The Grammar of Value: A Journey into the Invention of Money

Introduction: Learning to Speak Money

It began with a simple, almost unconscious act: paying for a morning coffee. I handed over a worn piece of paper, intricately printed with green and black ink, and in return received a steaming cup of ceramic and a handful of metal discs. The transaction was seamless, automatic, a reflex honed over a lifetime. But on this particular day, I paused. I looked at the dollar bill still in my wallet—a portrait of a long-dead statesman, a cryptic pyramid, a series of numbers and seals. What was this thing, really? It had no intrinsic utility. I couldn’t eat it, wear it, or build a shelter with it. Yet, it held a potent, almost magical power. It was a promise, a symbol, a tiny, portable piece of a vast, invisible system of trust and belief.

This simple observation sparked a question that grew into an obsession: Where did this idea come from? Who invented money, and why? Was it a single stroke of genius, a slow, stumbling evolution, or something else entirely?

I soon realized that to ask about the invention of money is to ask about the very foundations of human cooperation. And to understand it, I needed a better metaphor. The typical analogies felt inadequate. Money wasn’t just a tool, like a hammer, or a commodity, like oil. It was something more abstract, more social. I began to see that the best way to understand money is to think of it as a language.¹

Like language, money is a system of communication. It is a social convention we use to express value, coordinate action, and build trust across immense social distances.³ We are all fluent speakers of this language—we use it every day to negotiate our needs, signal our priorities, and build our lives. Yet, most of us are functional illiterates when it comes to its history. We rarely study its grammar, its etymology, or the political battles that shaped its syntax.

This journey is my attempt to do just that. It is a quest to deconstruct the language of money, to trace its origins from the first guttural utterances of value to the complex, coded dialects of the digital age. In doing so, I discovered that money is not a natural object that was discovered, but a constitutional project, a mode of governance that was invented.⁴ It is one of the three great social technologies, alongside law and language itself, that make society possible.³ This is the story of how we learned to speak it.

Chapter 1: The Textbook Grammar — A World of Barter

Every student of economics learns the same origin story. It is the foundational grammar of money, the textbook explanation that is so elegant and logical it feels like an immutable law of nature. It begins, as all such stories do, in a world before money—a world of barter.⁵

In this primordial economy, exchange was direct. A farmer with a surplus of grain would trade it for a shepherd’s wool; a potter would exchange his pots for a fisherman’s catch. This system, in its simplicity, allowed for the first stirrings of specialization and economic growth.⁷ People could focus on what they did best, knowing they could trade their surplus for the other necessities of life.

The Problem of the Double Coincidence of Wants

But this simple system concealed a crippling inefficiency, a fundamental friction that economists call the “lack of double coincidence of wants”.⁸ For a trade to occur, two parties must have a mirror-image of desires. It is not enough for the baker to want the orchardist’s apples; the orchardist must, at that very same moment, want the baker’s bread.¹⁰

Imagine the predicament of a musician in a bartering society. She might be “paid” for a performance with a few bottles of liquor or a hot meal. These are valuable, certainly, but her landlord will not accept them as payment for rent; he needs a new pair of shoes.¹¹ The musician must now become a traveling salesperson, trying to find a shoemaker who is thirsty, or a hungry person who needs music. Each failed transaction is a waste of time and effort, time that could have been spent composing new songs or honing her craft.¹² In a complex economy with a wide array of goods and services, this problem becomes exponentially more difficult, grinding commerce to a halt.¹⁰

The Solution: The First Words of Value

According to the classic tale, the solution to this problem emerged organically. Societies, through a process of collective trial and error, began to converge on the use of certain items as an intermediary. These were not yet money in the modern sense, but commodity money: objects that had intrinsic value of their own but were also widely accepted in exchange for other goods.¹⁰ They were the first “words” in our new language of value, a common denominator that everyone could understand and accept.

The variety of these early commodity monies is a testament to human ingenuity and local environments.

• Cattle: In pastoral societies, livestock were a natural choice. They were valuable for their meat, milk, and hides, but also had the unique advantage of being mobile and self-reproducing. Cattle were one of the oldest forms of money, dating back as far as 9,000 BCE.¹⁴ Their legacy is embedded in our modern financial vocabulary: the word “pecuniary” (relating to money) comes from the Latin
  pecus (cattle), and “capital” derives from capita (head, as in head of cattle).¹⁵
• Salt: In ancient times, salt was a precious commodity, essential for preserving food in a world without refrigeration. Its value was so recognized that Roman soldiers were sometimes paid in salt, a payment known as a salarium argentum. From this, we derive our modern word “salary”.¹⁵
• Cowrie Shells: For centuries, the small, durable, and easily portable shells of the cowrie mollusc served as currency across vast swathes of Africa, Asia, and the Pacific Islands. First used in China around 1200 BCE, their uniform size and resistance to counterfeiting made them an ideal medium of exchange.¹⁴
• Grain and Other Goods: In agricultural societies like ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt, standardized measures of barley or wheat served as money.¹⁸ Elsewhere, communities used whatever was valuable and convenient, from beaver pelts and tobacco in colonial America to giant copper plates in 17th-century Sweden and even whale teeth in Fiji.²⁰

The adoption of a common commodity money was a revolutionary step. It severed the need for a double coincidence of wants. Our musician no longer needs to find a thirsty shoemaker. She can sell her music for a handful of cowrie shells and then use those shells to pay her rent, buy shoes, or purchase bread. Trade explodes, specialization deepens, and wealth is created.⁷

This story of barter giving way to commodity money is powerful. It presents the market as a natural state of human affairs and money as a spontaneous, private-sector innovation that arose to make it more efficient.²³ It is a story of progress, of humanity logically solving a problem and setting itself on the path to prosperity. It is a clean, compelling narrative. And as I would soon discover, it is almost certainly a myth.²⁴ The power of this story lies not in its historical truth, but in its logical force and the ideological worldview it supports—one where money is a product of individual actors, not of states or societies.

Chapter 2: The First Alphabet — The Invention of the Coin

The world of commodity money, for all its advantages over barter, was still a messy and inefficient place. The language of value had its first words, but it lacked a formal grammar and a standardized alphabet. The problems were practical and persistent. Commodities could be bulky and difficult to transport; a farmer couldn’t easily carry a cow in his pocket to the market.¹⁷ They were often perishable; grain could rot, and cattle could die, wiping out a person’s savings.⁶ They lacked divisibility; you couldn’t pay for a loaf of bread by chipping a piece off your cow.⁹ And crucially, their quality was inconsistent. One bag of salt might be purer than another, one beaver pelt finer than the next, leading to constant haggling and uncertainty.²⁶

To solve these problems, humanity needed another breakthrough. It needed a way to standardize value, to create uniform units that could be trusted by everyone, everywhere. This innovation—the invention of the coin—would provide the first true alphabet for the language of money. And for this development, our journey takes us to the ancient kingdom of Lydia.

The Lydian Revolution

In the 7th century BCE, in the region of western Anatolia that is now modern-day Turkey, the kingdom of Lydia was a prosperous hub of commerce, a bridge between the empires of the East and the burgeoning city-states of Greece.⁶ The Lydians were renowned merchants. But they, like everyone else, faced the challenges of using raw precious metals for trade. Lumps of gold and silver were a popular medium of exchange, but they had to be weighed and their purity tested for every single transaction—a slow, cumbersome, and fraud-prone process.²⁷

Sometime around 610 BCE, the Lydian king, Alyattes, introduced a radical solution.²⁸ He began to produce small, bean-shaped lumps of a naturally occurring gold and silver alloy called electrum. What made these lumps revolutionary was not the metal itself, but what was done to it. Each piece was manufactured to a standardized weight—the most common being the

stater—and, most importantly, was stamped with the king’s official symbol: a lion’s head.²⁷

This stamp was the stroke of genius. It was a royal guarantee of both the weight and the purity of the metal. For a coin to be considered a coin, it must be issued by a governing authority; this is what distinguishes it from a mere token or barter item.²⁷ The Lydian stater is widely considered by numismatic historians to be the world’s first officially issued coin.²⁷

The impact was profound. A merchant no longer needed to carry a set of scales and a touchstone. He could accept a Lydian coin at face value, trusting the king’s seal rather than his own expertise. This dramatically reduced transaction costs and accelerated the pace of commerce.²⁷ It was the formalization of money by a central authority. The value, which had previously resided solely in the intrinsic worth of the metal, was now shared with the authority of the state that guaranteed it. This was the first great step away from purely physical value and toward the abstract, socially constructed value that defines modern money.

The Spread of the Alphabet

The idea of coinage was too powerful to remain confined to Lydia. Alyattes’s son, the famously wealthy King Croesus (r. 560-547 BCE), refined the system further. He abandoned the variable electrum alloy and created the world’s first bimetallic currency, issuing separate coins of highly purified gold and silver. This made their value even easier to calculate and established a convenient exchange rate between the two metals.²⁷

The concept spread like wildfire. The Greek city-states, Lydia’s neighbors and trading partners, quickly adopted and adapted the technology, stamping coins with their own emblems—the Athenian owl, the Corinthian pegasus. The Persian Empire, after conquering Lydia, continued to strike coins at the Sardis mint and later introduced its own famous gold daric.²⁷

Meanwhile, on the other side of the world, a parallel evolution was taking place. In China, which had a long history of using cowrie shells, a transition to metal currency was also underway. By the end of the Stone Age, the Chinese were manufacturing bronze imitations of cowrie shells.¹⁴ These evolved into early forms of “tool money,” such as small, stylized bronze knives and spades, before developing into the iconic round coins with a square hole in the center—a design that would persist for over two thousand years.⁵

Though their forms differed, the underlying principle discovered in Lydia and China was the same. The act of minting—of a state impressing its authority onto a piece of metal—was the creation of a reliable alphabet for commerce. It allowed for a universal language of value that could be spoken and understood across vast empires, laying the groundwork for the complex economies of the ancient world. It was a pivotal moment, but it was not, I was about to learn, the beginning of the story.

Chapter 3: The Lost Dialect — Unearthing the Language of Debt

My journey of discovery had, up to this point, followed a clear and satisfying path. It was the story I had always known: the friction of barter led to the convenience of commodity money, which was then perfected by the invention of coinage. It was a linear progression, a story of humanity’s rational march toward efficiency. But the deeper I dug, the more I found cracks in this elegant foundation. I began to encounter a dissenting view, primarily from anthropologists and archaeologists, who argued that this entire narrative was a fiction—a “foundational myth” with little to no historical basis.⁴

The Anthropological Challenge: A World Without Barter

The challenge was simple and devastating: there is no historical or ethnographic evidence of any society, anywhere in the world, that ever operated primarily on a system of barter.²³ This claim, first put forth by scholars like Marcel Mauss and Caroline Humphrey, is stunning in its implications. The “double coincidence of wants,” the problem that money was supposedly invented to solve, may never have been the primary organizing principle of any real-world economy.²⁵

Instead, anthropologists found that pre-monetary societies operated on complex systems of gift-giving, reciprocity, and long-term social obligations.²² Within a community, you didn’t barter for your neighbor’s goods; you were part of a web of mutual support. Exchanges were not based on calculation but on a

refusal to calculate, on strengthening social bonds.²⁵ A gift given today created an obligation that might be repaid years later, ensuring the continuity of the relationship. Barter did happen, but it was typically reserved for interactions with complete strangers or potential enemies—people outside the local web of trust.²²

If the problem of barter wasn’t the driving force, then where did money come from? If the classic story was wrong, what was the true origin? To find the answer, the trail led me back much further in time, not to 7th-century BCE Lydia, but to 4th-millennium BCE Mesopotamia.

Journey to Mesopotamia: The Language of the Ledger

In the fertile crescent between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, the Sumerian civilization developed the world’s first cities, the first writing systems, and the first complex state bureaucracies. And it is here, on thousands of baked clay tablets inscribed with cuneiform script, that we find the real “Rosetta Stone” of money.³¹

These tablets, which predate the first coins by nearly 3,000 years, are not records of market exchanges. They are, overwhelmingly, accounting ledgers.³² They were created by the scribes and priests who ran the massive temple and palace economies. These institutions were the central hubs of Sumerian life, collecting agricultural surplus, managing vast storehouses, and redistributing goods to their workers and dependents.³⁴ The tablets meticulously record inventories, expenditures, and, most importantly, debts.³²

They show us that money did not begin as a physical thing, but as an abstract unit of account. The Mesopotamian shekel was not a coin; for centuries, it was simply a unit of weight, defined as a specific quantity of barley (approximately 180 grains).¹⁸ This unit was used to measure and record obligations. A tablet might state that a farmer owed the temple 30 shekels of barley as tax, or that a merchant had been advanced goods worth 5 silver shekels, on which interest would accrue.³⁵ Money, in its earliest form, was a language of debt. It was a tool for accounting.

The State-Centric Origin of Money

This evidence supports a radically different origin story, a theory known as Chartalism (from the Latin charta, for token or ticket). It posits that money was not invented by private individuals to make trade easier. It was invented by the state (or in this case, the temple-palace complexes) as a tool of administration and social control.²³

The mechanism worked like this:

1. Imposition of Debt: The central authority (the palace) would impose a tax or tribute obligation on its subjects, and crucially, it would denominate this debt in its own abstract unit of account (e.g., the silver shekel).²³
2. Creation of Demand: This act instantly created a society-wide demand for that unit of account. Every household now needed to acquire shekels to settle its debt to the state and stay out of trouble.
3. Monetization of the Economy: To get the shekels, people had to offer goods or services to the palace or to others in the community. The palace could pay its soldiers and workers in silver IOUs, which they could then use to buy food from farmers, who in turn needed the silver to pay their taxes. Markets, in this view, did not create money; money created markets.³⁷ It was a system designed to mobilize resources and labor for the benefit of the state.

These two competing narratives represent a fundamental disagreement about the nature of money, markets, and the state.

Feature	Economic (Barter) Theory	Anthropological (Debt/State) Theory
Primary Driver	Inefficiency of barter (“double coincidence of wants”)	State/Temple need for administration, accounting, and tax collection
Initial Form	Physical commodity with intrinsic value (cattle, salt, shells)	Abstract unit of account for tracking debts (e.g., the barley shekel)
First Function	Medium of Exchange	Unit of Account / Standard of Deferred Payment
Role of the State	Later entrant; standardizes and certifies value (e.g., coinage)	Primary creator; invents money to denominate taxes and obligations
Key Evidence	Logical deduction, thought experiments (Adam Smith)	Mesopotamian clay tablets, ancient legal codes, tax records
Implied Market	Market exists before money; money makes it efficient	Market is created by money; people trade to get money for taxes

This “lost dialect” of debt completely reframes the story. It suggests that money’s primary function from the very beginning was not as a medium of exchange, but as a unit of account and a standard of deferred payment—the core functions needed for a credit-based system.¹² The idea of money as a virtual record of what is owed predated its physical form by millennia.³⁸ The coin was not the invention of money, but merely the physical tokenization of a pre-existing system of accounting and debt.

Chapter 4: The Poetry of Abstraction — From Nouns to Verbs

My journey had led me to a profound fork in the road: was money born of the marketplace or the palace? Was its first form a tangible commodity or an abstract debt? I began to realize that, in a way, both paths ultimately converge at the same destination. Whether money began as a physical thing (a noun, like “gold”) or an abstract record (a verb, like “to owe”), its evolution has been a relentless march toward abstraction. It is a story of money shedding its physical body, becoming a pure idea—a social and political construct whose power lies not in what it is, but in what we agree it represents.

This great leap into abstraction, the invention of paper money, did not happen in the West. For this chapter in our story, we must travel to China.

The Invention of Paper Money in China

By the 10th and 11th centuries CE, during the Song Dynasty, China’s economy was booming. Commerce was so vibrant that it created a massive demand for currency, leading to a shortage of the copper needed to mint coins.³⁹ Merchants in the prosperous Sichuan region, long familiar with the use of private credit notes, began issuing their own paper receipts as a more convenient substitute for heavy strings of coins. These notes, known as

jiaozi, were the world’s first paper money.⁴⁰

Initially, these were forms of representative money. A jiaozi note was essentially an IOU, a claim check that represented a specific amount of metallic coin or other valuable commodity (like gold, silver, or silk) held in reserve by the issuing merchant or, later, the government.⁴¹ It was a physical stand-in for the “real” money in the vault. It was lighter, more portable, and made large transactions infinitely easier.⁷

But soon, the Chinese government took a momentous step. It took over the printing of paper money, established a state monopoly, and eventually suspended the convertibility of the notes.⁴⁰ The paper itself could no longer be redeemed for a physical commodity. Its value now derived from two sources: the decree of the emperor that it was legal tender, and the government’s willingness to accept it for the payment of taxes. This was the birth of

fiat money—money that has value simply because the government says it does (the term “fiat” comes from the Latin for “let it be done”).³⁹ China would experiment with fiat paper currency for over 500 years, a history marked by periods of great economic expansion but also by rampant inflation when governments printed too many notes.⁴⁰

The West Catches Up

The West was much slower to adopt paper money. For centuries, its monetary language was spoken in gold and silver. There were early, isolated experiments with representative notes, such as the letters of credit issued by the Knights Templar to pilgrims in the 12th century, or the playing cards signed by the governor and used as emergency cash by soldiers in 17th-century French Canada.⁵

When European banks began issuing paper banknotes in the 17th century, they were strictly representative. A British pound sterling note was not money itself; it was a promise to pay the bearer one pound’s worth of silver on demand.⁴¹ This system, which eventually evolved into the international

Gold Standard, provided monetary stability. A government could only print as much money as it had gold in its vaults, which kept inflation in check. However, it also severely restricted a government’s flexibility to respond to economic crises, like depressions or wars.⁶

The Nixon Shock and the Birth of the Modern Era

Throughout the 20th century, the link between paper money and gold became increasingly tenuous. Governments temporarily suspended convertibility during wars and economic downturns to give themselves more policy freedom.³⁹ The final, decisive break came on August 15, 1971. Facing dwindling gold reserves and economic pressure, U.S. President Richard Nixon announced to the world that the United States would no longer convert U.S. dollars to gold at a fixed rate.³⁹

This event, known as the “Nixon Shock,” was the big bang of our modern financial universe. Because the U.S. dollar was the world’s reserve currency under the Bretton Woods system, this single act effectively severed the entire global monetary system from its metallic anchor.⁴¹ In an instant, every major currency on Earth—the pound, the franc, the mark, the yen—became pure fiat money.

Today, the cash in our pockets and the numbers in our bank accounts have no intrinsic value. They are not backed by any physical commodity. Their value comes purely from a shared social belief, a network effect underwritten by the full faith and credit of the governments that issue them.³⁹ This is the ultimate expression of money as a social technology. The journey that began with the Lydian king’s stamp, which added a layer of state guarantee to a physical object, reached its logical conclusion. The object was removed entirely, leaving only the guarantee. The language of money had become pure syntax, its meaning derived entirely from the rules of the system and the authority that enforces them. It confirmed what the Mesopotamian scribes seemed to know 5,000 years ago: money was always an idea, a system of accounting, first. The physical tokens were just a convenience that came later.

Chapter 5: The New Vernacular — Speaking in Code

The era of pure fiat money, our current era, is a system of incredible power and flexibility. It allows governments to manage their economies, cushion recessions, and fund vast public projects.³⁹ But this power comes with inherent vulnerabilities. The system is centralized, placing immense trust in governments and central banks not to abuse their power. The temptation to create money without limit to pay for government spending can lead to inflation, a “hidden tax” that silently erodes the purchasing power of citizens’ savings.⁷ Furthermore, the entire system relies on a network of large, private banking institutions that have proven to be fallible, as the global financial crisis of 2008 demonstrated all too clearly.³⁹

It was in the shadow of this crisis that a new monetary dialect began to emerge, one that sought to challenge the very foundations of the fiat system.

The Genesis Block

On January 3, 2009, an anonymous person or group known only as Satoshi Nakamoto mined the first block of a new digital currency called Bitcoin. Embedded in the code of this first block—the “genesis block”—was a headline from that day’s edition of The Times of London: “Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks”.⁴⁴ The message was clear. This new invention was a direct response to the perceived failures of the traditional, state-controlled financial system.

Bitcoin was proposed as a “peer-to-peer electronic cash system,” a way for people to transact directly with one another online without needing a trusted third party like a bank or a payment processor.¹⁰ It was a radical new language of value, one that aimed to replace the grammar of government decree with the grammar of mathematics and cryptography.

Bitcoin as a New Language

The technology underpinning Bitcoin, the blockchain, is its core grammatical innovation. It is a distributed public ledger, a giant, shared accounting book that is maintained and updated by a global network of computers. Every transaction is bundled into a “block,” which is then cryptographically linked to the previous block, forming an immutable “chain”.²⁶ Trust is not established by a central authority, but by the consensus of the network and the unbreakable laws of cryptography. It is a system designed to be trustless.

In a fascinating historical echo, Bitcoin reintroduces one of the most ancient properties of money: scarcity. While fiat currency can be printed in unlimited quantities, the Bitcoin protocol dictates that there can only ever be 21 million bitcoins created.⁴⁵ New coins are brought into circulation through a process called “mining,” where powerful computers solve complex mathematical problems to validate transactions and secure the network. The very use of the word “mining” is a deliberate metaphor, harking back to the gold rushes of the past and the idea that money should be difficult to produce and finite in supply.⁴⁵

The Promise and the Peril

The promise of Bitcoin and the thousands of other cryptocurrencies it inspired is to create a form of money that is decentralized, censorship-resistant, and immune to the inflationary whims of governments. For its proponents, it represents the next logical step in money’s evolution—a global, digital currency for a global, digital world.²⁶

Yet, this new vernacular faces immense challenges. Its value has been extraordinarily volatile, swinging wildly from day to day. This volatility makes it a poor unit of account (it’s hard to price goods in Bitcoin if its value changes dramatically overnight) and a risky store of value.⁴⁶ The network has also struggled with

transaction inefficiency. The Bitcoin network can only process a handful of transactions per second, compared to the tens of thousands processed by networks like Visa, and final settlement can take many minutes.⁴⁶ Furthermore, the “mining” process consumes a staggering amount of energy, raising serious environmental concerns.

What this new digital experiment truly reveals is a deep dialogue with the entire history of money. Cryptocurrency is a fascinating hybrid, an attempt to engineer a new monetary language by selectively recombining traits from every previous era.

• It has the hard-capped scarcity of commodity money like gold.⁴⁵
• It has the standardized, verifiable units of coinage.
• Its core is a ledger that meticulously tracks every transaction, echoing the debt-based systems of Mesopotamia.
• And like fiat money, its value is not based on any underlying physical asset but on a shared belief system and a network of users. It simply seeks to replace trust in fallible human institutions with trust in infallible mathematical code.

The fundamental paradox of cryptocurrency is this attempt to build a trustless system for what has always been the ultimate trust-based technology. This contradiction explains both its revolutionary appeal and its profound, ongoing struggles to find its place in the world.

Conclusion: The Language We All Write Together

My journey began with a simple question: who invented money? I now know there is no simple answer. There was no single inventor, no solitary genius who, in a flash of insight, conceived of this world-changing technology. The history of money is not a straight line but a tangled, branching tree, with roots reaching deep into two distinct soils: the practical needs of the marketplace and the administrative demands of the state.

Money is a living language, one that has been evolving for at least 5,000 years. It was not invented by one person but co-created by countless societies over millennia. Its first words were spoken by Mesopotamian accountants tracking barley debts on clay tablets. Its first alphabet was stamped onto electrum by Lydian kings. Its poetry was first written on paper by Chinese bureaucrats in the Song Dynasty. And its latest dialect is being coded into existence by anonymous programmers on the internet.

Each evolution—from cattle to clay, from coins to code—is a testament to humanity’s relentless search for better ways to express value, to manage trust, and to organize ourselves on an ever-grander scale.⁶ The story is far from over. Today, we stand at another crossroads, witnessing a vibrant and sometimes chaotic debate between the centralized language of fiat currency and the decentralized vernacular of cryptocurrency. The tension between these two systems—one based on political authority, the other on algorithmic consensus—is the chapter of monetary history that is being written in our lifetime.

In the end, the most profound discovery is not who invented money in the past, but who is inventing it now. The answer, I have come to believe, is all of us. Every time we choose to accept a dollar, a euro, or a Bitcoin in exchange for our labor or our goods, we are casting a vote. We are participating in a collective act of belief that gives this language its power. The true answer to the question “who invented money?” is “we did.” And the more powerful realization is that “we still are.” Having journeyed through its long and complex history, we are now more than just fluent speakers; we are conscious authors, empowered to help write the next verse in the epic poem of money.

Works cited

1. Money: The World’s Most Universal and Unifying Language – Invention City, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.inventioncity.com/money-the-worlds-most-universal-and-unifying-language
2. LANGUAGE IS POWER: THE CURRENCY OF WORDS IN THE FIGHT FOR EQUALITY, accessed August 6, 2025, https://medium.com/@broadlanguage/language-is-power-the-currency-of-words-in-the-fight-for-equality-468711ccfdd0
3. Money and language – Philosophy Of Money by Eric Lonergan, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.philosophyofmoney.net/money-and-language/
4. Creation Stories: Myths about the Origin of Money – DASH (Harvard), accessed August 6, 2025, https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstreams/7312037c-f89a-6bd4-e053-0100007fdf3b/download
5. The History of Money: Bartering to Banknotes to Bitcoin – Investopedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/roots_of_money.asp
6. The Evolution of Money: From Barter to Bank Notes and beyond, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.rcibank.co.uk/node/600
7. The History of Money: Barter, Fiat and Bitcoin – Sprouts – Learning Videos – Social Sciences, accessed August 6, 2025, https://sproutsschools.com/the-history-of-money-barter-fiat-and-bitcoin/
8. www.srapcollege.co.in, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.srapcollege.co.in/sites/default/files/Barter%20System%20%26%20Its%20failure.pdf
9. Mention three limitations of the barter system. – Doubtnut, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.doubtnut.com/pcmb-questions/144260
10. The Double Coincidence of Wants: Overcoming the … – Amber App, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.amber.app/article/the-double-coincidence-of-wants-overcoming-the-inefficiencies-of-barter-with-money
11. Coincidence of wants – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coincidence_of_wants
12. money functions – AmosWEB, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.amosweb.com/cgi-bin/awb_nav.pl?s=wpd&c=dsp&k=money+functions
13. The History of Money | Blog | Maps CU, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.mapscu.com/2024/04/12/the-history-of-money/
14. NOVA Online | Secrets of Making Money | The History of Money – PBS, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/moolah/history.html
15. Origin and Evolution of Money – Banco Central do Brasil, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.bcb.gov.br/ingles/origevoli.asp
16. History of Salt | SaltWorks®, accessed August 6, 2025, https://seasalt.com/salt-101/about-salt/history-of-salt
17. History of Money: Discovery and Evolution of Money – History Cooperative, accessed August 6, 2025, https://historycooperative.org/the-history-of-money/
18. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_money#:~:text=The%20Mesopotamian%20civilization%20developed%20a,and%20parallel%20form%20of%20currency.
19. bitcoinmagazine.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://bitcoinmagazine.com/glossary/commodity-money#:~:text=In%20ancient%20Egypt%2C%20grain%2C%20cattle,its%20importance%20as%20a%20preservative.
20. Commodity money – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_money
21. Money – A Wild Journey Through Millennia – Erply, accessed August 6, 2025, https://erply.com/money-a-wild-journey-through-millennia
22. History of money – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_money
23. Economics, Anthropology and the Origin of Money as a Bargaining Counter, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.worldeconomicsassociation.org/newsletterarticles/bargaining-counter/
24. Myths about money – Chris Skinner’s blog, accessed August 6, 2025, https://thefinanser.com/2023/02/myths-about-money
25. Is the Barter economy really a myth? : r/AskSocialScience – Reddit, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskSocialScience/comments/ssi2i1/is_the_barter_economy_really_a_myth/
26. The Evolution of Money: From Bartering to Banknotes to Bitcoin – Hiro Systems, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.hiro.so/blog/tracing-the-social-narratives-shaping-the-future-of-money-bartering-to-banknotes-to-bitcoin
27. The Importance of the Lydian Stater as the World’s First Coin – World …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.worldhistory.org/article/797/the-importance-of-the-lydian-stater-as-the-worlds/
28. The Story of Money: 05–Electrum Stater (610-561 BC) – Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.atlantafed.org/about/tours/story-of-money/06-early-coins/electrum-stater
29. Hallie Ford Museum of Art Exhibits | Lydian Electrum, accessed August 6, 2025, https://library.willamette.edu/hfma/omeka/exhibits/show/coinsofthegreekandromanworld/item/14
30. Ancient Chinese Currency | National Museum of China, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.chnmuseum.cn/exhibition/exhibition_series/special_exhibitions/202102/t20210210_248989.html
31. Ancient Money: The History of Banking and Currency – Cornerstone Wealth Management, accessed August 6, 2025, https://cornerstonevegas.com/ancient-money-the-history-of-banking-and-currency/
32. History of accounting – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_accounting
33. Ancient Accountants: Mesopotamia’s Advanced Economy – SDC CPAs, LLC., accessed August 6, 2025, https://sdccpa.com/hot-topics/ancient-accountants-mesopotamias-advanced-economy/
34. “Significance of ancient Mesopotamia in accounting history” by Douglas Garbutt – eGrove, accessed August 6, 2025, https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aah_journal/vol11/iss1/5/
35. The Mesopotamian Origin of Debt – The Observatory Wiki, accessed August 6, 2025, https://observatory.wiki/The_Mesopotamian_Origin_of_Debt
36. Prof. Goetzmann Discusses Finance Practices in Mesopotamia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://som.yale.edu/story/2023/prof-goetzmann-discusses-finance-practices-mesopotamia
37. The History of Money: Not What You Think – YSI INET, accessed August 6, 2025, https://ysi.ineteconomics.org/blog/the-history-of-money-not-what-you-think/
38. Money | Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/money
39. Fiat Money – Corporate Finance Institute, accessed August 6, 2025, https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/economics/fiat-money-currency/
40. Fiat money – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_money
41. The Origin of Money and Definition of Fiat Monetary Systems – Afrindependent Institute, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.afrindependent.org/publications/the-origin-of-money-and-definition-of-fiat-monetary-systems
42. Fiat vs. Representative Money: What’s the Difference? – Investopedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/041615/what-difference-between-fiat-money-and-representative-money.asp
43. Understanding Money: Its Properties, Types, and Uses – Investopedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/money.asp
44. What Is Bitcoin? How To Buy, Mine, and Use It – Investopedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bitcoin.asp
45. Exploring money as metaphor with artist William Drew – Future Everything, accessed August 6, 2025, https://futureeverything.org/news/money-as-a-metaphor-artist-william-drew-explains/
46. A History of Money & Investing From Barter to Bitcoin – Financial Planning Association, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.financialplanningassociation.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/Bitcoin%20Presentation.pdf