More Than a Border: My Journey to Understand the Great Divorce of Ireland

Introduction: The Frustration of a Two-Dimensional History

For the first decade of my career as a historian, I dreaded the week I had to teach the partition of Ireland. It wasn’t for a lack of material. My lecture notes were a fortress of facts, meticulously constructed with dates, treaties, and casualty counts. I could chart the legislative journey of the Government of Ireland Act 1920 with clinical precision.¹ I could list the articles of the Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1921 from memory.² I could draw the new border on a map and explain the demographic calculus that carved six counties of Ulster away from the other twenty-six.¹

My students, diligent and bright, would dutifully copy it all down. They learned the “what” and the “when.” But every semester, the same hands would go up, and the same questions would hang in the air, questions my fortress of facts could never answer. “But why did they feel so strongly?” a student would ask. “Why couldn’t they compromise? It’s one small island. Why was a border the only answer?”

And I had no satisfying response. My explanations felt hollow, two-dimensional. I spoke of competing nationalisms, of religious divides, of economic interests. But these were just labels, abstract categories that failed to capture the raw, human passion that drove men to take up arms against their own government, and then, with even greater bitterness, against each other. The standard historical account, for all its accuracy, was a black-and-white photograph of a world that had been lived in furious, tragic color. It explained the mechanics of the split, but it never touched the soul of it. It was a story without a heart.

This professional frustration became a personal obsession. I spent years buried in archives, moving beyond the official reports and parliamentary debates to the letters, diaries, and fiery speeches of the era.⁵ I was searching for the missing dimension, the emotional core of the conflict. The breakthrough, the epiphany, didn’t come from a dusty government file. It came when I stopped thinking about the partition as a political event and started seeing it for what it truly was: a divorce.

It was a long, bitter, and irreconcilable divorce between two peoples, two communities who, after centuries of a deeply troubled marriage, could no longer live together under one political roof. The United Kingdom was the house, and Britain was the conflicted, powerful party trying to mediate a separation it had, in many ways, caused. Once I saw it through this lens, everything changed. The passion made sense. The refusal to compromise became understandable. The violence, while still horrific, was no longer inexplicable. It was the tragic, final breakdown of a relationship that had been fractured for centuries.

This is not just the story of a line drawn on a map. This is the story of that great divorce. It is a journey back through the centuries of a dysfunctional marriage, through the failed attempts at counseling that only deepened the hostility, and into the final, violent separation that left a family, and an island, permanently torn apart.

Part I: The Long, Troubled Marriage: The Forging of Two Irelands (c. 1600–1880s)

To understand a divorce, one must first understand the marriage. The union of the two communities on the island of Ireland was never a partnership of equals. It was an arrangement forged by conquest and defined by power, a relationship whose inherent instability and deep-seated resentments made the eventual separation almost inevitable. The story of the split in 1921 does not begin with the stroke of a pen in London; it begins four centuries earlier, with the forceful introduction of a new branch of the family into the Irish home, a branch that would grow to have its own identity, its own economy, and its own unshakeable loyalty to a different sovereign.

A New Branch of the Family Arrives – The Plantation of Ulster

The single most consequential event in shaping the two Irelands was the Plantation of Ulster in the early 17th century.⁸ Following the defeat of the Gaelic lords in the Nine Years’ War and the subsequent “Flight of the Earls” in 1607, King James I of England (James VI of Scotland) initiated a systematic colonization of Ulster, the island’s northernmost province.⁸ This was not merely a military occupation; it was a deliberate demographic re-engineering of the region.

Vast tracts of land were confiscated from the native Gaelic Catholic Irish and granted to thousands of Protestant settlers from the Scottish Lowlands and the north of England.¹⁰ These newcomers were not intended to assimilate. They were brought in to control, to “civilize,” and to implant a loyal, English-speaking Protestant population in the heart of what had been the most Gaelic and rebellious part of Ireland.¹²

The result was the creation of a new and distinct community. The Scottish settlers were predominantly Presbyterian, bringing with them a stern, Calvinist faith and a culture forged in the often-harsh realities of the Anglo-Scottish borderlands.¹³ The English settlers were largely Anglican, members of the established state church. Together, they formed a Protestant bloc that was fundamentally different from the native population in religion, language, culture, and political allegiance.⁹ Their loyalty was not to an Irish chieftain or a Gaelic tradition, but to the British Crown, which had granted them their land and their privileged position. This act of plantation created what one historian aptly calls a “confessional divide,” a deep, structural fault line between the native, dispossessed Catholics and the new, powerful Protestant settlers that would define Irish history for the next 400 years.⁸

An Unequal Household – Land, Power, and Resentment

The structure of this “marriage” was codified by the system of land ownership. For the next three centuries, the Protestant Ascendancy—a class composed of the descendants of these planters and other British settlers—owned the vast majority of the land across the entire island.¹⁶ In 1870, a staggering 97% of Irish farmers were tenants, owning none of the land they worked.¹⁸ The native Catholic Irish were largely reduced to a peasant class, renting small, often insecure plots from landlords who were frequently absentees, living in Britain and managing their estates through agents.¹⁹

This system created a profound and enduring sense of grievance. The struggle for land became inseparable from the struggle for national and religious identity. The Irish Catholic population widely believed that the land had been stolen from their ancestors and that the rent they paid was an unjust tribute to a foreign, conquering class.¹⁹ This economic subjugation was reinforced by the Penal Laws of the 18th century, which systematically discriminated against Catholics (and to a lesser extent, Presbyterians), barring them from public office, land ownership, and education, in an effort to suppress their faith and secure the dominance of the Anglican establishment.¹¹

The ultimate, horrific expression of this dysfunctional system was the Great Famine of 1845-1851. When a potato blight destroyed the single crop upon which millions of tenant farmers depended for survival, the result was a catastrophe of biblical proportions.¹⁹ Over a million people died from starvation and disease, while another million were forced to emigrate on dangerous “coffin ships”.¹¹ Throughout the Famine, Ireland continued to export other foodstuffs like grain and livestock to Britain, a fact that burned a legacy of British government inaction—driven by a rigid

laissez-faire economic ideology—and perceived cruelty into the Irish nationalist psyche.¹⁹ The Famine tore the social fabric of Catholic Ireland asunder, but it also hardened the resolve for change, fueling the land agitation and nationalist movements of the late 19th century.¹⁹

Two Worlds, One Island – The Diverging Economies

Compounding the religious and land-based divisions was a stark economic divergence that pulled the North-East and the rest of the island in opposite directions. While the South and West remained overwhelmingly rural, agrarian, and, outside of a few cities, deeply impoverished, the region around Belfast experienced its own, separate Industrial Revolution.²⁵

By the early 20th century, Belfast had exploded from a modest town into the largest city in Ireland, a global industrial powerhouse built on two titan industries: linen and shipbuilding.²⁸ The Harland and Wolff shipyard, which built the Titanic, was one of the largest in the world.³⁰ The city’s linen mills dominated the international market. This industrial boom created a large, relatively prosperous Protestant working class and a confident Protestant middle class of managers, engineers, and merchants.²⁸

Crucially, this industrial economy was not oriented toward the rest of Ireland; it was fully integrated into the economy of Great Britain and its empire.²⁶ Britain provided the capital, the raw materials like coal and iron, and the vast global markets for Ulster’s ships and linen.²² The economic lifeblood of Protestant Ulster flowed east across the Irish Sea to Liverpool and Glasgow, not south to Dublin. This created two fundamentally different economic realities on one small island. The South was an agricultural region, often in conflict with its British landlord class. The North-East was an industrial hub, deeply and profitably enmeshed with the British imperial system. These two worlds, with their conflicting economic interests and outlooks, were set on a collision course when the political question of the “marriage” itself was forced onto the table.

Date	Event	Significance
1801	Act of Union	Abolishes the Irish Parliament and formally incorporates Ireland into the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. 32
1829	Catholic Emancipation	Grants Catholics the right to sit in Parliament, marking a major step in political mobilization for the Catholic majority. 11
1845-1851	The Great Famine	A devastating famine leads to one million deaths and one million emigrants, radicalizing Irish attitudes towards British rule. 19
1886	First Home Rule Bill	Prime Minister Gladstone’s first attempt to grant Ireland devolved government is defeated in the House of Commons, splitting the Liberal Party. 34
1893	Second Home Rule Bill	Passes the House of Commons but is vetoed by the Conservative-dominated House of Lords. 34
1912	Third Home Rule Bill	Introduced by a Liberal government. With the House of Lords’ veto power now limited, its eventual passage seems inevitable, sparking the Home Rule Crisis. 34
1912	Ulster’s Solemn League and Covenant	Signed by nearly half a million Ulster Protestants, pledging to resist Home Rule by any means necessary. 34
1916	Easter Rising	A rebellion in Dublin proclaims an Irish Republic. Its leaders are executed, turning public opinion towards radical separatism. 36
1919-1921	Irish War of Independence	A guerrilla war between the Irish Republican Army (IRA) and British forces, leading to a stalemate and truce. 39
1920	Government of Ireland Act	The British Parliament passes an act to partition Ireland, creating two devolved parliaments for “Northern Ireland” (6 counties) and “Southern Ireland” (26 counties). 1
1921	Anglo-Irish Treaty	Signed in London, it establishes the Irish Free State as a dominion within the British Empire and confirms Northern Ireland’s right to opt out. 2
1922	Irish Free State Established	The 26-county state comes into existence. Northern Ireland immediately exercises its right to remain in the UK. The Irish Civil War begins. 37
1923	End of Irish Civil War	The pro-Treaty forces are victorious, cementing the partition of Ireland. 44

Part II: The Failed Counseling & Escalating Hostility (1880s–1916)

By the late 19th century, the deep fractures in the Irish “marriage” were impossible to ignore. The British political establishment, particularly the Liberal Party under William Ewart Gladstone, began to see that the relationship was unsustainable in its current form. Their proposed solution was “Home Rule”—a form of devolved government that they hoped would act as a kind of political marriage counseling, giving Ireland enough autonomy to be content while keeping the family of the United Kingdom intact.⁴⁵

However, these attempts at reconciliation had the opposite effect. The process of debating the future of the union in the halls of Westminster acted like a pressure cooker, forcing both communities in Ireland to define themselves in opposition to one another, hardening their identities, and destroying any remaining middle ground. The counseling sessions, far from saving the marriage, made the divorce inevitable.

The Home Rule Debate – A Solution That Became the Problem

Beginning in 1886, Prime Minister Gladstone introduced a series of Home Rule Bills designed to create an Irish parliament in Dublin with authority over domestic affairs, while leaving imperial matters like defense and foreign policy to London.³⁵ From Gladstone’s perspective, this was a logical compromise, a way to satisfy Irish nationalist demands while preserving the integrity of the Empire.⁴⁶

In Ireland, however, the proposal was seen in starkly different terms. For the Irish Parliamentary Party, led first by the charismatic Charles Stewart Parnell and later by John Redmond, Home Rule was the minimum acceptable demand, a step toward restoring Irish nationhood.⁴ For the growing community of Ulster Unionists, it was an existential threat. They saw a Dublin parliament as inevitably dominated by the Catholic majority and hostile to their interests—a concept popularly decried as “Home Rule is Rome Rule”.³⁵ They feared economic ruin, religious persecution, and the destruction of their cherished cultural and political identity as citizens of the United Kingdom.⁴

The debate was not confined to Ireland. The “Irish Question” polarized British politics. Gladstone’s first bill in 1886 split his own Liberal Party, with a faction known as the Liberal Unionists breaking away and eventually aligning with the Conservative Party, which became the staunchest defender of the Union.³⁵ Conservative politicians like Lord Randolph Churchill (Winston’s father) and later Andrew Bonar Law recognized the political power of Unionist resistance, with Churchill famously declaring that “the Orange card is the one to play”.⁴² For decades, British politics revolved around this single, intractable issue, with the first two Home Rule bills being defeated.³⁵ When the third bill was introduced in 1912, the political landscape had changed. The Parliament Act of 1911 had broken the absolute veto power of the House of Lords, meaning the bill could no longer be permanently blocked.³⁴ Its eventual passage seemed certain, and Ulster Unionists prepared to move from political opposition to active, armed resistance.

The Unionist Response – “Ulster Will Fight, and Ulster Will Be Right”

The Unionist response to the 1912 Home Rule Bill was a masterclass in organized, militant opposition that brought the United Kingdom to the brink of civil war. The movement was led by two formidable figures: Sir Edward Carson, a brilliant and imposing Dublin-born barrister who became the parliamentary voice of Unionism, and Sir James Craig, a wealthy Belfast native and a genius of practical organization.³⁴

Their strategy was to demonstrate, unequivocally, that Ulster would not be coerced into a united, self-governing Ireland. The centerpiece of this campaign was “Ulster Day,” September 28, 1912. On this day, in an atmosphere of almost religious solemnity, 237,368 men signed “Ulster’s Solemn League and Covenant,” a document deliberately modeled on the 17th-century Scottish National Covenant.³⁴ In signing, they pledged themselves “in solemn Covenant… to stand by one another in defending for ourselves and our children our cherished position of equal citizenship in the United Kingdom and in using all means which may be found necessary to defeat the present conspiracy to set up a Home Rule Parliament in Ireland”.³⁸ A parallel “Declaration” was signed by 234,046 women.³⁸ Some, it was claimed, even signed in their own blood.³⁴

This was no mere petition. It was a mobilization for war. The Covenant was the basis for the formation of the Ulster Volunteer Force (UVF), a private army that quickly enlisted 100,000 men who openly drilled and trained for conflict.³⁷ In April 1914, the UVF executed a stunning act of defiance by smuggling nearly 25,000 German rifles and millions of rounds of ammunition into the port of Larne.³⁴ This event, the Larne gun-running, proved that Unionist threats were not a bluff. The British government’s authority was further undermined when dozens of British army officers stationed at the Curragh camp in Kildare indicated they would resign rather than march north to enforce Home Rule on Ulster.³⁰ Faced with an armed, organized, and determined population in the North-East, and a potentially mutinous army, the British government was paralyzed. Civil war seemed imminent.

The Nationalist Evolution – From Parnell to Pearse

While Unionism was consolidating its resistance, Irish Nationalism was undergoing a profound radicalization. The long, frustrating pursuit of Home Rule through parliamentary means had begun to wear thin for a new generation of activists. The constitutional nationalism of the Irish Parliamentary Party, which sought a settlement within the British Empire, was increasingly seen as insufficient and compromised.⁴

A more potent, separatist vision was gaining ground, fueled by several streams. The Gaelic Revival, a cultural movement at the turn of the century, sought to de-anglicize Ireland by promoting the Irish language, traditional sports like hurling and Gaelic football, and Irish literature and music.³⁴ This cultural nationalism fostered a sense of a distinct Irish identity that was incompatible with British rule.

Politically, this new mood found expression in organizations like Arthur Griffith’s Sinn Féin (“Ourselves Alone”). Founded in 1905, Sinn Féin initially advocated for a policy of abstention from the British Parliament and the creation of a dual monarchy, with Ireland and Britain sharing a monarch but having separate governments—a model inspired by Austria-Hungary.⁴ Though not yet a dominant force, its message of self-reliance resonated with those impatient with the slow pace of parliamentary politics.

Beneath the surface, the old physical-force tradition was being revived by the secret Irish Republican Brotherhood (IRB). A small, dedicated group of revolutionaries within the IRB saw the Unionist mobilization, the paralysis of the British government, and the looming threat of a European war as a golden opportunity. As the famous nationalist saying went, “England’s difficulty is Ireland’s opportunity.” They began to plan for an armed insurrection, not to achieve Home Rule, but to break the connection with Britain entirely and establish an independent Irish Republic.³⁴ The stage was being set for a dramatic and violent escalation.

Part III: The Point of No Return: Rebellion and War (1916–1921)

The outbreak of the First World War in August 1914 provided a temporary, tragic reprieve from the crisis in Ireland. The Home Rule Bill was passed into law but immediately suspended for the duration of the conflict, with the contentious issue of Ulster’s exclusion left unresolved.³⁶ John Redmond, the leader of the Irish Parliamentary Party, pledged nationalist support for the British war effort, hoping this display of loyalty would guarantee a smooth implementation of Home Rule for a united Ireland after the war. Tens of thousands of Irishmen, both nationalist and unionist, went to fight in the trenches of Europe.

But for the secret circle of revolutionaries in the IRB, the war was not a reason to pause the struggle; it was the long-awaited opportunity to strike. The events that followed would shatter the political landscape, destroy the constitutional nationalist movement, and make the partition of Ireland the only politically viable, if heartbreaking, outcome. This was the final, violent breakdown of the marriage, a point of no return from which a shared future became impossible.

The Easter Rising (1916) – The Unilateral Declaration of Divorce

On Easter Monday, April 24, 1916, while Britain was locked in the Great War, a small force of about 1,200 Irish Volunteers and members of the Irish Citizen Army seized key buildings in the center of Dublin.⁸ Standing on the steps of the General Post Office, their leader, Patrick Pearse, read the Proclamation of the Irish Republic, unilaterally declaring the “marriage” to the United Kingdom null and void.³⁶ “We hereby proclaim the Irish Republic as a Sovereign Independent State,” it read, “and we pledge our lives and the lives of our comrades-in-arms to the cause of its freedom, of its welfare, and of its exaltation among the nations.”

The Easter Rising was, in military terms, a dismal failure. The rebellion was largely confined to Dublin and received little public support. After a week of fierce fighting that left parts of the city in ruins and resulted in nearly 500 deaths, the rebels surrendered.³⁹ The initial public reaction was one of hostility; the rebels were seen as extremists who had brought chaos to the city and stabbed Britain in the back while Irish soldiers were dying on the Western Front.

But the British response transformed the situation completely. General Sir John Maxwell, the military governor, decided to make an example of the leaders. Between May 3 and May 12, fifteen of the key figures of the Rising, including the wounded James Connolly who had to be tied to a chair to face the firing squad, were executed by firing squad in Kilmainham Gaol.³⁷ This act of swift, harsh retribution was a catastrophic political miscalculation. The executions turned the defeated rebels into national martyrs. Public opinion, which had been hostile or indifferent, swung dramatically and decisively behind the cause for which they had died.⁸ The political party that benefited most was Sinn Féin. Though Arthur Griffith and his party had not been involved in planning the Rising, the British press mistakenly dubbed it the “Sinn Féin Rebellion,” inadvertently handing them the mantle of the martyred leaders.⁵⁶ For Ulster Unionists, the Rising was the ultimate confirmation of their deepest fears. They viewed it as a profound act of betrayal, an alliance with Germany during Britain’s darkest hour, and it hardened their resolve never to be part of an independent Ireland governed by such people.⁸

The War of Independence (1919-1921) – The Bitter Separation

The sea change in Irish public opinion was made clear in the UK general election of December 1918. The old Irish Parliamentary Party, which had dominated nationalist politics for forty years, was virtually wiped out. Sinn Féin won 73 of Ireland’s 105 seats in a landslide victory.³⁷ True to their abstentionist policy, the elected Sinn Féin members refused to take their seats in the British Parliament at Westminster. Instead, in January 1919, they convened their own illegal parliament in Dublin, Dáil Éireann, and once again declared Ireland an independent republic.³⁷

What followed was the Irish War of Independence, a brutal and bitter guerrilla conflict that lasted for two and a half years.³⁹ The war was masterminded on the Irish side by Michael Collins, a charismatic and ruthless genius of revolutionary warfare who served as the IRA’s Director of Intelligence.⁵⁸ The IRA, operating in small, mobile “flying columns,” waged a campaign of ambushes on police and military patrols, raids for arms, and targeted assassinations of British intelligence agents.³⁹

The British government, led by Prime Minister David Lloyd George, responded by escalating its forces. It deployed the regular British Army and recruited two new paramilitary police forces to bolster the beleaguered Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC): the “Black and Tans” and the Auxiliaries, composed largely of demobilized World War I veterans.⁶⁰ These forces became notorious for their brutal reprisals against the civilian population, including house burnings, indiscriminate shootings, and infamous atrocities like the burning of the city of Cork and the “Bloody Sunday” massacre at a Gaelic football match in Dublin in November 1920.³⁷ By 1921, the conflict had reached a bloody stalemate. British authority had collapsed across most of the south and west of Ireland, but the IRA was being hard-pressed by the sheer number of British troops and was running desperately short of arms and ammunition.³⁹ In London, the war was becoming politically and financially unsustainable, and the government faced severe criticism at home and abroad for the conduct of its forces.³⁹ A truce was finally called on July 11, 1921, paving the way for negotiations.

My Epiphany: Discovering the “Divorce” Analogy

It was while reading the primary documents from this period—the passionate Dáil debates, the defiant unionist speeches, the desperate letters from civilians caught in the crossfire—that the pieces finally clicked into place for me. I realized I had been trying to understand a story of human passion using the cold language of political science. The vocabulary was all wrong.

The words I was reading were not about legislative clauses or constitutional arrangements. They were about identity, betrayal, fear, and a profound, irreconcilable sense of difference. Unionists spoke of their “heritage of British citizenship” and their terror of being abandoned and “deprived” of it by a British Parliament they no longer trusted.⁵³ They saw themselves as a distinct people, loyal and industrious, about to be handed over to a hostile, alien culture. Nationalists spoke of an ancient nationhood, of centuries of oppression, and of an unquenchable right to self-determination. They saw the connection with Britain not as a union, but as a bondage to be broken.

This was the language of a divorce court. It was the testimony of two partners who had come to realize they wanted fundamentally different lives, who no longer shared the same values, and who could not imagine a future together. The “border” was not the cause of the conflict; it was the consequence. It was the line drawn through the family home after the relationship had irrevocably broken down. This “divorce” framework suddenly made the entire tragedy comprehensible. It accounted for the depth of feeling, the intransigence, the violence, and the sorrow. It allowed me to finally answer my students’ question: they couldn’t compromise because, in their hearts, the divorce had already happened. All that was left was to argue over the terms of the settlement.

Part IV: The Divorce Decree & The Custody Battle (1920–1923)

With the truce of July 1921, the shooting stopped, and the talking began. But this was not a negotiation between equals seeking a middle ground. It was the fraught process of finalizing a divorce settlement, brokered by a British government that was simultaneously a party to the dispute and the ultimate arbiter of its outcome. The legal and political acts that followed were Britain’s attempt to impose a final decree on a situation it could no longer control by force. This settlement, however, satisfied no one completely and, tragically, ignited a vicious “custody battle” within the Irish nationalist family itself, a battle fought over the very soul of the new state.

The First Draft of the Decree – The Government of Ireland Act (1920)

Even before the War of Independence had ended, the British government had already drafted its preferred solution. Faced with an unwinnable guerrilla war in the south and the unshakeable, armed resistance of unionists in the north, David Lloyd George’s coalition government passed the Government of Ireland Act in December 1920.¹ This act was the legal instrument that formally partitioned the island of Ireland.⁶¹

The Act was a desperate attempt to solve two contradictory problems at once. It created two separate, devolved parliaments with “Home Rule” powers.⁶² One was for “Southern Ireland,” comprising 26 counties, and the other was for “Northern Ireland,” made up of six of the nine counties of Ulster: Antrim, Armagh, Down, Fermanagh, Londonderry, and Tyrone.¹ This six-county bloc was not an arbitrary or ancient division. It was a carefully calculated political entity, representing the maximum area that Ulster Unionists, led by James Craig, believed they could securely control with a permanent Protestant majority.¹ The Act also created a “Council of Ireland,” a body with members from both parliaments, intended to encourage future cooperation and, theoretically, eventual reunification—a provision that showed even its architects saw partition as a potentially temporary, if necessary, solution.⁴²

The reaction to the Act was telling. Ulster Unionists, who had once opposed any form of Home Rule, reluctantly accepted their own devolved parliament as the lesser of two evils—a necessary bulwark to protect them from being ruled by a Dublin parliament.¹ Elections were held in May 1921, a Unionist government was formed in Belfast, and the new state of Northern Ireland began to function.⁴² In the south, however, the Act was a dead letter. Nationalists, who were fighting and dying for an independent republic, completely ignored the creation of “Southern Ireland.” In their elections, Sinn Féin won 124 of the 128 seats and treated it as an election for their own Dáil Éireann, rendering the British-created southern parliament a complete failure.⁴² Partition was now a reality on the ground in the north, but the war continued unabated in the south.

The Final Settlement – The Anglo-Irish Treaty (1921)

With the 1920 Act having failed to pacify the south, the truce and subsequent negotiations in London became the only path to a settlement. Éamon de Valera, the President of the Irish Republic, controversially chose not to lead the delegation himself, sending instead a team of plenipotentiaries led by Arthur Griffith and Michael Collins.⁴⁰

The negotiations were grueling. The Irish delegates were faced with the formidable British team, which included Prime Minister Lloyd George and Winston Churchill.² The British were adamant on two points: Ireland would not be a fully independent republic, and the naval security of the British Empire would not be compromised. After weeks of talks, Lloyd George issued an ultimatum, threatening the Irish delegation with a renewal of “immediate and terrible war” if they did not sign the agreement he placed before them.² In the early hours of December 6, 1921, believing they had secured the best possible deal under the circumstances, the Irish delegates signed the Anglo-Irish Treaty.³⁷

The Treaty’s terms represented a seismic compromise. The 26 counties of “Southern Ireland” would become the “Irish Free State”.⁴⁰ It would be a self-governing dominion within the British Commonwealth, with the same constitutional status as Canada or Australia—a significant degree of independence, but not a republic.² The British monarch would remain head of state, and members of the new Irish parliament would be required to swear an Oath of Allegiance, not to the King directly, but to the constitution of the Free State and to be “faithful” to the King as head of the Commonwealth.² The Royal Navy would retain control of three deep-water “Treaty Ports” in Ireland for defensive purposes.³ Crucially, the Treaty did not create partition; it accepted the reality of it. Article 12 gave the already-existing parliament of Northern Ireland the right to formally opt out of the Irish Free State, which it did at the earliest opportunity in December 1922.² A Boundary Commission was to be established to finalize the border, a clause that led many on the Irish side, including Collins, to believe that large nationalist areas of Fermanagh and Tyrone would be transferred to the Free State, making Northern Ireland economically unviable and leading to eventual unity.⁴ This belief would prove to be tragically mistaken.

The Family Feud – The Irish Civil War

Michael Collins knew the Treaty would be divisive, famously remarking, “I have signed my own death warrant”.³⁷ He was right. The terms of the settlement tore the victorious Sinn Féin movement apart, plunging the new Irish Free State into a brief but exceptionally bitter civil war from June 1922 to May 1923.⁶⁶

The split was not, as is often assumed, primarily about the partition of the island. While the border was a source of deep disappointment, it was already a fact on the ground. The true breaking point for the anti-Treaty side was one of symbols and status. For them, the failure to achieve the declared Republic, and especially the requirement to swear an oath of faithfulness to the British King, was a profound betrayal of the principles for which the 1916 leaders had been executed and for which the War of Independence had been fought.⁴¹ Éamon de Valera, who had led the opposition in the Dáil debates, argued that the Treaty did not represent the will of the people, as it was signed under the threat of British force. He and his followers, known as the “Irregulars” or Republicans, saw themselves as the true defenders of the Irish Republic proclaimed in 1919.⁶⁸

The pro-Treaty side, led by Arthur Griffith and Michael Collins, took a pragmatic view. Collins argued passionately that the Treaty was not the “ultimate freedom,” but rather “the freedom to achieve freedom”.⁴¹ They believed it gave Ireland the substance of independence—its own government, army, and control over its own affairs—and that the remaining symbols of British authority could be dismantled over time. They argued that they were upholding the democratic decision of the Dáil, which had ratified the Treaty by a narrow vote of 64 to 57.⁴⁰

The conflict that followed was a national tragedy. Former comrades-in-arms now fought each other with a ferocity that often surpassed the war against the British.⁶⁶ The pro-Treaty National Army, armed and supported by the British, ultimately proved stronger. But the cost was immense. The war claimed the lives of many of the revolution’s brightest leaders, including both Arthur Griffith, who died of a brain hemorrhage, and Michael Collins, who was killed in an ambush in his native County Cork in August 1922.⁵⁷ The victory of the pro-Treaty forces ensured the survival of the Irish Free State and cemented the reality of partition, leaving a legacy of political bitterness in the South that would define its party system for generations to come.⁴⁴

Feature	Pro-Treaty Faction (Irish Free State)	Anti-Treaty Faction (Republicans/”Irregulars”)
Key Leaders	Michael Collins, Arthur Griffith, W.T. Cosgrave	Éamon de Valera (political leader), Liam Lynch, Frank Aiken (military leaders)
Core Argument	The Treaty is a practical “stepping stone” to full independence. It represents the democratic will of the Dáil and the Irish people. It offers “the freedom to achieve freedom.” 41	The Treaty is a betrayal of the Irish Republic proclaimed in 1916 and 1919. It was signed under duress and is therefore illegitimate. The Oath of Allegiance is an unacceptable compromise of sovereignty. 44
Stance on the Republic	Accepted its temporary suspension in favor of Dominion status, believing a republic could be achieved peacefully in the future. 64	Refused to compromise on the existence of the Republic, which they believed was the only legitimate government of Ireland. 44
Stance on the Oath	Viewed the Oath of Allegiance as a mere formality, a political formula necessary to secure peace and substantive independence. 41	Saw the Oath as a deeply humiliating symbol of continued subjugation to the British Crown, violating their allegiance to the Irish Republic. 44
Stance on Dominion Status	Accepted Dominion status as a significant advance, granting Ireland control over its own army, finances, and domestic policy—the substance of freedom. 2	Rejected Dominion status as falling short of the complete and total independence for which they had fought. 64
Military Force	The National Army, formally established by the Provisional Government and supplied with arms by the British. 68	The anti-Treaty Irish Republican Army (IRA), which rejected the authority of the Dáil after the Treaty vote. 44

Conclusion: The Long Shadow of Divorce

The Irish Civil War ended in May 1923 with the victory of the pro-Treaty forces. The divorce was finalized, the decree absolute. The fighting stopped, but the consequences of the split would cast a long and dark shadow over the island for the rest of the century. Two new states emerged from the wreckage of the old union, each set on a divergent path, each defined in many ways by the bitter separation.

In the North, the six counties of Northern Ireland became what its first Prime Minister, James Craig, intended: a statelet built for the security of the Protestant, Unionist population. Born of a deep-seated fear of being absorbed into a Catholic, nationalist Ireland, its political life was dominated by a single imperative: the preservation of the Union with Great Britain. This foundational insecurity, however, came at a great cost. The state was left with a large and permanently alienated Catholic minority—nearly one-third of the population—who did not recognize its legitimacy and saw the new border as an artificial scar on the face of their nation. The decades that followed were marked by systematic discrimination in housing, employment, and political representation, a toxic situation that would eventually explode into the violent conflict known as “The Troubles” in the late 1960s.⁸

In the South, the 26-county Irish Free State began its life scarred by the trauma of a civil war that had pitted brother against brother. The pro-Treaty party, which would evolve into today’s Fine Gael, established the institutions of the new state, while the anti-Treaty side, which would become the Fianna Fáil party under Éamon de Valera, eventually entered politics and spent decades methodically dismantling the remaining symbols of the British connection that they had fought against.⁴⁴ The Oath of Allegiance was abolished, the office of the Governor-General was eliminated, and in 1949, the state finally left the Commonwealth and formally declared itself the Republic of Ireland—achieving, by peaceful means, the status that Collins had argued the Treaty made possible.⁸

Looking back, the divorce analogy holds. It was a separation born of centuries of incompatibility. The two communities on the island of Ireland had developed fundamentally different identities, faiths, economic structures, and national allegiances. The British government, acting as the reluctant and biased arbiter, ultimately chose the path of division as the only way to avoid a full-scale civil war between an armed and determined Unionist North and a revolutionary Nationalist South. The border they drew was a crude surgical solution to a deep-seated problem, a line that solved one conflict only to create the conditions for another.

For me, this framework finally brought the story to life. It allowed me to move beyond the sterile recitation of facts and to grasp the human drama at the heart of the conflict. It is a story of how identities can be forged in opposition, how political processes can deepen rather than heal divisions, and how the pursuit of freedom can lead to tragic and unforeseen consequences. It is the story of a family torn apart, a story whose painful legacy continues to shape the lives of everyone on that small island to this day. And in understanding that, I could finally begin to answer my students’ questions.

Works cited

1. Government of Ireland Act 1920 – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_Ireland_Act_1920
2. Anglo-Irish Treaty – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Irish_Treaty
3. The Anglo-Irish Treaty, 6 December 1921 – Ulster University, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/issues/politics/docs/ait1921.htm
4. Irish Partition – The National Archives, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/irish-partition/
5. Irish War of Independence: An IWM Collecting Project | Imperial War Museums, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/projects/irish-war-of-independence-an-iwm-collecting-project
6. Deciphering Ewart’s 1921 ‘Journey in Ireland’ diary | Mark Holan’s Irish American Blog, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.markholan.org/archives/11956
7. IRISH CIVIL WAR 1922-1923 – Dublin – National Museum of Ireland, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.museum.ie/getmedia/d3e984bd-c569-43a1-b124-921a3a9a5f25/Irish-Wars-factsheet-links-PF6.pdf
8. 100 years on: The partition of Ireland explained – University of Rochester, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/partition-of-ireland-explained-477342/
9. 100 Years of Irish Independence and Division | Origins, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://origins.osu.edu/read/100-years-irish-independence-and-division
10. The Troubles | Summary, Causes, & Facts – Britannica, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/The-Troubles-Northern-Ireland-history
11. History of Ireland – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Ireland
12. Ulster Protestants – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Protestants
13. Ulster Scots people – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Scots_people
14. ULSTER PRESBYTERIANS AND IRISH NATIONALISM – Cambridge University Press, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/65305B5BBA0EBBA46166C7D94A30600B/S0424208400016338a.pdf/ulster_presbyterians_and_irish_nationalism.pdf
15. The Story of the Presbyterians in Ulster, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://discoverulsterscots.com/history-culture/story-presbyterians-ulster
16. Background to Landed Estates – AskAboutIreland.ie, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.askaboutireland.ie/reading-room/history-heritage/big-houses-of-ireland/welcome-to-the-cork-archi/background-to-landed-esta/
17. Land-holding in Ireland 1760-1880 – History Home, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.historyhome.co.uk/c-eight/ireland/ire-land.htm
18. Land Acts (Ireland) – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Acts_(Ireland)
19. History of Ireland (1801–1923) – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Ireland_(1801%E2%80%931923)
20. The Land-Tenure System in Ireland: A Fatal Regime – Marquette Law Scholarly Commons, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1653&context=mulr
21. Britain’s Blueprint for Colonialism: Made in Ireland – JSTOR Daily, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://daily.jstor.org/britains-blueprint-for-colonialism-made-in-ireland/
22. Economic history of Ireland – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_Ireland
23. Irish Immigrant Letters Home | Historical Society of Pennsylvania, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://hsp.org/education/unit-plans/irish-immigration/irish-immigrant-letters-home
24. The Times: Rural Ireland, 1850-1950 | Country Life – National Museum of Ireland, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.museum.ie/en-ie/museums/country-life/exhibitions/the-times
25. medium.com, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://medium.com/@sophie_61522/the-irish-poor-laws-poverty-and-policy-in-19th-century-ireland-8d7600be3262#:~:text=19th%20century%20Ireland%20was%20characterized,struggling%20to%20make%20ends%20meet.
26. The History of Economic Development in Ireland, North and South – The British Academy, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/3854/98p035.pdf
27. Economies of Ireland, North and South, since 1920 | Encyclopedia.com, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/economies-ireland-north-and-south-1920
28. Belfast in the early 20th Century – The National Archives of Ireland, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://nationalarchives.ie/collections/about-the-census-collections/belfast-in-the-early-20th-century/
29. Belfast – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belfast
30. Why did the British government agree to partition Ireland? : r/IrishHistory – Reddit, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/IrishHistory/comments/1c76h30/why_did_the_british_government_agree_to_partition/
31. Social conditions in Belfast in the early 20 th century – Census, accessed on August 5, 2025, http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/exhibition/belfast/social_conditions.html
32. A Chronology of Key Events in Irish History 1800 to 1967 – Ulster University, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://cain.ulster.ac.uk/othelem/chron/ch1800-1967.htm
33. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_of_Great_Britain_and_Ireland
34. Partition of Ireland – BELFAST HIGH SCHOOL HISTORY, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.bhshistory.com/08-road-to-partition.html
35. Irish Home Rule movement – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Home_Rule_movement
36. Home Rule movement | Definition, Ireland, Irish History, & British Empire | Britannica, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/Home-Rule-Great-Britain-and-Ireland
37. Pursuit of Sovereignty & Impact of Partition Timeline – HistoryVault.ie, accessed on August 5, 2025, http://www.historyvault.ie/pursuit-of-sovereignty-impact-of-partition-timeline
38. Ulster Covenant – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulster_Covenant
39. Irish War of Independence – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_War_of_Independence
40. Anglo-Irish Treaty | Summary, Facts, Negotiations, & Civil War – Britannica, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Anglo-Irish-Treaty
41. Irish Civil War – Irish War of Independence, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.theirishwar.com/history/irish-civil-war/
42. Partition of Ireland – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_of_Ireland
43. The Partition of Ireland: Why Is Ireland Split in Two – Superprof, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.superprof.co.uk/blog/republic-of-ireland-and-northern-ireland/
44. Irish Civil War | History, Causes, Executions, & Deaths – Britannica, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/Irish-Civil-War
45. Irish Home Rule Debate | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/irish-home-rule-debate
46. Irish Home Rule and Constitutional Reform in the British Empire, 1885-1914, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/3900
47. The Partition of Ireland – How and Why Did it Happen? – YouTube, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxJ5_6hYSag
48. What was Home Rule in Ireland, and why was there a crisis over it? : r/IrishHistory – Reddit, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/IrishHistory/comments/1ed4dds/what_was_home_rule_in_ireland_and_why_was_there_a/
49. The Irish Question, 1800-1900: Home Rule | Gerard Moran – Gale, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.gale.com/intl/essays/gerard-moran-irish-question-1800-1900-home-rule
50. Bonar Law | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/bonar-law
51. Edward Henry Carson, 1st Baron Carson – Person – National Portrait Gallery, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/person/mp00779/edward-henry-carson-1st-baron-carson
52. Edward Henry Carson, Baron Carson | Irish Lawyer, Politician & Statesman – Britannica, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Edward-Henry-Carson-Baron-Carson
53. About the Ulster Covenant | nidirect, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/articles/about-ulster-covenant
54. “To associate ourselves with the men of Ulster:” A Gendered History of Ulster’s Solemn League and Covenant and the – Chapman University Digital Commons, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043&context=vocesnovae
55. Arthur Griffith – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Griffith
56. Arthur Griffith and Sinn Féin – National Library of Ireland – 1916 Exhibition, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.nli.ie/1916/exhibition/en/content/stagesetters/other/arthurgriffith/
57. Arthur Griffith (1871-1922) – AskAboutIreland.ie, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.askaboutireland.ie/narrative-notes/arthur-griffith-(1871-192/index.xml
58. Michael Collins | Biography & Facts | Britannica, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Michael-Collins-Irish-statesman
59. Michael Collins – Never Such Innocence, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.neversuchinnocence.com/michael-collins-irish-war-of-independence
60. Ireland – National Library of Wales, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.library.wales/discover-learn/digital-exhibitions/david-lloyd-george/the-life-and-work-of-david-lloyd-george/ireland
61. Government of Ireland Act (1920) – Creative Centenaries, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.creativecentenaries.org/on-this-day/government-of-ireland-act-1920
62. Government of Ireland Act 1920: What system did it create? – House of Lords Library, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/government-of-ireland-act-1920-what-system-did-it-create/
63. Government of Ireland Act | United Kingdom [1920] – Britannica, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Government-of-Ireland-Act
64. Irish Civil War – Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Civil_War
65. Ulster Unionism – Citizendium, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Ulster_Unionism
66. The Irish Civil War – National Museum of Ireland, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.museum.ie/en-IE/collections-research/art-and-industry-collections/art-industry-collections-list/military-history/irish-soldiers-at-home,-abroad,-and-in-the-21st-ce/soldiering-in-the-20th-21st-centuries/the-irish-civil-war
67. Irish Civil War | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/irish-civil-war
68. Ireland’s Wars: The Opposing Forces And Initial Strategy Of The Conventional Civil War, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://neverfeltbetter.wordpress.com/2021/04/06/irelands-wars-the-opposing-forces-and-initial-strategy-of-the-conventional-civil-war/
69. Eamon de Valera | Irish Revolutionary & President of Ireland – Britannica, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Eamon-de-Valera