Table of Contents
Part I: The Central Question: A Tale of Two Timelines
Introduction: The Shock, the Search, and the Spiral of Confusion
On September 27, 2024, the news of Dame Maggie Smith’s passing sent a ripple of collective grief across the globe.
As a media psychologist specializing in the cultural impact of digital information, the event was not just a moment of personal sadness—a feeling shared by millions who grew up with her on screen—but also a professional case study in the making.
The digital sphere erupted with tributes, a testament to a monumental career.
Yet, within hours, a strange and disorienting counter-narrative began to emerge.
A search for “Maggie Smith” on social media or a news aggregator might have presented a user with two starkly contradictory realities: a somber obituary from a reputable news source resting just beside a cheerful announcement for an upcoming book tour.
This jarring juxtaposition creates a moment of profound cognitive dissonance.
How can a person be both mourned by millions and actively promoting new work? How can two timelines—one ending in a celebrated life’s conclusion, the other continuing with vibrant creative output—exist simultaneously under the same name? This is not a simple error or a malicious prank in the traditional sense.
It is a symptom of our complex, often contradictory, information environment.
The search query that likely prompted this investigation, “why did maggie smith died,” is itself a reflection of this digital confusion.
It represents a user’s attempt to find a definitive answer in a sea of conflicting data points, to resolve an informational paradox that our modern tools have created.
This report will embark on a journey to not only provide a clear answer but to dissect the very architecture of that confusion, exploring the lives behind the name, the technological quirks that fuel the illusion, and the psychological traps that make our minds so susceptible to it.
Part II: The Lives Behind the Name: Two Women, One Identity Collision
Chapter 1: A Legacy Immortalized: The Life and Passing of Dame Maggie Smith (1934-2024)
The factual anchor of this investigation is unequivocal.
Dame Margaret Natalie Smith, the legendary British actress, passed away peacefully at the age of 89 on September 27, 2024.1
Her family confirmed the news in a statement released through her publicist, noting she was surrounded by friends and family at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London.3
Major news organizations, including CBS News, NPR, The Guardian, and the BBC, all corroborated the announcement, marking the end of an era for stage and screen.5
Her career, spanning over seven decades, was a masterclass in range and endurance.
It began not in film, but on the stage, where she honed her craft at the Oxford Playhouse in the early 1950s.2
She quickly became a luminary of Britain’s National Theatre, delivering a definitive performance as Desdemona in
Othello opposite Laurence Olivier in 1964, a role that earned her her first Academy Award nomination for the 1965 film adaptation.6
This early dominance in the theatre established her as one of the most significant performers of her generation.2
While she remained a titan of the stage, she achieved international stardom through film, securing two Academy Awards.
Her first, for Best Actress, came for her tour-de-force portrayal of an eccentric and manipulative teacher in The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie (1969).1
She won her second Oscar, for Best Supporting Actress, for Neil Simon’s
California Suite (1978), a role in which she played an actress nominated for an Oscar—a meta-performance that made her the only person to ever win an Academy Award for portraying a fictional Oscar nominee.2
For younger generations, however, her identity was forged in two iconic, late-career roles that cemented her status as a global cultural treasure.
As Professor Minerva McGonagall in the eight-film Harry Potter series, she was the stern, fiercely loyal, and deeply caring head of Gryffindor House, a figure of magical authority and integrity for millions of viewers.11
Simultaneously, she captivated television audiences as Violet Crawley, the Dowager Countess of Grantham, in the worldwide phenomenon
Downton Abbey.8
Her portrayal of the formidable, sharp-tongued matriarch earned her three Emmy Awards and made her the source of the show’s most memorable and quotable lines.2
It was this wit, both on-screen and off, that became her trademark.
Colleagues and collaborators remembered her “gloriously sharp tongue” and her ability to “intimidate and charm in the same instant”.15
As the Dowager Countess, her pronouncements became legendary bits of wisdom and social commentary: “Don’t be defeatist dear, it’s terribly middle class,” “What is a ‘weekend’?” and “I’m a woman, Mary.
I can be as contrary as I choose”.16
This persona, combined with the warmth she conveyed in roles like Professor McGonagall, fostered a deep and lasting connection with the public.
This phenomenon, known in psychology as a “parasocial relationship,” is a one-sided bond where an audience member develops feelings of kinship with a media figure.18
After spending hundreds of hours with her characters over decades, audiences felt they
knew her.
This powerful emotional investment explains why the news of her death felt so deeply personal to so many and created a psychological vulnerability to any information that might contradict the painful reality of her loss.
The scale of her impact was evident in the global outpouring of tributes.
King Charles III described her as a “national treasure,” while her Harry Potter co-star Daniel Radcliffe called her a “legend”.4
Tributes flowed from peers like Whoopi Goldberg, Helen Mirren, and J.K.
Rowling, and both West End and Broadway theaters dimmed their lights in her honor—a final, fitting salute to a life that illuminated the world’s stages and screens.2
Chapter 2: A Voice in the Making: The Life and Work of Maggie Smith, the Poet
The source of the digital confusion lies with a second, distinct, and accomplished public figure: Maggie Smith, the American poet.
Born in Columbus, Ohio, in 1977, she is an award-winning author and editor who has built a significant literary career entirely separate from her famous namesake.19
To be clear, she is alive and maintains an active public and professional life.21
Her career gained international prominence when her poem “Good Bones,” first published in the journal Waxwing in 2016, went viral on social media.20
The poem, a poignant reflection on telling children about a difficult world, resonated deeply with a global audience, particularly in the wake of public tragedies.
It was hailed by Public Radio International as the “Official Poem of 2016” and has been translated into nearly a dozen languages.24
Beyond this single work, Smith is the author of several acclaimed books.
Her memoirs, Keep Moving: Notes on Loss, Creativity, and Change (2020) and You Could Make This Place Beautiful (2023), both became national bestsellers, with the latter debuting on the New York Times Bestseller list.20
She is a respected figure in the literary community, with a Master of Fine Arts from Ohio State University, a National Endowment for the Arts fellowship, and numerous other awards to her name.23
Crucially, she maintains a very public presence.
Her official website, maggiesmithpoet.com, lists a full schedule of events, including a book tour for her upcoming work, Dear Writer, with dates scheduled throughout 2025 in cities like New York, Boston, and Nashville.21
It is these verifiable, future-dated events that collide so forcefully with the news of Dame Maggie Smith’s passing in the digital sphere.
The confusion is not merely hypothetical; it is a documented reality of the poet’s public life.
In a widely cited moment, the actress Meryl Streep, while reading “Good Bones” at an event, felt compelled to clarify for the audience that its author was “not that one, the American,” a phrase the poet has since wryly adopted in her social media biography.27
Comments sections on articles about the poet frequently contain remarks from confused readers referencing
Downton Abbey or the Royal Shakespeare Company, demonstrating the persistent conflation of the two identities.28
To provide absolute clarity and serve as a definitive reference, the key distinctions between these two remarkable women are summarized below.
| Feature | Dame Maggie Smith | Maggie Smith (Poet) |
| Born | December 28, 1934 | 1977 |
| Status | Deceased (September 27, 2024) | Living |
| Nationality | British | American |
| Profession | Actress (Stage and Screen) | Poet, Essayist, and Author |
| Key Works | Downton Abbey, Harry Potter series, The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie | “Good Bones” (poem), You Could Make This Place Beautiful (memoir) |
| Online Presence | Legacy / Memorial Tributes | maggiesmithpoet.com (Active) |
Part III: Deconstructing the Digital Illusion: Technology, Psychology, and the Perfect Storm
Chapter 3: The Ghost in the Machine: The Analogy of the Glitchy Card Catalog
Having established the two separate, factual realities, the central question remains: why do they become so tangled online? The answer begins with the technology itself.
The modern information ecosystem—powered by search engines and social media feeds—can be understood through an analogy: it is a vast, global library with a flawed, automated card catalog.
This digital card catalog operates on a simple principle: keyword association.
When a user types “Maggie Smith” into a search bar, the algorithm’s primary function is to scan billions of documents and retrieve all those that contain this exact keyword string.
It does not possess human-like discernment.
It cannot inherently distinguish between Dame Maggie Smith, the 89-year-old British actress, and Maggie Smith, the 47-year-old American poet.
It sees only the matching characters.
The result is a single, contradictory file drawer presented to the user.
In this drawer, an article from The Guardian detailing the Dame’s death sits next to a post from the poet’s website announcing a 2025 book tour.
A tweet mourning the loss of Professor McGonagall appears above an Instagram photo of the poet with her children.
The algorithm, in its relentless pursuit of relevance through keyword matching, has unintentionally synthesized two truths into one falsehood: the idea that the same person is both dead and alive.
From a purely technical standpoint, the system is not broken; it is functioning precisely as it was designed.
Its goal is to connect a user’s query to all associated content at an impossible scale and speed.29
The “flaw” is not a bug in the code but a fundamental limitation of a system that prioritizes connection over contextual correctness.
Human language and identity are filled with the kind of ambiguity—in this case, two public figures sharing a common name—that this automated, keyword-based logic is ill-equipped to resolve.
The digital card catalog diligently files everything under “Maggie Smith,” leaving the bewildered human user to sort out the mess.
Chapter 4: The Mind’s Echo Chamber: The Psychology of Believing What We See
The “glitchy card catalog” of technology is only the first half of the equation.
The second, and arguably more powerful, half is how the human brain processes the confusing information it is served.
The collision of Dame Maggie Smith’s death and poet Maggie Smith’s life creates a perfect storm of cognitive biases that makes us uniquely vulnerable to misinterpretation.
This situation differs from a typical celebrity death hoax, which is often a malicious fabrication created with the intent to deceive and generate clicks.30
The “Maggie Smith” case is more of an
accidental hoax.
It is not born from a single lie, but from the unintentional digital collision of two separate truths.
This subtlety makes it even more insidious, as the underlying pieces of information are, in isolation, factual.
The falsehood is created in the synthesis.
Several psychological factors prime the mind to accept this synthesized falsehood:
- Emotional Priming and Parasocial Grief: As established, many people felt a genuine sense of loss at Dame Maggie’s passing due to strong parasocial bonds. This state of grief is a high-arousal emotional state. Research in psychology shows that when people are in a heightened emotional state, their capacity for analytical reasoning diminishes, and they are more likely to believe and share information, particularly if it is emotionally resonant.32 We are not thinking with cool logic; we are processing through a filter of sadness and nostalgia.
- Confirmation Bias: This is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information that confirms or supports one’s preexisting beliefs or desires.34 In this context, the desire is powerful and simple: for a beloved figure
not to be dead. When the flawed algorithm presents a headline suggesting “Maggie Smith” is alive and well, it aligns perfectly with what the grieving fan wants to be true. The brain latches onto this “good news” as a potential refutation of the painful news, selectively elevating its importance. - The Illusory Truth Effect: This effect describes our tendency to believe information to be correct after repeated exposure.34 In the digital ecosystem, a single piece of confusing information (e.g., a link to the poet’s website) can be shared across thousands of accounts on Twitter, Facebook, and other platforms. A user might see multiple posts about “Maggie Smith’s book tour.” Even though these all stem from one source of confusion, the repetition makes the idea that “Maggie Smith is alive” feel more familiar and, therefore, more plausible.
These cognitive shortcuts, which normally help us navigate a complex world, become vulnerabilities when fed flawed data.
The algorithm creates the confusion, but our own psychological wiring makes us susceptible to believing it.
Chapter 5: The Human Cost: The Emotional Impact of Digital Confusion
While the mechanics of this confusion are technical and psychological, the consequences are deeply human.
This is not a victimless informational glitch; it has a real emotional cost for all involved.
For the millions of fans of Dame Maggie Smith, the experience can disrupt the natural process of grieving.
The cycle begins with the initial shock and sadness of her death.
This is then interrupted by a flicker of hope and confusion sparked by the conflicting reports.
This hope leads to frantic searching, which only yields more contradictory data, leading to frustration.
Finally, upon confirming the original, painful news, the fan may feel foolish or even slightly manipulated, adding a layer of complexity to their grief.37
Instead of a linear process of acceptance, they are put on an emotional rollercoaster, which can prolong and complicate their sense of loss.
For the living Maggie Smith, the poet, the situation presents a unique and persistent challenge.
She is forced to navigate a public and professional life where her own identity is perpetually at risk of being overshadowed or erased by that of a more famous, and now deceased, individual.
As her own career grows, so does the potential for confusion.
Every media mention, every book announcement, every public appearance carries the risk of being misinterpreted.
As seen with the Meryl Streep anecdote and online commentary, she is often put in the position of having to clarify her own existence, a strange and draining burden for any artist seeking to have their work judged on its own merits.27
On a broader societal level, each of these “accidental hoaxes” contributes to the steady erosion of public trust in our information systems.
When search engines and news feeds cannot be relied upon to distinguish between a living person and a dead one, it reinforces a growing sense of cynicism.
It teaches users that the information they receive is inherently unreliable.
This can lead to a state of apathy, where trying to discern fact from fiction feels futile, or a state of hyper-vigilance, where even credible information is met with reflexive distrust.
The “Maggie Smith” case, while seemingly benign, is a small but significant crack in the foundation of shared factual reality upon which a functioning society depends.31
Part IV: A Toolkit for the Modern Reader: Navigating the Digital Library
Chapter 6: Becoming Your Own Librarian: A Practical Guide to Digital Literacy
The solution to this modern problem is not to abandon the digital library, but to learn how to navigate its stacks with a more critical and discerning eye.
The most effective defense against misinformation is not a simple checklist to be memorized, but a new mindset: the mindset of a careful, curious librarian.
A librarian doesn’t just accept the card in the catalog; they investigate its claims.
Applying this mindset to the “Maggie Smith” mystery provides a powerful, practical framework for digital literacy.
The Librarian’s Method: A Narrative Guide
- Check the Shelving (Consider the Source): A librarian knows that a book’s location tells you a lot about it. When you see a piece of information, look at where it’s shelved. Is the article from a major news organization with a history of journalistic standards (e.g., Associated Press, Reuters, BBC)? Or is it from a personal blog, an unfamiliar domain name (like .co instead of .com), or an anonymous social media account? In our case, the news of the Dame’s death came from established sources like CBS and NPR.1 The news of the book tour came from
maggiesmithpoet.com.21 Recognizing these as two different, legitimate “shelves”—one for international news, one for a specific author’s publicity—is the first step to resolving the conflict.40 - Read the Full Card (Read Beyond the Headline): Headlines are designed to grab attention and are often sensationalized. A librarian reads the full catalog card, not just the title. A headline might scream, “Maggie Smith Alive and Well!” but the body of the article may clarify it is referring to the American poet. Never share a story based on the headline alone. Reading the full text provides the context necessary to understand the claim accurately.42
- Check the Author’s Credentials (Check the Author): Who wrote the information? Is it a veteran entertainment reporter with a byline and a history of credible work, or is it an unverified, anonymous account? A quick search on the author can reveal if they are a real person and if they have expertise on the topic they are covering. Anonymous sources should always be treated with extreme skepticism.41
- Look at the Footnotes (Examine Supporting Sources): Credible information often links to its sources. A librarian checks the footnotes. Do the links in an article or tweet lead back to an official statement, a scientific study, or another reputable news report? Or do they link to other questionable sites or provide no sources at all? Following the trail of information is a crucial step in verifying its authenticity.42
- Check the Publication Date (Verify the Date): This is a simple but powerful step. Old news stories are frequently recirculated online, making them seem current. In the “Maggie Smith” case, this is paramount. The obituaries are clearly dated September 27, 2024.2 The book tour announcements are for events in April 2025.21 Comparing the dates immediately reveals that the information pertains to two different timelines and, therefore, two different people.
- Consult Other Libraries (Cross-Reference): No single library has every book. The most powerful way to verify a major claim is to see if multiple, independent, and reliable sources are reporting the same thing. If only one obscure website is reporting a shocking story, it is likely false. In our case, a quick search for “Dame Maggie Smith” would have revealed a consistent consensus among all major global news outlets about her passing, definitively debunking any hope or confusion sparked by the conflicting data.40
This method reframes digital literacy from a passive chore into an active process of inquiry.
By adopting the investigative mindset of a librarian, any user can learn to navigate the digital world more effectively.
Conclusion: Finding Clarity in the Noise
The journey that began with a moment of jarring confusion—the collision of an obituary and a book tour—ends with clarity.
The initial question, “why did maggie smith died,” was never about a single fact but about the systemic failure of our information ecosystem to handle the nuances of human identity.
The case of the two Maggie Smiths serves as a perfect, tangible microcosm of the 21st-century information challenge.
We have seen that Dame Maggie Smith, the revered actress, did indeed pass away, leaving behind an indelible legacy.
We have also met Maggie Smith, the accomplished American poet, who continues to create and share her work with the world.
The “mystery” of her simultaneous life and death was not a paranormal event or a malicious conspiracy, but an accidental hoax created by the intersection of two powerful forces: algorithms that prioritize keyword association over contextual understanding, and a human psychology predisposed to believe what it wants to be true, especially in moments of emotional vulnerability.
This investigation reveals that misinformation is not always the product of deliberate deception.
It can arise organically from the very systems we rely on to understand our world.
The solution, therefore, is not to retreat from these tools in frustration, but to engage with them more wisely.
The answer is not to log off, but to log on with a new awareness.
By becoming our own careful librarians—by questioning sources, reading beyond headlines, and cross-referencing claims—we can learn to sort fact from the fiction that our own digital world creates.
We can find the signal in the noise, and in doing so, reclaim a measure of clarity in an age of confusion.
Works cited
- Academy Award-winning actress Dame Maggie Smith dies at 89 | Montana Public Radio, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.mtpr.org/2024-09-27/academy-award-winning-actress-dame-maggie-smith-dies-at-89
- Maggie Smith – Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maggie_Smith
- Dame Maggie Smith, “Harry Potter” and “Downton Abbey” actress …, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dame-maggie-smith-harry-potter-downton-abbey-actress-died-at-89/
- Maggie Smith tributes: JK Rowling, Harry Potter and Downton Abbey co-stars pay respect to acting legend | The Independent, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/maggie-smith-death-cause-minerva-mcgonagall-sister-act-downton-abbey-b2620503.html
- Remembering “Downton Abbey” actress Maggie Smith – YouTube, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7JP-EGq6qo
- Sharp-tongued, indomitable, and beloved actress Dame Maggie Smith dies at 89, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.wuft.org/2024-09-27/sharp-tongued-indomitable-and-beloved-actress-dame-maggie-smith-dies-at-89
- Dame Maggie Smith obituary | Maggie Smith | The Guardian, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2024/sep/27/dame-maggie-smith-obituary
- Maggie Smith: Biography, Actor, Dame, Oscar Winner, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.biography.com/actors/maggie-smith
- Maggie Smith’s Most Iconic Roles, from Sexy ’60s Dramas to the Funniest Films of the ’90s (and Of Course, Harry Potter) – People.com, accessed August 7, 2025, https://people.com/maggie-smith-most-iconic-roles-8719515
- en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maggie_Smith#:~:text=Smith%20won%20two%20Academy%20Awards,and%20Gosford%20Park%20(2001).
- Maggie Smith’s Memorable TV Shows & Movies You Can Stream Now On Peacock – NBC, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.nbc.com/nbc-insider/maggie-smith-tv-shows-movies-peacock
- Saying goodbye to a timeless talent, Dame Maggie Smith – The Quinnipiac Chronicle, accessed August 7, 2025, https://quchronicle.com/87729/arts-and-life/saying-goodbye-to-a-timeless-talent-dame-maggie-smith/
- Maggie Smith’s most memorable film and TV roles – Yahoo Movies UK, accessed August 7, 2025, https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/maggie-smith-best-film-tv-roles-145524336.html
- Maggie Smith (1934-2024): Actress, Biography, Movies, Awards & Legacy, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/maggie-smith-biography-movies-awards-legacy-1727459553-1
- ‘Harry Potter’ star Maggie Smith receives tributes from Hollywood: ‘We will never see another’ | Fox News, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/harry-potter-star-maggie-smith-receives-tributes-from-hollywood-we-never-see-another
- Favorite lines from Maggie Smith? : r/DowntonAbbey – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/DowntonAbbey/comments/k0kobf/favorite_lines_from_maggie_smith/
- Lady Grantham’s words of wisdom | lady.co.uk, accessed August 7, 2025, https://lady.co.uk/lady-granthams-words-wisdom
- Celebrity Deaths Often Have Pronounced Effects on Their Audiences, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.socialworktoday.com/news/dn_071312.shtml
- Maggie Smith | National Endowment for the Arts, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.arts.gov/impact/literary-arts/creative-writing-fellows/maggie-smith
- Maggie Smith (poet) – Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maggie_Smith_(poet)
- News and Events | Maggie Smith, accessed August 7, 2025, https://maggiesmithpoet.com/news/
- Maggie Smith | Award-winning poet, author, essayist, and freelance editor, accessed August 7, 2025, https://maggiesmithpoet.com/
- The Well Speaks of Its Own Poison, winner of the 2012 Dorset Prize and the 2016 Independent Publisher Book Awards Gold Medal in Poetry – Maggie Smith, accessed August 7, 2025, https://maggiesmithpoet.com/bio/
- Maggie Smith – Blue Flower Arts, accessed August 7, 2025, https://blueflowerarts.com/artist/maggie-smith/
- About Maggie Smith | Academy of American Poets, accessed August 7, 2025, https://poets.org/poet/maggie-smith
- Maggie Smith and Friends: Dear Writer | Symphony Space, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.symphonyspace.org/events/maggie-smith-dear-writer
- Author Interview: Talking with Award-Winning Poet and Essayist Maggie Smith, accessed August 7, 2025, https://artsfuse.org/293060/author-interview-talking-with-award-winning-poet-and-essayist-maggie-smith/
- Maggie Smith on the Anxious, Silent First Year of Motherhood – Literary Hub, accessed August 7, 2025, https://lithub.com/maggie-smith-on-the-anxious-silent-first-year-of-motherhood/
- How and why does misinformation spread? – American Psychological Association, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.apa.org/topics/journalism-facts/how-why-misinformation-spreads
- Don’t Fall for These Common Celebrity Death Scams & Hoaxes – Executech, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.executech.com/insights/dont-fall-common-celebrity-death-scams-hoaxes/
- How celebrity death hoaxes power fake news – Digiday, accessed August 7, 2025, https://digiday.com/media/queen-elizabeth-is-not-dead/
- What psychological factors make people susceptible to believe and act on misinformation?, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.apa.org/topics/journalism-facts/misinformation-belief-action
- Psychological factors contributing to the creation and dissemination of fake news among social media users: a systematic review – PMC, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11575416/
- Fake news: Why do we believe it? – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9548403/
- The psychology of belief, and how perceived threats to identity are linked to misinformation, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pen.org/the-psychology-of-belief-and-how-perceived-threats-to-identity-are-linked-to-misinformation/
- Ask a Psychologist: Why Do We Fall for Fake News? – UC San Diego Today, accessed August 7, 2025, https://today.ucsd.edu/story/ask-a-psychologist-why-do-we-fall-for-fake-news
- I don’t understand people’s reactions to celebrity deaths : r/aspergers – Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/aspergers/comments/evfjpm/i_dont_understand_peoples_reactions_to_celebrity/
- Martin Lawrence Death Hoax: The Truth Behind The Rumors, accessed August 7, 2025, https://paraseguirandando.adm.org.ar/the-sparkella/martin-lawrence-death-hoax-the-truth-behind-the-rumors/
- Faked death – Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faked_death
- checklist: can you spot ‘fake news’ online? – ISPCC, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ispcc.ie/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ISPCC_Tips-and-Tricks_Can-you-spot-fake-news-online.pdf
- Spotting Fake News – U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.tradoc.army.mil/social-media-fake-news/
- How to spot fake news: Identifying propaganda, satire, and false information | SFU Library, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.lib.sfu.ca/help/research-assistance/fake-news
- Recognise Fake News Checklist – Checkify, accessed August 7, 2025, https://checkify.com/daily-checklists/recognise-fake-news-checklist/
- How to Spot Fake News Vocabulary: Seven Point Checklist for Students: Discussion Questions:, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.epsnj.org/cms/lib/NJ01912667/Centricity/Domain/3033/How%20to%20Spot%20Fake%20News.pdf
