The Fierce Urgency of Now: How a Forgotten Greek Idea Unlocked the True Power of King’s Dream

Part I: The Historian’s Dilemma: When Facts Fail to Tell the Truth

For twenty years, I have lived and breathed the American Civil Rights Movement. As a historian, my world is one of archives, oral histories, and the meticulous reconstruction of the past. I have dedicated my life to understanding this pivotal era, to knowing the names, the dates, the political machinations, and the legislative battles that defined it. Yet, for most of my career, I harbored a secret, a persistent and deeply unsettling professional failure. I could explain what happened on August 28, 1963, but I could never truly convey why it mattered.

I remember standing before a lecture hall, the faces of my students looking up at me, eager and expectant. I had my notes, my slides, a comprehensive timeline of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. I spoke of A. Philip Randolph’s initial vision in the 1940s, of Bayard Rustin’s logistical genius, of the “Big Six” civil rights leaders navigating a treacherous political landscape.¹ I detailed the ten demands of the marchers, the anxieties of the Kennedy administration, the sweltering heat of that August day.¹ I parsed the famous “I Have a Dream” speech line by line, analyzing its metaphors and allusions with academic precision. I gave them all the facts. And yet, I could feel the energy in the room dissipate. The story felt inert, a collection of historical artifacts rather than a living, breathing moment that tore a nation’s conscience open.

My deepest fear was confirmed after one such lecture. A bright, earnest student approached me. “Professor,” she began, choosing her words carefully, “that was all very informative. I learned a lot. But I still don’t feel why it mattered so much. I don’t understand what made that speech so powerful that it changed things.”

Her words stung with the force of truth. She had articulated the very gap I felt but could not name. My meticulous assembly of facts had failed to transmit the soul of the event. I had given my students the anatomy of a masterpiece but had failed to show them its lifeblood, its spirit, its earth-shaking power. I was a custodian of data, not a storyteller of truth. That conversation set me on a new path, a quest to understand not just the history of that day, but the very nature of its power. I needed a new lens, a new language to explain how a seventeen-minute speech could become, as King himself said, the moment when the “whirlwinds of revolt” would “shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges”.⁴

Part II: The Epiphany in a Dusty Book: Discovering Kairos

My search led me far from the familiar archives of the Civil Rights Movement. I found myself wandering through the intellectual landscapes of philosophy, sociology, and, quite unexpectedly, classical rhetoric. It was there, in a dusty, forgotten volume on the orators of ancient Greece, that I found the key. It was a single word: kairos.

The concept was a revelation. It wasn’t just a new piece of terminology; it was a completely new paradigm for understanding history itself. The ancient Greeks had two words for time. The first, chronos, is the one we know well. It is chronological, quantitative, linear time—the relentless ticking of the clock, the turning of calendar pages.⁵

Chronos is the sequence of events I had so dutifully taught my students.

But kairos is something different entirely. It is qualitative time. It refers to the opportune moment, the supreme moment, the right time to say or do the right thing for maximum effect.⁶ If

chronos is the river of time, kairos is the precise moment of confluence, when all currents converge to create a singular, powerful surge. It is the moment an archer must release the arrow to hit a moving target, not a second before or a second after.⁶ For ancient rhetoricians,

kairos was the art of recognizing, seizing, and sometimes even creating this perfect moment, aligning circumstance, emotion, and action to persuade an audience and shape the future.⁵

Suddenly, I understood. The power of King’s speech was not just in its brilliant text (logos), its emotional weight (pathos), or his unimpeachable character (ethos). Its true, world-altering genius lay in its kairos. It was a perfect intervention, delivered at the only moment in American history when the political, social, and moral conditions were perfectly aligned to receive it. To understand why King gave that speech, I realized, we must first understand the relentless chronos of 1963 that created the stage, and then the masterful engineering of the kairotic moment that allowed his voice to change the world.

Part III: The Ticking Clock of Injustice (Chronos): America in the Crucible of 1963

The year 1963 was not an ordinary year. It was a year of fire, a year when the slow, simmering pot of American racial injustice boiled over. To understand the “fierce urgency of now” that King spoke of, one must feel the relentless, accelerating chronos of that year—a drumbeat of violence and defiance that made a national reckoning unavoidable.

The year began with Alabama Governor George Wallace, standing at his inauguration, defiantly proclaiming, “Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation for ever”.¹⁰ His words were a declaration of war against the tide of history, a promise of massive resistance supported by the Ku Klux Klan and White Citizens Councils.¹¹ This was the “southern way of life,” a system obsessed with racial purity and terrified of Black men sitting next to white women in darkened movie theaters.¹¹

This intransigence was met with a new wave of direct action. Protests erupted in some 115 Southern cities, leading to over 20,000 arrests.¹¹ But it was the events in Birmingham, Alabama, that seared themselves into the national consciousness. In April and May, movement strategists, including King, launched a campaign to break segregation in one of its toughest strongholds.¹² When adult participation waned, they made the agonizing decision to involve high school students in the “Children’s Crusade.” The world watched in horror as television broadcasts and newspaper photographs showed children being blasted by high-pressure fire hoses powerful enough to rip bark from trees, and attacked by snarling police dogs unleashed by Public Safety Commissioner Eugene “Bull” Connor.¹⁰

These images created a moral and political feedback loop. The more brutal the segregationist response, the more the nation was horrified. Before Birmingham, a mere 4% of Americans considered civil rights the nation’s most pressing issue; in the weeks that followed, that number skyrocketed to 52%.¹⁰ The relentless violence was systematically dismantling the argument for patience and gradualism. It became clear that the status quo was not a stable condition but a state of violent, immoral oppression. The very actions of the segregationists were creating an inevitability engine, destroying the political middle ground and forcing a national confrontation.

The chronos of crisis continued to tick. In Jackson, Mississippi, sit-in activists at a Woolworth’s lunch counter were beaten and doused with ketchup and mustard by a white mob.¹² In June, Fannie Lou Hamer and other activists were brutally beaten in a Winona, Mississippi, jail, leaving Hamer with permanent injuries.¹² Then, on June 12, just hours after President John F. Kennedy had finally been compelled to address the nation on civil rights, NAACP field secretary Medgar Evers was assassinated in his own driveway in Mississippi.¹²

The assassination of a respected leader and the televised brutality against children forced the federal government’s hand. Kennedy, who had previously been cautious, fearing the loss of Southern political support, could no longer remain on the sidelines.¹³ In his historic June 11 address, he called civil rights a “moral crisis” and announced his intention to submit a comprehensive civil rights bill to Congress.¹² The nonviolent commitment of the activists, contrasted with the raw violence of their opponents, had successfully pressured the highest office in the land.¹⁶ The stage for a grand, national statement was now set. The relentless

chronos of 1963 had created the perfect, desperate vacuum for a kairotic moment to fill.

Date (1963)	Event & Significance
January 14	George Wallace delivers his “Segregation Forever” inaugural address, setting a tone of massive resistance.10
April–May	The Birmingham Campaign, including the Children’s Crusade, exposes the brutality of segregation to a horrified nation via television.10
May 28	Activists endure a violent mob attack during the Woolworth’s sit-in in Jackson, Mississippi, creating an iconic image of nonviolent courage.12
June 9	Fannie Lou Hamer and other activists are brutally beaten in a Winona, MS jail, highlighting the extreme personal danger of activism.12
June 11	President Kennedy delivers a landmark Civil Rights Address, framing it as a moral issue and committing the federal government to action.12
June 12	NAACP leader Medgar Evers is assassinated, raising the stakes of the struggle and creating a martyr for the cause.12
August 28	The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom occurs, providing a national stage for the movement’s demands.
September 15	The 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham is bombed by the KKK, killing four young girls and serving as a horrific reminder that the dream was not yet reality.12

Part IV: Forging the Moment (Kairos): The Strategic Creation of August 28th

The March on Washington was not a spontaneous gathering; it was a deliberately and brilliantly engineered act of creating a kairotic moment. Its architects understood that to seize the nation’s attention and force political change, they needed to build the perfect stage. This required a delicate balancing act: demonstrating the immense power and frustration of the movement without confirming the white public’s fears of chaos and violence. The march, therefore, was designed as a “rhetorical container”—a carefully controlled event that could channel the righteous anger of a quarter-million people into a message that was both powerful and palatable.

The vision belonged to A. Philip Randolph, the elder statesman of the movement, who had first proposed a march on Washington in the 1940s to protest discrimination in the defense industry.¹ By 1963, Randolph, along with the “Big Six” leaders of the major civil rights organizations, saw the opportunity to bring the full force of the movement to the nation’s capital.² The man tasked with turning this vision into reality was Bayard Rustin, a master strategist and logistical genius.¹ In just two months, Rustin and a staff of over 200 volunteers coordinated what would become the largest peaceful demonstration in U.S. history.¹ They chartered more than 2,200 buses and 40 special trains, prepared 80,000 boxed lunches, set up first-aid stations, and trained volunteer “marshals” in nonviolent crowd control techniques.¹ This meticulous planning was the foundation upon which the

kairotic moment was built.

Building this container meant navigating immense pressure and conflict. The Kennedy administration was deeply apprehensive. In a June meeting, President Kennedy warned the leaders that a large demonstration could result in “disorder, chaos” and doom the chances of passing his civil rights bill.³ Public opinion was no more encouraging; a Gallup poll found that only 23% of Americans who had heard of the march viewed it favorably.³ The White House was flooded with letters predicting riots and violence.³

The pressure to maintain control also came from within the coalition. The most significant point of conflict was the fiery speech prepared by John Lewis, the young chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). Lewis, representing the young activists on the front lines, had drafted a speech that directly condemned the Kennedy administration for its inaction, asking, “I want to know, which side is the federal government on?”.¹⁹ His original text also threatened, “We will march through the South, through the heart of Dixie, the way Sherman did”.¹⁹ More moderate leaders, along with the influential Archbishop of Washington, Patrick O’Boyle, threatened to withdraw from the march unless the speech was toned down.¹⁹ In a tense negotiation just moments before the program began, the elder Randolph appealed to Lewis’s sense of solidarity, persuading him to soften the language for the sake of unity.¹⁹ This compromise was a crucial act of shaping the rhetorical container, ensuring the day’s message remained focused and did not splinter the fragile coalition.

This carefully managed program also revealed the movement’s own blind spots. Despite the tireless work of women like Anna Arnold Hedgeman and Dorothy Height, the male leadership refused to include a woman as a main speaker.¹⁵ The only concession was a brief “Tribute to Negro Women,” delivered by Daisy Bates after Myrlie Evers was unable to make it to the stage in time.³ This exclusion stands as a stark reminder of the complex, and at times contradictory, nature of the forces at play. The container, while powerful, was not perfect. It was a product of its time, designed to present a specific, controlled image of unity and discipline to a skeptical nation, and it was upon this carefully constructed stage that Dr. King would step to deliver the message that would fill the container and overflow into history.

Part	Details
A: The Official Program	Speakers: A. Philip Randolph, Dr. Eugene Carson Blake, John Lewis, Walter Reuther, James Farmer (read by Floyd McKissick), Whitney M. Young, Jr., Mathew Ahmann, Roy Wilkins, Rabbi Joachim Prinz, Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr..18	Performers: Marian Anderson, Mahalia Jackson, Joan Baez, Bob Dylan, Eva Jessye Choir.16	Tribute: “Tribute to Negro Women Fighters for Freedom” delivered by Daisy Bates.18
B: The Ten Demands	A comprehensive list calling for meaningful civil rights legislation, immediate school desegregation, protection from police brutality, a federal public works program to train and place unemployed workers, a national minimum wage of over $2 per hour, and withholding federal funds from discriminatory programs.1
C: The Unspoken Program	The Lewis Speech Controversy: The intense, last-minute negotiations to moderate John Lewis’s speech, which originally criticized the Kennedy administration and threatened a “march through the South, the way Sherman did,” to preserve the unity of the coalition.19	Exclusion of Women: The refusal of the male leadership to allow a woman to deliver a major address, despite protests from female organizers like Anna Arnold Hedgeman and Dorothy Height, resulting in only a brief tribute.15

Part V: The Voice for the Moment: Deconstructing the Speech as a Kairotic Masterpiece

When Martin Luther King, Jr. stepped to the podium, he did more than just deliver a speech; he executed the ultimate kairotic act. His address was a rhetorical masterpiece precisely because it was perfectly tailored to the complex demands of the moment. It functioned as a two-act play, beginning as a prosecutor’s dispassionate case against a delinquent nation and transforming into a prophet’s transcendent vision for its redemption. This structure was its genius, allowing it to act as a bridge, uniting the disparate factions of the movement and speaking to the divided soul of America itself.

Act I: The Prosecutor’s Case (The Prepared Text)

The first half of the speech was a meticulously crafted legal and logical argument, aimed squarely at the political establishment and the conscience of moderate white America. King began not as a radical, but as a patriot calling the nation to account. His opening line, “Five score years ago,” was a deliberate and powerful allusion to Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address.²¹ This immediately established his ethical appeal (

ethos), positioning him not as an agitator, but as an heir to Lincoln, standing in his “symbolic shadow” to continue the unfinished work of emancipation.²¹

The central argument of this first act was built around a brilliant and accessible metaphor: the “promissory note”.²¹ King argued that the architects of the republic, in writing the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, had signed a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note promised the “unalienable Rights of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” But for its citizens of color, America had defaulted on this sacred obligation. The check had come back marked “insufficient funds”.²¹ This was a masterful appeal to logic (

logos). It framed the demand for civil rights not as a plea for special treatment, but as a demand for a debt to be honored, a contract to be fulfilled. It was a language of fairness and obligation that the Kennedy administration and a business-minded nation could understand. He was not asking for a handout; he was demanding that America make good on its own founding promises.

The Interlude: The Call from the Crowd

As King neared the end of his prepared remarks, he paused. The speech was powerful, logical, and politically astute, but it had not yet caught fire. It was in this momentary lull that the kairotic opening appeared, not from the podium, but from the crowd. The legendary gospel singer Mahalia Jackson, who had performed earlier and had heard King preach about his dream before in Detroit, cried out, “Tell ’em about the dream, Martin! Tell ’em about the dream!”.²³ This was the unplanned, spiritual cue—the spark that ignited the second act. In that moment, King the political orator made a conscious decision to become King the preacher. He pushed his manuscript to the side and seized the moment.²³

Act II: The Prophet’s Vision (The Improvised Sermon)

What followed was a transformation. King’s cadence shifted, his voice swelled, and he began to preach, drawing on the familiar and powerful refrains he had honed in churches across the country. This was the appeal to the heart, to emotion (pathos). The anaphora of “I have a dream,” repeated eight times, built a tidal wave of emotional momentum, turning the speech into a shared litany, a call-and-response with the 250,000 souls before him.²¹ His dreams were not abstract political goals; they were vivid, personal tableaus of reconciliation: “I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood”.²⁶ He made the dream personal to himself—”I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character”—and in doing so, made it personal to everyone.

In this second act, King fully embodied the “prophetic voice”.²⁷ He was no longer just a civil rights leader; he was a vessel, merging his own voice with the hallowed traditions of Scripture and the Black church. He drew directly from the prophets of the Old Testament, calling for a day when “justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream,” a near-verbatim quote from Amos.²³ He envisioned a future where “every valley shall be exalted,” echoing the words of Isaiah.²³ By doing so, he was casting himself in the role of a modern-day prophet, a reluctant messenger called to remind a straying nation of its sacred covenant—the promises of its own founding documents, which he argued were in perfect alignment with God’s will.²⁷

This two-part structure was the speech’s ultimate kairotic genius. It served as a bridge, speaking to the two primary audiences simultaneously. The first act, the prosecutor’s case, satisfied the pragmatic, legislation-focused wing of the movement and gave the Kennedy administration a logical, patriotic framework they could work with. The second act, the prophet’s vision, spoke to the soul-deep weariness and fervent hopes of the activists and the Black community, validating their struggle with a transcendent moral purpose. In seventeen minutes, King had managed to resolve the central tension of the entire Civil Rights Movement—the need for practical political maneuvering and the demand for profound moral transformation—uniting them under a single, soaring vision.

Part VI: The Echo of the Moment: How Kairos Reshaped a Nation

The impact of King’s speech was immediate and profound. The quarter-million people gathered at the Lincoln Memorial, and the millions more watching on television, felt they had witnessed a hinge-point in history. One participant, Dorothy Height, recalled feeling that it was a “decisive moment” that “resulted in a new determination to move toward equality”.²⁹ Another attendee remembered walking away with the undeniable feeling that “change was going to come”.³⁰ In the White House, President Kennedy met the march leaders, greeting them “like a beaming, proud father,” his earlier fears replaced by relief and admiration for the powerful, peaceful spectacle.¹⁴

This kairotic moment sent a shockwave through the nation’s political landscape, providing the moral and political momentum for concrete legislative change. The March on Washington, with King’s speech as its crowning achievement, fundamentally shifted public attitudes and armed President Lyndon B. Johnson, who took office after Kennedy’s assassination in November 1963, with the mandate to push for historic legislation.²⁹ Less than a year after the march, Johnson signed the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, a landmark law that banned discrimination in public accommodations and employment, addressing many of the key demands of the marchers.² The momentum continued, leading directly to the passage of the

Voting Rights Act of 1965, which dismantled the legal barriers that had prevented African Americans from exercising their franchise.²⁹ These acts were the tangible, legislative echo of the voice that had rung out from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.

The long-term legacy of the speech is etched into the American psyche. It did more than just advocate for laws; it reframed the entire narrative of the Civil Rights Movement. King’s genius was in rooting the struggle for Black freedom firmly within the soil of the American dream.³¹ He argued that civil rights were not a special interest or a fringe issue, but the very fulfillment of the nation’s founding principles. The speech became a foundational text of American civic life, a touchstone for discussions on race and justice, and a source of inspiration for human rights movements around the world, from the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa to the ongoing fight for equality today.³¹ King’s dream, delivered at that one perfect moment, became part of the nation’s own dream for itself.

Conclusion: Teaching the Soul of History

I often think back to that student and her simple, devastating question. My journey to answer it led me to a forgotten Greek word and, in doing so, transformed my understanding of my own discipline. Today, I no longer teach the “I Have a Dream” speech as a static historical document. I teach it as the climax of a gripping three-act drama, framed by the concept of kairos.

First, we explore the relentless, building pressure of chronos—the crucible of 1963 that made a national confrontation inevitable. Then, we analyze the brilliant stagecraft of the March itself—the engineering of the kairotic moment, a platform built to hold the weight of a revolution. Finally, we witness the performance—King’s masterful two-act speech, perfectly timed and tailored to seize that moment and reshape the nation’s destiny.

The difference in my classroom is palpable. The students are no longer passive observers of facts; they are on the edge of their seats. They feel the tension of 1963, they appreciate the strategic genius of Rustin and Randolph, and they understand the delicate dance King performed between prosecutor and prophet. They grasp that history is not an inevitable series of events, but a story forged by human beings making critical choices at decisive moments. They finally feel why it mattered.

To truly understand why Martin Luther King, Jr. gave his speech, we must understand when he gave it. Its enduring power lies not only in its soaring rhetoric but in its perfect, unrepeatable fusion of the right person, with the right message, at the only moment in American history that could have produced such a profound and lasting change. Kairos does not just provide an analytical framework for the speech; it allows us, more than half a century later, to feel its living, breathing soul.

Works cited

1. March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom (U.S. National Park …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.nps.gov/articles/march-on-washington.htm
2. March on Washington | Date, Jobs and Freedom, Definition, Summary, Importance, & Facts | Britannica, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/March-on-Washington
3. Making the March on Washington, August 28, 1963 – The JFK Library Archives, accessed August 8, 2025, https://jfk.blogs.archives.gov/2020/08/27/making-the-march-on-washington/
4. March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom – Legal Defense Fund, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.naacpldf.org/march-on-washington/
5. What is Kairos? Definition & Examples | Boords, accessed August 8, 2025, https://boords.com/ethos-pathos-logos/what-is-kairos
6. What Does ‘Kairos’ Mean in Classical Rhetoric? – ThoughtCo, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.thoughtco.com/kairos-rhetoric-term-1691209
7. louisville.edu, accessed August 8, 2025, https://louisville.edu/writingcenter/for-students-1/handouts-and-resources/handouts-1/logos-ethos-pathos-kairos#:~:text=Kairos%20(Greek%20for%20%E2%80%9Cright%20time,come%20at%20the%20right%20time.
8. What Is Kairos? History, Definition, and Examples – Grammarly, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-devices/kairos/
9. kairos – Dictionary.com, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.dictionary.com/e/religion/kairos/
10. 1963: the defining year of the civil rights movement | Race – The Guardian, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/07/1963-defining-year-civil-rights
11. Veterans of the Civil Rights Movement — History & Timeline, 1963 (Jan-June), accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.crmvet.org/tim/timhis63.htm
12. Key Events in 1963 History – Civil Rights Teaching, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.civilrightsteaching.org/resource/key-events-1963
13. 1963: Change In America – Roundabout Theatre Company, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.roundabouttheatre.org/get-tickets/upstage-guides-current/upstage-guide-caroline-or-change/change-in-america-caroline-or-change
14. An Oral History of the March on Washington – Smithsonian Magazine, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/oral-history-march-washington-180953863/
15. March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom | National Women’s History Museum, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.womenshistory.org/resources/general/march-washington-jobs-and-freedom
16. The Historical Legacy of the March on Washington | National Museum of African American History and Culture, accessed August 8, 2025, https://nmaahc.si.edu/explore/stories/historical-legacy-march-washington
17. The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom – Chicago History Museum, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.chicagohistory.org/march-on-washington-1963/
18. Official Program for the March on Washington (1963) – National Archives, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/official-program-for-the-march-on-washington
19. The March on Washington | Articles and Essays | Civil Rights History …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.loc.gov/collections/civil-rights-history-project/articles-and-essays/the-march-on-washington/
20. Protests That Changed America: The March on Washington | Timeless, accessed August 8, 2025, https://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2020/06/protests-that-changed-america-the-march-on-washington/
21. “I Have a Dream” Analysis – University of South Alabama, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.southalabama.edu/colleges/artsandsci/english/resources/2024_cochran.pdf
22. Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.’s ‘I Have a Dream’ Speech – Aithor, accessed August 8, 2025, https://aithor.com/essay-examples/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-king-jr-s-i-have-a-dream-speech
23. I Have a Dream – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Have_a_Dream
24. Did MLK Improvise in the ‘Dream’ Speech? | African American Blog – PBS, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/wnet/african-americans-many-rivers-to-cross/history/did-mlk-improvise-in-the-dream-speech/
25. Speech Analysis: I Have a Dream – Martin Luther King Jr. – Six Minutes, accessed August 8, 2025, https://sixminutes.dlugan.com/speech-analysis-dream-martin-luther-king/
26. Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr’s ‘I have a Dream’ Speech | UKEssays.com, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ukessays.com/essays/english-language/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-king-jrs-i-have-a-dream-speech-2237.php
27. The “Integrative” Rhetoric of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.tehattagovtcollege.ac.in/Studymaterial/125150Martin%20Luthar%20King,%20Jr..pdf
28. I Have a Dream: A Rhetorical Analysis – EminentEdit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.eminentediting.com/post/i-have-a-dream-rhetorical-analysis
29. 50th Anniversary of March on Washington & “I Have a Dream …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://cz.usembassy.gov/our-relationship/50th-anniversary-of-march-on-washington-i-have-a-dream-speech/
30. Eyewitnesses Share Memories of Martin Luther King’s Most Famous Moment, accessed August 8, 2025, https://thezebra.org/2025/02/05/eyewitnesses-march-on-washington/
31. The Lasting Legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” Speech – Social Studies, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.socialstudies.com/blog/the-lasting-legacy-of-martin-luther-king-jr-s-i-have-a-dream-speech/
32. cz.usembassy.gov, accessed August 8, 2025, https://cz.usembassy.gov/our-relationship/50th-anniversary-of-march-on-washington-i-have-a-dream-speech/#:~:text=Less%20than%20a%20year%20after,and%20also%20prohibited%20employment%20discrimination.
33. The Lasting Impact of MLK’s ‘I Have a Dream’ Speech – Africa Imports, accessed August 8, 2025, https://africaimports.com/blog/the-lasting-impact-of-mlks-i-have-a-dream-speech/