Table of Contents
Introduction: Deconstructing a Demigod’s Desire
The central catalyst of Disney’s 2016 animated feature, Moana, is a single, audacious act: the demigod Maui steals the heart of the mother island, Te Fiti.
The question of “why” he committed this transgression appears, on the surface, to have a simple answer provided within the film’s narrative.
However, a comprehensive analysis reveals that this act is not a singular moment of hubris but rather the climactic symptom of a profound personal, psychological, and cultural deficit.
To fully understand Maui’s motivation, one must deconstruct it through a multi-lensed approach that examines the explicit narrative justifications, the implicit psychological drivers rooted in trauma, the complex relationship between the film’s character and his mythological origins, and the symbolic and cultural-political dimensions of the story.
This report argues that Maui’s theft of the heart is the ultimate expression of a life spent attempting to fill a void left by parental abandonment.
His actions are driven by a desperate, transactional model of heroism where love is not given but earned through spectacular deeds.
The theft was intended to be his magnum opus, a gift so grand it would secure the permanent adoration of humanity, thereby healing his primal wound.
This analysis will demonstrate that the character’s journey, the film’s narrative structure, and even the real-world controversies surrounding its creation are all inextricably linked to this foundational act of taking.
By dissecting Maui’s motivations through the layers of plot, psychology, mythology, and allegory, this report will provide a definitive answer to the user’s query, revealing that the demigod’s desire for the heart was born from a deep and tragic emptiness.
Section 1: The Hero’s Proclamation – Maui’s Stated Motivations
Within the universe of Moana, Maui presents a clear and consistent, albeit self-aggrandizing, justification for his actions.
He frames the theft of the Heart of Te Fiti not as a crime, but as the ultimate act of benevolence toward humanity.1
The persona he projects is that of a magnanimous benefactor, a “hero to all,” whose purpose is to furnish mortals with the tools for a better life.
The heart, possessing the power of creation itself, was to be his greatest gift, one that would cement his legacy and earn him the eternal gratitude of humankind.2
This motivation is most explicitly articulated in the musical number “You’re Welcome.” The song functions as Maui’s lyrical résumé, a boastful catalog of his prior services to humanity.
He takes credit for pulling islands from the sea, harnessing the sun to lengthen the days, bringing fire, and even creating coconuts.2
Each of these deeds, he implies, was a gift bestowed upon an undeserving but beloved mortal population.
In his own mind, stealing the heart was the logical and ultimate culmination of this pattern.
If he could give them fire and longer days, why not give them the power of creation itself? This act was intended to be the final, irrefutable proof of his love for them, and in turn, would win him their “favor forever”.2
However, this proclaimed altruism is inextricably linked to his identity as a trickster.
Polynesian myths widely characterize Māui as a trickster figure, one who causes mischief even when his actions are intended to benefit mankind.2
The film embraces this aspect, suggesting that Maui stole the heart “simply because he could”.2
The act was a thrilling adventure meant to prove his prowess, create a bit of chaos, and add another spectacular achievement to his “tattoo tapestry of achievements”.2
This dual motivation—benefactor and mischief-maker—paints a picture of a demigod who believes the ends justify the means, especially when the end result is further adoration from his “fans”.6
A deeper analysis of his dialogue and actions reveals that his heroism operates on a transactional basis.
He does not perform deeds for their intrinsic moral worth but for the validation they generate.
His entire self-concept is built upon the praise and adoration of mortals.2
The theft of the heart was not a selfless gift but an investment in his own reputation.
This is confirmed when his primary motivation to help Moana return the heart is the promise that doing so would “most certainly return Maui’s positive reputation with the mortals he cares so deeply for”.2
He is not driven by a desire to right a wrong for its own sake, but by the opportunity to restore his heroic status.
This pattern establishes a consistent
quid pro quo relationship with humanity: his gifts are the quo, and their worship is the quid.
This re-frames his grand proclamations of generosity not as genuine altruism, but as a carefully constructed, self-serving enterprise designed to secure a continuous supply of external validation.
Section 2: The Wound Within – The Psychological Impetus for Theft
Maui’s carefully curated persona as a charismatic hero and benefactor is a psychological shield, a facade constructed to mask a profound and defining trauma.
His boastful narcissism is not a sign of genuine self-love but a desperate defense mechanism against a crippling insecurity that stems from the primal wound of his past: parental abandonment.7
To understand why Maui stole the heart, one must look past his proclamations and into the psychological void he has spent his immortal life trying to fill.
The origin of this trauma is etched directly onto his skin.
One of his most significant tattoos tells the story not of a heroic deed, but of a tragic beginning: as a mortal infant, he was deemed unwanted by his parents, who callously threw him into the ocean to die.3
Though he was saved by the gods and granted demigod status, this initial act of rejection became the foundational event of his existence.3
Consequently, his entire life transformed into a relentless quest for the love and approval he was denied at birth.7
His grand, world-shaping feats are less the actions of a confident deity and more akin to a “child who does stupid stuff to get attention”.7
After being exiled for a millennium for his transgression with the heart, he is found “starved of human attention,” so desperate for interaction that he is willing to trick and trap a child to escape his island prison.9
This deep-seated insecurity is the engine of his narcissism.
The “narcissistic celebrity” persona he adopts is a direct compensation for his feelings of worthlessness.7
He needs to be “everyone’s hero” because he is terrified that he is, in fact, no one’s child.10
The theft of the heart was an act of supreme “hubris” 2, but this hubris was born from desperation, not strength.
It was the most grandiose gesture he could conceive of to prove his worth and finally secure the unconditional love he craves.
This psychological fragility is further evident in his crippling dependence on his magical fishhook.
The hook, a gift from the gods, is more than a tool; it is the tangible source of his power and the symbol of his entire constructed identity.7
It is the stand-in for the parental validation he never received.
His panicked, honest admission to Moana, “Without my hook, I am nothing,” reveals the precariousness of his self-esteem.10
When the hook is damaged, he immediately abandons the quest, demonstrating that his courage is contingent on this external object.7
Ultimately, the theft of the heart can be understood as a direct psychological reenactment of his own trauma.
Having been denied the “heart” of parental love and belonging, Maui attempts to seize control of the very concept of life-giving power.
The Heart of Te Fiti is the ultimate symbol of creation and nurturing love.1
By stealing it, Maui’s subconscious goal was to become the ultimate purveyor of this power, to gift it to humanity and, in doing so, receive back the love and acceptance he was denied.
This transforms the theft from a simple act of arrogance into a tragic and misguided attempt to heal a primal wound through external validation, rather than achieving the internal reconciliation he truly needs.
Section 3: A Canvas of Conscience – The Narrative Role of Maui’s Tattoos
Maui’s intricate tattoos are far more than mere decoration; they function as a sophisticated and dynamic narrative device, serving simultaneously as a living biography, a visual record of his ego, and, most crucially, an externalized conscience that guides his character arc toward redemption.3
This “tattoo tapestry of achievements” is a unique storytelling tool that provides the audience with direct insight into Maui’s past, his internal struggles, and his capacity for change.2
Primarily, the tattoos act as a visual résumé, chronicling the heroic deeds upon which Maui has built his identity.
He explains to Moana that the tattoos “show up when I earn them,” each one representing a significant accomplishment like lassoing the sun or pulling islands from the sea.3
This living record serves to reinforce his ego, providing a constant, visible testament to his power and his contributions to humanity.
They are the physical manifestation of the stories he tells about himself, a permanent gallery of his own greatness.
The most innovative function of the tattoos, however, is the character of “Mini Maui.” This small, animated version of the demigod on his skin is explicitly identified as his conscience.3
Mini Maui frequently acts in direct opposition to the larger Maui’s selfish or cowardly impulses.
He silently goads Maui to “do the right thing,” such as helping Moana retrieve the heart or confessing the truth about his past.3
This allows the audience to witness Maui’s internal moral conflict in a visually engaging Way. A cut scene from the film’s development, in which Maui panics because he thinks Mini Maui is drowning, highlights the filmmakers’ intention for the tattoo to be an integral part of his being, not just ink on skin.11
Some interpretations even suggest Mini Maui represents the guiding parental figure he was denied in his infancy.11
The tattoos also visually map his arc of redemption.
After his fishhook is damaged and he abandons Moana, his tattoos seemingly lose their vitality.
However, upon his return and his selfless decision to help Moana, his tattoos reappear, glowing with renewed energy, symbolizing his moral and emotional recovery.12
By the end of the film, new tattoos appear that reflect his shared journey with Moana, marking his evolution from a self-serving hero to a collaborative partner who understands that true strength lies in connection to others.12
The very existence of Mini Maui suggests that Maui is not a monolithic narcissist but a character in a constant state of internal conflict.
It indicates a level of self-awareness regarding his own flaws, even if his pride prevents him from admitting them verbally.
Mini Maui is not an external force but a manifestation of Maui’s own inner, better self.
This means that Maui already possesses a moral compass; he has simply been ignoring it in favor of his trauma-induced ego.
Moana’s role, therefore, is not to teach him how to be good, but to empower him to finally listen to the part of himself that Mini Maui represents.
This makes his eventual redemption a more earned and psychologically resonant transformation, rather than a simple change of heart prompted by an external character.
Section 4: Echoes of Antiquity – The Mythological Māui vs. Disney’s Creation
The character of Maui in Moana is a carefully constructed cinematic figure, a composite who borrows liberally from the rich and diverse traditions of Polynesian mythology while being anchored to a central conflict that is a complete narrative invention by Disney.
Understanding the distinction between the authentic mythological hero and the film’s adaptation is crucial to deconstructing Maui’s motivations, as it reveals that his primary transgression—the theft of the heart—has no precedent in the source material.13
Across Polynesia, from Aotearoa (New Zealand) to Hawaiʻi to Sāmoa, Māui is a preeminent culture hero and trickster.13
He is celebrated for his cleverness (
kolohe), his shapeshifting abilities, and his deeds that better the lives of humankind.5
Many of the feats Maui proudly lists in “You’re Welcome” are direct adaptations of these pan-Polynesian legends.
These include:
- Fishing up islands: In Māori tradition, he fishes up the North Island, Te Ika-a-Māui (the fish of Māui).13 In Hawaiian tradition, he pulls the Hawaiian islands from the ocean floor.17
- Snaring the sun: Both Māori and Hawaiian myths tell of Māui capturing the sun with ropes to slow its journey, thus lengthening the days for human activities like drying kapa cloth or gathering food.17
- Acquiring fire: In Māori myths, he obtains fire from the goddess Mahuika.13 In Hawaiʻi, he tricks birds for the secret.19 In Sāmoa, his cognate, Tiʻitiʻi, wrestles the secret of fire from the earthquake god Mafuiʻe.20
Disney’s creative team clearly drew from these heroic exploits to build their character’s backstory.
However, the central plot of the film—that Maui stole the “heart” of a creator goddess to gift the power of creation to mortals—is a fabrication.
There is no traditional myth from any Polynesian culture that corresponds to this event.17
This invention represents the most significant and consequential departure from the source mythology.
Furthermore, the film’s characterization of Maui diverges in key aspects.
While Disney’s Maui is a physically imposing, muscle-bound figure, many traditional myths describe him as the youngest, smallest, or even a premature infant who relies on his wits and magic over brute force.13
Perhaps the most profound omission is Māui’s most significant and tragic tale: his quest for human immortality.
In Māori mythology, Māui attempts to reverse the cycle of birth and death by passing through the body of the goddess of death, Hine-nui-te-pō.
He fails and is crushed to death, thereby establishing mortality as the permanent condition for all humanity.13
Disney completely excises this complex and somber narrative, which explains a fundamental aspect of the human condition.
The following table provides a clear comparison of the mythological record versus Disney’s narrative choices.
Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Māui’s Deeds in Polynesian Mythology vs. Moana
| Deed/Event | Māori Mythology 13 | Hawaiian Mythology 17 | Samoan Mythology (Tiʻitiʻi) 20 | Disney’s Moana 1 |
| Fishing up Islands | Yes, fishes up North Island (Te Ika-a-Māui). | Yes, fishes up Hawaiian islands. | Yes, Tongan tradition credits him with pulling up Tongatabu. | Yes, mentioned in “You’re Welcome.” |
| Snaring the Sun | Yes, to lengthen the days for work. | Yes, to help his mother dry kapa cloth. | Not a prominent myth. | Yes, mentioned in “You’re Welcome.” |
| Acquiring Fire | Yes, from the goddess Mahuika. | Yes, tricks a tribe of birds for the secret. | Yes, wrestles the secret from the god Mafuiʻe. | Yes, mentioned in “You’re Welcome.” |
| Quest for Immortality | Yes, tries to reverse birth through Hine-nui-te-pō and is crushed, causing human mortality. | Absent. | Absent. | Absent. |
| Stealing a Goddess’s Heart | No. This myth does not exist. | No. This myth does not exist. | No. This myth does not exist. | Yes. The central conflict of the film. |
This deliberate invention of the “heart-stealing” plot serves a specific Western narrative purpose.
It establishes a clear “original sin” for the character, creating a straightforward problem that requires a simple, redemptive solution.
The episodic and etiological nature of the original myths, which often explain why the world is the way it is, is replaced by a character-driven plot focused on fixing a single mistake.
The tragic and profound story of his failure to conquer death does not fit the conventional three-act structure of a Disney film, which typically demands a flawed protagonist who overcomes their flaw to achieve a happy ending.
By inventing a reversible transgression, Disney simplifies a complex mythological figure into a character perfectly suited for their narrative formula, prioritizing a clean, redemptive arc over mythological fidelity.
This choice fundamentally alters the character’s purpose, shifting it from explaining the world to healing his own invented failing.
Section 5: The Heart of the Matter – Symbolic and Allegorical Interpretations
Beyond the literal narrative and psychological underpinnings, the story of Maui’s theft of the heart invites a powerful allegorical reading.
Interpreted symbolically, the central conflict of Moana transforms into a nuanced exploration of trauma, violation, and the nature of healing, offering a profound, feminist perspective on the film’s core events.
In this framework, Maui’s act is not just a mistake driven by ego, but a deep violation, and the film’s resolution is not a simple victory, but a complex process of restorative justice led by feminine empathy.
Several analyses interpret Maui’s act of “violently” prying the heart from Te Fiti’s core as a metaphor for sexual assault or a profound violation of feminine sovereignty.26
The heart itself, a small, smooth stone imbued with the power to create life, serves as a clear symbolic stand-in for Te Fiti’s “womb/vagina/womanhood”.26
Maui’s use of his “giant fish hook,” described as a “clear metaphor for his masculinity/phallus,” to forcibly take this source of life from the mother island reinforces this reading of the event as an act of gendered violence.26
From this perspective, Te Fiti’s subsequent transformation into the volcanic demon Te Kā is not an expression of inherent evil, but a direct manifestation of her trauma.
Te Kā represents the “anger, sadness, and fear” that consume Te Fiti after the violation.26
She becomes a “monster of fire and lava” and coats herself in “fire and ash” as a protective measure, ensuring that “no creature could come close to her.
Could hurt her again”.26
Te Kā is not a separate entity to be defeated; she is Te Fiti, wounded, broken, and defined by her pain, having forgotten her true self in the millennium since the attack.27
Moana’s heroic journey, then, is radically redefined.
Her purpose is not to slay a monster but to heal a victim.
Her greatest strength is not combat prowess but radical empathy.
The climax of the film hinges on a moment of profound recognition, when Moana realizes that the swirling spiral pattern on the heart matches a mark on Te Kā’s chest, leading her to understand they are the same being.27
She does not fight Te Kā; instead, she “turns to the monster with compassion” and asks the ocean to “Let her come to me”.26
The restoration of the heart is achieved through words of acknowledgment and validation: “I have crossed the horizon to find you.
I know your name.
They have stolen the heart from inside you.
But this does not define you.
This is not who you are”.26
Moana’s power lies in her ability to see Te Fiti as whole and complete even in her brokenness, separating her identity from her trauma.
This allegorical framework creates a powerful thematic parallel between Te Fiti and Maui.
Both characters are fundamentally defined by a deep-seated trauma—for Te Fiti, the theft of her heart; for Maui, his abandonment by his parents.
Both have allowed an external object to define their worth—Te Fiti’s identity is lost with her heart, while Maui believes he is “nothing” without his hook.10
Moana serves as the catalyst for healing for both.
Just as she tells Te Fiti that the loss of her heart “does not define you,” her faith in Maui helps him realize his own intrinsic worth, separate from his magical tool, culminating in his declaration, “Hook.
No hook.
I’m Maui”.26
The physical restoration of the heart is therefore symbolic of a much deeper, dual process of psychological and spiritual recovery, where two wounded figures are guided by Moana’s empathy to reclaim their true selves, independent of the symbols of their power and their pain.
Section 6: A Contested Legacy – The Cultural Politics of Portrayal
Despite Disney’s well-publicized efforts to engage in respectful cultural consultation through its “Oceanic Story Trust,” the production and release of Moana ignited significant debate and criticism from Polynesian scholars, artists, and community members.28
The portrayal of Maui, the pan-Polynesian approach to the culture, and the film’s commercial marketing became flashpoints for a broader conversation about representation, authenticity, and cultural appropriation.
This controversy reveals a deep tension between the narrative aims of a global entertainment corporation and the cultural sovereignty of the peoples whose stories are being told.
One of the most immediate and widespread criticisms centered on Maui’s physical depiction.
In stark contrast to many traditional myths that portray Māui as a “lithe teenager,” Disney’s version is a “bulky and oversized figure”.25
This portrayal was condemned by some as perpetuating harmful stereotypes of Polynesian men as overweight, with one New Zealand Member of Parliament of Tongan heritage describing the character as looking like “half pig, half hippo”.25
For many, this depiction was seen as a caricature that was particularly hurtful given Maui’s status as a revered ancestor and demigod.29
Further critique was aimed at the film’s homogenization of diverse Pacific cultures.
Moana blends distinct cultural elements from Māori, Samoan, Tongan, Hawaiian, and Fijian traditions into a single, generic “Polynesia”.32
While this may have been a creative choice to create a fantasy world, critics argued that it functions as a form of erasure, flattening the unique and sovereign identities of individual island nations into a monolithic, easily consumable product for a Western audience.32
The controversy reached a fever pitch with the marketing of a Maui Halloween costume for children.
The costume, a one-piece suit featuring tattooed brown skin, was widely condemned as a form of cultural appropriation and even labeled “Polyface,” a modern equivalent of blackface.25
The act of wearing another race’s skin as a costume was deemed deeply offensive.34
Furthermore, the commercialization of sacred tattoo patterns, which in Polynesian cultures represent a person’s lineage, status, and spiritual power (
mana), was seen as a profound disrespect.
In the face of widespread public outcry, Disney pulled the costume from shelves and issued an apology.25
While Disney’s Oceanic Story Trust was intended to guide the production toward authenticity, its effectiveness has been debated.
Filmmakers and consultants have praised the collaborative process.28
However, some scholars argue that “having brown advisers doesn’t make it a brown story.
It’s still very much a white person’s story,” suggesting that the final product remains filtered through a Western, and at times colonial, lens.29
Conversely, the film has also received praise from within the community for its empowering portrayal of a strong female protagonist without a love interest, its celebration of wayfinding traditions, and for providing a positive role model for Pacific youth.37
Intriguingly, the central conflict of the film serves as a powerful, if unintentional, metaphor for the cultural dynamics of its own creation.
In the film, Maui, a powerful outsider, takes a sacred and culturally vital object—the heart—from a Pacific island goddess for his own purposes, namely to win adoration and gift it to the world.1
This act causes a blight that damages the local culture.1
In the real world, Disney, a powerful outside corporation, took sacred and culturally vital narratives and figures from Polynesia for its own purposes—namely profit and gifting a story to a global audience.
According to critics, this act caused cultural harm through stereotyping and appropriation.29
The film’s plot then revolves around a native figure, Moana, who must guide the powerful outsider to correct his mistake and restore what was taken.
This mirrors the real-world discourse, where native scholars and cultural practitioners engaged with the powerful outsider, Disney, to guide and correct its representations.
The very plot of
Moana, therefore, can be read as a meta-commentary on the complex and fraught relationship between a dominant global culture and the indigenous cultures from which it borrows, revealing the anxieties and power dynamics inherent in such an exchange.
Conclusion: A Multifaceted Motivation
The question “Why did Maui steal the heart?” cannot be answered with a single, simple motivation.
The act is a narrative nexus, a point where multiple layers of meaning—explicit, psychological, mythological, and political—converge.
A comprehensive analysis reveals that Maui’s theft was driven by a complex confluence of factors, each contributing to the demigod’s fateful decision.
On the surface, Maui’s stated reason is the culmination of his career as a hero to humanity.
He stole the heart as the ultimate gift, an act of misguided generosity intended to win him the permanent adoration of mortals, a group he professes to love.
This is the story he tells himself and the world.
Beneath this heroic proclamation lies a deep psychological wound.
His actions are a desperate and pathological attempt to heal the trauma of his infant abandonment.
Starved of the parental love he was denied, he pursues the love of humanity with a child-like need for attention, performing grand deeds to prove his worth.
The theft was the most spectacular gesture he could imagine to finally feel worthy and loved.
From a mythological perspective, the theft is a narrative invention, a deliberate choice by the filmmakers to create a clear “original sin” that facilitates a conventional, redemptive character arc suitable for a Western film structure.
This fabrication replaces the more complex, and often tragic, narratives of the traditional pan-Polynesian Māui, simplifying a multifaceted culture hero into a flawed protagonist in need of fixing.
Symbolically, the act can be read as an allegory for masculine violation and trauma.
This interpretation reframes the story as one of feminine-led healing, where Moana’s empathy and recognition, not violence, are the keys to restoring balance to both the wounded goddess Te Fiti and the insecure demigod Maui.
Finally, the act and the character are a flashpoint for critical real-world conversations about cultural representation.
The controversy surrounding Maui’s depiction and the film’s creation highlights the inherent power dynamics in global storytelling.
The narrative of a powerful outsider taking a sacred object from a Pacific culture unintentionally serves as a potent metaphor for the very act of cultural appropriation that critics accused the film of committing.
In conclusion, Maui did not steal the heart for one reason, but for all of them.
His motivation is a tapestry woven from threads of proclaimed heroism, hidden trauma, narrative convenience, and symbolic weight.
The theft is the central pillar of a complex modern myth, a story that is as much about the character’s profound internal deficit as it is about the vital cultural dialogue it both reflects and generated.
Works cited
- Disney’s Moana | The University Union, accessed August 8, 2025, https://theuniversityunion.com/unique/archive-detail/disneys-moana
- Moana: Why Maui Stole The Heart of Te Fiti – Screen Rant, accessed August 8, 2025, https://screenrant.com/moana-disney-maui-heart-tefiti-steal-reason/
- Maui’s Tattoos In Moana Explained – Screen Rant, accessed August 8, 2025, https://screenrant.com/moana-maui-tattoos-explained/
- The Meaning Behind Moana: Myth and Metaphor – The Bible in Magic: the Gathering, accessed August 8, 2025, https://bramclabby.wordpress.com/2017/01/16/the-meaning-behind-moana-myth-and-metaphor/
- Demigod Māui | Polynesian Mythology – Aloha From Maui – Kullen Coble, accessed August 8, 2025, https://kullencoble.com/blog/demigod-maui-polynesian-mythology/
- (PDF) THE ANALYSIS OF FLOUTING OF CONVERSATIONAL MAXIMS ON THE MAIN CHARACTERS IN “ MOANA” MOVIE – ResearchGate, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337255099_THE_ANALYSIS_OF_FLOUTING_OF_CONVERSATIONAL_MAXIMS_ON_THE_MAIN_CHARACTERS_IN_MOANA_MOVIE
- Analyzing the Disney Villains: Maui (Moana) – Eric J. Juneau, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ericjuneaubooks.com/2023/04/analyzing-the-disney-villains-maui-moana/
- An Analysis of Language Ideologies in Disney’s “Moana” – Ashley Wagner Arts, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ashleywagnerarts.com/academic/an-analysis-of-language-ideologies-in-disneys-moana
- Maui’s OTHER Reason For Stealing The Heart Of Te Fiti – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xk9GMARXlG4
- A Deeper Look Into Moana. A film of extraordinary character… | by Angeline – Medium, accessed August 8, 2025, https://medium.com/movie-analysis-by-angeline/a-deeper-look-into-moana-a55645f8e529
- The DARK Reason Maui’s Tattoos MOVE In Moana… – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCFsufA7nS4
- Maui’s Powers & Tattoos Explained In MOANA 2 – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7kvHl2ExFc
- Māui (Māori mythology) – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C4%81ui_(M%C4%81ori_mythology)
- Myth of Māui | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/myth-maui
- Maui : The Enigmatic Trickster – Mythlok, accessed August 8, 2025, https://mythlok.com/maui/
- The Legend of New Zealand | 100% Pure New Zealand, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.newzealand.com/nz/feature/the-legend-of-new-zealand/
- Māui (Hawaiian mythology) – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C4%81ui_(Hawaiian_mythology)
- How Māui slowed the sun – Mātauranga Māori, accessed August 8, 2025, https://eng.mataurangamaori.tki.org.nz/Support-materials/Te-Reo-Maori/Maori-Myths-Legends-and-Contemporary-Stories/How-Maui-slowed-the-sun
- Māui – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C4%81ui
- Tiʻitiʻi – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ti%CA%BBiti%CA%BBi
- TS Maui Myth – Samoan Mythology, accessed August 8, 2025, https://samoanmythology.net/ts-mauimyth/
- Maui Steals Fire – Samoan Mythology, accessed August 8, 2025, https://samoanmythology.org/ta-maui_steals_fire/
- How good was Moana at portraying Polynesian culture and stories? – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/moana/comments/5thfz1/how_good_was_moana_at_portraying_polynesian/
- How did Maui die? – Tuwharetoa Bone, accessed August 8, 2025, https://tuwharetoabone.com/blogs/news/maui
- Moana: progressive paean to Polynesia – or another of Disney’s cultural blunders? – The Guardian, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2016/sep/26/moana-polynesia-disney-cultural-blunders
- Moana: Trigger Warning – Honest to a Fault, accessed August 8, 2025, https://thebrutallyhonestmom.com/2017/03/18/moana-trigger-warning/
- While We Were Yet Monsters (Lessons from Moana) – Lightning Bug, accessed August 8, 2025, https://nicholeq.com/2018/05/06/while-we-were-yet-monsters-lessons-from-moana/
- How the Oceanic Cultural Trust Influenced ‘Moana 2 | The Walt Disney Company, accessed August 8, 2025, https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/oceanic-cultural-trust-moana-2/
- How the Story of ‘Moana’ and Maui Holds Up Against Cultural Truths, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/how-story-moana-and-maui-holds-against-cultural-truths-180961258/
- Disney’s ‘Moana’: An offensive portrayal of Polynesian culture and mythology, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.thedailystar.net/entertainment/tv-film/news/disneys-moana-offensive-portrayal-polynesian-culture-and-mythology-3743591
- Disney’s “Moana” Compared to True Hawaiian Culture – Kauai Calls, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.kauaicalls.com/disneys-moana-compared-to-true-hawaiian-culture/
- Disney’s Moana, mono-myths, and cultural appropriation – Dawning of a Brighter Day, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.associationmormonletters.org/2016/11/disneys-moana-mono-myths-and-cultural-appropriation/
- Is Moana racist?.. : r/movies – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/movies/comments/dkzjpf/is_moana_racist/
- Disney’s Moana and Cultural Appropriation – The Prindle Institute for …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.prindleinstitute.org/2016/10/disney-moana-cultural-appropriation/
- Disney’s ‘Moana’ puts a spotlight on ancient Pacific tradition of wayfinding, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.bpr.org/2024-12-16/disneys-moana-puts-a-spotlight-on-ancient-pacific-tradition-of-wayfinding
- Time to Face the Music: Musical Colonization and Appropriation in Disney’s Moana – MDPI, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/7/113
- Patrick Thomsen: Why Moana could actually be good for us | E …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://e-tangata.co.nz/arts/patrick-thomsen-why-moana-could-actually-be-good-for-us/
- Māui and the giant fish – Mātauranga Māori, accessed August 8, 2025, https://eng.mataurangamaori.tki.org.nz/Support-materials/Te-Reo-Maori/Maori-Myths-Legends-and-Contemporary-Stories/Maui-and-the-giant-fish
- Ti’iti’i : The Firebringer – Mythlok, accessed August 8, 2025, https://mythlok.com/ti%CA%BBiti%CA%BBi/
