty-in-2012-double-homicide/
- Witness: Aaron Hernandez ‘Fired 5 Shots’ In 2012 Double Murder – YouTube, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-iR8LCHbXw
- Aaron Hernandez’s Sex Life Probed as Murder Motive, Police Source Says – Newsweek, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/aaron-hernandez-hidden-sexuality-murder-police-587879
- Netflix Docuseries Killer Inside: The Mind of Aaron Hernandez Probes the Secret Life of the Convicted Killer and Ex-NFL Star, accessed August 6, 2025, https://time.com/5764870/aaron-hernandez-netflix-documentary-killer-inside/
- An inside look into Aaron Hernandez’s double murder case – Boston …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.boston25news.com/news/an-inside-look-into-aaron-hernandez-s-double-murder-case/872893529/
- Is there a reason why the media is tip-toeing around the Aaron Hernandez motive behind murdering Odin Lloyd? Is it not the case that some have now begun to suggest Odyn Lloyd was murdered for threatening to expose Hernandez’s orientation? : r/boston – Reddit, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/boston/comments/67oxxf/is_there_a_reason_why_the_media_is_tiptoeing/
- Police source: Aaron Hernandez sexuality is possible motive for murder of Odin Lloyd, feared being outed as gay. : r/Patriots – Reddit, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Patriots/comments/66tpf0/police_source_aaron_hernandez_sexuality_is/
- Aaron Hernandez Uncovered: What Was the Motive? | Oxygen – YouTube, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LelpLzL2yao
- How ‘Football Inc’ missed warning signs around Aaron Hernandez …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/how-football-inc-missed-warning-signs-around-aaron-hernandez
- What happened to Aaron Hernandez? New series, experts examine NFL star’s troubled upbringing, CTE diagnosis, accessed August 6, 2025, https://news.northeastern.edu/2024/09/19/aaron-hernandez-cte-american-sports-story/
- What the Aaron Hernandez Documentary Missed About His Brain – Amen Clinics, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.amenclinics.com/blog/what-the-aaron-hernandez-documentary-missed-about-his-brain/
- Aaron Hernandez’s CTE Worst Seen by BU Experts in a Young Person | Bostonia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.bu.edu/bostonia/2017/aaron-hernandez-cte-worst-seen-in-young-person/
- Repeated trauma | BPS – British Psychological Society, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/repeated-trauma
- Football and CTE: The Story of Aaron Hernandez – Mohan Nair M.D., accessed August 6, 2025, https://mohannairmd.com/football-and-cte-the-story-of-aaron-hernandez/
- A Review of the Role of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7979483/
