Table of Contents
Part I: The Strategist’s Dilemma: A Personal Introduction
For years, my work as a cultural historian and brand strategist was governed by a cold, hard pragmatism.
I advised individuals and organizations on how to navigate the complex currents of public perception, and often, the most effective path was the one of least resistance.
The playbook was simple: identify the dominant cultural norms and align with them.
If a name was difficult to pronounce, simplify it.
If a background was perceived as “niche,” broaden it.
I saw identity as a malleable asset, a set of levers to be pulled to achieve a desired outcome—success, influence, market penetration.
This wasn’t born of malice, but of a belief in a certain kind of strategic realism.
You play the game on the board you’re given.
My conviction in this playbook was firm, reinforced by countless case studies of success.
Then, I encountered a story that didn’t fit the model.
It was a piece of Hollywood trivia I’d heard before but never truly examined: the story of why the actor Martin Sheen changed his name.
On the surface, it was a textbook case from my own playbook.
A young man named Ramón Estévez, son of a Spanish immigrant father and an Irish immigrant mother, adopted an anglicized name to open doors in a biased industry.1
He became “Martin Sheen,” and with that name, he built a legendary career, achieving the very success the name change was designed to secure.
By all my metrics, the strategy was a resounding success.
But as I delved deeper, the clean lines of my strategic model began to blur.
I found a story not of triumphant pragmatism, but of profound, lifelong regret.2
I discovered a decision that echoed through generations, creating divergent paths for his sons, one who would reclaim the original name and another who would inherit the new one.2
The story was not a simple equation of
A + B = C.
It was a complex, aching human drama about the hidden costs of a choice that seemed, at the time, so logical.
It forced me to abandon my old playbook and ask a much deeper question, one that lies at the heart of this report: What is the true function of a name? Is it merely a label to be optimized for the marketplace, or is it something more fundamental? What happens to a family, to a legacy, to a man’s soul, when a name—a name like Estévez—is removed? The answer, I would discover, required an entirely new framework for understanding identity itself.
Part II: A New Paradigm: The ‘Keystone Identity’ Framework
To truly grasp the weight of the decision made by Ramón Estévez, one must look beyond the world of branding and into the realm of ecology.
In the natural world, there exists the concept of a “keystone species.” This is an organism—like the sea otter in the kelp forests of the Pacific or the beaver in a river valley—whose presence has a disproportionately large effect on its environment relative to its abundance.
The keystone species maintains the very structure, stability, and diversity of its ecosystem.
The sea otter preys on sea urchins, preventing them from devastating the kelp forests that shelter countless other species.
The beaver builds dams, creating wetlands that support a rich web of life.
The removal of a keystone species triggers a devastating chain reaction known as a “trophic cascade.” Without the otter, the urchins multiply, the kelp vanishes, and the entire ecosystem collapses.
This ecological principle provides a powerful analogy for understanding the role of a name in a person’s life.
A given name, particularly one rich with familial and ethnic heritage, is not merely a label.
It is a “Keystone Identity.” It is the central, load-bearing element that connects an individual to the intricate ecosystem of their personal history.
It anchors them to their family tree, their cultural context, their ancestral struggles and triumphs, and their fundamental sense of self.
It is the piece that holds the entire structure together.
From this perspective, the act of changing such a name is not a simple rebranding exercise.
It is the removal of the keystone.
When Ramón Estévez became Martin Sheen, he did more than adopt a stage name; he removed the central pillar connecting his public life to his private heritage.
This act, however pragmatic, inevitably set off a series of “generational tremors”—shockwaves that would ripple through his own life and the lives of his children, fundamentally altering the family’s personal ecosystem.
His story, and the divergent paths of his sons Emilio and Charlie, becomes a living case study of this trophic cascade.
It demonstrates what happens when the keystone is pulled: the deep, personal cost of the initial act, the subsequent instability, and the long, arduous journey toward restoring the balance.
Part III: The Hostile Environment: Forcing the Keystone’s Removal
The decision to remove a keystone identity is rarely made in a vacuum.
It is almost always a response to a hostile environment, a survival strategy adopted when the ecosystem itself becomes toxic to one’s natural state.
For Ramón Estévez, the New York and Hollywood of the 1950s and 1960s was precisely such an environment.
The choice to become Martin Sheen was not an act of whimsy or cultural self-loathing; it was a calculated, almost tragically logical, response to a system built on prejudice and exclusion.
The General Climate of Prejudice
When Ramón Estévez arrived in New York in 1959 to pursue his acting dream, he stepped into a culture rife with anti-Hispanic sentiment.
He himself noted that “there was great, you know, prejudice against Hispanics, largely against the Puerto Rican community that I adored, and I felt very much a part of the Hispanic community”.6
This wasn’t a subtle bias; it was a formidable barrier to entry in all aspects of life, from housing to employment.
In a 2003 interview, he gave a stark account of this reality: “Whenever I would call for an appointment, whether it was a job or an apartment, and I would give my name, there was always that hesitation and when I’d get there, it was always gone”.8
For a young, struggling actor trying to provide for a growing family, this was not an abstract social issue; it was a direct and constant economic threat.
The name “Estévez” was a professional liability before he ever set foot in an audition room.
Hollywood’s System of Stereotypes
This societal prejudice was amplified and codified by the Hollywood studio system.
During the early and mid-20th century, the film industry didn’t just reflect stereotypes; it manufactured and mass-produced them.
For Latino actors, the roles available were a depressingly narrow and demeaning set of archetypes.
The industry created a feedback loop where the on-screen caricature reinforced the off-screen prejudice.
Scholarly analyses of this period reveal a landscape dominated by figures like the “greaser,” the violent and untrustworthy bandit, the bumbling and comical sidekick, or the hyper-sexualized “Latin Lover”.10
Latina actresses were similarly confined to roles as the fiery “spitfire,” the dangerous vamp, or the submissive, self-sacrificing señorita.11
These weren’t characters; they were containers for Anglo-American anxieties and fantasies about their southern neighbors.
As a National Park Service study on Latino media history notes, after Rita Moreno won an Oscar for
West Side Story in 1962, she was offered only typecast roles and did not make another film for seven years, a testament to the rigidity of this system.14
This systemic exclusion created what Congressman Joaquin Castro would later call a “black hole and narrative,” where the lack of authentic stories allowed negative stereotypes to “fester and grow”.15
For an actor like Ramón Estévez, the choice was stark: either accept a career playing one-dimensional stereotypes that perpetuated the very prejudice that held him back, or find a way to bypass the system’s ethnic gatekeeping altogether.
The Pragmatic “Solution”: Assimilation as a Survival Tactic
Faced with this hostile environment, anglicizing one’s name became a widespread and rational survival tactic.
It was a pragmatic attempt to neutralize the perceived ethnic liability and be judged on talent alone.
Martin Sheen’s decision was far from unique; it was part of a larger, painful tradition of assimilation in Hollywood, a toll extracted for entry into the mainstream.
This pattern is crucial for understanding that Sheen’s choice was not a sign of personal weakness, but a symptom of a systemic disease.
As the following table illustrates, many of the most iconic stars of the era were born with names that the industry deemed “too ethnic” for the marquee.
Table 1: The Pressure to Assimilate: Notable Hollywood Name Changes (1940s-1970s)
| Actor | Birth Name | Rationale/Context |
| Martin Sheen | Ramón Antonio Gerardo Estévez | Changed his name in 1958 due to anti-Hispanic prejudice, believing it would help him secure more acting roles and avoid typecasting.1 |
| Rita Hayworth | Margarita Carmen Cansino | Born to a Spanish father, her agent had her change her name and dye her hair red to appear more “American” and escape the “Latin Lover” stereotype trap.3 |
| Anthony Quinn | Manuel Antonio Rodolfo Quinn Oaxaca | Though part Irish, his Mexican heritage was prominent. His name was anglicized from Antonio to Anthony to broaden his appeal.10 |
| Raquel Welch | Jo Raquel Tejada | Born to a Bolivian father, the studio had her use her husband’s surname and even tried to change her first name to “Debbie,” which she refused.16 |
| Sir Ben Kingsley | Krishna Pandit Bhanji | Of Indian descent, he stated starkly, “As soon as I changed my name, I got the jobs.” He recounted being told his audition was “beautiful” but they didn’t know how to “place” him with his original name.8 |
| Kirk Douglas | Issur Danielovitch | The son of Russian Jewish immigrants, he changed his name because he felt it was “too Jewish for Hollywood at the time,” a decision he later regretted.18 |
The admission of Sir Ben Kingsley is particularly chilling in its clarity.
The name change was not a preference; it was a switch that, when flipped, turned the lights of opportunity on.
This context reframes Ramón Estévez’s decision.
It was a strategic maneuver to gain access to a marketplace that was structurally designed to exclude him.
This created a tragic paradox: to achieve the success that could bring honor to his family and provide a platform for his talent, he first had to publicly erase the most visible marker of that family—the name Estévez.
This inherent contradiction, born of a necessary compromise, would become the central conflict of his life.
Part IV: The Fateful Choice: A Name Changed, An Ecosystem Altered
In 1958, facing the relentless friction of a biased industry, Ramón Estévez made the fateful choice.
He pulled the keystone.
The creation of “Martin Sheen” was a carefully considered act of professional engineering, a name constructed from the building blocks of his early career and personal faith.
The first name, “Martin,” was a tribute to Robert Dale Martin, the CBS casting director who gave him his first significant break and was instrumental in his career.7
The surname, “Sheen,” was chosen to honor the prominent Catholic archbishop and televangelist Fulton J.
Sheen, a figure whose broadcasts were a familiar presence in his devoutly Catholic household.6
This construction reveals a profound internal negotiation.
By choosing a name from a respected Catholic figure, Estévez was attempting to graft his new, artificial public persona onto an authentic root of his private identity: his faith.19
It was a compromise, an attempt to anchor the inauthentic in something real.
But as the decades would prove, the heritage of family and ethnicity tied to “Estévez” was a far more critical component of his identity, and its suppression would leave a wound that his faith-based surname could never fully heal.
The Core Wound: A Father’s Disappointment
The first and most immediate tremor from this decision struck at the heart of his family.
The story of his father, Francisco Estévez, is central to understanding the depth of the wound.
Francisco was a Spanish immigrant from Galicia, a factory worker at the National Cash Register Company in Dayton, Ohio, who had worked his entire life to provide for his ten children.2
He was a practical man who initially disapproved of his son’s artistic ambitions, fearing for his financial security and urging him to go to college.2
After “very, very painful confrontations,” Francisco eventually saw his son’s unwavering commitment and gave his blessing.2
This makes the story that followed all the more heartbreaking.
In 1967, Martin Sheen was starring on Broadway in the Pulitzer Prize-winning play The Subject Was Roses.
It was a moment of immense professional triumph.
His father, Francisco, came to New York to see the show.
As both Martin and his son Emilio would later recount, Francisco stood outside the theater, looked up at the marquee that blazed with the name “Martin Sheen,” and simply shook his head in disappointment.5
For the immigrant father who had passed his name—his heritage, his identity—to his son, seeing it erased at the moment of his greatest success was a profound blow.
Martin Sheen said of the incident, “He never got over that”.5
This quiet moment of paternal sorrow became the epicenter of the family’s emotional earthquake, the origin point of a generational trauma that would define much of the family’s narrative for the next half-century.
The Lifelong Duality: The Regret of a Divided Self
The success that followed was immense.
As Martin Sheen, he became a Hollywood icon, starring in seminal films like Badlands, Apocalypse Now, and The Departed, and the acclaimed television series The West Wing.9
But the professional triumph was shadowed by a deep and persistent personal regret.
In interview after interview, for decades, he has spoken of the name change as one of the great sorrows of his life.
“That’s one of my regrets,” he told Closer Weekly in 2022.2
He has repeatedly stated that he was “persuaded when you don’t have enough insight or even enough courage to stand up for what you believe in, and you pay for it later”.2
This is not the language of a man satisfied with a pragmatic choice.
It is the language of a man who feels he compromised a core part of himself and has lived with the consequences ever since.
The most telling detail in this lifelong struggle is a crucial fact: he never legally changed his name.
The persona of Martin Sheen exists only on screen and in the public sphere.
On all of his essential documents, he remains who he has always been.
“I never changed my name officially,” he has affirmed many times.
“It’s still Ramon Estévez on my birth certificate.
It’s on my marriage license, my passport, driver’s license”.2
This decision to maintain his legal name reveals a conscious, lifelong separation between his private identity and his public brand.
“Martin Sheen” was a role he played, a uniform he wore for work, but it was not who he was.
This internal duality, this splitting of the self into a private Ramón and a public Martin, is a classic recipe for the kind of psychological dissonance that manifests as profound, decades-long regret.
He was living proof that one can achieve the world and still feel that the price paid was too high.
Part V: Generational Tremors: The Divergent Fates of the Estevez Legacy
The removal of a keystone identity does not end with the individual.
The tremors radiate outward, forcing the next generation to navigate a fundamentally altered landscape.
The story of Martin Sheen’s sons, Emilio Estevez and Charlie Sheen, is a perfect illustration of these generational aftershocks.
They represent two distinct and classic responses to a legacy of assimilation and regret.
One son would dedicate himself to restoring what was lost, while the other would adapt to and build upon the new reality.
Their choices reveal how a single decision can bifurcate a family’s legacy.
To clarify this complex family dynamic, the following table outlines the names and choices across three generations.
Table 2: A Tale of Two Names: The Sheen/Estevez Family Tree
| Family Member | Birth Name | Professional Name | Stated Rationale / Key Influence |
| Francisco Estévez | Francisco Estévez Martinez | N/A (Factory Worker) | The patriarch whose name was passed down. His disappointment over the name change was a pivotal event.5 |
| Martin Sheen | Ramón Antonio Gerardo Estévez | Martin Sheen | Changed name to overcome anti-Hispanic prejudice and secure acting roles. Later expressed deep, lifelong regret.1 |
| Emilio Estevez | Emilio Estevez | Emilio Estevez | Kept his birth name on the direct advice of his father, who warned him not to repeat his mistake. He also wanted to honor his grandfather.2 |
| Charlie Sheen | Carlos Irwin Estévez | Charlie Sheen | Adopted the “Sheen” name, seeing it as an established brand and feeling it had a “nicer ring to it.” He viewed it as carrying on his father’s professional legacy.26 |
Emilio the Conservationist: Reintroducing the Keystone
Emilio Estevez, the eldest son, embodies the path of restoration.
His decision to keep his birth name was a conscious and deliberate act of ecological repair for the family’s identity ecosystem.
As he began his own career, his agent, following the standard industry playbook, advised him to adopt the famous and bankable “Sheen” name.2
It was the logical move, the path of least resistance.
Emilio refused.
The primary driver of this decision was the powerful, cautionary influence of his father.
Martin Sheen’s regret was not a quiet, private sorrow; it was an active lesson he imparted to his son.
“The only influence I had on Emilio was to keep his name,” Martin has said.
“He said, ‘Don’t make the mistake that I did.
Don’t change your name'”.2
Emilio took this advice to heart.
His choice was a direct response to his father’s pain and a tribute to the grandfather he never wanted to disappoint.
He wanted to be the one to finally put the name “Estevez” on a marquee, to heal the wound that had been opened at that Broadway theater years before.6
In doing so, he wasn’t just choosing a name; he was choosing to reintroduce the keystone, to restore the link between his professional life and his family’s heritage.
Charlie the Inheritor: Adapting to the Altered Landscape
Charlie Sheen, born Carlos Irwin Estévez, represents the path of adaptation.
He grew up in a world where “Sheen” was not a compromise but a powerful, established Hollywood brand.
His choice to become “Charlie Sheen” was a pragmatic decision to accept the altered landscape his father had created and leverage the assets it provided.
In a 1986 interview, a young Charlie explained his reasoning.
Part of it was aesthetic—he felt “Charlie Sheen” had a “nicer ring to it”.27
But the more significant reason was about legacy.
He saw his father’s professional identity as something to be continued.
“With how pop has established Sheen in this business,” he reasoned, “I should probably carry it on”.27
He saw himself not as abandoning a heritage, but as inheriting and perpetuating a successful brand.
His path was not one of restoration but of adaptation to the new environment.
Significantly, he did make a notable, if temporary, nod to his birth name.
For the 2013 Robert Rodriguez film Machete Kills, a film with a distinctly Latino sensibility, he was credited as “Carlos Estevez”.6
This act, while singular, suggests an underlying awareness and connection to the heritage he had professionally set aside, a brief moment of re-linking to the original family ecosystem before returning to the powerful persona of Charlie Sheen.
These two paths, restoration and adaptation, highlight the complex nature of legacy.
Martin Sheen’s single act of assimilation resulted in a bifurcated inheritance for his sons.
Emilio inherited the wisdom gained from the mistake—the profound lesson about the importance of authenticity.
Charlie inherited the tangible asset created by the mistake—the famous and powerful brand name.
Both are valid forms of inheritance, and both demonstrate how the tremors of a single identity choice can create divergent, yet equally logical, paths for the next generation.
Part VI: Conclusion: The Restored Ecosystem and the Power of Authenticity
A story of such profound fracture and generational consequence demands a moment of healing, a restoration of the ecosystem.
For the Estévez family, this resolution came not through discussion or declaration, but through the transcendent power of Art. The climax of this decades-long narrative is the 2010 film The Way, a project that serves as the ultimate act of restoration and brings the family’s journey full circle.
The film, a deeply personal story about a father walking the Camino de Santiago pilgrimage in Spain after his son’s death, was a passion project for the family.
It was written and directed by Emilio Estevez.
It starred Martin Sheen.
And it was dedicated to the man whose quiet disappointment started it all: the patriarch, Francisco Estévez.5
The film’s very setting in Spain, the homeland of their ancestors, was a powerful act of reclaiming heritage.
But the most significant act of restoration was in the film’s credits.
For the first time in a career spanning more than half a century, Martin Sheen was not credited as Martin Sheen.
At the behest of his son, the director, he was credited by his birth name: Ramón Gerard Estévez.5
In that moment, the central paradox of his life was resolved.
The professional success born from the assimilated name (“Sheen”) had finally created the power and the platform for the original, authentic name (“Estévez”) to be publicly restored and honored.
The son who had chosen the path of conservation had created the space for his father to finally, professionally, come home.
The keystone was put back in its place.
The Estévez family saga is more than just a compelling Hollywood drama; it serves as a powerful allegory for the evolution of minority representation in American culture.
Martin Sheen represents the generation that had to compromise to get in the door, the pioneers who paid a heavy personal price for access.
Emilio Estevez, standing on the shoulders of his father’s success, represents the generation that could demand to be let in on their own terms, a generation for whom authenticity was not a liability but a source of strength.
Their two-generation story maps perfectly onto the broader historical arc of representation in American media, a slow, painful, but undeniable shift from forced assimilation toward a celebration of diverse and authentic identities.
This brings me back to my own journey, from a strategist championing pragmatism to a storyteller humbled by the power of authenticity.
The story of Ramón, Martin, Emilio, and Carlos provides the definitive answer to the question that shattered my old worldview.
The “pragmatic” choice, the one that seems so logical in the short term, can carry devastating, hidden, long-term costs.
My old playbook was incomplete because it only measured the immediate gain and ignored the potential for a lifetime of regret and the fracturing of a legacy.
The true measure of a name—and an identity—is not its marketability or its ease of pronunciation.
It is its connection to the truth of who we are.
The “Keystone Identity” is the non-negotiable foundation of a stable and healthy personal and generational ecosystem.
To remove it is to risk a collapse.
To preserve it, or to fight, as Emilio did, to restore it, is to affirm that our heritage is not a brand to be managed, but a treasure to be honored.
The most powerful name is not the one that opens the most doors, but the one that allows you to walk through them as your whole, authentic self.
Works cited
- en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Sheen#:~:text=Born%20and%20raised%20in%20the,help%20him%20gain%20acting%20parts.
- Charlie Sheen’s father Martin Sheen says changing his name for …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/charlie-sheen-father-martin-sheen-changing-name-regret
- Martin Sheen regrets changing the name passed down to him by his …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://ew.com/celebrity/martin-sheen-regrets-changing-his-spanish-name/
- Martin Sheen says he regrets changing his name and reveals he …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://news.sky.com/story/martin-sheen-says-he-regrets-changing-his-name-and-reveals-he-lacked-insight-and-courage-12637759
- Emilio Estevez reveals the tragic reason father Martin Sheen made …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/emilio-estevez-martin-sheen-hispanic-ethnicity-b2336736.html
- Why Did Emilio Estevez Change His Last Name From Sheen? – CBR, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.cbr.com/emilio-estevez-not-using-sheen-name-explained/
- Martin Sheen Regrets Changing His Name When He Started Acting | The Vintage News, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.thevintagenews.com/2022/06/28/martin-sheen-real-name/
- Movie star Martin Sheen and his name change – Soho House, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.sohohouse.com/house-notes/issue-006/film-and-entertainment/hanna-flint-25-june-22
- US Hispanics: Ramón Estévez regrets his name change to Martin …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://english.elpais.com/culture/2022-06-27/ramon-estevez-regrets-his-name-change-to-martin-sheen.html
- Hispanics in Hollywood – UMN Libraries News & Events, accessed August 8, 2025, https://libnews.umn.edu/2017/09/hispanics-in-hollywood/
- Latinos and film | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/latinos-and-film
- Hispanic Stereotypes in Contemporary Film – Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, accessed August 8, 2025, https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1508&context=honors-theses
- Latin Looks in Hollywood over Time – Race & Ethnicity in Advertising | America in the 20th Century, accessed August 8, 2025, https://raceandethnicity.org/exhibits/show/latin-looks-in-hollywood-over-/latin-looks-in-hollywood-over-
- American Latino Theme Study: Media – National Park Service, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.nps.gov/articles/latinothemestudymedia.htm
- Mexican-Americans in Hollywood: Why Representation Matters, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.mexamcef.org/blog/mexican-americans-in-hollywood-why-representation-matters
- 5 Latinx Actors Who Anglicized Their Names to Make It in Hollywood – LatinaMedia.Co, accessed August 8, 2025, https://latinamedia.co/anglicize-name/
- How ethnic actors changing their names perpetuates Hollywood’s racism – The Wildcat Tribune, accessed August 8, 2025, https://thewildcattribune.com/14421/opinion/how-ethnic-actors-changing-their-names-perpetuates-hollywoods-racism/
- Jon Bon Jovi, Jennifer Aniston and 28 Other Celebrities Who Changed Their Names, accessed August 8, 2025, https://people.com/celebrities-who-changed-their-names-before-hollywood-8656508
- Martin Sheen | Biography, Movies, TV Shows, Children, The West Wing, & Apocalypse Now | Britannica, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Martin-Sheen
- Family tree of Martin SHEEN – Geneastar, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.geneastar.org/genealogy/ramonantoniogerarder/martin-sheen
- Emilio Estevez’s father Martin Sheen warned actor not to make the one ‘mistake’ he did, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/emilio-estevez-father-martin-sheen-warned-actor-not-make-one-mistake-he-did
- Martin Sheen says he regrets changing his name for acting career | The Independent, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/martin-sheen-real-name-estevez-b2106566.html
- “That’s one of my regrets. I never changed my name officially. It’s still Ramon Estévez on my birth certificate,” he told Closer Weekly. He added that his given name is also still listed on his marriage license, passport, and driver’s license. : r/HilariaBaldwin – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/HilariaBaldwin/comments/vig9pe/thats_one_of_my_regrets_i_never_changed_my_name/
- Martin Sheen Says He Regrets Changing His Name From Ramón Estévez – WKYC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.wkyc.com/article/entertainment/entertainment-tonight/martin-sheen-says-he-regrets-changing-his-name-from-ramon-estevez/603-7bd33673-1eb3-406b-874b-a643cde73fc6
- Charlie Sheen’s 3 Siblings: All About Emilio, Ramon and Renée Estevez – People Magazine, accessed August 8, 2025, https://people.com/all-about-charlie-sheen-siblings-8407560
- Charlie Sheen – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Sheen
- Charlie Sheen talks about the family name, 1986: CBC Archives – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bBkDZTa4tM
- Charlie Sheen is changing his name – Yahoo Lifestyle, accessed August 8, 2025, https://au.lifestyle.yahoo.com/charlie-sheen-changing-name-222900389.html
- Charlie Sheen to change his name back to Carlos Estevez for film role – Digital Spy, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a484664/charlie-sheen-to-change-his-name-back-to-carlos-estevez-for-film-role/
