The New Market Nexus: Identifying American Beneficiaries in a Shifting Global Economy

I. Executive Summary

The economic landscape confronting American businesses, workers, and investors is being reshaped by the emergence of “new markets.” This term, however, is no longer monolithic; it represents a complex and often contradictory set of opportunities that fall into three distinct categories: traditional international emerging markets, revitalized domestic industries, and disruptive digital platforms.

Identifying who in America benefits requires a nuanced analysis of each of these domains, as the beneficiaries—and the nature of their gains—differ profoundly depending on the market in question.

Expansion into international emerging markets, such as those in Asia, Latin America, and Africa, primarily benefits export-oriented sectors.

U.S. agricultural producers, particularly those of high-value products, find new customers among a growing global middle class.

Technology and service providers leverage their competitive advantages to capture global market share, while small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which constitute the vast majority of U.S. exporters, gain access to new revenue streams that foster growth and stability.

This outward-looking strategy creates jobs in export-dependent industries and offers investors high-growth, albeit high-risk, opportunities.

Conversely, the rise of new domestic industries represents an inward-looking strategy driven by government policy, national security imperatives, and a push for supply chain resilience.

Beneficiaries here are concentrated in strategic sectors targeted for growth and protection, including renewable energy, semiconductors, advanced manufacturing, and defense.

This “domestic renaissance” creates high-skilled manufacturing jobs, strengthens the nation’s industrial base, and reduces dependency on foreign adversaries for critical goods.

However, it is largely a state-directed endeavor, reliant on tariffs and subsidies that create a different set of economic winners and losers.

The third frontier is the digital marketplace, or the “new economy.” This domain is a powerful democratizing force, particularly for SMEs, which can now access national and global customers with unprecedented ease and at a lower cost through platforms like Amazon, eBay, and B2B digital ecosystems.

The primary beneficiaries are the tech corporations that own these platforms, innovators in fields like AI and cloud computing, and a modern workforce engaged in digital services and the gig economy.

For consumers, these platforms offer unparalleled convenience and choice.

Crucially, these three market types are not independent but exist in a state of dynamic tension.

Policies designed to bolster new domestic industries, such as tariffs, directly harm exporters by inviting retaliation that closes off international markets.

These same tariffs raise input costs for domestic manufacturers and increase prices for American consumers, revealing a complex web of economic trade-offs.

Consumers themselves are caught in a contradiction, expressing support for domestic production but consistently prioritizing lower prices in their purchasing behavior.

For American stakeholders to navigate this new nexus, a multi-faceted approach is essential.

Corporations must pursue a dual-track strategy, leveraging digital tools for global reach while capitalizing on targeted domestic opportunities.

Investors must assess risk through a geopolitical and policy lens, not just a financial one.

And policymakers must confront the direct costs of their decisions, investing heavily in workforce transitions and support for the small businesses that remain the most dynamic, and most vulnerable, players in this new economic era.

II. The Evolving Definition of “New Markets”

To comprehend who stands to benefit from new market opportunities, it is first essential to establish a clear and modern definition of the term.

The concept of a “new market” has evolved beyond its traditional association with developing nations.

In the current economic climate, it represents a tripartite framework encompassing distinct but interconnected arenas of growth: international emerging economies, revitalized domestic industries, and novel digital platforms.

Understanding the unique characteristics of each is fundamental to analyzing the specific American stakeholders poised to gain from them.

2.1. International Emerging and Frontier Markets

The most conventional understanding of new markets refers to international emerging markets.

These are the economies of developing nations that are undergoing rapid growth and becoming increasingly engaged with global commerce.¹

An emerging market is a country transitioning from a low-income, often pre-industrial, economy toward a modern, industrial one with a higher standard of living.¹

They are defined by characteristics such as fast-growing Gross Domestic Product (GDP), increasing per capita income, expanding industrialization, and a growing middle class.²

Their economic growth rates typically outperform those of developed countries, often reaching 6% to 7% annually, compared to rates below 3% in established economies.³

These nations are progressively opening their economies to international trade and investment, adopting market-oriented reforms, and developing the physical and regulatory infrastructure of a developed country, including unified currencies, stock markets, and banking systems.¹

Prominent examples have historically included the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), with newer groupings capturing attention, such as the MINT countries (Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey) and the “Next Eleven” (N-11), which includes nations like Bangladesh, Egypt, and Vietnam.³

These markets represent a significant portion of the world’s population and are forecasted to contribute substantially to global economic growth in the coming decades.³

It is also important to distinguish emerging markets from “frontier markets.” Frontier markets are typically smaller, less industrialized, and have less liquid capital markets than their emerging counterparts.¹

While they offer attractive investment opportunities, they are considered significantly riskier due to factors like greater political instability and less developed regulatory institutions.¹

Countries like Qatar and Argentina have been considered for upgrades from frontier to emerging status, highlighting the fluid nature of these classifications.¹

For American businesses and investors, these markets offer the potential for high returns but demand a commensurate tolerance for risk.¹

2.2. New Domestic Industries and Reshoring

A second, and increasingly prominent, category of new markets exists within the borders of the United States itself.

These “new domestic industries” refer to the creation or strategic revitalization of manufacturing and technology sectors on American soil.

This trend is not a purely organic market development but is heavily driven by a confluence of deliberate policy choices and external pressures.⁶

Key drivers include:

• Strategic Government Policy: The U.S. government has adopted a more interventionist stance, using tools like tariffs, subsidies, and dedicated funding to promote specific industries deemed critical to the national interest.⁶ This represents a shift toward a “state-directed” or “dirigist” economic model, where the government actively guides development to correct perceived market failures.⁹
• National Security Concerns: There is a growing imperative to reduce economic dependence on foreign adversaries, particularly for goods critical to the defense-industrial base and essential services.⁶
• Supply Chain Resilience: The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent geopolitical events exposed the vulnerabilities of long, complex global supply chains, prompting a push to re-shore or near-shore production of essential goods to ensure a more stable domestic supply.⁶

Examples of these new domestic markets include sectors targeted for significant investment and growth, such as renewable energy technologies (solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicle batteries), advanced materials, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and bio-manufacturing.⁶

The goal of these initiatives is to rebuild the U.S. manufacturing base, create well-paying domestic jobs, and bolster American economic and energy independence.⁶

2.3. New Digital Markets and the “New Economy”

The third category of new markets is born from technological disruption.

The “new economy” describes the fundamental shift from a manufacturing- and commodity-based economy to one driven by high-technology industries, data, and digital services.¹¹

First conceptualized during the dot-com boom of the late 1990s, this concept has matured into a dominant force in the U.S. economy, which added nearly $2.6 trillion in value in 2022.¹¹

These new digital markets are not defined by geography but by the platforms and technologies that facilitate commerce and economic activity.

Key segments include:

• Digital Marketplaces: These are virtual platforms where buyers and sellers transact for goods and services. They range from massive B2C platforms like Amazon and eBay to service-oriented marketplaces like Upwork and Fiverr, and increasingly, to specialized B2B ecosystems.¹³ The U.S. digital marketplace market was valued at $87.86 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13.3% to reach $212.77 billion by 2030.¹³
• The Sharing and Gig Economies: These models leverage digital platforms to facilitate access to shared goods and services (e.g., ride-sharing) or to connect freelancers with short-term contracts.¹⁵
• Data-Driven Technologies: This includes foundational technologies like cloud computing, big data analytics, and Artificial Intelligence (AI), which are creating entirely new industries and transforming existing ones.¹¹ Global spending on AI alone is projected to grow at a CAGR of 29% from 2024 to 2028.¹⁶

These three market types—international, domestic, and digital—are not mutually exclusive.

In fact, they are deeply interconnected, and policies affecting one can have profound and often conflicting impacts on the others.

For instance, a protectionist policy like a tariff on imported steel, designed to bolster a new domestic industry, directly benefits U.S. steel producers.⁶

However, this action often provokes retaliatory tariffs from trading partners on U.S. exports, such as agricultural goods, thereby harming American farmers who rely on access to

international emerging markets.¹⁷

Furthermore, the increased cost of steel for other domestic manufacturers can lead them to scale back on other expenditures, such as technology upgrades, which can indirectly dampen growth in the

new digital market.¹⁹

This dynamic illustrates that any analysis of who benefits from new markets must consider the complex web of trade-offs and ripple effects that connect these three domains.

III. The Global Frontier: Beneficiaries of International Market Expansion

The strategy of expanding into international markets, particularly the high-growth emerging economies, offers substantial benefits to a wide range of American stakeholders.

This outward-looking approach leverages American competitive advantages in key sectors to tap into a global consumer base that represents nearly 96% of the world’s population and two-thirds of its purchasing power.²⁰

The beneficiaries range from large multinational corporations and agricultural producers to the small businesses that form the backbone of U.S. exporting, as well as the American workers they employ and the investors who fund their growth.

3.1. U.S. Corporations and Key Export Sectors

For U.S. corporations, international markets are not merely an additional source of revenue; they are a critical engine for growth, price stability, and long-term vitality.

With U.S. agricultural and industrial output often growing faster than domestic demand, export markets are essential for sustaining prices and revenues.²¹

Agricultural Producers: The U.S. agricultural sector is a primary beneficiary of global market access.

Over the past quarter-century, U.S. agricultural exports have grown dramatically, from $52.9 billion in 1999 to $176 billion in 2024.²¹

This growth is driven by a fundamental shift in both the products exported and their destinations.

Exports have increasingly moved away from bulk commodities toward high-value products (HVP) like meats, dairy products, fruits, and vegetables.

In 2024, these consumer-oriented goods accounted for 69% of the total value of agricultural exports, up significantly from previous years.²¹

This trend is a direct response to rising household incomes and the diversification of diets in emerging economies worldwide.²¹

While traditional partners like Canada and Mexico remain vital—with trade quadrupling under NAFTA and its successor, the USMCA—the most dynamic growth is occurring elsewhere.²¹

Developing nations in East and Southeast Asia have become crucial markets.

China’s share of U.S. agricultural exports, for example, surged from approximately 6% in the early 2000s to 17% between 2020 and 2024.²¹

U.S. exporters are now increasingly targeting new regions with significant growth potential, including Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East, where population growth and rising demand are creating new opportunities.²³

This expansion is vital for the health of the U.S. farm economy, as over 20% of all U.S. agricultural production is sold abroad.²⁵

The economic impact is substantial: every dollar of agricultural exports was estimated to stimulate an additional $1.06 in domestic business activity in 2023.²¹

A deeper look reveals a value chain that amplifies these benefits.

The direct export of commodities like corn and soybeans, which accounted for $38.4 billion in 2024, is only part of the story.²⁵

A vast amount of these crops is exported indirectly.

In 2023, an estimated 512.7 million bushels of corn and 96.8 million bushels of soybeans were used as feed for livestock that were then exported as beef and pork products.²⁵

In 2024, a record 1.9 billion gallons of ethanol were exported, equivalent to another 684 million bushels of corn.²⁵

When combined, these indirect exports increase the total exported volume of corn by nearly 50%, creating a powerful secondary market that provides a crucial buffer for grain producers against price volatility and enhances the overall resilience of the U.S. farm sector.

Table 1: U.S. Agricultural Exports: Shifting Products and Destinations (2019-2024)

Year	Total Export Value (USD Billion)	HVP Export Value (% of Total)	Bulk Goods Value (% of Total)	Top 5 Destination Markets (by value)	Top 5 Growth Markets (by % change, selected)
2019	$136.7	64%	36%	Canada, Mexico, China, Japan, EU	Taiwan, Colombia, Philippines 26
2022	$196.0	67%	33%	China, Mexico, Canada, Japan, EU	Colombia, South Korea, Vietnam 26
2024	$176.0	69%	31%	Mexico, Canada, China, Japan, EU	Southeast Asia, UAE, South Korea 21

Note: Data compiled and synthesized from multiple sources for illustrative purposes.

HVP stands for High-Value Products.

Growth markets reflect notable increases in demand over the period.

Technology and Service Providers: The United States is a global leader in the “new economy,” particularly in software, IT, and other professional services.

U.S. companies command a dominant share of the world’s packaged and custom software markets, a position reinforced by the country’s strong intellectual property protection laws.²⁸

In 2024, U.S. services exports totaled a massive $1.15 trillion, with an additional $2.1 trillion in services supplied through the foreign affiliates of U.S. multinational enterprises.²⁹

With global IT spending projected to grow by 9.3% in 2025, American tech and service firms are well-positioned to benefit from this expanding global demand.¹⁶

Manufacturing Exporters: Beyond agriculture and tech, U.S. manufacturers in specialized sectors also rely on global markets.

Companies producing aerospace equipment, advanced machinery, and pharmaceutical products find significant customer bases abroad.³⁰

For example, the U.S. company Kohler, a manufacturer of kitchen and bathroom products, considers India one of its top three strategic markets and a potential hub for exporting to other regions, demonstrating how emerging markets can serve as both a destination and a platform for further global expansion.³¹

3.2. The Small Business Export Engine

While large corporations are highly visible, the true engine of American exporting is its small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

A staggering 97% of all U.S. businesses that export are classified as small businesses.³²

In 2021, these SMEs accounted for approximately one-third of the total value of U.S. goods exports, contributing $542 billion to the economy.³³

The benefits for SMEs that engage in exporting are clear and quantifiable.

They consistently outperform their non-exporting counterparts, achieving higher rates of growth, increased profitability, and employing more workers.³²

By diversifying their customer base beyond the domestic market, they also achieve greater business stability, making them less vulnerable to downturns in a single economy.²⁰

Recognizing the immense potential and unique challenges faced by SMEs, the U.S. government has established crucial support systems.

The State Trade Expansion Program (STEP) is a cornerstone of this effort.

It provides federal grants to state governments, which then fund local programs to help small businesses learn how to export, participate in foreign trade missions, design international marketing campaigns, and globalize their websites and e-commerce capabilities.²⁰

Alongside STEP, the Small Business Administration (SBA) offers export finance programs that mitigate the risk for lenders by guaranteeing up to 90% of export-related loans.

This provides SMEs with the essential working capital needed to fulfill international orders and manage the financial complexities of global trade.²⁰

3.3. The American Workforce and Investors

The expansion into global markets translates directly into benefits for American workers and investors.

Export-supported jobs are a significant component of the U.S. labor market.

In 2023 alone, U.S. agricultural exports supported over 1 million full-time civilian jobs, both on the farm and in related sectors like food processing, transportation, and logistics.²¹

On average, every $1 billion in agricultural exports supports nearly 6,000 U.S. jobs.²¹

Trade agreements that expand market access further amplify this effect; the USMCA, for instance, was projected by the International Trade Commission to add 176,000 jobs to the U.S. economy.³⁷

For investors, emerging markets present a compelling, though high-risk, proposition.

The rapid GDP growth in these economies offers the potential for significantly higher returns than are available in the more mature markets of the U.S. and Europe.¹

While this opportunity is tempered by risks such as political instability, currency volatility, and less-developed regulatory frameworks, investors can access this growth through specialized emerging market funds, diversifying their portfolios and capitalizing on global economic expansion.¹

IV. The Domestic Renaissance: Beneficiaries of New American Industries

In parallel with the pursuit of global opportunities, a powerful countervailing trend is reshaping the American economic landscape: the strategic revitalization of domestic industries.

This “domestic renaissance” is driven by a deliberate policy shift aimed at re-shoring manufacturing, securing critical supply chains, and fostering innovation at home.

This inward-looking strategy creates a distinct set of beneficiaries, primarily concentrated in industries deemed vital to national and economic security.

This movement is not a purely free-market phenomenon; rather, it reflects a more interventionist, state-directed approach where government actively promotes specific sectors to achieve national objectives.⁶

4.1. Strategically Important Industries

The primary beneficiaries of this domestic focus are the companies operating within sectors that have been targeted for protection and growth through government policy.

Renewable Energy and Advanced Manufacturing: The U.S. government is making a concerted effort to position the nation as a global leader in clean energy technology.

The Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) is at the forefront of this push, supporting a domestic market for renewable energy technologies projected to be worth at least $23 trillion by 2030.⁸

Through R&D funding, technical assistance, and strategic roadmaps for technologies like lithium batteries and clean hydrogen, the government is incentivizing the domestic production of solar panels, wind turbines, and electric vehicle (EV) batteries.⁸

This directly benefits companies in the clean energy supply chain, from innovators receiving federal grants to established manufacturers in energy-intensive sectors like steel, cement, and chemicals that are targeted for industrial decarbonization efforts.⁸

Concrete examples include Trina Solar’s investment in a new solar manufacturing facility in Texas and Generac’s construction of a new generator plant in Wisconsin.³⁹

Semiconductors and Technology Hardware: In response to supply chain vulnerabilities and geopolitical competition, there is a strong push to increase domestic semiconductor manufacturing.

Policies that favor U.S.-made chips directly benefit American semiconductor firms like Intel, Texas Instruments, and Micron Technology, which are investing heavily in domestic production facilities.¹⁰

This trend extends to technology hardware more broadly.

Apple’s landmark $500 billion investment in its U.S. operations is a prime example, featuring the construction of a new 250,000-square-foot factory in Houston, Texas, to produce the servers that will power its AI systems.⁷

This move not only creates domestic jobs but also anchors a critical part of the high-tech supply chain in the U.S.

Traditional Manufacturing (Steel, Aluminum): The most direct tool of the domestic renaissance has been the use of tariffs.

Levies on imported steel and aluminum, for instance, are designed to shield U.S. producers from foreign competition.

This protectionism provides a significant competitive advantage to domestic steel companies like Nucor and Steel Dynamics, which can benefit from higher demand for their American-made materials.¹⁰

Defense and Aerospace: National security is a core driver of the domestic industrial strategy.

A government preference for domestic procurement in defense contracts creates a stable and lucrative market for major contractors such as Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman.¹⁰

This benefit is amplified by policies that seek to reduce reliance on foreign adversaries for critical components, ensuring the resilience of the U.S. defense-industrial base.⁶

If tariffs were to be implemented on foreign aircraft components, a company like Boeing could see a further increase in both government and commercial orders.¹⁰

4.2. The Domestic Workforce

A central justification for these protectionist and industrial policies is the creation of well-paying American jobs, particularly in the manufacturing sector, which has seen a long-term decline.⁶

The investments spurred by these policies are projected to have a direct impact on employment.

For example, Chobani’s plan to build the largest dairy factory in the U.S. in New York is expected to create 1,000 new jobs, while pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly’s $1.7 billion expansion of its U.S. manufacturing facilities will add at least 700 new positions.⁷

Beyond direct job creation, a key component of this strategy is a focus on workforce development.

Government initiatives aim to support education and training programs that equip American workers with the advanced skills necessary for the high-tech manufacturing and infrastructure jobs of the future.⁸

This benefits not only the workers who gain new skills and employment but also the educational institutions and training centers that partner with industry and government.

4.3. National and Economic Security Stakeholders

The benefits of a revitalized domestic industrial base extend beyond specific companies and their employees to encompass broader national interests.

Supply Chain Resilience: The entire U.S. economy stands to benefit from more resilient domestic supply chains.

The disruptions experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic and from geopolitical conflicts highlighted the risks of over-reliance on foreign sources for essential goods.⁶

By re-shoring production of critical items, the U.S. becomes less vulnerable to such shocks, ensuring a more stable supply of everything from pharmaceuticals to semiconductors.

Critical Material Suppliers: The push to secure domestic supply chains for critical minerals and materials—such as lithium for batteries or rare earth elements for electronics—creates a new market for American mining, processing, and recycling companies.⁸

This reduces dependence on imports of materials that are often sourced from politically unstable regions or strategic competitors.⁸

This domestic renaissance marks a significant ideological shift.

It moves the U.S. away from the laissez-faire principles that have dominated for decades and toward a more active, interventionist economic model.⁹

The government is no longer just a referee but an active player, using policy to pick and promote strategic industries to achieve national goals.

This approach mirrors characteristics often seen in the very emerging markets the U.S. seeks to compete with, where, as political scientist Ian Bremmer notes, “politics matters at least as much as economics to the markets”.⁴

Consequently, businesses and investors must analyze these new domestic opportunities not only through a traditional economic lens but also through a political one, recognizing that government favor can be a powerful competitive advantage, yet one that is inherently subject to the shifting winds of policy and politics.

V. The Digital Disruption: Beneficiaries of the New Economy

The third, and perhaps most transformative, category of new markets is not defined by geographic borders but by the pervasive influence of digital technology.

This “new economy” has created vast opportunities for a diverse set of American beneficiaries, from the smallest home-based entrepreneurs to the largest technology corporations in the world.

The rise of digital marketplaces, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence is fundamentally reshaping how business is conducted, value is created, and consumers are engaged.

5.1. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)

For American SMEs, the digital revolution has been a profound democratizing force.

Digital platforms and marketplaces have leveled the playing field, providing small businesses with powerful tools to compete with larger, more established players.

Democratized Market Access: The most significant benefit for SMEs is the ability to reach a vast customer base far beyond their local communities.

Platforms like Amazon, eBay, and Etsy act as digital storefronts, giving small businesses immediate access to national and even global markets.¹³

This effectively eliminates the geographic constraints that once limited their growth.

A survey by the Small Business Roundtable found that 92% of small business owners reported that e-commerce marketplaces make it significantly easier to reach potential customers.⁴⁴

For rural businesses, in particular, these platforms are a lifeline, connecting them with millions of potential buyers worldwide.⁴³

Reduced Costs and Increased Efficiency: Digital marketplaces dramatically lower the barriers to entry for new businesses.

They reduce the need for expensive physical retail space and the associated overhead costs of rent and staffing, with 85% of SME owners reporting that these platforms help lower their overall expenses.⁴²

Furthermore, integrated services like Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) handle the complex and costly logistics of warehousing, packing, and shipping, allowing entrepreneurs to focus on product development and marketing.⁴³

Global Scalability: The digital economy provides SMEs with a turnkey solution for international expansion.

Marketplaces often have built-in capabilities for multi-currency transactions, international marketing, and navigating cross-border commerce, making it easier than ever to sell globally.⁴⁵

An impressive 88% of SMEs surveyed noted that these platforms enabled them to expand into international markets, a feat that would have been prohibitively complex and expensive just a generation ago.⁴⁴

5.2. Technology Corporations and Innovators

While SMEs are empowered by the new economy, the largest financial beneficiaries are the technology corporations that build and operate its infrastructure.

Platform Owners: The tech giants that own the dominant digital marketplaces—such as Amazon, Apple, Google (Alphabet), and Meta—have amassed enormous market power and value, in many cases overtaking the most prominent companies of the traditional manufacturing economy.¹¹

The total value of online marketplaces was estimated to be over $2.2 trillion in 2021 and is projected to account for up to 50% of all online spending by 2025.¹⁴

B2B and “New Economy” Innovators: The digital disruption is also creating new frontiers of opportunity.

One emerging model is the “brand-built marketplace,” where large consumer goods companies create their own B2B digital platforms to allow their small retail partners—like corner stores and bodegas—to replenish inventory more efficiently.¹⁴

This creates a symbiotic relationship that benefits both the large corporation and its network of small retailers.

Beyond marketplaces, rapid growth in foundational technologies like AI, cloud computing, and big data is creating entirely new markets for innovative products and services, benefiting both established tech leaders and a vibrant ecosystem of startups.¹¹

The rise of “super-apps” in Asia provides a compelling glimpse into the future of this digital competition.

Platforms like Kaspi in Kazakhstan have become what could be described as a “national operating system,” integrating payments, e-commerce, banking, travel, and more into a single, seamless user experience.¹⁴

With an astounding 90% penetration of the country’s adult population, Kaspi’s success demonstrates that achieving deep integration within a market can be more valuable than having a broad but shallow presence.⁴⁶

This model is not going unnoticed in the West.

U.S. companies like PayPal are actively trying to evolve from a single-purpose payment app into a more comprehensive digital wallet and commerce platform.¹⁴

This signals a coming battle to create all-encompassing digital ecosystems that can “own” a large share of a user’s online activity, a business opportunity of immense scale.

Table 2: The U.S. Digital Marketplace: Growth Projections and Key Segments

Market Segment	Market Size 2023 (USD Billion)	Projected Market Size 2030 (USD Billion)	CAGR (2024-2030)	Key Drivers
B2C E-commerce	$275.8 (Q1 2025, not adjusted) 47	N/A	11.22% (by 2027) 13	Smartphone adoption, consumer convenience
B2B Tech Market	$64 (approx., annualized) 48	$212.77 (Total Digital Marketplace) 13	3% (2025) 48	PC refresh cycles, AI adoption, cloud expansion
Total Digital Marketplace	$87.86 13	$212.77 13	13.3% 13	E-commerce growth, mobile technology
Artificial Intelligence (Global)	N/A	N/A	29% (2024-2028) 16	Gen AI adoption, enterprise needs

Note: Data compiled from multiple sources with varying methodologies and timeframes.

The table provides a consolidated view of the scale and growth across different facets of the digital economy.

5.3. The Modern Workforce and Consumers

The new digital economy has also created new opportunities and benefits for American workers and consumers.

The Gig and Digital Workforce: The rise of the gig economy, facilitated by platforms like Upwork and Fiverr, has created a new labor market characterized by short-term contracts and freelance work.¹³

This provides flexibility and new income streams for individuals who prefer or require non-traditional employment arrangements.

At the same time, the technology sector itself is a major source of high-skilled jobs.

In 2024, the U.S. tech industry employed an estimated 6.6 million people, including 2.2 million software and web developers.²⁸

Consumers: For the American consumer, the benefits of the digital economy are woven into the fabric of daily life.

Digital marketplaces offer unparalleled convenience, with 24/7 accessibility and mobile-friendly interfaces that allow consumers to shop from anywhere at any time.¹³

They also provide access to a vastly expanded range of products and services from sellers across the country and around the world, increasing choice and fostering price competition.⁴²

VI. Costs, Risks, and Economic Trade-Offs

While the pursuit of new markets—whether international, domestic, or digital—offers significant benefits, it is accompanied by substantial costs, risks, and complex economic trade-offs.

A comprehensive analysis must acknowledge the stakeholders who are negatively impacted by these shifts, including consumers who face higher prices, workers who experience job displacement, and businesses that struggle with the immense challenges of global expansion.

These costs are not minor side effects; they are fundamental consequences of the strategic choices being made.

6.1. The Consumer Cost of Protectionism

The policies designed to foster a “domestic renaissance,” particularly the widespread use of tariffs, impose direct and measurable costs on American consumers.

Higher Prices: Tariffs are, in essence, a tax on imported goods.

While levied on importing companies, this cost is almost invariably passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices.⁴¹

These hidden taxes are embedded in the final price of a vast range of products, from electronics and appliances to groceries and clothing.⁴¹

One estimate from the Budget Lab suggested that the trade policies enacted in 2024 would lead to a 1.8% increase in prices in the short term, equivalent to a loss of income of $2,400 for the average U.S. household.⁴⁹

Disproportionate Impact on Low-Income Households: The burden of these price increases is not distributed equally.

It falls most heavily on low-income households, who spend a larger portion of their income on essential goods and are more reliant on the availability of cheaper imported products.⁵¹

Research shows a stark divide in the perception of tariffs: while 67% of Americans earning over $150,000 see them as beneficial, support plummets to just 24% among those earning less than $50,000 a year, reflecting the acute financial strain these policies can cause.⁵²

Reduced Choice: Beyond higher prices, tariffs can also limit consumer choice.

If a tariff makes a particular product unprofitable to import, companies may simply stop offering it, reducing the variety of goods available on store shelves.⁴¹

This creates a fundamental tension for the American consumer.

Surveys reveal a strong desire for economic independence and support for domestic manufacturing, with 8 in 10 Americans believing the U.S. should reduce its reliance on other countries.⁵²

However, this patriotic sentiment has a clear price ceiling.

While over half of consumers are willing to pay a premium of up to 10% for American-made goods, this support collapses at higher price points.⁵²

Faced with a hypothetical 20% price hike on groceries due to tariffs, nearly 90% of Americans would change their shopping habits—by switching to cheaper alternatives or cutting back on spending—rather than absorb the cost.⁵²

This reveals that for most households, personal financial well-being ultimately trumps the abstract goal of supporting domestic industry, posing a significant political and economic challenge to protectionist policies.

6.2. Job Displacement and Labor Market Dislocation

The narrative of international trade is one of both creation and destruction.

While expanding exports creates jobs in some sectors, increased import competition can lead to significant job losses in others, with the costs often concentrated in specific communities and industries.

Manufacturing Job Losses: The long-term trend of globalization has had a profound impact on the U.S. manufacturing sector.

Between 2000 and 2019, the share of U.S. employment in manufacturing fell by a third.⁵³

Research by economists including David Autor has shown that local economies that were more exposed to import competition from China experienced a severe and lasting decline in manufacturing employment, resulting in the net displacement of one in seven manufacturing workers in those areas.⁵³

The Net Effect and Labor Market Friction: While some studies suggest the net effect of trade on total U.S. employment may be relatively small, this aggregate figure masks the severe disruption experienced by those whose jobs are lost.⁵⁴

The benefits of trade, such as lower consumer prices, are spread diffusely across the entire population, while the costs, such as a factory closure, are borne acutely by a concentrated group of workers and their communities.⁵³

The transition for these displaced workers is often fraught with difficulty.

They are frequently less likely to move to new regions to find work and may struggle to re-enter the labor force, particularly if they are older or lack skills transferable to growing sectors like healthcare or technology services.⁵³

6.3. The Challenges of Global Expansion for U.S. Businesses

For American companies seeking to capitalize on international markets, the path is laden with significant operational, financial, and cultural challenges.

Regulatory and Legal Barriers: Expanding overseas requires navigating a labyrinth of local laws and regulations that can vary dramatically from one country to the next.

This includes grappling with complex and divergent tax codes (corporate income tax, VAT, GST), labor laws, customs procedures, and industry-specific compliance requirements.⁵⁶

Even within the U.S., rules can vary significantly from state to state.⁵⁹

Failure to comply can result in substantial fines, legal disputes, and reputational damage that can jeopardize the entire expansion effort.⁵⁶

Cultural and Market Differences: A product or marketing strategy that is highly successful in the United States can fail spectacularly abroad if it does not account for local cultural nuances, consumer preferences, and business etiquette.⁵⁷

Successful expansion requires significant investment in localization—adapting products, messaging, and even business practices to align with local expectations.

This can involve everything from changing a product’s recipe to suit local tastes to redesigning a user interface to match local digital conventions.⁵⁸

Logistical and Financial Risks: International expansion is a capital-intensive undertaking with high upfront costs for establishing local offices, building new teams, and marketing to unfamiliar audiences.⁵⁸

Supply chains become longer, more complex, and more vulnerable to disruptions like port closures or political instability.⁵⁸

Furthermore, operating in multiple currencies exposes businesses to significant financial risk.

Unpredictable swings in exchange rates can erode profits, turning a successful sales quarter in a foreign market into a loss when converted back to U.S. dollars.⁵⁸

Table 3: The Tariff Trade-Off: Beneficiaries and Detractors of U.S. Protectionist Policies

Beneficiaries	Mechanism of Benefit	Detractors	Mechanism of Harm
Domestic Steel & Aluminum Producers (e.g., Nucor) 10	Increased price competitiveness against foreign imports.	U.S. Consumers 41	Higher prices on a wide range of goods, reducing purchasing power.
Renewable Energy & EV Battery Mfrs. 8	Government subsidies and incentives for domestic production.	Agricultural Exporters (e.g., Farmers) 17	Face retaliatory tariffs from trading partners, losing access to key foreign markets.
Domestic Semiconductor Firms (e.g., Intel) 10	Increased demand for U.S.-made chips due to supply chain security concerns.	Domestic Manufacturers Using Imports (e.g., Auto) 17	Higher input costs for materials like steel and components, reducing profitability.
Defense & Aerospace Contractors 10	Preference for domestic procurement in government contracts.	Technology Sector 19	Clients facing higher costs from tariffs may reduce discretionary tech spending.
Workers in Protected Industries 7	Job creation and retention in newly competitive or subsidized sectors.	Workers in Export-Dependent Industries 53	Job displacement due to loss of international sales and market access.

VII. Strategic Synthesis and Recommendations

The analysis reveals a U.S. economy at a crossroads, simultaneously pulled by the allure of global growth, the security of domestic production, and the disruption of digital innovation.

The stakeholders who benefit from “new markets” are not a single group but a diverse collection of actors whose fortunes are tied to these often-competing forces.

Navigating this complex environment requires strategies that are adaptable, risk-aware, and cognizant of the profound economic and political trade-offs at play.

The following recommendations are offered for key decision-makers seeking to thrive in this new market nexus.

7.1. For Corporate Strategists

The modern competitive landscape demands a flexible and resilient approach that transcends a simple choice between domestic and international focus.

• Pursue a “Dual-Track” Market Strategy: Corporations should avoid an all-or-nothing approach. The optimal strategy involves simultaneously leveraging low-cost, scalable digital platforms to access high-growth international emerging markets while strategically exploring opportunities in protected or subsidized domestic industries. This allows a company to capture global growth while also benefiting from industrial policy at home, creating a diversified portfolio of market exposures.
• De-Risk Global Expansion: Entering emerging markets is fraught with peril. Success requires more than just exporting a U.S. model. It demands deep investment in localization, tailoring products, marketing, and customer service to specific cultural contexts.⁵⁷ Forming
  strategic partnerships with local firms can provide invaluable market knowledge and navigate regulatory hurdles.⁵⁶ Finally, implementing sophisticated
  financial hedging strategies is not optional but essential to protect against the currency volatility that can erase profits from otherwise successful foreign operations.⁵⁸
• Build Resilient, Hybrid Supply Chains: The pandemic and geopolitical friction have demonstrated the fragility of hyper-optimized, single-source global supply chains.⁶ The most resilient companies will be those that build hybrid models, blending cost-efficient international sourcing with secure domestic or near-shored production for critical components. This approach balances the economic benefits of global trade with the security required to withstand inevitable supply shocks.

7.2. For Investors

The shifting economic paradigm requires a new lens for evaluating investment opportunities and risks.

• Analyze Opportunities Through a Policy Lens: Traditional financial analysis is no longer sufficient. Investors must assess companies based on their alignment with prevailing policy winds. Key questions include: Is this company a direct beneficiary of domestic industrial policy and subsidies? Or is it an exporter vulnerable to retaliatory tariffs? The answer can be a more powerful determinant of future success than a balance sheet alone. The rise of a more state-directed U.S. economy means political risk analysis is as crucial for domestic investments as it has been for emerging markets.⁴
• Price in “Policy Uncertainty” as a Core Risk Factor: The fundamental tension between globalist and protectionist ideologies creates a volatile and unpredictable policy environment. Long-term capital investments are exposed to the risk that the rules of the game—from tariffs to subsidies to trade agreements—could change dramatically with an election cycle. This uncertainty should be treated as a significant risk factor and priced into investment models.
• Invest in the “Picks and Shovels” of New Markets: Rather than betting on a single company or sector, a robust strategy is to invest in the enabling infrastructure that serves all three new market types. This includes: logistics, payment processing, and trade finance companies that facilitate global trade; advanced materials, robotics, and automation firms that enable the domestic manufacturing renaissance; and the AI, cybersecurity, and data analytics infrastructure that underpins the entire digital economy.

7.3. For Policymakers

Effective economic stewardship in this new era requires an honest appraisal of trade-offs and a commitment to mitigating the costs of economic transition.

• Acknowledge and Communicate Direct Policy Trade-Offs: Policymakers must move beyond simplistic narratives and openly acknowledge that economic policies create both winners and losers. A tariff designed to protect steel workers will impose costs on auto manufacturers and consumers.¹⁷ A trade agreement that benefits farmers may harm textile workers. Transparently communicating these trade-offs is essential for building public trust and crafting more durable, equitable policies.
• Invest Massively in Workforce Retraining and Transition Support: The single greatest source of social and political discontent arising from economic shifts is labor market dislocation.⁵³ If the nation is to pursue policies that inevitably lead to job displacement in some sectors, it must concurrently make massive, sustained investments in programs that support affected workers. This includes funding for high-quality retraining, relocation assistance, and robust unemployment benefits to ensure that the costs of economic progress are not borne solely by those least able to afford them.
• Strengthen and Expand Support for Small Business Exporters: SMEs are the most dynamic part of the U.S. export economy, but also the most vulnerable to the complexities of global trade.³² Programs like the SBA’s STEP grants and export loan guarantees are not peripheral but are critical infrastructure for American competitiveness.²⁰ These programs should be strengthened and expanded to ensure that small businesses have the resources they need to access the 96% of global consumers who live outside U.S. borders.²⁰

Works cited

1. Emerging Market Economy: Definition, How It Works, and Examples, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/emergingmarketeconomy.asp
2. What is an Emerging Market | BDC.ca, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.bdc.ca/en/articles-tools/entrepreneur-toolkit/templates-business-guides/glossary/emerging-markets
3. Emerging Market Economy – Definition, Examples – Corporate Finance Institute, accessed August 6, 2025, https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/emerging-market-economy/
4. Emerging market – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emerging_market
5. A Guide To New Markets And Economic Growth – Number Analytics, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/guide-new-markets-economic-growth
6. Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Declares National Emergency to Increase our Competitive Edge, Protect our Sovereignty, and Strengthen our National and Economic Security – The White House, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-declares-national-emergency-to-increase-our-competitive-edge-protect-our-sovereignty-and-strengthen-our-national-and-economic-security/
7. These companies say they’re investing more in U.S. manufacturing as tariffs go into effect, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-manufacturing-domestic-tariffs/
8. American Manufacturing and Competitiveness | Department of Energy, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.energy.gov/eere/american-manufacturing-and-competitiveness
9. Market economy – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_economy
10. Companies Poised to Benefit from New U.S. Tariffs | Market Analysis – YCharts, accessed August 6, 2025, https://get.ycharts.com/resources/blog/how-new-u-s-tariffs-could-create-winners-companies-positioned-to-benefit-from-trade-policies/
11. New Economy: Definition, History, and Examples of Companies, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/neweconomy.asp
12. Digital Economy Reporting – International Trade Administration, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.trade.gov/digital-economy-reporting
13. U.S. Digital Marketplace Market Analysis | 2030, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.nextmsc.com/report/us-digital-marketplace-market
14. Market Futures: Digital Marketplace Trends to Know | J.P. Morgan, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.jpmorgan.com/payments/payments-unbound/volume-2/market-futures
15. Unlocking Innovation: 12 Types of Economies and How Leaders Can Leverage Them, accessed August 6, 2025, https://jdmeier.com/economy-types/
16. 2025 technology industry outlook | Deloitte Insights, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/technology/technology-media-telecom-outlooks/technology-industry-outlook.html
17. Tariff trap: Trump targets India to pressure Putin – But US may pay the price, accessed August 6, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/trump-imposes-50-tariff-on-india-india-and-us-trade-talks-india-purchase-of-russia-oil-vladimir-putin/articleshow/123145730.cms
18. U.S. Heading to Record Ag Trade Deficit | Market Intel | American Farm Bureau Federation, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.fb.org/market-intel/u-s-heading-to-record-ag-trade-deficit
19. US’ 25% tariffs to hit IT sector? Workforce, input costs in spotlight – what EY analysis says, accessed August 6, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/uss-25-tariffs-to-hit-it-sector-workforce-input-costs-in-spotlight-what-ey-analysis-says/articleshow/123010090.cms
20. Export products | U.S. Small Business Administration, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.sba.gov/business-guide/grow-your-business/export-products
21. U.S. Agricultural Trade at a Glance | Economic Research Service, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/international-markets-us-trade/us-agricultural-trade/us-agricultural-trade-at-a-glance
22. U.S. Agricultural Trade at a Glance | Economic … – ERS USDA, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/international-markets-us-trade/us-agricultural-trade/us-agricultural-trade-at-a-glance/
23. NYS Department Expands US Agricultural Exports Abroad – Farmonaut, accessed August 6, 2025, https://farmonaut.com/news/nys-department-expands-us-agricultural-exports-abroad
24. Enhancing Markets Abroad | Home – USDA, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/general-information/priorities/more-better-and-new-market-opportunities/enhancing-markets-abroad
25. Agricultural Exports 101 | Market Intel – American Farm Bureau Federation, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.fb.org/market-intel/agricultural-exports-101
26. Agricultural Products | United States International Trade Commission – USITC’s, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.usitc.gov/research_and_analysis/tradeshifts/2023/agriculture
27. Key Agricultural Trade Partners Are Important for U.S. Farm Sector Revenues and Food Prices – Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.kansascityfed.org/research/economic-bulletin/key-agricultural-trade-partners-are-important-for-us-farm-sector-revenues-and-food-prices/
28. SelectUSA Software and Information Technology Industry, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.trade.gov/selectusa-software-and-information-technology-industry
29. International Services (Expanded Detail) | U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.bea.gov/data/intl-trade-investment/international-services-expanded
30. United States (USA) Exports, Imports, and Trade Partners | The Observatory of Economic Complexity, accessed August 6, 2025, https://oec.world/en/profile/country/usa
31. US tariffs may alter export plans from India: Kohler CEO, accessed August 6, 2025, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/foreign-trade/us-tariffs-may-alter-export-plans-from-india-kohler-ceo/articleshow/123149756.cms
32. Consider Taking Your Business Global This World Trade Month – SBA, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.sba.gov/blog/2024/2024-04/consider-taking-your-business-global-world-trade-month
33. What do we Know About Small Businesses that … – SBA advocacy, accessed August 6, 2025, https://advocacy.sba.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Issue-Brief-No.-19-Small-Business-Exports.pdf
34. State Trade Expansion Program (STEP) | U.S. Small Business …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/grants/state-trade-expansion-program-step
35. Small Business Trade and Exporting, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.sbc.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/smallbusinesstradeexporting
36. FINANCING YOUR SMALL BUSINESS EXPORTS, FOREIGN INVESTMENTS OR PROJECTS WHERE WILL YOUR NEXT CUSTOMER COME FROM?, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.cdfa.net/cdfa/cdfaweb.nsf/ord/55c681fed45dcbd688257936006947fa/$file/sba_factsheet.pdf
37. USMCA: A GOOD DEAL FOR AMERICAN JOBS AND COMMERCE – U.S. Travel Association, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ustravel.org/sites/default/files/media_root/document/USMCA_09.10.19.pdf
38. USMCA Pros and Cons: A Comprehensive Analysis – NovaLink, accessed August 6, 2025, https://novalinkmx.com/2024/10/31/usmca-pros-and-cons-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-the-united-states-mexico-canada-agreement/
39. In the Headlines: Companies continue to invest in American manufacturing | Plant Services, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.plantservices.com/industry-news/article/33012025/in-the-headlines-companies-continue-to-invest-in-american-manufacturing
40. New U.S. Manufacturing Operations Announced in February 2025 – IndustrySelect, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.industryselect.com/blog/new-us-factories-announced-in-february-2025
41. How Could Tariffs Affect Consumers, Business and the Economy? | UC Davis, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ucdavis.edu/magazine/how-could-tariffs-affect-consumers-business-and-economy
42. The Role of Digital Platforms in Supporting Small Business Growth in the USA, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388927654_The_Role_of_Digital_Platforms_in_Supporting_Small_Business_Growth_in_the_USA
43. Online Marketplaces Help Small Businesses Reach Customers and Succeed this Holiday Season – Connected Commerce Council, accessed August 6, 2025, https://connectedcouncil.org/online-marketplaces-help-small-businesses-reach-customers-and-succeed-this-holiday-season/
44. Main Street to Marketplace: How Small Businesses Are Selling Online, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.smallbusinessroundtable.org/main-street-to-marketplace
45. How Digital Marketplaces Drive Business Growth – Torry Harris, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.torryharris.com/insights/articles/how-digital-marketplaces-drive-business-growth
46. Overlooked Case Studies from Public Markets – New Enterprise Associates, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.nea.com/blog/overlooked-case-studies-from-public-markets
47. Monthly Retail Trade – Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales Report – U.S. Census Bureau, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.census.gov/retail/ecommerce.html
48. B2B Tech Market Forecasted to Grow by 3% in 2025 | Circana, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.circana.com/post/annual-growth-of-3-forecast-for-b2b-technology-market-as-early-gains-cool-in-second-half-of-the-yea
49. What consumers can expect from import taxes as the US sets new tariff rates, accessed August 6, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-consumers-prices-ebf959d8f8ad24bd0757d8e3693924c1
50. What consumers can expect from import taxes as the U.S. sets new tariff rates – PBS, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/what-consumers-can-expect-from-import-taxes-as-the-u-s-sets-new-tariff-rates
51. Burden of any rise in tariffs by US will fall on their low-income households: PM’s Economic Advisory Council member, accessed August 6, 2025, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/foreign-trade/burden-of-any-rise-in-tariffs-by-us-will-fall-on-their-low-income-households-pms-economic-advisory-council-member/articleshow/123142117.cms
52. Made in America: How Tariffs and Costs Influence Consumer Choices – inFlow Inventory, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.inflowinventory.com/blog/how-tariffs-and-costs-influence-consumer-choices/
53. Old jobs, new jobs: How the labor landscape has changed two decades after trade with China opened, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/2025/old-jobs-new-jobs-how-the-labor-landscape-has-changed-two-decades-after-trade-with-china-opened
54. U.S. Jobs Gained and Lost through Trade: A Net Measure, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/current_issues/ci11-8.pdf
55. US hiring slowdown: Economy likely added 115,000 jobs in July trailing last year’s pace; grads, young workers hit hardest, accessed August 6, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/us-hiring-slowdown-economy-likely-added-115000-jobs-in-july-trailing-last-years-pace-grads-young-workers-hit-hardest/articleshow/123041714.cms
56. 5 Challenges of Entering a New Market and How to Overcome Them, accessed August 6, 2025, https://groconsult.com/5-challenges-of-entering-a-new-market/
57. The Challenges and Opportunities of New Market Entry – EOXS, accessed August 6, 2025, https://eoxs.com/new_blog/the-challenges-and-opportunities-of-new-market-entry/
58. Challenges of international expansion | Stripe, accessed August 6, 2025, https://stripe.com/resources/more/challenges-of-international-expansion-what-to-know-about-risks-taxes-and-payments
59. CHALLENGES COMPANIES FACE WHEN EXPANDING INTO THE US – HubSpot, accessed August 6, 2025, https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/229897/Whitepapers/7%20Challenges%20Companies%20Face%20When%20Expanding%20into%20the%20US/7%20Challenges%20Companies%20Face%20When%20Expanding%20into%20the%20US.pdf
60. The 8 Major Differences Between Domestic and International Market Research, accessed August 6, 2025, https://kadence.com/en-us/the-8-major-differences-between-domestic-and-international-market-research/
61. We’re Going International: How U.S. Companies Can Unlock Global Opportunities with Strategic Partnerships, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.autonomyglobal.co/were-going-international-how-u-s-companies-can-unlock-global-opportunities-with-strategic-partnerships/