Table of Contents
Introduction: The Question in My Kitchen
The scene is a familiar one, played out in countless homes on any given weeknight.
A kitchen table, bathed in the artificial glow of an overhead light, serves not as a place of nourishment but as a silent battleground.
On one side sits a child, shoulders slumped in a posture of weary defeat, staring at a worksheet as if it were an unsolvable riddle.
Tears of frustration well in their eyes, a quiet testament to the exhaustion that has settled in long after the school day has ended.
Across from them, a parent offers encouragement that feels increasingly hollow, caught between the desire to help and the gnawing question that echoes their own childhood memories of late-night study sessions, missed playtime, and simmering anxiety: Why do we do this? Who decided this nightly ritual of stress and struggle was a good idea?
This poignant, recurring tableau is more than just a personal struggle; it is a symptom of a deep and unresolved conflict at the heart of modern education.
The feeling of powerlessness in the face of a seemingly immutable requirement—homework—sparks a fundamental line of inquiry.
It transforms a personal moment of parental frustration into a catalyst for a much larger investigation.
This report embarks on that investigation, a forensic journey to uncover the truth behind a practice that affects millions of students, parents, and educators every day.
The central query is simple, yet its answer is profoundly complex: Who, exactly, is responsible for homework, and what was their original purpose? The search for an answer will lead not to a single culprit, but through a tangled history of myths, social engineering, geopolitical fear, and a system whose origins have been long forgotten but whose legacy endures in the very fabric of our schools.
Part I: Chasing a Ghost – The Myth of Roberto Nevilis
The Obvious Suspect
Any modern investigation into the origins of homework begins, as most do, with a simple internet search.
The results are swift and seemingly conclusive, pointing to a single individual: Roberto Nevilis, an Italian teacher from Venice.1
The story, repeated across countless websites, blogs, and even classroom presentations, is compelling in its simplicity.
Depending on the source, in either 1905 or, more improbably, 1095, Nevilis grew frustrated with his students’ lack of understanding or discipline.1
As a form of punishment to correct their laziness, he devised a new tool: assigning work to be completed at home.3
In more charitable versions of the tale, his motive was less punitive and more pedagogical; he wanted to help students retain the lessons taught in class and practice their skills independently.5
This teaching technique, the story goes, then spread throughout Europe and eventually to North America, becoming the global institution we know today.
Unraveling the Myth
At first glance, Nevilis appears to be the clear answer, the single inventor responsible for generations of after-school toil.
However, a closer examination of the evidence reveals critical inconsistencies that cause the entire narrative to collapse.
The case against Roberto Nevilis is built on a foundation of historical contradictions and a complete lack of verifiable proof.
First and foremost, there is no credible historical evidence that Roberto Nevilis ever existed.8
Historians, educators, and fact-checkers have scoured records and found no documentation of a Venetian teacher by that name who played any role in educational reform.
He is, by all scholarly accounts, an internet myth—a piece of digital folklore that has achieved the status of fact through sheer repetition.5
Beyond the lack of personal documentation, the timeline of the myth does not align with the documented history of homework.
The practice of assigning work to be done outside of class predates 1905 by centuries, if not millennia.2
More damningly, the story of homework’s invention in 1905 clashes with events that were already unfolding in the United States.
In 1901, the state of California, responding to a powerful anti-homework movement, passed a law that effectively banned the practice for all students under the age of 15.8
It is historically impossible for Nevilis to have “invented” homework in Europe in 1905 when it was already so prevalent in America that it had provoked a legislative backlash years earlier.
The ghost of Roberto Nevilis, the convenient villain of our story, vanishes under the faintest light of scrutiny.
The Scapegoat Phenomenon
The search for a single inventor leads to a dead end, but this failure is itself a crucial piece of evidence.
The persistence of the Roberto Nevilis myth is not merely an error of fact; it is a psychological phenomenon that reveals a deep societal need.
It is far more comforting to direct our collective frustration at a single, misguided teacher from a bygone era than to confront the unsettling reality that homework, in its modern, compulsory form, is the product of large-scale, impersonal forces: state-building, industrial capitalism, and geopolitical anxiety.
The myth provides a simple narrative with a clear antagonist, a story that is emotionally satisfying and allows for a neat assignment of blame.
The truth, as the investigation will show, is far more complex and disturbing.
It forces a critical examination of the very foundations of our public education system, a system built not just to enlighten, but also to control.
The Nevilis myth, therefore, functions as a narrative shield, a convenient scapegoat that protects us from a more profound and uncomfortable history.
Its enduring power is a testament to our collective reluctance to face the true, systemic origins of the institution we have inherited.
The easy answer is a fabrication; the real story is buried deeper.
Part II: The Factory’s Shadow – Forging a Compliant Mind
The Real Precursors
With the ghost of Roberto Nevilis exorcised, the investigation turns to the documented historical record.
The core idea of learning outside of formal instruction is, of course, ancient.
In the first century AD, the Roman orator and teacher Pliny the Younger encouraged his students to practice their public speaking skills at home to build confidence and fluency.2
Medieval monks spent countless hours outside of formal lessons memorizing chants and texts.8
These early examples, however, bear little resemblance to the standardized, compulsory homework of the modern era.
They were forms of self-study or practice, not systemic requirements imposed by a centralized authority.
To find the true ancestor of modern homework, the trail leads not to ancient Rome, but to 19th-century Prussia.
The Prussian Connection
In the early 19th century, in the wake of Napoleon’s defeat, German philosopher Johann Gottlieb Fichte became a key architect of a new form of state-controlled education.2
He helped develop the
Volksschulen (People’s Schools), a mandatory, government-provided system.
Fichte’s primary goal was not academic enlightenment in the liberal sense; it was a nationalistic project designed to forge a unified German identity and demonstrate the power and reach of a centralized state.2
Within this system, homework became a mandatory tool.
Its purpose was explicit: to extend the authority of the state beyond the classroom and into the private sphere of the family home.3
It was an instrument of discipline and a means of ensuring that the values of the state were being reinforced even during a child’s personal time.
This was a radical shift.
Homework was no longer just about practicing a skill; it was about instilling obedience and demonstrating the state’s power over the individual.7
The Industrial Revolution’s Influence
The Prussian model of education, with its emphasis on discipline and conformity, emerged at the precise historical moment when a new economic order was taking shape: the Industrial Revolution.
Factories required a fundamentally new type of worker, one starkly different from the agrarian or artisanal laborer.
This new workforce needed to be punctual, docile, sober, and tolerant of long, grueling hours performing repetitive tasks.14
To meet this demand, a new model of schooling arose, one that mirrored the factory itself.
This “factory model” of education, which became dominant in the 19th century, was characterized by its rigid structure: students grouped by age, bells signaling the start and end of periods, a standardized curriculum, and an emphasis on rote memorization and obedience.14
The goal was to produce a compliant and disciplined workforce.
As one educational vision funded by industrialist John d+. Rockefeller stated, “We shall not try to make these people or their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science…
we will organize our children into a little community and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way”.17
Homework was a natural and essential extension of this factory model.
It habituated children to the idea that their time was not their own, that work followed them home, and that compliance with authority was a constant requirement.
It was the perfect tool for practicing the behavioral traits—punctuality, obedience, repetitive work—that were the “covert curriculum” of industrial-era schooling.15
The American Importer: Horace Mann
The final link in the chain connecting the Prussian model to American classrooms is Horace Mann.
Often celebrated as the “Father of American Public Education,” Mann was an influential 19th-century educational reformer.12
During a trip to Prussia in the 1840s, he was deeply impressed by the efficiency and structure of the
Volksschulen.2
Believing it to be a superior system, he championed its adoption in the United States.
Mann’s advocacy was instrumental in bringing the Prussian model—including its system of mandatory, state-sanctioned homework—to America, where it quickly took root and spread across the rapidly industrializing nation.2
The Original Sin of Homework
This historical lineage reveals a profound and troubling truth.
The foundational “why” of modern, compulsory homework was not to foster creativity, critical thinking, or a lifelong love of learning.
Its purpose, embedded in its very DNA, was to instill behavioral traits deemed necessary for a specific economic and political order: compliance, discipline, and obedience to an external authority.
This represents the “original sin” of homework.
This origin explains why, even today, so much of it feels like meaningless “busy work”.19
The system’s default setting, inherited from its 19th-century creators, is for standardization and quantity, not personalization and quality.
A fundamental contradiction was thus born: we are now using a tool designed to create compliant factory workers with the modern expectation that it will somehow produce innovative, creative, and critical thinkers.
The reason homework so often fails to be inspiring is that it was never designed to be.
Its core structure is rooted in a philosophy of control, not intellectual liberation, a contradiction that continues to plague our educational system to this day.
Part III: A Century of Conflict – Homework on Trial
The introduction of factory-model homework into American schools was not a quiet affair.
For over a century, its role and value have been the subject of a fierce and cyclical debate.
The history of homework in the 20th century can be viewed as a dramatic courtroom trial, with public opinion acting as a swinging pendulum, pushed back and forth by the prevailing social and political anxieties of the era.
Prosecution 1: The People vs. Homework (1900-1940s)
At the dawn of the 20th century, a powerful grassroots movement rose up to challenge the legitimacy of homework.
The crusade was famously spearheaded by Edward Bok, the influential editor of the Ladies’ Home Journal.
In a fiery 1900 article titled “A National Crime at the Feet of Parents,” Bok laid out the prosecution’s case.11
The charges were threefold.
First, homework was accused of being a grave threat to children’s physical and mental health.
Drawing on the work of progressive psychologists, Bok and his supporters argued that after-school study interfered with a child’s natural need for play and fresh air, leading to “overwork” that could permanently damage their developing bodies and minds.11
Second, homework was seen as a “rank injustice” that robbed children of their childhood.20
Third, and perhaps most powerfully, it was condemned as an imperialistic intrusion by the school into the sanctity of the family home, usurping the right of parents to control their children’s time and activities.21
As legal cases from the era show, some parents viewed homework as the state attempting to “wrest control of education, and of children’s lives generally, from parents”.21
The verdict from the public was swift and decisive.
Bok’s magazine was flooded with letters of support from parents, teachers, and physicians.20
The anti-homework crusade gained national momentum, leading numerous school districts, from San Francisco to Washington, d+.C., to pass regulations restricting or abolishing the practice.21
The movement’s greatest victory came in 1901, when the California legislature passed a statewide law prohibiting homework for any student in grades K-8.5
During this period, a more moderate faction of progressive educators argued not for abolition, but for reform.
They envisioned a new kind of creative homework that would connect school to life, suggesting assignments like visiting museums, building scrapbooks, helping with the family budget, or conducting field trips to local factories.20
Prosecution 2: The State vs. Complacency (1950s-1980s)
For the first half of the century, the anti-homework sentiment held sway.
But in the 1950s, the pendulum of public opinion swung violently in the opposite direction, driven by the anxieties of the Cold War.
The inciting incident was the Soviet Union’s successful launch of the Sputnik satellite in 1957.13
A wave of national panic swept the United States.
The country’s technological and military superiority was suddenly in doubt, and the American education system became a primary scapegoat.
A new prosecution began, this time with the state charging its own citizens with complacency.
American students were portrayed as soft, lazy, and intellectually unprepared to compete with their disciplined Russian counterparts.8
Homework was no longer a domestic issue of child welfare; it was recast as a critical tool for national security.
The debate shifted from protecting childhood to winning the Cold War.
Rigor, discipline, and sheer quantity of work became paramount.
The anti-homework arguments of the previous generation were dismissed as dangerously permissive and anti-intellectual.22
This pro-homework consensus was solidified in 1983 with the publication of the landmark government report, A Nation at Risk.
It warned of a “rising tide of mediocrity” in American schools and explicitly championed more homework as a key solution to bolster academic achievement and national competitiveness.19
The pendulum had completed its swing, and a heavy homework load became, once again, the national norm.
Homework as a Cultural Barometer
These dramatic historical shifts reveal that the debate over homework has rarely been about pedagogy alone.
It functions as a sensitive cultural barometer, a proxy war for the deepest anxieties and values of a given era.
The arguments used to attack or defend homework provide a clear window into what society fears and cherishes most at a particular moment in time.
In the Progressive Era, the debate was framed around the sanctity of childhood, the fear of industrialization’s impact on health, and the tension between the individual family and the growing power of the state.
These were the core anxieties of the time.
During the Cold War, the debate was dominated by fears of geopolitical competition and national decline.
Today, as the next section will explore, the debate is centered on a new set of anxieties: mental health, student well-being, and social equity.
The content of the arguments changes, but homework’s function as the tangible point of contact between the abstract fears of the adult world and the daily lives of children remains constant.
Part IV: The Modern Crime Scene – Evidence from the Lab and the Home
The investigation now arrives in the 21st century, where the homework debate rages on, fueled by conflicting evidence from neuroscience, psychology, and sociology.
The modern “crime scene” is littered with contradictory clues.
On one hand, scientific research reveals homework’s immense potential as a learning tool.
On the other, data from homes and schools paints a grim picture of its real-world impact on student well-being and social equity.
To make sense of this complex evidence, it is useful to first lay out the arguments in a clear ledger.
Table 1: The Modern Homework Ledger: A Summary of Key Arguments
| The Case for Homework (PROS) | The Case Against Homework (CONS) |
| Improves Academic Achievement: Studies show a correlation between homework and higher grades, better standardized test scores, and increased likelihood of attending college.27 | Harms Mental & Physical Health: Identified as a primary source of student stress, leading to anxiety, sleep deprivation, headaches, exhaustion, and burnout.28 |
| Reinforces Classroom Learning: Helps solidify knowledge, as students typically retain only 50% of information from in-class instruction alone. It allows teachers to gauge student understanding.27 | Exacerbates Inequity (The “Homework Gap”): Disadvantages students who lack access to quiet study spaces, reliable internet, technology, or parental support, thus widening the achievement gap.27 |
| Develops Key Life Skills: Teaches crucial skills like time management, organization, responsibility, discipline, self-direction, and independent problem-solving.28 | Reduces Time for Essential Activities: Encroaches on time needed for play, exercise, family engagement, and hobbies, which are critical for holistic development and well-being.30 |
| Involves Parents in Learning: Creates a home-to-school connection, allowing parents to track what their children are learning, monitor progress, and identify potential learning disabilities early on.27 | Limited Effectiveness (Especially for Younger Students): Research shows little to no academic benefit for elementary students. For all ages, excessive homework leads to diminishing returns and can become counterproductive “busy work”.19 |
This table crystallizes the central conflict.
Homework is a tool with the theoretical potential to deliver significant benefits, but its practical application often results in substantial harm.
The following sections will examine the evidence behind this conflict in greater detail.
The Neurological Evidence (The Potential)
From a neuroscientific perspective, homework is not inherently good or bad; it is a potential delivery mechanism for learning strategies that are proven to build stronger, more durable memories.
The brain’s ability to learn is rooted in neuroplasticity—its capacity to form and reorganize synaptic connections in response to experience.33
Well-designed homework can powerfully harness this process.
The two most effective strategies that homework can facilitate are retrieval practice and spacing.
- Retrieval practice is the act of actively recalling information from memory, rather than passively rereading or reviewing it. For example, answering questions about a history chapter without looking at the book forces the brain to work harder to find and strengthen the relevant neural pathways. This process is far more effective for long-term retention than simply highlighting a textbook.31
- Spacing involves revisiting material at increasing intervals over time. Learning a math concept on Monday and then doing related homework problems on Tuesday and Thursday helps transfer that knowledge from fragile, short-term memory into robust, long-term memory through a process called memory consolidation.31 Sleep plays a vital role in this consolidation, suggesting that reviewing material before bed can enhance the process.33
In theory, homework is the perfect vehicle for applying these principles, training the brain to focus, solve problems, and build lasting knowledge.33
The Psychological & Physical Toll (The Reality)
While the neurological potential of homework is clear, the psychological reality for many students is dire.
The gap between what homework could be and what it is has created a public health issue.
A landmark study from Stanford University found that a majority of students in high-performing schools considered homework a primary source of stress.29
Multiple other studies confirm this, with over half of students citing homework as their main stressor.28
This stress is not a benign motivator; it is a corrosive force with documented physical and psychological consequences.
Researchers have directly linked excessive homework loads to a host of health problems, including chronic stress, sleep deprivation, persistent headaches, exhaustion, and stomach issues.29
The psychological toll is equally severe.
Students report that the sheer volume of work leads to burnout, emotional exhaustion, and a decline in their self-esteem and academic confidence.32
Perhaps most tragically, they are often forced to sacrifice balance in their lives, dropping extracurricular activities, hobbies, and time with friends and family just to keep up.29
The Social Injustice (The Unfairness)
Beyond the personal toll, the modern practice of homework functions as a powerful engine of social and educational inequity.
The concept of the “homework gap” refers to the chasm between students who have the resources to complete assignments successfully and those who do not.27
A one-size-fits-all homework policy does not create a level playing field; it tilts it dramatically in favor of the privileged.
Consider two students assigned the same online research project.
One goes home to a quiet bedroom with a personal laptop, high-speed internet, and a college-educated parent available to help.
The other goes home to a crowded apartment shared with multiple siblings, no reliable internet access, and parents who are working multiple jobs or may not have the educational background to assist.30
The assignment does not measure the students’ intelligence or effort; it measures their socioeconomic status.
By design, it rewards the privileged student and penalizes the disadvantaged one, widening the very achievement gap it is theoretically meant to close.27
The Systemic Contradiction
This brings the investigation to its central, modern conclusion.
The crisis of homework is defined by a systemic contradiction: the method of its assignment, a relic of the factory model, is actively preventing the science of learning from taking place.
The legacy of prioritizing quantity, standardization, and compliance is in direct opposition to the principles of purposeful, personalized, and brain-based practice that neuroscience proves are essential for effective learning.
The science demands quality, but the system defaults to volume.
The science requires personalization, but the system enforces standardization.
This mismatch explains why a theoretically powerful tool has become, for so many, a source of stress, anxiety, and inequity.
We are not simply “doing homework wrong” on an individual basis.
We are operating within an inherited system that is structurally misaligned with the biological process of learning.
The problem is not just a series of bad assignments; it is a flawed and outdated philosophy of assignment that is causing demonstrable harm.
Conclusion: The Verdict and a Blueprint for the Future
The forensic investigation that began at a kitchen table ends not with the indictment of a single person, but of an entire system.
The ghost of Roberto Nevilis was a distraction.
The true culprit is an outdated educational philosophy, born of Prussian nationalism and forged in the factories of the Industrial Revolution, that we have allowed to persist out of sheer inertia.
The frustration and exhaustion felt by children and parents nightly are not individual failings but collective symptoms of this deep systemic dysfunction.
The verdict, therefore, is not simply to abolish homework.
To do so would be to discard a potentially powerful tool because we have been using it incorrectly.
The answer is to fundamentally reinvent it.
We must dismantle the factory model of homework—with its emphasis on compliance, volume, and standardization—and replace it with a modern, evidence-based approach that is purposeful, equitable, and aligned with the science of how human beings actually learn.
This requires a new blueprint for “smart homework,” one built on the following principles:
- Purposeful & Authentic: Assignments must have a clear learning goal that is transparent to the student. They should connect to the real world, asking students to solve practical problems, conduct interviews with family members, design inventions, or apply classroom concepts to their own lives.40
- Personalized & Choice-Driven: Whenever possible, students should be given agency. This can be achieved through “choice boards” that allow them to select from a menu of tasks, the freedom to design their own projects, or the simple but powerful option to read a book of their own choosing. Choice fosters intrinsic motivation, which is far more potent than external pressure.40
- Playful & Engaging: Learning should not be synonymous with drudgery. Homework can incorporate educational video games, project-based learning (like creating a podcast, a documentary, or a scrapbook), or kinesthetic activities that get students moving. Turning practice into a game increases engagement and retention.41
- Equitable & Mindful: The volume of homework must be strictly limited, following evidence-based guidelines like the “10-minute rule” (10 minutes per grade level per night).40 Educators must be acutely aware of the potential for inequity and design assignments that do not rely on resources (like technology or specific parental help) that may not be available to all students. Homework should never be used as a punishment.44
- Brain-Based: Above all, assignments must be intentionally designed to leverage the principles of neuroscience. Quality must always trump quantity. Tasks should be crafted to encourage spaced repetition and active retrieval practice, ensuring that the work students do at home is actually building durable, long-term knowledge.
Returning to the kitchen table, the scene is now viewed through a new lens.
The frustration has not vanished, but it has been replaced by clarity and a sense of agency.
The nightly struggle is no longer an isolated, personal problem to be endured.
It is a clear signal of a systemic failure that can be understood and, more importantly, addressed.
The fight is no longer about just getting through tonight’s worksheet.
It is about advocating for a better, more humane, and more effective future for our children—a future where the work they bring home finally serves the true purpose of education: to ignite curiosity, foster understanding, and build a genuine love of learning.
Works cited
- findmykids.org, accessed August 6, 2025, https://findmykids.org/blog/en/who-invented-homework#:~:text=If%20you’ve%20ever%20felt,the%20lessons%20taught%20during%20class.
- Who Invented Homework and Why | Studyfy – Studyfy.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://studyfy.com/blog/who-invented-homework-and-why
- To be or not to be homework…..just a perspective – International School of Schaffhausen, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.issh.ch/to-be-or-not-to-be-homework-just-a-perspective/
- Homework: what’s helpful and what isn’t – UFT, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.uft.org/news/building-your-career/new-teacher-articles/homework-whats-helpful-and-what-isnt
- Who Invented Homework: The Invention That Changed the Education System Completely, accessed August 6, 2025, https://prestoexperts.co.uk/who-invented-homework/
- Who Invented Homework – Why? Roberto Nevelis of Venice – The Student Helpline, accessed August 6, 2025, https://thestudenthelpline.io/blog/who-invented-homework-and-why.php
- Who Invented Homework? – Alchemy Tuition, accessed August 6, 2025, https://alchemytuition.com.au/who-invented-homework/
- Who Invented Homework? A Big Question Answered with Facts, accessed August 6, 2025, https://findmykids.org/blog/en/who-invented-homework
- Invention Of Homework | The Dr Binocs Show | Peekaboo Kidz – YouTube, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqOn1mO7ors&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
- Who Invented Homework and Why? A History of Students’ Daily Bread – NoteGPT, accessed August 6, 2025, https://notegpt.io/blog/who-invented-homework
- Homework in America – Brookings Institution, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/homework-in-america/
- Who invented school homework? – Greenlight, accessed August 6, 2025, https://greenlight.com/learning-center/fun-facts/who-invented-school-homework
- Is Homework an Antiquated Concept? – Psychology Today, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/raising-resilient-children/202508/is-homework-an-antiquated-concept
- The modern education system was designed to teach future factory …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://qz.com/1314814/universal-education-was-first-promoted-by-industrialists-who-wanted-docile-factory-workers
- The Ugly Truth About The Education System You Were Never Told – The Soul Jam, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.thesouljam.com/posts/the-ugly-truth-about-the-education-system-you-were-never-told
- Factory model school – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factory_model_school
- The Factory Model of Schooling – Mike Anderson Consulting, accessed August 6, 2025, https://leadinggreatlearning.com/the-factory-model-of-schooling/
- The Invented History of ‘The Factory Model of Education’ – Hack Education, accessed August 6, 2025, http://hackeducation.com/2015/04/25/factory-model
- Homework – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homework
- The history of parents complaining about how … – Slate Magazine, accessed August 6, 2025, https://slate.com/human-interest/2019/10/parents-complaining-about-homework-history.html
- Parents and the Politics of Homework: Some Historical Perspectives – Carnegie Mellon University, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/history/people/faculty/parents-and-politics-of-homework-some-historical-perspectives.pdf
- HISTORY OF HOMEWORK – SFGATE, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/HISTORY-OF-HOMEWORK-3053660.php
- The Surprising History of Homework Reform – JSTOR Daily, accessed August 6, 2025, https://daily.jstor.org/the-surprising-history-of-homework-reform/
- The Lost Cause of Homework Reform – The University of Chicago Press: Journals, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/444258
- Homework History – YouTube, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7cLX_-Um90
- A Nation at Rest: The American Way of Homework – Martin Luther College, accessed August 6, 2025, https://mlc-wels.edu/continuing-education/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2024/06/A-Nation-at-Rest.pdf
- Homework | Pros, Cons, Arguments, Debate, School, Education …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/procon/homework-debate
- The Pros and Cons of Homework – Oxford Learning, accessed August 6, 2025, https://oxfordlearning.com/the-pros-and-cons-of-homework/
- Health Hazards of Homework – Stanford Medicine Children’s Health Blog, accessed August 6, 2025, https://healthier.stanfordchildrens.org/en/health-hazards-homework/
- Homework: The Ongoing Debate of For or Against – Nannyjob blog, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.nannyjob.co.uk/blog/homework-the-ongoing-debate-of-for-or-against/
- Does homework work? The science of when and how to approach it …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.educationalneuroscience.org.uk/2025/02/04/does-homework-work-the-science-of-when-and-how-to-approach-it/
- How Homework Affects Students: The Pros And Cons | NSHSS, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.nshss.org/resources/blog/blog-posts/how-homework-affects-students-the-pros-and-cons/
- Is Homework Actually Useful? – Simple Studies, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.simplestudies.org/blog/is-homework-actually-useful
- Why Homework Should Be Banned: Reasons For and Against – EssayPro, accessed August 6, 2025, https://essaypro.com/blog/why-homework-should-be-banned
- Growing Brains, Nurturing Minds—Neuroscience as an Educational Tool to Support Students’ Development as Life-Long Learners – PubMed Central, accessed August 6, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9775149/
- Infographic: How Does Homework Actually Affect Students? -, accessed August 6, 2025, https://oxfordlearning.com/how-does-homework-affect-students/
- Homework’s Implications for the Well-Being of Primary School Pupils—Perceptions of Children, Parents, and Teachers – MDPI, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/10/996
- www.nshss.org, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.nshss.org/resources/blog/blog-posts/how-homework-affects-students-the-pros-and-cons/#:~:text=Negatively%20Impacts%20Mental%20Health&text=When%20students%20lack%20downtime%20to,self%2Desteem%20and%20academic%20confidence.
- The Pros and Cons of Homework – UoPeople, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.uopeople.edu/blog/the-pros-and-cons-of-homework/
- How to Help Students Be Successful With Homework – Walden University, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.waldenu.edu/online-bachelors-programs/bs-in-elementary-education/resource/how-to-help-students-be-successful-with-homework
- Innovative Assignment : 5 Must-Try Approaches for Teachers …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.upeducators.com/5-innovative-assignment-to-homework-and-assignments-every-teacher-must-use/
- 5 Alternatives to Homework | HMH, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.hmhco.com/blog/alternatives-to-homework-ideas
- 13 Fun Homework Ideas: The Best Ways To Make Homework Fun For Kids Quickly & Easily, accessed August 6, 2025, https://thirdspacelearning.com/us/blog/fun-homework-ideas/
- Homework | EEF, accessed August 6, 2025, https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/teaching-learning-toolkit/homework
