Table of Contents
Introduction: The Deathbed and the Fable
In the winter of 1324, as Marco Polo lay on his deathbed in his native Venice, he was surrounded by friends and family who were concerned not just for his health, but for his immortal soul.
They implored the dying man, then nearly 70, to retract the fantastical stories that filled his famous book.
To a world that could not conceive of his experiences, his tales of a distant, dazzling empire were surely fictions, dangerous lies that would stain his final confession.
Polo’s legendary response, however, was not a retraction but a defiant confirmation: “I did not tell half of what I saw”.1
This deathbed scene encapsulates the central tension of Marco Polo’s life and legacy: the vast, unbridgeable chasm between his lived reality and the world’s capacity to believe it.
His book, known as The Travels of Marco Polo, was given the nickname Il Milione (“The Million”).
The name was a double-edged sword, referring both to the “millions” of marvels he described and, more cynically, to the “million lies” his readers believed it contained.1
The controversy that began in his own lifetime has never truly ended, evolving into a complex scholarly debate that continues to this day.
This report seeks to understand not just what Marco Polo did, but why his account was so revolutionary, so controversial, and ultimately, so profoundly important that it reshaped the European imagination and redrew the map of the world.3
The skepticism that greeted his story was more than just doubt; it was a historical artifact in itself, revealing the constrained, insular worldview of 14th-century Europe.5
The immediate reaction was not one of academic curiosity but of visceral disbelief from a society whose fundamental understanding of the world was being assaulted.
Marco Polo’s greatest journey, it turns out, was not crossing the Gobi Desert, but the challenge of convincing his own civilization that the world was infinitely larger and more complex than it had ever imagined.
Part I: The World in a Venetian Lagoon: The Old Paradigm
To understand the shockwave of Marco Polo’s return, one must first understand the world he left behind.
Born around 1254, Marco was a product of the Republic of Venice, a city that was itself a state of mind.
It was a nexus of global commerce, a maritime power of immense wealth and prestige, yet its worldview was fundamentally anchored in a European and Christian-centric reality.7
The Polo family were prominent members of this world—wealthy merchants, the “movers and shakers” of their time, with established trading posts in Constantinople and along the Black Sea, the known fringes of the Latin world.7
Marco’s own upbringing was unusual.
His father, Niccolò, and his uncle, Maffeo, had departed on a trading expedition before he was even born.
They would not return until he was 15 years old.8
Raised first by his mother, who died when he was young, and then by extended family, Marco’s world was the bustling, cosmopolitan, yet ultimately parochial network of Venetian canals and markets.8
He was a child of the known world, steeped in its assumptions and limitations.
The European “map” of the East in the mid-13th century was a tapestry of myth, rumor, and fragmented reports.
There were accounts from earlier papal envoys like Giovanni da Pian del Carpini and William of Rubruck, who had made daring journeys to the Mongol capital but had not penetrated China itself.11
Beyond these limited reports, the East was a realm of legend: the fabled Christian king Prester John, a potential ally against the Saracens; monstrous races from classical lore; and unimaginable riches.12
It was a land of marvels and souls to be saved, but it was not conceived of as a place of sophisticated, secular governance or advanced technology that could rival, let alone surpass, Europe.
This was the old paradigm that the Polos’ journey would shatter.
Critically, the epic journey that would change history began not as a grand mission of exploration, but as a business trip gone awry.
Niccolò and Maffeo’s first venture was a commercial one that took them deep into Mongol territory.
When a war broke out between rival Mongol khans, their route back to Venice was blocked.8
Faced with a choice between waiting out the conflict or pushing forward, they made the pragmatic merchant’s decision and traveled deeper into the unknown, moving southeast until they found themselves, unexpectedly, at the court of the most powerful man in the world: Kublai Khan.
This accidental nature of their first encounter is key; it grounds the fantastical story in the very real, practical world of Venetian commerce.
It was a series of calculated risks and geopolitical accidents that transformed a trading venture into a world-changing odyssey.
Part II: The Unraveling of the Known World: A Journey to the Sunrise (1271-1275)
In 1271, two years after his father and uncle’s return, a 17-year-old Marco Polo joined them for the return voyage to the East.
This time, they were not just merchants but also emissaries, carrying letters from the newly elected Pope Gregory X for the Great Khan.14
The grueling overland journey that followed would take nearly four years and serve as a systematic deconstruction of the medieval European map, replacing myth with a complex, tangible, and often brutal reality with every league traveled.
Their route was an epic in itself.
From Venice, they sailed to Acre in the Holy Land, then traveled overland through the mountains of Armenia, the deserts of Persia, and the highlands of Afghanistan, eventually reaching the formidable Pamir Mountains, the “roof of the world”.7
The journey was fraught with peril.
Marco contracted an illness that forced the party to recuperate in the mountains of Badakhshān for a year.15
They crossed desolate landscapes like the Gobi Desert, where Marco noted there was “nothing at all to eat”.7
This monumental undertaking was only possible because of the Pax Mongolica, the “Mongol Peace.” The Mongol Empire’s unification of much of Asia had brought a measure of stability and security to the ancient Silk Road, which had been perilous for centuries.8
The Polos traveled with a special passport from Kublai Khan—a golden tablet, or
paiza—that commanded all subjects of the empire to provide them with safe passage, lodging, and fresh horses.10
This small artifact was a symbol of the immense, organized power of the empire they were entering, a level of centralized authority unimaginable in the fragmented feudal kingdoms of Europe.
Along this path, the young Venetian was immersed in a stunning tapestry of cultures and faiths.
He encountered not only Muslims, whom Europeans knew as adversaries, but also Nestorian Christians, Buddhists, Zoroastrians, and Manichaeans.12
For a boy raised in the singular faith of Catholic Venice, this journey was a profound education in the world’s diversity, systematically unraveling the simplistic religious geography of his homeland.
By the time the Polos finally arrived at Kublai Khan’s summer palace in Shangdu in 1275, Marco was no longer just a Venetian; he was a man whose entire conception of the world had been remade.
| Table 1: Chronology of the Polo Expedition (1271-1295) |
| Date |
| 1271 |
| 1272 |
| 1272-1274 |
| 1275 |
| 1275-1292 |
| 1292-1295 |
| 1295 |
Part III: A New Paradigm of Empire: In the Service of the Great Khan (1275-1292)
For the next 17 years, Marco Polo was not a tourist in a foreign land; he was an integrated part of the Mongol administration.
This period forms the heart of his story, where he witnessed a “new paradigm” of civilization that would form the basis of his revolutionary book.
Kublai Khan, grandson of Genghis Khan and emperor of the vast Yuan Dynasty, was impressed by the young foreigner’s intelligence, humility, and keen powers of observation.10
Marco had a talent for languages, quickly learning the dialects needed for his work (though likely not complex written Chinese).1
The Khan appointed Marco as his foreign emissary, a role that fit perfectly with Mongol administrative strategy.
Wary of giving too much power to their recently conquered Chinese subjects, the Mongol rulers frequently employed foreigners—Persians, Arabs, Turks, and now Europeans—in positions of trust.1
In this capacity, Marco was dispatched on fact-finding missions to the farthest reaches of the empire, from the southwestern province of Yunnan to the borders of modern-day Myanmar, tasked with reporting back to the Khan on the customs, governance, and resources of these lands.1
Some versions of his story even claim he served for three years as a tax official or governor of the city of Yangzhou, though this remains one of the most contentious points of his account.9
What Marco observed and later reported was a civilization operating with technologies and systems far in advance of anything in Europe.
His descriptions were not those of a philosopher or poet, but of a pragmatic merchant and administrator, focused on the mechanics of power and commerce.
- An Engine of Commerce: He was astonished by the concept of paper money. He described in detail how the Khan’s mint used the bark of mulberry trees to create paper notes, which were then stamped with the imperial seal and circulated as legal tender. He understood it was a state-controlled fiat currency, noting that counterfeiting was a capital offense.10 He also reported on the widespread use of
coal, describing how the Chinese burned “black stones” for fuel, a cheap and abundant energy source virtually unknown in Europe.18 His account of the state’s
salt monopoly, detailing how revenue was generated from brine wells in specific provinces, is so precise that it has been corroborated by obscure Chinese administrative records from the period.5 - The Veins of Empire: Marco marveled at the Mongol postal system, or yamb. He described a vast network of post-houses stationed every 25 to 30 miles along the empire’s major roads. These stations were stocked with over 200,000 fresh horses, allowing imperial messengers to travel at incredible speeds, covering up to 250 miles a day. This logistical and communications network was the nervous system of the empire, a level of infrastructure Europe would not achieve for centuries.18
- The Fabric of Society: He depicted Chinese cities as wonders of urban planning and wealth. He was especially captivated by “Quinsay” (modern Hangzhou), which he called the finest and noblest city in the world. He described its 12,000 bridges spanning a network of canals, its elegantly paved streets, its bustling markets, and the refined, peaceful character of its inhabitants.9
The very pattern of what Marco Polo chose to report reveals his professional identity.
His detailed observations center on currency, commodities, infrastructure, and governance—the precise concerns of a merchant and state official.
The famous “omissions” from his book, such as tea drinking, foot-binding, or calligraphy, were cultural practices with little direct relevance to his administrative duties or commercial interests.
He was not writing a comprehensive ethnography; he was reporting on the operational mechanics of the world’s most powerful and sophisticated empire through the lens of a pragmatic Venetian.
This perspective is the key to understanding both the remarkable strengths and the puzzling weaknesses of his account.
Part IV: The Prophet in Chains: The Making of The Travels (1295-1299)
After 24 years abroad, the Polos finally returned to Venice in 1295, laden with riches.
They were strangers in their own home, their identities so changed that they struggled to convince relatives of who they were.
The irony of Marco’s life, however, was just beginning.
Soon after his return, Venice went to war with its maritime rival, Genoa.
Marco, now a wealthy man, equipped a galley and joined the fight, only to be captured in a naval skirmish around 1298 and thrown into a Genoese prison.14
It was here, in the confinement of a prison cell, that the world’s greatest travelogue was born.
His cellmate was a man named Rustichello da Pisa (also Rusticiano).9
This was a fateful pairing.
Rustichello was not a historian, a scholar, or a simple scribe; he was a professional writer of chivalric romances, best known for his works on the legends of King Arthur.23
To pass the time, Marco dictated the story of his life’s journey, likely from a combination of memory and written notes he had managed to keep.
Rustichello wrote it all down, not in Italian or Latin, but in Franco-Italian, a literary language popular for courtly tales at the time.22
The result was a manuscript titled
Divisament du monde, or Description of the World.24
This process of creation is central to the entire Polo controversy.
No original manuscript of their collaboration survives.
Today, the book exists in approximately 140 to 150 different manuscript versions, copied and translated by hand over centuries.6
These versions often differ significantly, with scribes adding, removing, or altering passages to suit their own tastes or those of their patrons.
This textual instability makes it impossible to know with certainty what Marco originally dictated.
The collaboration with Rustichello was both a blessing and a curse for Polo’s legacy.
Rustichello’s narrative skill undoubtedly shaped the raw material of Marco’s memories into a compelling story that became a medieval bestseller.
He knew how to capture the reader’s imagination.
However, his professional instinct was to write romances, not factual reports.
Scholars have noted that the book’s style is characteristic of Rustichello’s other works and that he likely added “fantastic and romantic elements” to make the tale more exciting.2
The very medium threatened to undermine the message.
Marco Polo’s unprecedented, factual account of a real-world empire was packaged in the literary genre of fantasy and adventure.
This created a credibility problem from the moment of its publication, ensuring that the man who saw the world’s greatest wonders would be forever known to many as the man who told the world’s greatest lies.
Part V: The Great Controversy: Eyewitness or Impostor?
The debate over the authenticity of Marco Polo’s journey, which began on his deathbed, has evolved into one of history’s most fascinating scholarly controversies.
The case can be examined as if in a courtroom, with compelling arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defense.
The case for the prosecution, arguing that Polo was an impostor, was most famously articulated in the 20th century by the sinologist Frances Wood.
The arguments are powerful and direct:
- The Glaring Omissions: The most damning evidence is what Polo fails to mention. How could a man spend 17 years in China and not write about the Great Wall, the universal custom of tea drinking, the use of chopsticks, the unique art of calligraphy, or the shocking practice of foot-binding among elite women? To skeptics, these omissions are inconceivable for a genuine eyewitness.26
- Factual Errors and False Claims: The book contains demonstrable inaccuracies. Polo’s description of the Lugou Bridge outside Beijing states it has 24 arches, when it has never had more than 13.26 He takes credit for providing the Mongols with siege engines for the capture of the city of Xiangyang, a siege that had concluded a year before he even arrived in China.26
- Linguistic Evidence: Polo uses Persian and Turkic terms for Chinese places and titles, rather than the native Chinese or Mongol words. This suggests his knowledge was second-hand, likely gleaned from Persian guidebooks and merchants he met on the Black Sea.13
- The Argument from Silence: Despite the Yuan Dynasty’s meticulous and extensive record-keeping, there is no mention of a Marco Polo, his father, or his uncle in any surviving Chinese or Mongol document.5
- The Verdict of Skeptics: Based on this evidence, Wood and others conclude that Polo was a brilliant fraud who likely never traveled much beyond his family’s trading posts in Constantinople and the Black Sea. They argue The Travels is a masterful compilation of stories he heard from other travelers, woven into a compelling first-person narrative.26
The defense, however, presents an equally compelling case, arguing that these criticisms arise from a misunderstanding of Polo’s context.
- Explaining the Omissions: Polan scholars argue the omissions are logical. The Great Wall we know today is a 16th-century Ming Dynasty construction; the wall of Polo’s time was a series of older, dilapidated earthen ramparts that may not have seemed noteworthy.27 Furthermore, Polo was an official in the
Mongol court. The ruling Mongols did not bind their feet, often preferred their traditional fermented mare’s milk (kumis) to tea, and used knives at meals. His world was that of the Mongol elite, not the broader Han Chinese culture.29 - Unfakable Specificity: The strongest evidence for his authenticity lies in details so specific they would have been impossible to fake. His account of the use of cowry shells as currency is accurate, but he correctly notes their use specifically in the distant southern province of Yunnan, a detail confirmed by Chinese sources but unlikely to be known to a Persian merchant.5 His technical descriptions of salt production methods and state revenues in particular regions are remarkably precise.5 His detailed report on the manufacture and circulation of paper money is considered the best and most comprehensive account from that era in any language.30
- The Name Game: The absence of his name in Chinese records is not surprising. He would have been given a Chinese or Mongol name for official purposes, and since we do not know what that name was, it is impossible to search for it. The concept of a fixed, inherited surname was not as rigid as it is today.31
- The Verdict of the Defense: Scholars like Igor de Rachewiltz and Stephen Haw concede that Polo clearly exaggerated his own importance (as with the Xiangyang siege). However, they argue that the sheer weight of obscure, accurate, and verifiable details provides overwhelming proof that he must have been to China. No second-hand account could have contained such precise information.29
| Table 2: The Polo Debate – A Summary of Arguments |
| Argument Against Authenticity (Skepticism) |
| Fails to mention the Great Wall.26 |
| Omits tea, chopsticks, and foot-binding.26 |
| No mention of “Marco Polo” in vast Chinese records.5 |
| Uses Persian place-names, suggesting Persian sources.13 |
| Contains factual errors and self-aggrandizing claims (e.g., Xiangyang siege).26 |
| Overall Thesis: The book is a second-hand account based on Persian sources.26 |
Part VI: The Million Truths: The Enduring Legacy of Marco Polo
Ultimately, the fierce debate over the factual minutiae of Marco Polo’s account can obscure a larger, undeniable historical truth: the book’s impact was monumental.
Whether a perfectly accurate record or a flawed masterpiece of memory and embellishment, The Travels of Marco Polo fundamentally altered the trajectory of Western history.
His “million lies” contained more than enough truth to redraw the world.
First, the book redrew the mental map of Europe.
It was one of the first widely circulated works to provide a comprehensive, secular, and detailed description of the East.
It replaced a world of monsters and myths with a vision of a real, sprawling, and staggeringly wealthy civilization.4
This new geographic and cultural information began to seep into the work of European cartographers.
The famed Catalan Atlas of 1375 was one of the first major maps to incorporate names and locations from Polo’s account, giving tangible form to his descriptions.2
Second, Polo’s vivid descriptions of immense riches—spices in the Indies, silks and porcelains in Cathay, palaces roofed in gold—provided a powerful economic incentive that helped ignite the Age of Discovery.
His book became a manual for the ambitious and the adventurous, a treasure map for a Europe hungry for new trade routes and new sources of wealth.3
The most direct and consequential piece of this legacy was his influence on Christopher Columbus.
It is a documented fact that Columbus owned a copy of The Travels, which he annotated heavily.33
His dream of reaching the East by sailing west was predicated on Polo’s geographical data.
Polo’s descriptions, combined with other contemporary theories, led Columbus to drastically underestimate the Earth’s circumference and believe that the fabled shores of Cipangu (Japan) and Cathay (China) were only a few thousand miles west of Europe.
When Columbus set sail in 1492, he carried Polo’s book with him, fully expecting to meet the descendants of the Great Khan.34
This reveals the ultimate irony and importance of Marco Polo’s legacy.
He was not a perfect historian, but he was a powerful catalyst.
His book was a flawed but uniquely potent data set.
When this data—a mixture of incredible truths and significant errors—was fed into the ambitious, commercially driven engine of Renaissance Europe, it produced the Age of Discovery.
In a very real sense, the mistakes in his book were as influential as its truths.
Had Polo’s geographical account been perfectly accurate, Columbus might have concluded the ocean was too vast to cross and never set sail.
It was the irresistible combination of Polo’s true stories of wealth and his false geography that made the voyage seem not only desirable but feasible.
In this way, the Venetian merchant’s “fables” became a necessary precondition for the European encounter with the Americas, proving that sometimes, it is the stories we can’t quite believe that change the world forever.
Works cited
- Marco Polo – Explorer, China, Silk Road | Britannica, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Marco-Polo/Sojourn-in-China
- The Travels of Marco Polo – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Travels_of_Marco_Polo
- www.ebsco.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/travels-marco-polo#:~:text=Polo’s%20book%20is%20responsible%20for,until%20the%20late%20nineteenth%20century.
- Marco Polo and His Journey Through the Orient | Venezianico, accessed August 6, 2025, https://us.venezianico.com/blogs/news/marco-polo-and-his-journey-through-the-orient
- Marco Polo Was in China: New Evidence from Currencies, Salts and Revenues – Reviews in History, accessed August 6, 2025, https://reviews.history.ac.uk/review/1667/print/
- Marco Polo: The travel writer who shocked medieval Europe, accessed August 6, 2025, https://cmrs.ucla.edu/news/marco-polo-the-travel-writer-who-shocked-medieval-europe/
- Marco Polo: Facts, Biography & Travels | Live Science, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.livescience.com/27513-marco-polo.html
- Marco Polo | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/biography/marco-polo
- Marco Polo – History.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.history.com/articles/marco-polo
- READ: Marco Polo (article) | Khan Academy, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/big-history-project/expansion-interconnection/exploration-interconnection/a/marco-polo
- Marco Polo and His Travels – Silkroad Foundation, accessed August 6, 2025, http://www.silkroadfoundation.org/artl/marcopolo.shtml
- The Travels of Marco Polo by Marco Polo | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/travels-marco-polo-marco-polo
- Did Marco Polo Go to China? (review) – Project MUSE, accessed August 6, 2025, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/179197/summary
- Marco Polo – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Polo
- Marco Polo | Biography, Accomplishments, Facts, Travels, & Influence | Britannica, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Marco-Polo
- Timeline: Marco Polo – World History Encyclopedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.worldhistory.org/timeline/Marco_Polo/
- Marco Polo – Heritage History, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=resources&s=char-dir&f=polo
- Marco Polo – World History Encyclopedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.worldhistory.org/Marco_Polo/
- Marco Polo – the man who brought China to Europe | Europeana, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.europeana.eu/stories/marco-polo-the-man-who-brought-china-to-europe
- Marco Polo in China (1271-1295) – Mongols in World History | Asia for Educators, accessed August 6, 2025, https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/mongols/pop/menu/class_marco.htm
- Marco Polo – Ages of Exploration, accessed August 6, 2025, https://exploration.marinersmuseum.org/subject/marco-polo/
- The Travels of Marco Polo – World Literature – NOVA Open Publishing, accessed August 6, 2025, https://pressbooks.nvcc.edu/eng255/chapter/the-travels-of-marco-polo/
- Rustichello da Pisa – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rustichello_da_Pisa
- The Travels of Marco Polo. | Library of Congress, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.loc.gov/item/2021668052/
- Authenticity in Marco Polo’s Story and in Honors Student Research: An Aside from the Early Renaissance – UNL Digital Commons, accessed August 6, 2025, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1069&context=nchcjournal
- Debunking the Myth: Did Marco Polo Go to China? – Association for Asian Studies, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/debunking-the-myth-did-marco-polo-go-to-china/
- Expedition Magazine | Marco Polo’s Travels: Myth or Fact? – Penn Museum, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.penn.museum/sites/expedition/marco-polos-travels-myth-or-fact/
- Did Marco Polo go to China, accessed August 6, 2025, https://rhs.rocklinusd.org/subsites/AP-World-History/documents/600-1450/Did-Marco-Polo-go-to-China.pdf
- Did Marco Polo Really Go To China? – Mongols in World History | Asia for Educators, accessed August 6, 2025, https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/mongols/pop/polo/mp_essay.htm
- An update on the Marco Polo problem – Frog in a Well, accessed August 6, 2025, https://froginawell.net/frog/2016/11/an-update-on-the-marco-polo-problem/
- Did Marco Polo Go to China? – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Did_Marco_Polo_Go_to_China%3F
- How Did Marco Polo Influence Columbus – 2318 Words – Cram, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.cram.com/essay/Marco-Polo-And-Christopher-Columbus/F3LV7H9G6E45
- Marco Polo’s Influence on Christopher Columbus… – 2145 Words …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Marco-Polos-Influence-on-Christopher-Columbus-P3H9D34KRZZA
- Marco Polo’s Travels – World History Commons, accessed August 6, 2025, https://worldhistorycommons.org/marco-polos-travels
- Voyages of Christopher Columbus – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyages_of_Christopher_Columbus
