Table of Contents
Part I: The Monolith Myth – A Personal Crisis in Branding
There’s a certain purity to the monolith.
In the world of brand strategy, where I’ve spent my entire career, the monolith is the holy grail.
It’s the idea of a single, perfect, unassailable logo that represents everything a company is and aspires to be.
For years, I didn’t just believe in this theory; I preached it.
My bible was written in swoosh.
Nike’s iconic mark was, to me, the pinnacle of branding achievement—a symbol so potent it needed no name, a testament to the power of singular focus.1
It stood for victory, for innovation, for the heroic ideal of the athlete.
It was one brand, one voice, one symbol.
It was perfect.
This conviction, so clear and powerful in theory, led directly to the most humbling failure of my professional life.
The client was a fascinating, if challenging, conglomerate.
One division manufactured high-torque, industrial-grade power tools—rugged, reliable equipment sold to contractors and construction firms.
The other developed sleek, minimalist consumer electronics—high-end headphones and smart home devices sold to a design-conscious urban audience.
They came to me with a classic problem: a fractured identity.
They wanted to unify, to present a single, powerful face to the world.
And I, the zealous advocate for the monolith, had the answer.
I spent weeks developing the perfect unified logo.
It was a masterclass in compromise, a sleek, geometric mark that tried to be both strong and sophisticated.
I presented it with the passion of a true believer.
This, I argued, was their swoosh.
This was the symbol that would bridge their two worlds, creating a powerful parent brand that would elevate all their products.
The board was convinced.
The rollout was expensive and comprehensive.
And it was a catastrophe.
The industrial clients, the ones with calloused hands and a need for no-nonsense reliability, found the new logo too slick, too “corporate.” It felt alien, lacking the grit they associated with their tools.
On the other side, the tech-savvy consumers found it cold and generic, devoid of the personality and style they craved from their electronics brands.
The logo that was meant to please everyone ended up resonating with no one.
Sales dipped.
Internal teams, once proud of their distinct divisional identities, were now confused and demoralized.
The brand I was hired to strengthen had become a ghost, a vague entity haunting two disparate product lines.
The failure was absolute, and it shattered my core belief system.
The monolith wasn’t a universal truth; it was just one answer to one type of question.
My client, I realized too late, was asking a much more complex question, and I had given them a tragically simple answer.
Part II: The Urban Planning Epiphany – Discovering a New Blueprint for Brands
The fallout from that project sent me into a period of intense professional introspection.
My confidence was shaken, and my playbook felt obsolete.
I started looking for answers beyond the polished case studies and branding textbooks that lined my shelves.
I needed a new way to think about complex, multifaceted organizations.
The world was full of them, yet our industry’s default solution seemed to be a forced, often painful, unification.
The epiphany didn’t come from a marketing guru or a business seminar.
It came, unexpectedly, from a book on urban planning.
As I read about the structure of great cities, a powerful new metaphor began to take shape in my mind.
A city isn’t a single, uniform building.
A truly great city—a London, a Tokyo, a New York—is a living, breathing system of distinct districts, each with its own unique character, architecture, and population, yet all connected by a shared infrastructure and a unifying identity.3
There’s the financial district, with its gleaming skyscrapers and population of suited professionals.
There’s the historic quarter, with its cobblestone streets, preserved architecture, and appeal to tourists and history buffs.
There are bohemian arts districts, bustling market areas, quiet residential neighborhoods, and high-tech industrial parks.
Each district serves a different purpose and a different population.
You wouldn’t build a skyscraper in the middle of a historic village, nor would you expect a quiet suburban family to thrive in the heart of the financial district.
A city’s strength lies in its diversity, in its ability to be many things to many people at once.
This was it.
This was the model I had been missing.
I began to map the concepts of urban planning onto the principles of brand architecture:
- The Metropolis: The parent company (e.g., Adidas AG).
- The Districts: The major product divisions or sub-brands (e.g., Performance, Lifestyle).
- The Citizens: The specific target audiences for each district (e.g., athletes, fashionistas, casual consumers).
- The Architecture & Vibe: The unique logo, messaging, and product design of each district.
- The Unifying Infrastructure: The core brand DNA, values, and visual motifs that connect all the districts, like a city’s road network, power grid, and water supply.
Suddenly, I understood.
Some companies aren’t meant to be a single, perfect monument like Nike.
They are meant to be a sprawling, dynamic metropolis.
My mistake with my client had been a failure of urban planning; I had tried to force two completely different districts into a single, generic architectural style, and in doing so, had destroyed the character of both.
Armed with this new framework, I saw the branding world with fresh eyes.
And the most brilliant and successful example of a “Brand Metropolis” wasn’t a niche company or an academic theory—it was one of the biggest players in the world: Adidas.
Its seemingly confusing collection of logos was not a sign of a fractured identity.
It was a deliberate, sophisticated, and masterful act of city planning.
Part III: Mapping the Adidas Metropolis – A Tour of the Brand’s Districts
Overview: The City on Three Stripes
To understand the Adidas Metropolis, one must first understand its foundational infrastructure: the Three Stripes.
This simple, powerful motif is the road network, the power grid, and the water supply that connects every district.
It is the single, unifying element that ensures no matter how distinct the neighborhoods become, they are all unmistakably part of the same city.
The power of this visual DNA is so profound that its origin story has become a piece of branding folklore.
In 1952, founder Adi Dassler didn’t invent the three stripes; he acquired them from a Finnish sports company called Karhu Sports.
The price? The equivalent of €1,600 and two bottles of whiskey.5
It was one of the greatest bargains in corporate history.
Dassler understood that this visual signature, originally designed for shoe stability, was the perfect, versatile foundation upon which he could build an empire.8
He even took to calling his company “The three stripes company”.6
This infrastructure allows Adidas to do what a monolith brand cannot: build distinct districts, each with its own specific purpose, architecture, and citizenry.
It has meticulously constructed at least three major “districts,” each marked by its own logo, to speak to different consumer worlds without sacrificing the core identity of the parent brand.
This is not brand confusion; this is strategic segmentation at its most brilliant.
District 1: The Performance District (The “Badge of Sport”)
The Urban Plan: Welcome to the high-tech industrial park and elite athletic training center of the Adidas Metropolis.
This district is a place of raw function, cutting-edge engineering, and relentless innovation.
The architecture is sharp, modern, and purposeful.
This is where the city’s most advanced work gets done, where records are broken, and where the core credibility of the entire metropolis is forged.
It is built for one purpose: to help athletes achieve their goals.
The Logo & Its Semiotics: The architecture of this district is defined by the three-bar “Badge of Sport” logo, often called the “Mountain.” Introduced in 1991, it was originally created for the “Adidas Equipment” (EQT) line, a range of products focused purely on athletic performance.10
Semiotically, the logo is a masterwork of aspirational messaging.
The three bars are angled to create a dynamic, upward-moving shape that powerfully evokes the image of a mountain.13
This is no accident.
The mountain symbolizes challenge, the obstacles to be faced, and the goals to be achieved—the very essence of athletic competition.5
Adding another layer of depth, the logo’s design was born from a unique perspective: it was inspired by sketching the three stripes as they appear from inside an Adidas shoe.10
This is a profound choice, positioning the brand not as an external observer, but from the viewpoint of the athlete themselves, looking out at the challenge ahead.
It’s a logo that says, “We see the mountain from where you stand, and we will help you climb it.”
The Citizens: The inhabitants of this district are elite athletes and serious sports enthusiasts.
These are the “citizens” who prioritize function, durability, and performance above all else.5
They are the marathon runners, the professional footballers, the dedicated gym-goers.
They demand equipment that works, and this district is built to serve them.
The Economic Engine: The Performance district is the industrial and technological heart of the Adidas Metropolis.
It is the engine that generates the brand’s core authenticity.
Without the credibility earned on the fields, tracks, and courts of the world, the other, more style-focused districts would lack substance.
This is not just a philosophical pillar; it is a massive economic driver.
Recent financial reports consistently show strong, often double-digit, growth in performance categories like Running, Training, and Performance Basketball, proving that this district is a vital and profitable part of the city.19
The creation of the Performance logo was more than a simple rebrand; it was a calculated act of corporate warfare.
In the late 1980s, Adidas was lagging behind its rival, Nike, particularly in the crucial North American market and in the cultural narrative of the “hero athlete” that Nike had perfected.22
In a move of strategic genius, Adidas didn’t just hire a designer; they hired the enemy’s top weapon smith.
They brought on Peter Moore, the creative director who had masterminded the Air Jordan line for Nike—arguably the most successful athlete-driven sub-brand in history.6
Moore’s creation of the “Mountain” logo was therefore not just a design update; it was a strategic injection of Nike-esque DNA into the Adidas brand.
It gave Adidas a visual language of power, perseverance, and overcoming obstacles that could directly compete with Nike’s “Just Do It” ethos.
The Performance logo is an artifact of a direct strategic assault on a competitor’s dominance, a tool forged to reclaim credibility in the high-stakes world of athletic performance.
District 2: The Cultural District (The “Trefoil”)
The Urban Plan: If the Performance district is the city’s industrial engine, then the Cultural District is its historic and vibrant soul.
This is the part of the Adidas Metropolis filled with museums, art galleries, music venues, and bustling streets where culture is born.
It is a district where the city’s rich heritage is not just preserved in archives but is actively reinterpreted and remixed by new generations.
This neighborhood is not about breaking records; it’s about breaking rules.
It’s about style, authenticity, community, and a sense of belonging.
The Logo & Its Semiotics: The defining landmark of this district is the iconic Trefoil logo.
Introduced in 1971, the Trefoil was created as Adidas expanded beyond shoes into the world of apparel.8
Its design, inspired by florals, was meant to be symbolic.16
The three-leaf shape represented the brand’s growing diversity and its expanding global reach across the three major landmasses where its products were sold: the Americas, Europe, and Asia.9
Crucially, the design masterfully incorporates the foundational three stripes, tying this new cultural architecture back to the city’s core infrastructure.
From 1972 until 1997, the Trefoil was the primary logo for the entire company.
However, in a brilliant strategic move, it was “retired” from performance gear and, since 2000, has been used exclusively to represent the Adidas Originals line—the brand’s heritage and lifestyle division.5
Today, the Trefoil is a pure symbol of culture, not competition.
The Citizens: The citizens of the Cultural District are a diverse and influential group.
They are the fashion-conscious consumers, the Gen Z and Millennial trendsetters, the dedicated “sneakerheads,” the artists, musicians, and skateboarders who value retro style and cultural authenticity.17
This is the district where collaborations with cultural icons like David Beckham, Missy Elliott, Jenna Ortega, and Jennie from BLACKPINK are born and thrive, creating products that are seen on stage and on the street, not just on the pitch.29
The Economic Engine: This district is responsible for generating the city’s “brand heat.” While the Performance district builds credibility, the Originals district builds “cool.” This coolness is immensely profitable.
The runaway success of heritage franchises like the Samba, Gazelle, and Superstar—shoes that are decades old—has become a massive revenue engine for the company.
In many quarters, the growth in this lifestyle segment, driven by cultural trends, is a primary driver of the company’s overall financial success, proving that culture can be just as lucrative as sport.19
The decision to repurpose the Trefoil demonstrates the genius of the multi-logo strategy.
Most companies discard their old logos as they evolve.
Adidas, however, understood the immense equity built into the Trefoil.
Instead of throwing it away, they built a beautiful, protected historical district around it.
This strategic segmentation was a masterstroke.
It allowed Adidas to fully embrace and capitalize on the burgeoning retro and streetwear trends without diluting the high-tech, forward-looking message of its Performance line.
This dual identity allows the brand to have two distinct, authentic conversations at the same time.
It can sell the future of sport to an elite athlete with the “Mountain” logo, and it can sell the history of style to a fashion influencer with the “Trefoil” logo.
They can launch a campaign for the Originals line with the slogan “We Gave the World an Original.
You Gave Us a Thousand Back,” celebrating user-led cultural adoption, while simultaneously running a Performance campaign focused on elite athletic achievement.30
A single-logo “monolith” brand would find it incredibly difficult to navigate these two worlds without sending a mixed message.
Adidas, the city planner, simply built two different districts for two different conversations.
District 3: Special Economic & Creative Zones (The “Circle” & Collaborations)
The Urban Plan: Beyond the main industrial and cultural hubs lie the city’s special zones.
These are the exclusive, avant-garde districts—the high-fashion boulevards, the experimental art labs, and the pop-up innovation hubs.
This is where the city’s most daring architectural experiments take place.
This district is not for everyone; it’s for the niche, the trend-driven, and the fashion-forward.
It’s where Adidas collaborates with high-fashion designers like Yohji Yamamoto (Y-3) and, for a time, catered specifically to a younger, more accessible style crowd with its NEO line.
The Logo & Its Semiotics: The primary logo associated with this zone is the globe or circle logo, introduced in 2002.5
This mark encloses the three stripes within a circle, but the stripes themselves are stylized and curved, breaking from their traditionally rigid, parallel form.
This design suggests globality, fluidity, and a more organic, fashion-forward movement.5
It is less about the tangible challenge of a mountain and more about the abstract concepts of global style and collaboration.13
This logo was the face of the “Adidas Style” division and later the youth-focused “NEO” collections.18
The Citizens: The residents of these special zones are the high-fashion consumers, the design aficionados, and the younger teenagers looking for trendy, accessible streetwear that connects them to the broader Adidas brand.18
They are drawn to the hype and exclusivity of designer collaborations and the fast-fashion sensibility of lines like NEO.
The Economic Engine: These zones function as the city’s incubators for innovation and coolness.
While their direct contribution to revenue may not match the scale of the Performance or Originals districts, their strategic value is immense.
They generate disproportionate amounts of hype and media attention, pushing design boundaries and creating a powerful “halo effect” that elevates the perception of the entire Adidas Metropolis.
They are, in effect, a strategic investment in the brand’s long-term cultural capital.
Table 1: The Logos of the Adidas Metropolis
To visualize this complex urban plan, the following table summarizes the distinct roles of each major logo within the Adidas brand architecture.
| Logo | Name / Division | Year Introduced | Target “Citizen” (Audience) | Urban Planning Role / Symbolic Meaning |
| !(https://i.imgur.com/example_badge.png) | Badge of Sport / Performance | 1991 | The Athlete: Serious sports participants, professional and amateur athletes. | The High-Tech & Industrial District: Represents the brand’s core technical credibility. Symbolizes challenge, goals, and peak performance. |
| !(https://i.imgur.com/example_trefoil.png) | Trefoil / Originals | 1971 | The Culturalist: Fashion-conscious consumers, sneakerheads, artists, musicians, Gen Z/Millennials. | The Historic & Cultural District: Represents the brand’s heritage and connection to street culture. Symbolizes style, authenticity, and creative expression. |
| Circle / Style (NEO) | 2002 | The Trend-Seeker: High-fashion consumers, design collaborators, and younger, style-driven youth. | The Special Economic & Creative Zone: Acts as a hub for hype, innovation, and designer collaborations. Symbolizes globality, fashion, and modern lifestyle. |
Part IV: The Strategic Blueprint – How the Metropolis Model Builds an Empire
A Tale of Two Cities: Adidas’s Metropolis vs. Nike’s Monument
The “Brand Metropolis” model is not just a descriptive analogy; it is a strategic choice with profound business implications.
To fully grasp its power, it is essential to compare it directly with the approach of its chief rival, Nike.
This is a tale of two fundamentally different philosophies of empire-building, best understood through the lens of formal brand architecture models.
Adidas employs a sophisticated Hybrid Model, specifically a “House of Brands with a strong endorser”.34
In this structure, the company maintains a portfolio of distinct sub-brands (Performance, Originals) that operate like separate houses, each with its own identity, target audience, and marketing strategy.
However, unlike a pure “House of Brands” (like Procter & Gamble, where few know that Tide and Crest share a parent), every Adidas “house” is clearly endorsed by the master brand (“Adidas”) and visually connected by the shared infrastructure of the Three Stripes.
This allows each division to build a targeted, authentic relationship with its specific “citizens” while still benefiting from the credibility and recognition of the parent company.
Nike, in stark contrast, operates as a classic Branded House.1
The Nike brand is a monolith, a single, monumental structure under which all products live.
The Swoosh is the master brand, and everything from high-performance track spikes to casual lifestyle sneakers and even golf apparel is a “Nike” product first and foremost.
They all share the same brand promise, the same core identity, and the same aspirational voice encapsulated by the “Just Do It” ethos.22
This strategy is designed to build immense, concentrated equity in a single, powerful mark.
This divergence represents a fundamental strategic trade-off.
A Branded House like Nike’s is incredibly efficient.
Every dollar spent on marketing, every celebrity endorsement, every sponsorship reinforces the power of the single master brand.
The risk, however, is that the brand’s identity can become stretched too thin or that a crisis in one product area can tarnish the entire brand.
It also makes it more difficult to enter new markets or cultural spaces that don’t align perfectly with the core brand’s established identity.
Adidas’s Hybrid model is inherently more complex and more expensive to manage.
It requires separate marketing campaigns, distinct product development pipelines, and a nuanced understanding of multiple consumer subcultures.19
The payoff for this complexity is enormous flexibility.
Adidas can authentically and simultaneously participate in the gritty world of elite sports, the fickle realm of high fashion, and the nostalgia-driven trends of street culture without creating brand confusion or diluting the message for any single audience.17
Nike chose power and focus.
Adidas chose flexibility and breadth.
The Economic Engine: Proving the Blueprint Works
The success of the Adidas Metropolis model is not merely theoretical; it is written in the clear, hard numbers of its financial reports.
An analysis of the company’s revenue streams provides concrete proof that this multi-logo segmentation strategy is a core pillar of its business success.
Earnings reports consistently break down revenue by division, and they reveal that both the “Performance” district and the “Lifestyle” district (which encompasses Originals and Sportswear) are massive, multi-billion-dollar growth engines.
For example, a recent quarterly report highlighted a 12% currency-neutral revenue increase in the Performance segment, driven by strong growth in Running and Training.
In the very same quarter, the Lifestyle segment grew by 13%, fueled by double-digit growth in both Originals and Sportswear.19
These are not figures from a dominant division and a minor one; they are the results of two powerful, parallel engines driving the company forward.
The strategy allows Adidas to capture growth from entirely different market trends simultaneously.21
Furthermore, market share analysis often reveals the symbiotic relationship between the districts.
While Nike remains the larger company overall in terms of brand value and revenue, Adidas’s ability to gain market share is frequently propelled by the cultural “heat” generated by its Originals line.42
The immense popularity of heritage sneakers like the Samba and Gazelle creates a halo effect, making the entire brand more desirable to younger, trend-setting demographics.
This cultural relevance, born in the “Cultural District,” benefits the entire metropolis.
This strategy is explicitly articulated by the city’s chief planner, CEO Bjorn Gulden.
In investor calls, he has detailed the company’s approach: “I think our logic has been all the time, we create brand heat on lifestyle footwear.
We then roll it over to apparel and to Performance”.44
He speaks of the distinct strategies for growing the lifestyle business—by reviving classics like the Superstar and tapping into new trends like “low profile” silhouettes—while simultaneously detailing investments in performance basketball and running to gain credibility and market share.44
This first-hand commentary from the top confirms that the multi-logo, multi-division approach is not an accident of history but a deliberate, actively managed, and successful corporate strategy.
Table 2: A Tale of Two Architectures – Adidas vs. Nike
This table provides a direct, side-by-side comparison of the two competing brand-building philosophies, crystallizing the strategic trade-offs each company has made.
| Strategic Element | Adidas (Hybrid / Metropolis Model) | Nike (Branded House / Monument Model) |
| Core Philosophy | A portfolio of specialized offerings for distinct market segments. | A single, unified brand promise for all consumers. |
| Logo System | Multiple logos (Badge of Sport, Trefoil, etc.) for segmented audiences. | One primary logo (the Swoosh) for all audiences and products. |
| Brand Architecture | Hybrid: Endorsed sub-brands (Performance, Originals) under a master brand. | Branded House: All products and services exist as extensions of the master brand. |
| Marketing Approach | Targeted campaigns for each division, speaking different “languages” to different “citizens.” | Overarching campaigns that reinforce the single master brand identity (“Just Do It”). |
| Key Advantage | Flexibility & Targeted Relevance: Ability to speak authentically to diverse cultural and functional groups without conflict. | Efficiency & Equity Focus: All investment builds equity in a single, powerful brand mark. Simpler to manage. |
| Key Risk | Complexity & Cost: Higher management and marketing costs. Potential for consumer confusion if not managed carefully. | Reputation Contagion & Inflexibility: A problem in one area can damage the entire brand. Less agile in entering disparate markets. |
Part V: Lessons from the City Planner – Building Brands for a Complex World
Conclusion: Beyond the Monolith
Revisiting the wreckage of my early career failure, the “Adidas Metropolis” model illuminates my mistake with painful clarity.
My client, with its rugged industrial tools and sleek consumer electronics, was a nascent metropolis.
It had two distinct districts, each with its own citizens and its own unique needs.
By trying to impose a single, monolithic architectural style upon them, I had created a city with no soul, a place where no one felt at home.
What they needed was not a monument, but a thoughtful urban plan.
They needed a shared infrastructure—a core brand promise of quality and innovation—but with distinct architectural identities for their different neighborhoods.
The lesson is profound.
The “one brand, one logo” rule of the monolith isn’t wrong; it’s just a blueprint for a simpler type of structure, like a village or a single, magnificent tower.
It is perfectly suited for companies with a highly focused offering and a singular target audience.
But for today’s complex, global organizations that operate across multiple cultural and functional arenas, the “Metropolis” model offers a more sophisticated and ultimately more effective blueprint for building a lasting empire.
Adidas has proven that it is possible to be a city of performance and a city of culture, a place for the elite athlete and the street-style icon, all at the same time.
You just have to be a brilliant city planner.
Actionable Insights for Brand Builders
The Adidas model provides more than just a fascinating case study; it offers a practical, actionable framework for any leader tasked with building a brand in a complex world.
By asking questions rooted in the urban planning analogy, you can begin to design a more resilient and relevant brand architecture for your own organization.
- Are you building a village or a city? First, conduct an honest assessment of your company’s complexity. Do you have a single, core offering for a well-defined audience, or do you serve multiple, disparate markets with different products and needs? The answer determines the scale of your architectural project.
- Who are your citizens? Go beyond basic demographics and conduct a deep psychographic analysis of your customer segments. Do they all live in the same “neighborhood” with shared values and lifestyles, or do they inhabit different worlds? Understanding your citizens is the first step to designing districts that truly serve them.
- What is your infrastructure? Identify the non-negotiable core of your brand. What is the foundational DNA—the core values, the promise of quality, the unique point of view—that connects everything you do? This is your city’s infrastructure, and like the Three Stripes, it must be strong and consistent across all districts.
- Do you need distinct districts? Finally, determine if your customer segments are so fundamentally different that they require their own unique identities—their own logos, their own messaging, their own vibe. Could a single brand voice speak to all of them authentically, or would it, as in my case, feel generic and alienating? Creating a new district is a significant investment, but for a complex metropolis, it is the only way to ensure that every citizen has a place to call home.
Works cited
- The Power of Combination Logo: How Adidas and Starbucks Use Logos | SologoAI, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.sologo.ai/pt/blog/the-power-of-combination-logo-how-adidas-and-starbucks-use-logos/
- House of Brands vs Branded House: Which One Wins? | Backstory Branding – Insights, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.backstorybranding.com/insights/house-of-brands-vs-branded-house
- Brand Architecture: Types & Best Examples – Ebaqdesign, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ebaqdesign.com/blog/brand-architecture
- Brand Architecture Models: Strategies for Business Success – Studio Noel, accessed August 8, 2025, https://studionoel.co.uk/brand-architecture-models
- History and Meaning Behind Adidas Logo | ZenBusiness, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.zenbusiness.com/blog/adidas-logo/
- Adidas – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adidas
- Three stripes – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_stripes
- Adidas Logo Design Analysis – History, Evolution and Meanin – Logome.ai, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.logome.ai/blogs/adidas-logo
- Adidas Logo Evolution: The Power of Three Stripes, accessed August 8, 2025, https://logovent.com/blog/adidas-logo-evolution/
- The Adidas Logo: A Look Behind the Stripes | Looka, accessed August 8, 2025, https://looka.com/blog/adidas-logo/
- The Complete History Of The Adidas Logo – Hatchwise, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.hatchwise.com/resources/history-complete-history-of-the-adidas-logo
- Adidas Logo History: How design reflects its brand identity – Designhill, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.designhill.com/design-blog/adidas-logo-history/
- The Adidas Logo & Brand: A Story Of Heritage And Rivalry, accessed August 8, 2025, https://logo.com/blog/adidas-logo
- What Does The Adidas Logo Represent? – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7LvOl0PXQI
- The History Behind Adidas Logo | Create Next Hit Logo, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.logodesignvalley.com/blog/adidas-logo/
- adidas Logos: History and Meaning, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.adidas.com/us/blog/932571-adidas-logos-history-and-meaning
- Adidas Segmentation, Targeting, and Positioning – Boardmix, accessed August 8, 2025, https://boardmix.com/analysis/adidas-segmentation-targeting-and-positioning/
- Adidas Segmentation, Targeting, and Positioning – PDF Agile, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.pdfagile.com/blog/adidas-segmentation-targeting-and-positioning
- Continued strong double-digit growth for adidas brand in the second …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.adidas-group.com/en/media/press-releases/continued-strong-double-digit-growth-for-adidas-brand-in-the-second-quarter-of-2025
- Adidas Q2 profit jumps 58% on strong demand and tighter cost controls – Kr Asia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://kr-asia.com/adidas-q2-profit-jumps-58-on-strong-demand-and-tighter-cost-controls
- EXEC: Adidas Swings to Full-Year Profit in 2024; Job Cuts Loom at Herzo HQ – SGB Media, accessed August 8, 2025, https://sgbonline.com/exec-adidas-swings-to-full-year-profit-in-2024-na-sees-double-digit-growth-in-q4/
- Tangents – Nike vs. Adidas: Whose Marketing Strategy Reigns Supreme? – Trig, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.trig.com/tangents/nike-vs-adidas
- The Story Behind Iconic adidas Logos – Industry News – Sneaker Freaker, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.sneakerfreaker.com/news/adidas-three-stripe-equipment-trefoil-logo-history/
- Adidas Performance logo brief history – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/adidas/comments/1k3md0m/adidas_performance_logo_brief_history/
- History – adidas Group, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.adidas-group.com/en/about/history
- Adidas Logo History and Evolution | Tailor brands, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.tailorbrands.com/blog/adidas-logo
- Adidas Target Market | Business Strategy Hub, accessed August 8, 2025, https://bstrategyhub.com/adidas-target-market/
- Adidas | PDF | Market Segmentation – Scribd, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/doc/8760709/Adidas
- Adidas unites superstars across music, sports, fashion in culture play | Marketing Dive, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.marketingdive.com/news/adidas-unites-superstars-across-music-sports-fashion-in-culture-play/752262/
- adidas Originals Launches New Global Brand Platform: “We Gave the World an Original. You Gave Us a Thousand Back.”, accessed August 8, 2025, https://news.adidas.com/originals/adidas-originals-launches-new-global-brand-platform—we-gave-the-world-an-original.-you-gave-us-a-t/s/d6c2a3f5-a4ba-4eb0-b02c-035b85a92f72
- THE ORIGINAL: adidas Originals presents “The Original” for Spring/Summer 2025, accessed August 8, 2025, https://news.adidas.com/originals/the-original–adidas-originals-presents–the-original–for-spring-summer-2025/s/cdfbdb06-7f49-4a15-abab-f7cfbe9247d8
- adidas reports strong results for 2024 and expects top- and bottom-line momentum to continue in 2025, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.adidas-group.com/en/media/press-releases/adidas-reports-strong-results-for-2024-and-expects-top-and-bottom-line-momentum-to-continue-in-2025
- Behind the 2025 Brand Campaign: We All Need Someone to Make Us Believe You Got This, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.adidas-group.com/en/magazine/behind-the-scenes/behind-the-2025-brand-campaign-we-all-need-someone-to-make-us-believe-you-got-this
- A Comparative Analysis of Strategies and Business Models of Nike, Inc. and Adidas Group with special reference to Competitive Advantage in the context of – ijbmer, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ijbmer.com/docs/volumes/vol6issue3/ijbmer2015060302.pdf
- An In-depth Comparative Analysis of Adidas … – Atlantis Press, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125991551.pdf
- Adidas and Its Marketing Strategy: Critical Analysis – Free Essay Example – Edubirdie, accessed August 8, 2025, https://hub.edubirdie.com/examples/adidas-and-its-marketing-strategy-critical-analysis/
- What is Brand Architecture? Definition, Models, and Examples – The Branding Journal, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.thebrandingjournal.com/2022/01/brand-architecture/
- Multi-Brand Strategies: Branded House vs. House of Brands – Vaimo, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.vaimo.com/blog/branded-house-vs-house-of-brands/
- Branding Strategies of the Big Four: Nike, Adidas, Reebok, Under Armour, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.samford.edu/sports-analytics/fans/2015/branding-strategies-of-the-big-four-nike-adidas-reebok-under-armour
- Adidas Marketing Strategy, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.marketingweek.com/adidas/
- adidas presents growth strategy ‘Own the Game’ until 2025, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.adidas-group.com/en/media/press-releases/adidas-presents-growth-strategy-own-the-game-until-2025
- Adidas poised to grab market share this year as Nike falters | Retail …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.retaildive.com/news/adidas-grabs-apparel-market-share-nike-falters/756373/
- Adidas Target Market Analysis & Consumer Demographics | Start.io, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.start.io/blog/adidas-target-market-segmentation-and-marketing-strategy-audience-demographics-competitors/
- Earnings call transcript: Adidas sees strong Q2 2025 growth amid …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-adidas-sees-strong-q2-2025-growth-amid-global-expansion-93CH-4160794
