The Great Thinning: A Definitive Analysis of the Loss of Mars’s Atmosphere and its Planetary Consequences

I. Introduction: The Tale of Two Planets and a Climatic Metamorphosis

The modern Mars is a world of stark, desolate beauty. It is a frigid desert planet, locked in a deep freeze, with a tenuous atmosphere less than one percent as dense as Earth’s.¹ Its thin air, composed almost entirely of carbon dioxide, is incapable of retaining significant heat or preventing the planet’s remaining water from either freezing solid or rapidly sublimating into vapor. Yet, etched into this barren landscape is the unmistakable ghost of a different past. Orbiters and rovers have returned a wealth of data revealing a world that was once warmer, wetter, and shrouded in a far more substantial atmosphere.¹ Ancient river valleys meander for thousands of kilometers, vast deltas fan out into now-empty crater basins, and mineral deposits betray a history of long-standing lakes and seas. This dramatic planetary transformation from a potentially habitable world to a sterile wasteland represents one of the most profound climatic catastrophes in the history of our solar system. The central question, which has driven decades of planetary exploration, is what caused this metamorphosis? Why did Mars lose its atmosphere?

The answer, now established with a high degree of scientific confidence, is not a single, simple event but a protracted, multi-stage process of planetary decline. The prevailing scientific consensus holds that the loss of Mars’s atmosphere was initiated by a fundamental failure deep within the planet’s interior—the shutdown of its core dynamo—and was subsequently executed by the relentless, erosive forces of the Sun. This report will deconstruct this entire causal chain, tracing the journey of Mars from its warm, wet infancy to its current cold, dry state. It will reconstruct the environment of ancient Mars, detail the geophysical trigger that lowered its planetary shield, and explain the physical mechanisms of atmospheric escape. It will synthesize the diverse and converging lines of evidence—from the geological record on the surface, to the chemical fingerprints in the atmosphere, to the direct, real-time measurements from dedicated space missions. Finally, it will analyze the profound consequences of this atmospheric loss for the planet’s climate, its inventory of water, and its potential to have ever hosted life, placing the Martian story in context by comparing its divergent evolutionary path with that of our own vibrant, life-sustaining world.

To comprehend this planetary evolution, it is essential to frame it within the established geological timeline of Mars. This history is broadly divided into three major eras: the Noachian, the Hesperian, and the Amazonian. These periods serve as the chronological backbone for the narrative of atmospheric loss, marking the transition from a world of possibility to one of desolation.⁶

Geological Era	Time Period (Ga = Billion Years Ago)	Key Planetary Conditions & Events
Noachian	~4.1−3.7 Ga	Active core dynamo and global magnetic field. A thicker, denser atmosphere supported a warmer climate and abundant surface water, leading to the formation of valley networks and lakes.6
Hesperian	~3.7−3.1 Ga	A transitional period. The core dynamo failed, and the global magnetic field collapsed early in this era.6 Atmospheric stripping by the solar wind accelerated, leading to widespread volcanic activity, desiccation, and the freezing of remaining water.6
Amazonian	~3.1 Ga – Present	The modern era. Mars is characterized by a cold, dry, and oxidized surface under a thin atmosphere. Atmospheric loss continues at a much-reduced rate. The planet is largely geologically inactive and inhospitable at the surface.6

II. Echoes of a Watery World: Reconstructing the Environment of Ancient Mars

The case for a thicker, warmer ancient Martian atmosphere begins not with atmospheric models, but with the rocks and landforms on the ground. The geological and mineralogical evidence for a past epoch of abundant liquid water is so compelling that it serves as an indirect but powerful confirmation of a once-substantial atmosphere. The fundamental principles of physics dictate that liquid water cannot remain stable on a planetary surface without sufficient atmospheric pressure to prevent it from rapidly boiling away and a greenhouse effect to maintain temperatures above freezing.² Therefore, the very existence of ancient aqueous features necessitates a past Martian atmosphere that was profoundly different from the tenuous envelope observed today.

The Geological Case for Liquid Water

Decades of exploration by orbiters and rovers have revealed a Martian surface carved by water. These are not ambiguous features; in many cases, they are landforms with direct terrestrial analogues that can only be formed by the action of liquid water over extended periods.

• Ancient River Valleys and Streambeds: Across the ancient southern highlands of Mars, intricate networks of valleys, strongly resembling terrestrial river systems, are etched into the landscape.¹⁰ In 2012, NASA’s
  Curiosity rover found direct evidence of an ancient streambed in Gale Crater, with smoothly rounded pebbles indicating a “vigorous flow” of water that was likely hip-deep and moving at about 3.3 km/h.¹²
• Deltas and Lakebeds: Numerous craters, including Eberswalde, Jezero (the landing site of the Perseverance rover), and Gale, contain clear evidence of ancient lakes. These craters host fan-shaped deposits of sediment that are classic river deltas, formed as water carrying sediment flowed into a standing body of water.⁵ The layered sediments within these former lakebeds provide a geological record of Mars’s ancient climate.
• Outflow Channels and Megafloods: Beyond meandering rivers, Mars also bears the scars of catastrophic floods. Enormous outflow channels, some many kilometers wide and hundreds of kilometers long, were carved by sudden, massive releases of water, likely from subsurface reservoirs.¹¹ These features speak to a time when Mars held vast quantities of water.
• Inverted Topography: In some regions, ancient stream channels now appear as raised, sinuous ridges rather than valleys. This “inverted relief” occurs when sediment in a riverbed is cemented by minerals, making it more resistant to erosion than the surrounding plains. Over billions of years, wind has stripped away the softer surrounding material, leaving the hardened, former riverbed standing in relief as a fossil of the ancient water flow.¹⁴

The Mineralogical Case for a Thicker, Warmer Atmosphere

The minerals found within Martian rocks provide a chemical fingerprint of the environment in which they formed. The widespread presence of minerals that can only form in the presence of liquid water offers some of the most definitive evidence for Mars’s wetter past and, by extension, its thicker atmosphere.

• Hydrated Minerals: Missions like the Opportunity, Spirit, and Curiosity rovers have identified a host of hydrated minerals. These include various sulfates, chlorides, and opaline silica.¹⁰ The rover
  Opportunity at Meridiani Planum found rocks rich in salts and pocked with “vugs”—small cavities left behind when salt crystals, formed in briny water, later dissolved or eroded away.¹⁰ Perhaps most significantly, orbiters and rovers have discovered vast deposits of clays (phyllosilicates).¹⁵ The formation of thick clay layers requires stable, long-lived bodies of water and intense chemical weathering, conditions that would be greatly facilitated by a denser, warmer atmosphere.¹⁵
• Carbonates and the Ancient Carbon Cycle: Carbonate minerals, such as limestone on Earth, form when atmospheric carbon dioxide dissolves in water and reacts with rocks. The discovery of carbonate deposits on Mars, though not as extensive as once hypothesized, provides direct evidence of a past carbon cycle and a CO₂-rich atmosphere capable of supporting liquid water.¹⁷ The presence of these minerals confirms that CO₂, the primary component of Mars’s atmosphere today, was also abundant in the past and actively participated in surface chemistry.

The Faint Young Sun Paradox and Greenhouse Solutions

The overwhelming evidence for liquid water on early Mars presents a significant climatic puzzle known as the “Faint Young Sun Paradox”.¹⁹ Standard models of stellar evolution indicate that roughly 4 billion years ago, during the Noachian period when Martian rivers were flowing, the Sun was only about 70-75% as luminous as it is today.¹⁹ Under such a dim Sun, even a very thick atmosphere composed purely of carbon dioxide and water vapor would have been insufficient to warm the Martian surface above the freezing point of water.²¹ Mars should have been a frozen ball of ice.

The resolution to this paradox forces a re-evaluation of the character of the early Martian atmosphere. The need for additional warming implies that the atmosphere was not simply a denser version of today’s but was chemically complex and dynamic.

• The Role of Super-Greenhouse Gases: To bridge the energy gap, scientists propose that the early Martian atmosphere contained potent “reducing” greenhouse gases in addition to CO₂. The leading candidates are molecular hydrogen (H2​) and methane (CH4​).¹⁹ These gases are highly effective at trapping thermal radiation through a process known as “collision-induced absorption,” where interactions with the abundant CO₂ molecules allow them to absorb infrared light far more effectively than they would on their own.¹⁹
• Episodic Warming: These reducing gases are photochemically unstable and would not last indefinitely in the atmosphere.²³ This has led to models of an early Mars that fluctuated between long, cold, icy periods and transient warm, wet spells.⁸ Episodic releases of H₂ and CH₄ from widespread volcanism or serpentinization (a chemical reaction between water and iron-rich rock) could have temporarily boosted the greenhouse effect, melting surface ice and allowing rivers to flow for periods of thousands to millions of years before the gases were destroyed and the planet lapsed back into a deep freeze.²²

This solution to the climate problem has profound astrobiological implications. The very gases needed to warm the planet—hydrogen and methane—are also key ingredients for prebiotic chemistry. A chemically reducing atmosphere, rich in H₂ and CH₄, is a highly favorable environment for the synthesis of the complex organic molecules that are the building blocks of life.²⁵ Thus, the climatic necessity for a complex, reducing atmosphere simultaneously provides a potential pathway for the origin of life on early Mars.

III. The Dying Heart: Cessation of the Martian Core Dynamo

The story of Mars’s lost atmosphere begins not at its surface, but deep within its metallic core. The ultimate cause of the planet’s climatic downfall was an internal, geophysical failure: the cessation of its planetary dynamo, which led to the collapse of its protective global magnetic field. This event, which occurred roughly 4 billion years ago, is the “original sin” of Martian climate change, the single failure that set in motion all the subsequent atmospheric loss.⁹ It demonstrates that a planet’s long-term surface habitability is critically dependent on the vitality of its deep interior.

A Primer on Planetary Magnetic Fields

A global magnetic field, like the one that shields Earth, is generated by a geodynamo. This process requires three key ingredients: an electrically conductive fluid layer (Earth’s molten iron-nickel outer core), a source of energy to drive convection within that fluid (primordial heat and heat from crystallization), and planetary rotation. The churning, convective motion of the molten metal generates powerful electrical currents, which in turn produce a stable, global magnetic field that extends far out into space.²⁷ This magnetosphere acts as a crucial planetary shield, deflecting the solar wind—a constant stream of high-energy charged particles from the Sun—and preventing it from directly eroding the atmosphere. Earth’s sustained dynamo is a primary reason it has remained habitable for billions of years.

The Martian Core’s Failure

Evidence from magnetized rocks in the ancient Martian crust indicates that Mars, too, once possessed a powerful global magnetic field early in its history.⁵ However, this shield did not last. The primary reason for its failure lies in Mars’s smaller size. With only about half the diameter and one-tenth the mass of Earth, Mars has a higher surface-area-to-volume ratio, causing it to lose its internal primordial heat much more rapidly.²⁹ As the core cooled, the convection that powered the dynamo slowed and eventually stopped.

A leading theory, supported by high-pressure, high-temperature laboratory experiments simulating Martian core conditions, points to a specific chemical mechanism for the dynamo’s shutdown: core stratification.⁵ Mars’s core is believed to be a mixture of iron, sulfur, and a significant amount of hydrogen. The experiments showed that under the immense pressures of the Martian core, this Fe-S-H liquid would have separated into two distinct, immiscible layers: a denser, sulfur-rich iron liquid (Fe-S) and a lighter, hydrogen-rich iron liquid (Fe-H). Initially, the upward movement of the less dense, hydrogen-rich liquid would have driven vigorous convection, powering the early dynamo. However, this process was self-limiting. Once the two liquids had fully separated and stratified, the primary driver of convection would have vanished. The dynamo would have shut down relatively abruptly, extinguishing the planet’s protective magnetic field.⁵

Timeline of the Collapse

The timing of this magnetic collapse is a critical anchor point in the story of Mars. Analysis of magnetized crustal rocks by spacecraft like the Mars Global Surveyor places the death of the dynamo at approximately 4.1 to 4.0 billion years ago, near the boundary between the Noachian and Hesperian periods.⁷ After this point, all that remained were patches of “crustal magnetism”—remnant magnetic fields locked into ancient rocks from the time when the global field was active. These localized fields offer no global protection and, in some ways, may even funnel solar wind particles into the atmosphere, creating a complex and “lumpy” interaction.³² The moment the global shield fell, Mars’s atmosphere was left exposed to the full, unmitigated force of the young, active Sun.

IV. The Sun’s Relentless Assault: Mechanisms of Atmospheric Escape

With its global magnetic shield gone, the Martian atmosphere became vulnerable to direct erosion by the Sun. The primary agent of this destruction is the solar wind, a continuous supersonic stream of charged particles (mainly protons and electrons) flowing outward from the Sun at speeds of around one million miles per hour.²⁸ While a planet with a strong magnetosphere like Earth deflects the bulk of this wind, the solar wind plows directly into the upper atmosphere of Mars.³⁵ This interaction creates a weak, induced magnetosphere as the solar wind’s magnetic field drapes around the planet’s ionosphere, but this provides little protection against several powerful escape processes that have stripped the atmosphere away over billions of years.²⁹

The atmospheric loss was not a steady, gentle trickle. It was a dynamic process that varied with the Sun’s activity. The young Sun, some 4 billion years ago, was far more active than it is today, rotating faster and emitting a much more intense stream of ultraviolet (UV) radiation and a more powerful solar wind.⁹ Data from NASA’s MAVEN mission shows that even today, atmospheric escape rates can increase by a factor of 10 or more during solar storms.³² By combining these modern observations with our knowledge of the early Sun, scientists can confidently extrapolate that the atmospheric stripping rate was vastly higher in the first billion years after the magnetic field failed, providing a mechanism to remove a thick atmosphere in a geologically reasonable timeframe.

Dominant Mechanism: Sputtering

The most significant process responsible for the loss of the bulk of Mars’s atmosphere is known as sputtering.⁴ For years a leading theory, sputtering was directly observed and confirmed by the MAVEN mission, solidifying its central role in Martian climate history.³⁸

The physics of sputtering involves a multi-step process. First, particles in the upper atmosphere are ionized by solar UV radiation. The magnetic field carried by the solar wind can then “pick up” these newly formed ions (such as O2+​ or CO2+​) and accelerate them to high energies. Some of these energized ions are flung away from the planet, but many are slammed back down into the neutral upper atmosphere. These high-speed ions act like cosmic “cannonballs,” crashing into neutral atoms and molecules (like argon, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide) and transferring enough kinetic energy to knock them completely out of the planet’s gravitational grasp and into space.⁹ MAVEN’s data not only confirmed this process but revealed that it is happening at a rate four times higher than previous models had predicted.³⁸

Other Key Escape Processes

While sputtering is the primary driver for the loss of heavier atmospheric components, a suite of other mechanisms has contributed to the comprehensive stripping of the Martian atmosphere. This multi-pronged attack ensured that all major components, from heavy CO₂ to light hydrogen, were effectively removed over time.

• Ion Pickup and Escape: In addition to driving sputtering, the solar wind can directly remove atmospheric ions. As solar UV light ionizes atoms at the top of the atmosphere, the magnetic field embedded within the solar wind can sweep them up and carry them away from the planet.³⁴ MAVEN’s instruments have mapped the primary escape routes for these ions, identifying a “tail” of escaping plasma flowing behind Mars, a “polar plume” of ions escaping from over the poles, and an extended cloud of gas surrounding the planet. The tail region alone accounts for approximately 75% of this ion loss.³⁴
• Photochemical Escape: High-energy solar radiation, particularly in the extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and X-ray parts of the spectrum, can directly impart escape energy to atmospheric particles. When a high-energy photon strikes a molecule like CO₂, it can break it apart (a process called photodissociation) into charged fragments. These fragments are created with significant kinetic energy, sometimes enough to exceed Mars’s escape velocity on their own, without needing a secondary “kick” from a sputtering ion.²⁹ This process is particularly effective for lighter ions like hydrogen and oxygen.
• Jeans Escape (Thermal Escape): This mechanism is most effective for the lightest atmospheric gases, particularly hydrogen. At the very top of the atmosphere, a region called the exobase, atoms and molecules can travel long distances without colliding. Here, the lightest atoms in the thermal “tail” of the velocity distribution can achieve speeds greater than the planet’s escape velocity and simply fly away into space.²⁹ While not significant for heavy molecules like CO₂, Jeans escape is the primary mechanism for the loss of hydrogen. Since hydrogen is a key component of water (H₂O), this process has been critical to the long-term drying of Mars.²
• Impact Erosion: Especially during the solar system’s chaotic youth, a period known as the Late Heavy Bombardment, Mars was subjected to frequent and massive impacts from asteroids and comets. A large impact can vaporize rock and create an expanding plume of hot gas that can blast a significant column of the atmosphere directly into space.³¹ While this was likely a major factor in shaping the planet’s earliest atmosphere, it is not considered the primary driver of the slow, continuous loss that occurred over the subsequent billions of years.

The following table summarizes these key escape mechanisms, highlighting their distinct physics and the atmospheric species they primarily affect.

Mechanism	Physical Description	Primary Species Affected	Key Evidence
Sputtering	High-energy ions, accelerated by the solar wind, collide with and eject neutral atoms and molecules from the upper atmosphere.	All species, especially heavy ones like Argon (Ar), Carbon Dioxide (CO2​), and Oxygen (O).	MAVEN argon distribution data 38; Isotopic ratios of Ar, N, C.37
Ion Pickup	Atmospheric atoms are ionized by solar UV and then swept away by the solar wind’s embedded magnetic field.	Ions, particularly O+, O2+​, and CO2+​.	MAVEN ion composition and escape flux measurements.34
Photochemical Escape	Solar UV/X-ray radiation breaks apart molecules, creating energetic fragments that can exceed escape velocity.	Lighter ions like H+ and O+ from the dissociation of H₂O and CO₂.	Models of atmospheric chemistry and energy deposition.29
Jeans Escape	Light atoms at the top of the atmosphere are thermally excited to speeds greater than the planet’s escape velocity.	Lightest gases, primarily Hydrogen (H) and Helium (He).	MAVEN measurements of hydrogen escape; D/H isotopic ratio.2
Impact Erosion	Large asteroid/comet impacts blast portions of the atmosphere directly into space.	All atmospheric species in the impact region.	Crater record on Mars; models of impact physics.41

V. A Forensic Investigation: The Multi-faceted Evidence for Atmospheric Loss

The scientific confidence in the narrative of atmospheric escape is exceptionally high because it is not based on a single piece of evidence, but on the convergence of three independent and mutually reinforcing lines of investigation: the geochemical history recorded in isotopes, the direct, real-time measurements of escaping particles by dedicated missions, and the falsification of major alternative theories. This creates a closed loop of evidence where the historical record (isotopes) matches the present-day process (MAVEN observations) and the underlying theory (physics).

Subsection 5.1: Isotopic Fingerprints in the Atmosphere and Meteorites

The most powerful forensic tool for reconstructing the history of Mars’s atmosphere is the analysis of stable isotopes. The core principle is straightforward: atmospheric escape processes are mass-selective. Lighter isotopes of an element, being less tightly bound by gravity, are stripped away into space more easily than their heavier counterparts. Over billions of years, this preferential loss leaves the remaining atmosphere progressively “enriched” in the heavier isotope.⁷ By measuring the isotopic ratios in the modern Martian atmosphere and comparing them to the primordial ratios found elsewhere in the solar system (e.g., in meteorites or on Earth), scientists can calculate the total fraction of the atmosphere that has been lost over time.

• The Argon Ratio ($^{36}Ar/^{38}$Ar): Argon serves as the “gold standard” for tracing atmospheric loss by sputtering. As a noble gas, it does not participate in chemical reactions and cannot be sequestered in rocks, meaning the only way it can be permanently removed from the atmosphere is by escape to space.³⁷ Measurements by the
  Curiosity rover’s Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) instrument found the modern Martian atmospheric $^{36}Ar/^{38}$Ar ratio to be approximately 4.2.⁴⁴ This is significantly lower than the primordial solar system value of ~5.3, which is found on Earth and Jupiter.⁴⁴ This pronounced depletion of the lighter $^{36}$Ar isotope is definitive proof of long-term, mass-dependent escape. Based on this fractionation, scientists estimate that 65-66% of all the argon Mars ever had in its atmosphere has been lost to space.³⁷
• Nitrogen ($^{14}N/^{15}N)andCarbon(^{12}C/^{13}$C): Similar patterns of enrichment are observed in other key atmospheric gases. The Martian atmosphere is significantly enriched in the heavier nitrogen isotope, $^{15}$N, relative to the lighter $^{14}$N, when compared to Earth’s ratio.⁴⁶ Likewise, the carbon in atmospheric CO₂ is enriched in the heavier $^{13}$C isotope relative to $^{12}$C.⁴⁶ These measurements, corroborated by analyses of gases trapped in Martian meteorites, confirm that the atmospheric loss was not limited to argon but was a planet-wide phenomenon affecting all major gases.¹³
• The Deuterium/Hydrogen (D/H) Ratio: This ratio is the primary tracer for the history of water on Mars. Deuterium (D) is an isotope of hydrogen with an extra neutron, making it twice as heavy. The Martian atmosphere today is profoundly enriched in deuterium, with a D/H ratio about five to six times higher than that of Earth’s oceans.⁴⁶ This indicates that a vast quantity of water has been lost over Martian history. The process involves water molecules (H₂O) being broken apart by solar UV radiation in the atmosphere. The resulting light hydrogen atoms then easily escape to space via Jeans escape, while the heavier deuterium atoms are more likely to be retained. This isotopic “fingerprint” suggests that Mars has lost a volume of water equivalent to a global layer tens, or even hundreds, of meters deep over its history.⁷

The following table summarizes the key isotopic measurements that form the bedrock of our understanding of Martian atmospheric loss.

Isotope Ratio	Measured Martian Value	Primordial/Terrestrial Value	Implication
$^{36}Ar/^{38}$Ar	~4.2 44	~5.3 44	Definitive evidence for significant loss of heavy atmospheric gases via sputtering. Estimated loss of >65% of the original argon inventory.37
$^{15}N/^{14}$N	Enriched by ~62% (ratio of ~173) 46	Earth’s ratio is ~272 47	Substantial loss of nitrogen from the atmosphere over geological time.
D/H	Enriched by ~5-6 times 46	Earth standard (VSMOW)	Massive loss of water, with lighter hydrogen preferentially escaping to space. Corresponds to a lost global ocean tens of meters deep.7
$^{13}C/^{12}$C	Enriched by ~5% 46	Terrestrial standard (PDB)	Significant loss of atmospheric carbon dioxide to space.

Subsection 5.2: The MAVEN Mission – A Revolution in Martian Atmospheric Science

While isotopic ratios provide a historical record of total loss, NASA’s Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN) mission, which entered orbit in 2014, was designed to observe the escape processes in action today.²⁸ MAVEN has revolutionized our understanding by providing direct, quantitative measurements of how, where, and at what rate the atmosphere is currently being lost.

• Quantifying Modern Loss: MAVEN’s instruments measured the current rate of atmospheric escape to be approximately 100 grams (about a quarter of a pound) per second under normal solar conditions.³⁴ Critically, the mission observed that during solar storm events, this loss rate can be accelerated by a factor of 10 or more.³² This observation is the key to bridging the gap between present-day loss and the massive loss required in the past, as the young Sun was much more active. The total loss rate for hydrogen and oxygen alone is estimated at 2-3 kg/s.⁴⁰
• Mapping Escape Pathways: MAVEN’s suite of instruments, including mass spectrometers and magnetometers, has mapped the structure of Mars’s interaction with the solar wind. It confirmed that ions are primarily escaping in a “tail” that flows behind the planet and in “plumes” above the poles, providing a 3D picture of the atmospheric leak.³⁴
• Unveiling Atmospheric Complexity: MAVEN’s discoveries went beyond simply confirming theories. It found unexpected complexity in the Martian upper atmosphere, including the deep penetration of solar wind particles that become neutralized through chemical reactions, allowing them to bypass the induced magnetosphere.³² It also discovered new types of planet-wide aurorae (termed “diffuse” and “proton” aurorae) that are fundamentally different from Earth’s polar lights and are a direct result of solar particles crashing into the entire atmospheric disk.³² These findings paint a picture of a much more dynamic and complex Mars-Sun interaction than previously imagined.

Subsection 5.3: The Carbonate Conundrum – Falsifying an Alternative Hypothesis

The process of scientific advancement often involves not just confirming theories, but also ruling out plausible alternatives. A major alternative hypothesis for the disappearance of Mars’s early atmosphere was sequestration—the idea that the thick CO₂ atmosphere was not lost to space but was instead chemically locked away into carbonate minerals in the planet’s crust.⁵⁶ This was a logical and testable hypothesis. If true, Mars should harbor vast, continent-sized deposits of carbonate rocks, similar to the limestone and dolomite deposits on Earth.

For years, scientists expected missions to find these massive carbonate reservoirs.⁵⁷ However, extensive orbital surveys by instruments like the Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES) and the Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) have systematically searched for these deposits and have come up largely empty-handed.⁵⁸ While some concentrated carbonate deposits have been identified, most notably in the Nili Fossae region, their total volume is woefully insufficient to account for the thick atmosphere required to explain a warm, wet past.⁵⁶ The largest known deposit contains, at most, twice the carbon of the

current Martian atmosphere, falling short by a factor of at least 35 of what would be needed.⁵⁶

This “missing carbonate” problem is a powerful piece of negative evidence. The failure to find the predicted reservoirs strongly indicates that sequestration was, at best, a minor process in the removal of Mars’s atmosphere. This result dramatically strengthens the case for the dominant alternative: that the vast majority of the atmosphere was lost to space.⁵⁶ This episode serves as a classic example of the scientific method in action, where a plausible hypothesis was tested with observational data and ultimately falsified, leading to a refinement of our understanding and increased confidence in the prevailing theory of atmospheric escape.

VI. The Great Drying: Climatic and Astrobiological Consequences

The protracted loss of its atmosphere was not a subtle change for Mars; it was a planetary catastrophe that triggered a radical and irreversible transformation of its climate and surface environment. The consequences of this “great thinning” directly explain the transition from the potentially habitable world of the Noachian period to the frigid, sterile desert we see today.⁹

Climate Transformation

The thinning of the atmosphere drove a dramatic shift in the planet’s energy balance and the physical state of water.

• Loss of Greenhouse Warming: Carbon dioxide, while only a trace gas on Earth, was the primary constituent of the ancient Martian atmosphere. As a potent greenhouse gas, it was responsible for trapping solar heat and maintaining warmer temperatures.³⁷ The relentless stripping of CO₂ by sputtering and other escape processes caused the greenhouse effect to collapse. Global temperatures plummeted, plunging the planet into a permanent deep freeze with average surface temperatures today around -60° C (-76° F), far below the freezing point of water.²
• Collapse of Atmospheric Pressure: As the atmospheric mass was eroded, the surface pressure dropped to its current negligible level of about 6 millibars, less than 1% of Earth’s sea-level pressure.¹ At this extremely low pressure, liquid water is no longer stable on the surface. Any liquid water exposed to the modern Martian environment would rapidly and simultaneously boil and freeze.³ This change in a fundamental physical parameter made the existence of rivers, lakes, and seas impossible.

The Fate of Martian Water

The loss of the atmosphere and the loss of surface water were inextricably linked, coupled in a runaway positive feedback loop of desiccation. As the atmosphere thinned, the planet cooled, causing more of its surface water to freeze into the polar caps and subsurface permafrost, removing it from the active climate system.¹¹ Simultaneously, the lower pressure made the remaining liquid water evaporate or sublimate more easily into the atmosphere. This put more water vapor into the upper atmosphere, where it was vulnerable to being broken apart by solar UV radiation. The light hydrogen atoms from this dissociation were then permanently lost to space, a process confirmed by the extreme enrichment of deuterium in the remaining atmosphere.⁷ The loss of water vapor, itself a greenhouse gas, further contributed to the planetary cooling. This vicious cycle—less atmosphere leading to colder temperatures and lower pressure, which in turn accelerated water loss, which further weakened the atmosphere—rapidly and irreversibly drove Mars to its current hyper-arid state. The planet’s once-abundant water inventory is now either locked away as ice or has been lost to space forever.⁷

Implications for Habitability

The collapse of the Martian atmosphere had profound and devastating consequences for the planet’s potential to harbor life.

• End of Surface Habitability: The transition to a cold, dry world where liquid water is unstable rendered the Martian surface uninhabitable for life as we know it.⁴ Furthermore, the loss of the atmospheric shield meant the surface became bombarded by sterilizing high-energy solar radiation and galactic cosmic rays, making it an even more hostile environment.²⁸ The era of a potentially life-bearing surface on Mars effectively ended with the loss of its atmosphere.
• The Search for Subsurface Refugia: This catastrophic climate change directly informs our modern search for life on Mars. The leading hypothesis is that if life ever did arise on the Red Planet, it would have been forced to retreat into the subsurface to survive.⁹ Shielded from the harsh surface radiation and extreme temperatures, life could potentially persist in “refugia”—isolated pockets where geothermal heat might maintain liquid water in aquifers deep underground. Consequently, the modern astrobiological exploration of Mars is increasingly focused on drilling and developing techniques to probe the subsurface, searching for the chemical or fossilized biosignatures of a biosphere that was driven into hiding billions of years ago.

VII. The Earth-Mars Dichotomy: A Comparative Analysis of Atmospheric Evolution

To fully appreciate the tragedy of Mars’s atmospheric loss, it is instructive to compare its fate with that of its sibling planet, Earth. Formed from similar materials in the same region of the solar system, Earth and Mars began as rocky worlds with outgassed secondary atmospheres and the potential for liquid water. Yet, their evolutionary paths diverged dramatically, resulting in one vibrant, living world and one cold, dead one. This divergence can be attributed to a few fundamental differences in their planetary characteristics, highlighting that a planet’s habitability is an emergent property of a complex, interconnected system involving its core, mantle, crust, and atmosphere.

The Role of Planetary Mass and Gravity

The most fundamental difference is size. Mars is significantly smaller than Earth, with about 11% of its mass and 53% of its diameter.⁶¹ This has two critical consequences:

1. Gravity and Escape Velocity: Earth’s greater mass results in stronger gravity and a higher escape velocity (11.2 km/s vs. Mars’s 5.0 km/s). This makes it intrinsically more difficult for any atmospheric particle, regardless of the escape mechanism, to achieve the energy needed to break free from the planet’s gravitational pull.²⁹ Mars’s weaker gravity made it inherently more vulnerable to all forms of atmospheric stripping.⁶³
2. Internal Heat: A larger planetary volume allows a planet to retain its primordial heat from accretion for much longer. Earth’s larger size has kept its interior hot and geologically active, while Mars, with its higher surface-area-to-volume ratio, cooled much more quickly.³⁰ This difference in thermal evolution is the root cause of their differing fates.

The Enduring Dynamo

The difference in internal heat directly led to the divergence of their magnetic fields. Earth’s massive, hot, and convecting liquid outer core has sustained a powerful geodynamo for billions of years. This enduring magnetic field has continuously shielded our atmosphere from the erosive force of the solar wind.³⁰ In contrast, Mars’s smaller core cooled and solidified (or stratified) much earlier in its history, causing its dynamo to fail and its protective magnetic shield to vanish around 4 billion years ago.⁵ This was the pivotal moment: Earth kept its shield, while Mars lost its.

The Role of Plate Tectonics

Earth’s retained internal heat also drives another critical process for atmospheric stability: plate tectonics. The constant motion and recycling of Earth’s crustal plates fuels widespread volcanism, which continuously replenishes the atmosphere with volatiles (gases like CO₂, H₂O, and N₂) outgassed from the mantle.³⁰ This acts as a long-term source that helps to balance atmospheric loss processes. Mars, lacking plate tectonics, has been largely geologically quiescent for most of its history. While it experienced massive volcanism in its past, it lacked the sustained, planet-wide recycling mechanism to replace the atmospheric gases that were being steadily stripped away into space.³⁰ Earth’s atmosphere is constantly being resupplied; Mars’s was not.

The following table provides a stark, side-by-side comparison of the key parameters that dictated the divergent atmospheric evolution of Earth and Mars.

Parameter	Modern Mars	Modern Earth
Mass (vs Earth)	0.107	1
Surface Gravity	3.72 m/s2 (0.38 g)	9.81 m/s2 (1 g)
Global Magnetic Field	Absent (only localized crustal fields) 28	Present and Strong 28
Plate Tectonics	Absent 30	Active 30
Primary Atmospheric Composition	95% CO2​, 2.8% N2​, 2% Ar 2	78% N2​, 21% O2​, 0.9% Ar 61
Average Surface Pressure	~6 millibars (0.6% of Earth’s) 3	~1013 millibars (1 bar)

This comparison reveals that a planet’s ability to remain habitable is not simply a matter of being in the right place—the so-called “Goldilocks Zone.” It is a function of a complete planetary system. Earth’s success is a story of multiple interconnected geophysical systems—a hot core, a protective magnetosphere, and an active mantle driving tectonic recycling—all working in concert over billions of years to maintain a stable, life-sustaining surface environment. Mars serves as a cautionary tale of what happens when one of those critical systems fails.

VIII. Synthesizing the Narrative of a Lost World: Current Consensus and Future Frontiers

The disappearance of the Martian atmosphere, a defining event in the history of the solar system, is no longer a deep mystery. A robust and compelling scientific consensus, built upon decades of observation, experimentation, and theoretical modeling, has emerged. This consensus paints a clear picture of planetary evolution, where a world’s internal destiny dictates the fate of its surface environment.

The causal chain is now well-established. The story begins with the rapid cooling of Mars’s small planetary core, which led to the cessation of its internal dynamo and the collapse of its protective global magnetic field approximately four billion years ago. This singular geophysical failure left the planet’s early, thick atmosphere undefended against the intense solar wind and radiation from a young, hyperactive Sun. Over the subsequent hundreds of millions of years, during the Hesperian period, a relentless combination of atmospheric escape processes—dominated by sputtering but aided by ion pickup, photochemical reactions, and thermal escape—stripped the atmosphere away. The resulting catastrophic collapse in atmospheric pressure and greenhouse warming caused the planet’s surface water to either freeze into vast subsurface ice deposits or be lost to space forever. This climatic metamorphosis transformed Mars from a potentially habitable world, with rivers and lakes, into the cold, arid, and irradiated desert we see today.

While this overarching narrative is secure, science continues to refine the details and probe the remaining uncertainties. Key areas of active research include:

• Quantifying the Primordial Atmosphere: Precisely determining the pressure and composition of the Noachian atmosphere remains a challenge. While evidence points to a thicker atmosphere, estimates for its exact density vary, with some models suggesting pressures from half of Earth’s current sea-level pressure to potentially several times higher.⁶⁴
• Modeling Long-Term Climate Variability: Mars experiences chaotic, large-scale variations in its axial tilt (obliquity) over millions of years. Recent modeling suggests that periods of high obliquity could have dramatically increased atmospheric water vapor content and hydrogen escape rates, potentially accounting for a significant fraction of the planet’s total water loss.⁵¹ Understanding this long-term dynamic is crucial for a complete water budget.
• Constraining the Early Greenhouse Effect: Further investigation is needed to fully understand the sources, abundance, and cycling of the potent greenhouse gases, like hydrogen and methane, that were necessary to solve the Faint Young Sun paradox and keep early Mars warm.²²

The next great leap in understanding will likely come from the analysis of pristine Martian samples on Earth. Missions like the joint NASA-ESA Mars Sample Return campaign aim to bring back carefully selected rock and atmospheric samples collected by the Perseverance rover. Analyzing these samples in state-of-the-art terrestrial laboratories will allow for an unprecedented level of precision in isotopic, mineralogical, and geochemical measurements.⁸ This will provide the definitive “ground truth” needed to constrain models, resolve remaining uncertainties, and write the final, detailed chapters in the epic story of how Mars lost its world.

Works cited

1. Mars Evolution – NASA SVS, accessed August 8, 2025, https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/11372
2. Atmosphere of Mars – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Mars
3. Mars’ atmosphere: Facts about the composition and climate – Space, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.space.com/16903-mars-atmosphere-climate-weather.html
4. Is This How Mars Lost Its Atmosphere? – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fwo1jYHlYRU
5. How Mars Lost Its Magnetic Field—and Then Its Oceans – JSTOR Daily, accessed August 8, 2025, https://daily.jstor.org/how-mars-lost-its-magnetic-field-and-then-its-oceans/
6. 2. Approximate timeline of the major martian geological eras. The …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Approximate-timeline-of-the-major-martian-geological-eras-The-Noachian-41-37-Ga-is_fig1_379072535
7. How did Mars lose its atmosphere and water? | Physics Today – AIP Publishing, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article/75/4/62/2842795/How-did-Mars-lose-its-atmosphere-and-water-They
8. Explaining persistent hydrogen in Mars’ atmosphere – Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, accessed August 8, 2025, https://seas.harvard.edu/news/2025/01/explaining-persistent-hydrogen-mars-atmosphere
9. How Mars Lost Its Atmosphere and Became a Frigid Desert | University of Arizona News, accessed August 8, 2025, https://news.arizona.edu/news/how-mars-lost-its-atmosphere-and-became-frigid-desert
10. Geologists Discover Water Once Flowed on Mars | AMNH, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.amnh.org/explore/videos/space/geologists-water-mars
11. Water on Mars – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_on_Mars
12. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_on_Mars#:~:text=In%202012%2C%20NASA%20scientists%20announced,%2C%20possibly%20at%20hip%2Ddepth.
13. Timeline of Mars Science Laboratory – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Mars_Science_Laboratory
14. Evidence of water on Mars found by Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_water_on_Mars_found_by_Mars_Reconnaissance_Orbiter
15. Thick Clay Layers on Mars May Have Been Stable Place for Ancient …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.jsg.utexas.edu/news/2025/06/thick-clay-layers-on-mars-may-have-been-stable-place-for-ancient-life/
16. Could signs of Mars life be hidden in its thick layers of clay? – Space, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.space.com/astronomy/mars/could-signs-of-mars-life-be-hidden-in-its-thick-layers-of-clay
17. news.txst.edu, accessed August 8, 2025, https://news.txst.edu/research-and-innovation/2025/txst-researchers-find-evidence-of-carbon-cycle-on-ancient-mars.html#:~:text=in%20Gale%20Crater.-,The%20discovery%20of%20carbonate%20suggests%20that%20the%20ancient%20Martian%20atmosphere,carbon%20dioxide%20into%20rock%20form.
18. How the Chemistry of Mars Both Extended and Ended Its Habitability – Universe Today, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.universetoday.com/articles/how-the-chemistry-of-mars-both-extended-and-ended-its-habitability
19. GSA Today – The Faint Young Sun Problem Revisited – Geological Society of America, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/science/G403A/article.htm
20. A Solution to the Faint-Sun Paradox Reveals a Narrow Window for Life | Quanta Magazine, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-sun-was-dimmer-when-earth-formed-how-did-life-emerge-20220127/
21. EARLY MARS CLIMATE MODELING AND THE FAINT YOUNG SUN PARADOX. Robert M. Haberle, Space Science and Astrobiology Division, NASA/Am, accessed August 8, 2025, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20150021504/downloads/20150021504.pdf
22. seas.harvard.edu, accessed August 8, 2025, https://seas.harvard.edu/news/2017/01/bursts-methane-may-have-warmed-early-mars#:~:text=In%20a%20paper%20published%20in,liquid%20water%20on%20the%20surface.
23. Bursts of methane may have warmed early Mars – Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, accessed August 8, 2025, https://seas.harvard.edu/news/2017/01/bursts-methane-may-have-warmed-early-mars
24. Explaining persistent hydrogen in Mars’ atmosphere – ScienceDaily, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/01/250128123630.htm
25. Explaining Persistent Hydrogen In Mars’ Atmosphere – Astrobiology Web, accessed August 8, 2025, https://astrobiology.com/2025/01/explaining-persistent-hydrogen-in-mars-atmosphere.html
26. Methane on Mars and Habitability: Challenges and Responses – PMC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6205098/
27. Mars had an atmosphere… until it lost its magnetic field. #space #science – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/shorts/9EqDxw7RA2g
28. MAVEN, studying how Mars lost its atmosphere | The Planetary …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.planetary.org/space-missions/maven
29. Why did Mars lose it’s atmosphere while Venus didn’t despite both lacking an internally generated magnetosphere? – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskScienceDiscussion/comments/13gbt0e/why_did_mars_lose_its_atmosphere_while_venus/
30. Did Mars have an atmosphere like Earths in the past? : r/askscience – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1bq1ta/did_mars_have_an_atmosphere_like_earths_in_the/
31. Exploring Mars’ Climate History, accessed August 8, 2025, https://mars.nasa.gov/files/resources/MAVEN_Overview_Nov8_2013.pdf
32. 1,000 Days in Orbit: MAVEN’s Top 10 Discoveries at Mars – NASA, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/1000-days-in-orbit-mavens-top-10-discoveries-at-mars/
33. The Early Evolution of the Atmospheres of Earth, Venus, and Mars | ISSI Team led by Colin Johnstone (AT) – International Space Science Institute, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.issibern.ch/teams/eeofaevm/
34. NASA Mission Reveals Speed of Solar Wind Stripping Martian Atmosphere, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-mission-reveals-speed-of-solar-wind-stripping-martian-atmosphere/
35. NASA | Solar Wind Strips Martian Atmosphere – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX5JCYBZpcg
36. www.sciencefocus.com, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.sciencefocus.com/space/how-did-mars-lose-its-atmosphere#:~:text=The%20solar%20wind%20stripped%20away,the%20solar%20wind%20more%20energetic.
37. NASA’s MAVEN Reveals Most of Mars’ Atmosphere Was Lost to Space, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasas-maven-reveals-most-of-mars-atmosphere-was-lost-to-space/
38. NASA spacecraft finds solar ‘cannonballs’ may have stripped Mars of its water — proving decades-old theory | Live Science, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.livescience.com/space/mars/nasa-spacecraft-finds-solar-cannonballs-may-have-stripped-mars-of-its-water-proving-decades-old-theory
39. NASA may have worked out how Mars lost its atmosphere | BBC Sky at Night Magazine, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/mars-sputtering
40. Loss of the Martian atmosphere to space: Present-day loss rates determined from MAVEN observations and integrated loss through time – ResearchGate, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325542237_Loss_of_the_Martian_atmosphere_to_space_Present-day_loss_rates_determined_from_MAVEN_observations_and_integrated_loss_through_time
41. Effects of impacts on the atmospheric evolution: Comparison between Mars, Earth, and Venus – ResearchGate, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232374040_Effects_of_impacts_on_the_atmospheric_evolution_Comparison_between_Mars_Earth_and_Venus
42. newspaceeconomy.ca, accessed August 8, 2025, https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2024/07/01/how-asteroids-sculpted-the-face-of-mars/#:~:text=Atmospheric%20Loss,can%20cause%20significant%20atmospheric%20erosion.
43. How Asteroids Sculpted the Face of Mars – New Space Economy, accessed August 8, 2025, https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2024/07/01/how-asteroids-sculpted-the-face-of-mars/
44. Primordial argon isotope fractionation in the atmosphere of Mars …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4373143/
45. First direct evidence of how Mars lost its thick atmosphere and water, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/first-direct-evidence-of-how-mars-lost-its-thick-atmosphere-and-water/
46. preliminary interpretations of atmospheric stable isotopes and argon from mars science laboratory, accessed August 8, 2025, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20130011192/downloads/20130011192.pdf
47. Isotopes of nitrogen on Mars: Atmospheric measurements by Curiosity’s mass spectrometer, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4459194/
48. THE EVOLUTION OF THE MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE – NASA …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19860021142/downloads/19860021142.pdf
49. Tracking Down the “Missing” Carbon From the Martian Atmosphere – Human Resources, accessed August 8, 2025, https://hr.caltech.edu/news/tracking-down-missing-carbon-martian-atmosphere-48827
50. Atmospheric Loss to Space and the History of Water on Mars – Annual Reviews, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-earth-062420-052845
51. Increased hydrogen escape from Mars atmosphere during periods of high obliquity – arXiv, accessed August 8, 2025, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.16692
52. MAVEN | Missions – Astrobiology at NASA, accessed August 8, 2025, https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/missions/maven/
53. Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN), accessed August 8, 2025, https://etd.gsfc.nasa.gov/our-work/maven/
54. The effect of solar wind on terraforming efforts? : r/Mars – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Mars/comments/9aoxr0/the_effect_of_solar_wind_on_terraforming_efforts/
55. Released Results – MAVEN – Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, accessed August 8, 2025, https://lasp.colorado.edu/maven/science/released-results/
56. What Happened to Early Mars’ Atmosphere? New Study Eliminates One Theory, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/what-happened-to-early-mars-atmosphere-new-study-eliminates-one-theory/
57. What Happened to Early Mars’ Atmosphere? New Study Eliminates One Theory – USGS.gov, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.usgs.gov/news/technical-announcement/what-happened-early-mars-atmosphere-new-study-eliminates-one-theory
58. ASU instruments help scientists probe ancient Mars atmosphere, accessed August 8, 2025, https://news.asu.edu/content/asu-instruments-help-scientists-probe-ancient-mars-atmosphere
59. What Happened to Early Mars’ Atmosphere? New Study Eliminates …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/what-happened-to-early-mars-atmosphere-new-study-eliminates-one-theory
60. science.nasa.gov, accessed August 8, 2025, https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/planets/mars/nasa-new-insights-into-how-mars-became-uninhabitable/#:~:text=As%20the%20planet%20cooled%20and,arid%20desert%20we%20see%20today.
61. Mars Atmosphere Compared to Earth – Earth How, accessed August 8, 2025, https://earthhow.com/mars-atmosphere/
62. BRIEF GUIDE TO MARS Earth and Mars: What is different? Earth and Mars: What is similar? Mars is like New Mexico! Why do we study, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.nmnaturalhistory.org/sites/default/files/BriefGuidetoMars.pdf
63. Planetary atmospheres and evolution | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/environmental-sciences/planetary-atmospheres-and-evolution
64. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Mars#:~:text=Estimates%20suggest%20that%20the%20initial,owing%20to%20their%20heavier%20mass.
65. What was the atmospheric pressure on Mars when it had an atmosphere? : r/askastronomy, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askastronomy/comments/zbujvb/what_was_the_atmospheric_pressure_on_mars_when_it/
66. Increased Hydrogen escape from Mars atmosphere during periods of high obliquity – arXiv, accessed August 8, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2505.16692v1
67. Constraining the history of water and climate on Mars through light …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2404260121