The Wig as a System: Decoding the Most Powerful Object of the 18th Century

I’ve spent years wandering through the portrait galleries of museums, both in person and through the pages of books.

My gaze always lands on the men of the 17th and 18th centuries, frozen in time, staring out with a serene confidence from beneath cascades of powdered curls.

And I always asked the same simple question: Why the wigs?

For a long time, the answers I found felt hollow, like a checklist of historical trivia.

I was told that men wore wigs to cover the embarrassing effects of rampant syphilis, like hair loss and scalp sores.¹

I read that it was a clever solution to the era’s appalling hygiene and constant battle with head lice.³

And, of course, there was the oft-repeated story of a prematurely balding king, Louis XIII, who started a fashion trend out of vanity.³

Each of these reasons is factually correct.

Yet, they felt profoundly unsatisfying.

They were a pile of disconnected facts that failed to explain the sheer, suffocating dominance of the periwig.

How could a single object simultaneously be a medical device, a political statement, a class marker, and a professional uniform? How did it hold an entire continent in its grip for nearly 150 years, worn by everyone from kings and Founding Fathers to city clerks and shopkeepers?⁶ The simple answers couldn’t account for the intensity, the longevity, or the intricate social grammar of the wig.

They explained the

what, but not the how or the why.

It felt like describing a car by listing its parts—a steering wheel, an engine, four tires—without ever explaining the concept of driving.

My frustration grew.

I felt I was missing the engine, the underlying logic that powered this bizarre and ubiquitous fashion.

The real story, I sensed, wasn’t in the list of causes, but in the relationship between them.

The epiphany arrived, as they often do, from a completely unexpected direction.

While researching a project on modern military history, I became fascinated by the sociology of the uniform.⁸

A military uniform, I learned, is not just clothing.

It is a dense, highly sophisticated piece of signaling technology.

In a single glance, it communicates a soldier’s rank, their branch of service, their specific job, their achievements, and their allegiance.

It is a wearable CV, a system for instantly resolving ambiguity and establishing hierarchy.⁸

Suddenly, the puzzle of the 18th-century wig clicked into place.

I had been looking at it as a fashion accessory when I should have been seeing it as social technology.

The periwig was not merely an object; it was the 18th century’s most effective wearable signaling system.

This new paradigm changed everything.

The wig wasn’t popular in spite of its multiple functions; it was popular because of them.

Its genius lay in its ability to broadcast a complex, layered set of signals about the wearer’s body, his political loyalties, his economic power, and his professional identity—all at the same time.

It was a solution to the fundamental problem of how to know who was who in an era of rapid change, urbanization, and increasing social flux.

The disconnected facts I had gathered were not separate causes; they were the different frequencies on which the wig broadcast its messages.

To truly understand its power, one has to deconstruct the system and analyze each of its four core signals.

Pillar 1: The Foundation of Health and Virility (The Biological Signal)

Before the wig could become a symbol of power or status, it had to serve a more fundamental purpose.

It was first and foremost a piece of hardware designed to manage the frailties of the human body in a brutal age.

Its initial adoption was driven by two of the era’s great biological crises: venereal disease and vermin.

The Syphilis Mask

From the late 15th century onward, a devastating syphilis epidemic, known as the “Great Pox” or “French Pox,” swept across Europe.¹⁰

Before the advent of antibiotics, the disease was chronic and disfiguring.

Its tertiary stage brought on a host of horrifying symptoms, including dementia, ulcerating skin lesions, and, most visibly, patchy hair loss (alopecia).²

In a society where a full, healthy head of hair was a potent symbol of strength and virility, going bald was a social catastrophe.³

As the diarist Samuel Pepys wrote with dread when his brother contracted the disease, “If [my brother] lives, he will not be able to show his head—which will be a very great shame to me”.¹²

The wig emerged as a technology of concealment.

Contemporary writers of the late 16th and early 17th centuries made the connection explicit.

Thomas Nashe, in 1592, wrote that “a close periwig hides all the sins of an old whore-master,” a clear reference to masking the signs of venereal disease.¹¹

A 1604 play,

The Wit of a Woman, states plainly that the periwig “had never been used, but for the poxe”.¹¹

The wig allowed a man to maintain a public façade of health, dignity, and respectability, hiding the physical evidence of a disease that was considered both shameful and widespread.

Both King Louis XIV of France and his cousin, King Charles II of England—the two men most responsible for popularizing the periwig—are believed by many historians to have suffered from syphilis, turning to wigs to cover their thinning hair.¹

A Hygienic Revolution on the Head

Beyond the pox, daily life in the 17th and 18th centuries was an intimate struggle with pests, particularly head lice.³

With infrequent bathing and limited means of washing hair, infestations were common and difficult to eradicate.

The wig offered a brilliantly practical, if cumbersome, solution.

A man could simply shave his head, eliminating the natural habitat for lice.³

It was far easier to maintain a clean scalp and to de-louse a wig than one’s own hair.

Wig maintenance became a craft in itself.

The pieces, often made from human or animal hair woven onto a net-like cap, could not be washed in the modern sense.³

Instead, they were periodically sent to a wigmaker for cleaning and delousing, a process that often involved boiling or baking the wig to kill any lice and their eggs.¹⁴

To combat the inevitable odors from sweat and the animal fats used for styling, wigs were heavily powdered with finely ground starch—often from wheat or corn flour—and scented with fragrant oils like lavender or orange flower.³

This practice served a dual purpose: it kept the wig smelling fresh and gave it the fashionable white or greyish hue that became the signature look of the 18th century.¹

Projecting the Idealized Mane

The wig did more than just hide the negative; it actively projected a powerful positive signal.

For centuries in European culture, long, thick hair on a man was a signifier of strength, virility, and high social status, a tradition with roots reaching back to ancient Germanic tribes.³

Baldness was therefore not just a cosmetic issue; it was perceived as a sign of weakness, impotence, or effeminacy.³

The periwig allowed a man to bypass the genetic lottery and the ravages of age and disease entirely.

It did not just restore lost hair; it provided the ideal head of hair—a full, lustrous, perfectly coiffed mane that never thinned or went grey (unless grey was the fashion).

It was a form of biological enhancement, a way to seize control of one’s physical presentation and broadcast an unwavering signal of masculine vitality.

This foundational layer of biological signaling—masking disease, ensuring cleanliness, and projecting virility—made the wig a profoundly useful tool.

It was on this practical base that the more complex social and political signals could be built.

Pillar 2: The Insignia of Allegiance and Power (The Political Signal)

While the wig’s origins lie in practicality, its ascent to cultural ubiquity was a direct result of its adoption and weaponization by Europe’s most powerful monarchs.

At the royal courts of France and England, the wig was transformed from a personal solution into a public uniform—a mandatory symbol of political loyalty and social aspiration.

The Sun King’s Gambit

The trend began modestly with King Louis XIII of France, who started wearing a wig in the 1620s to cover his premature balding.³

But it was his son and successor, Louis XIV (the “Sun King”), who understood its true potential.

A master of political theater, Louis XIV cultivated an image of absolute power and divine authority, and fashion was a key instrument in his statecraft.¹⁸

As his own hair began to thin in his youth, he turned to wigs, commissioning ever more magnificent and voluminous creations that became the centerpiece of style at his court in Versailles.¹³

At Versailles, etiquette was policy.

To be in the king’s favor, to be considered part of the elite, one had to adopt the court’s fashions.

The periwig became, in effect, a uniform of the aristocracy.³

Courtiers shaved their own healthy hair to don elaborate wigs in imitation of their king, visually pledging their allegiance to his authority.¹⁹

Louis XIV institutionalized the craft, employing a team of 48 personal wigmakers and elevating them to the status of artists.¹⁹

By dictating this expensive and high-maintenance fashion, he achieved a subtle political victory.

He forced the French nobility to invest their time and fortunes in the elaborate, costly rituals of courtly life in Paris, thereby diminishing their resources and power to foment rebellion in their provincial domains.¹⁸

The wig was not just a symbol of loyalty; it was a mechanism for enforcing it.

The English Periwig and the Rejection of Puritanism

The trend crossed the English Channel with the restoration of the monarchy in 1660.

King Charles II, having spent years in exile at the French court, brought the periwig back with him to England.²¹

Like his cousin Louis XIV, Charles also began wearing a wig to cover prematurely greying and thinning hair, possibly a symptom of syphilis.¹³

He used the wig to project an image of modern, continental sophistication and regal power.¹⁸

For the English elite, adopting the periwig was a powerful political statement.

It signaled loyalty to the restored Stuart monarchy and a wholesale rejection of the austere, short-haired sobriety of the Puritan Commonwealth that had preceded it under Oliver Cromwell.²²

The long, flowing curls of the wig were the antithesis of the Puritan “roundhead” haircut.

The diarist Samuel Pepys, ever attuned to new fashions, chronicled his own adoption of a wig in 1663, noting his initial anxiety that “all the church would presently have cast their eye all upon me,” only to find the fashion was already becoming commonplace.²⁶

Trickle-Down Tresses

With France as the undisputed arbiter of European taste, the fashion set by the French and English courts rapidly spread throughout the continent and to the American colonies.³

The wig became the ultimate aspirational item.

For the burgeoning professional and merchant classes, wearing a wig was a way to emulate the aristocracy and signal one’s own sophistication, wealth, and social ambition.⁶

It was a tangible link to the centers of power and culture.

This political signal, which equated the wig with royalty, loyalty, and elite status, supercharged its desirability and set the stage for its codification as a detailed marker of one’s specific place in the world.

Pillar 3: The Uniform of Status and Profession (The Socio-Economic Signal)

As the wig cascaded down the social hierarchy, its signaling system grew more complex and granular.

It evolved from a general symbol of elite status into a highly codified uniform that broadcast precise information about a man’s wealth, profession, and social standing.

It became the most legible and immediate marker of identity in the 18th-century city.

The “Bigwig” Economy

Wigs were, first and foremost, a conspicuous display of wealth.

The very term “bigwig,” which we still use to refer to an important person, originated from the larger, more elaborate, and thus more expensive, wigs worn by the affluent.¹

The cost of a wig created a clear economic hierarchy, as detailed in the table below.

Wig Type	Material	18th-Century Cost	Modern Equivalent (USD)	Supporting Evidence
Commoner’s Everyday Wig	Goat, Horse, or Yak Hair	~25 shillings	~$3,000 – $4,000	1
Professional’s Wig	Human Hair (Standard Quality)	Varies, significantly more	N/A (higher than commoner’s)	3
Nobleman’s Formal Peruke	Fine Human Hair (Blonde/Grey)	Up to 800 shillings (£40)	~$10,000 – $12,000+	1

An everyday wig could cost a typical Londoner a full week’s wages, making it a significant investment.¹

The most luxurious perukes, crafted from the finest human hair—with blonde, silver-grey, and naturally curly hair being the most prized—could cost a fortune.³

Cheaper alternatives were made from the hair of horses, goats, or even yaks.²⁹

This material difference was an immediate and visible signal of the wearer’s economic standing.

This voracious demand fueled a massive international hair trade.

Hair collectors traveled through rural Europe, buying hair from poor peasant women, who cultivated their long locks as a cash crop.³

Convents, prisons, and workhouses also became sources for the raw material needed to supply the thousands of wigmakers across the continent.³

The wig was not just a product; it was the engine of a global industry built on the foundations of class and poverty.

A Wig for Every Trade

Beyond wealth, the wig evolved into a professional uniform, with distinct styles adopted by different vocations to signify authority and expertise.

This created a visual language that was instantly recognizable.

By the mid-18th century, an encyclopedia of wigs counted 115 different styles.³

Profession	Wig Style Name/Type	Key Features	Social Significance	Supporting Evidence
Law	Full-bottomed, “Lexonic”	Long, with rows of curls, often unpowdered for judges.	Signals judicial authority, impartiality, and tradition.	16
Medicine	“Perruque à trois marteaux”	A wig with three distinctive knots or rolls.	Denotes medical expertise and professional status.	32
Clergy	“Perruque abbatiale”	Short, simple, often with a tonsure woven in.	Shows piety, modesty, and adherence to clerical rules.	32
Military	“Brigadière,” “à deux queues”	Knotted or tied back in queues (pigtails) for practicality.	Worn by officers to denote rank and distinguish them from enlisted men.	32
Academics/Gentry	Bob wig, Bag wig	Shorter, less formal styles for everyday wear.	Indicated a man of letters or a gentleman of leisure.	3

A doctor in his “perruque à trois marteaux” or a lawyer in his full-bottomed wig was instantly identifiable.³²

This codification brought order to the increasingly anonymous urban landscape.

In a city like Paris or London, where one constantly encountered strangers, the wig was a reliable guide to a man’s station and profession, a crucial function in a society obsessed with rank and propriety.⁷

The American Paradox

This signaling system was exported directly to colonial America.

Prominent figures like the Founding Fathers—including John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison—wore wigs to project an image of authority, education, and sophistication on par with their European counterparts.¹

It was a way for the colonial elite to perform their status and command respect.³⁵

This created a fascinating paradox.

In a new republic theoretically founded on ideals of equality and the rejection of a hereditary aristocracy, its leaders adopted one of the most potent symbols of that very system.²⁷

Even George Washington, who famously did not wear a wig, went to great lengths to make his own reddish-brown hair

look like one, powdering it white and styling it in the fashionable queue.⁵

This demonstrates the immense power of the wig’s signal; the

look of aristocracy was essential for projecting leadership, even if the object itself was absent.

The wig’s socio-economic signal was so strong that it was indispensable for anyone aspiring to or holding power.

Part IV: System Failure – The Great Male Renunciation and the Death of the Wig

For over a century, the wig’s signaling system was unparalleled in its effectiveness.

But its very success—its inextricable link to the political, social, and economic order of the Ancien Régime—made it uniquely vulnerable.

When that order was violently overthrown, the wig’s signals became obsolete, and the entire system collapsed with breathtaking speed.

“Let Them Eat Flour”

The French Revolution of 1789 was the death knell for the periwig in its heartland.

The wig was the ultimate symbol of the aristocracy, and as revolutionaries stormed the Bastille, it became a politically lethal accessory.³⁷

To wear an elaborate, powdered wig was to align oneself with the monarchy and the hated nobility, a decision that could easily lead to an appointment with the guillotine.³⁷

The symbolism was made even more potent by the powder itself.

The fine white powder used for wigs was often made from wheat or rice flour—the very substance that the starving masses of Paris lacked for bread.³⁷

The image of an aristocrat dusting his wig with flour while the people starved was a perfect encapsulation of the regime’s grotesque inequality.

In this new political reality, the wig’s signals of “status” and “power” were reinterpreted as “enemy” and “oppressor.” Fashion became a matter of life and death, and the plainer cottons and natural, unpowdered hair of the revolutionaries became the new uniform of patriotism.³⁸

The Taxman’s Revenge

Across the Channel in Britain, the wig’s decline was less bloody but equally decisive, hastened by economics and politics.

In 1795, to help fund the costly war against revolutionary France, the British government under Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger introduced the Duty on Hair Powder Act.³⁹

This law levied a hefty annual tax of one guinea on anyone who wished to use hair powder.³⁷

The tax was a brilliant political move.

It primarily hit the wealthy, making it popular with the general public, and was framed as a moral imperative—a way to stop wasting precious flour during a time of food shortages and war.³⁷

The effect was immediate and catastrophic for the fashion.

The tax made wig-wearing prohibitively expensive for the middle classes and an unattractive extravagance for many of the gentry.³⁹

The fashion for powdered hair and wigs, which had dominated for a century, all but vanished.

The Rise of the Romantic Ideal

Providing a fashionable alternative to the dying wig was a powerful new cultural movement.

The late 18th century saw the “Great Male Renunciation,” a profound shift in masculine aesthetics away from the ornate and artificial towards ideals of naturalism, simplicity, and classicism, inspired by the Enlightenment and the burgeoning Romantic movement.²⁸

Figures like the English dandy Beau Brummell championed a new form of masculine elegance based on impeccable personal hygiene, understated but perfectly tailored clothing, and meticulously groomed natural hair.²⁸

This new aesthetic was a direct philosophical rejection of the wig.

It proposed a competing signaling system where status was communicated not through overt, artificial ornamentation, but through the subtle language of cut, cleanliness, and control over one’s natural form.

After the French Revolution, the artifice of the wig seemed dishonest and outmoded, while natural hair felt authentic, modern, and virtuous.²⁷

The wig’s signaling system had no answer to this multi-front assault.

Its core messages were rendered meaningless by political revolution, economically unviable by taxation, and culturally obsolete by a new philosophy of aesthetics.

Because it was so perfectly symbolic of the old world, it could not survive in the new one.

Its symbolic rigidity was its ultimate undoing.

Part V: The Ghost in the Machine – The Enduring Legacy of the Wig

The powdered periwig is gone, a relic of a bygone era.

Yet, its ghost lingers.

The system it perfected—the use of a wearable object to broadcast a complex suite of signals about identity, status, and power—is more relevant today than ever.

By understanding the wig not as a historical curiosity but as a case study in the technology of the self, we gain a powerful lens for decoding the symbolic language of our own time.

From the British Courtroom to the Met Gala

The physical wig survives in only a few niche corners of the modern world.

Its most notable holdout is the British legal system, where barristers and judges still don some version of the horsehair wig.⁴⁵

Here, its function remains remarkably consistent with its 18th-century origins: it signals tradition, authority, and, by masking the individual, the impartiality of the law itself.¹⁶

It also appears as a ghost in the machine of high fashion, occasionally gracing the runways or the red carpet of the Met Gala, a self-aware nod to its history as the ultimate statement piece.

Decoding Our Modern “Wigs”

The true legacy of the periwig, however, is conceptual.

We no longer wear powdered horsehair, but we are all fluent in the language of signaling that it pioneered.

The fundamental human need to manage social impressions, project an idealized identity, and navigate complex social hierarchies has not changed.

We have simply swapped one technology for another.

Consider our modern “wigs”:

• The Luxury Handbag: A handbag with a prominent logo from a brand like Louis Vuitton or Hermès functions precisely as a fine peruke once did. It is a Veblen good, an object whose primary function is to broadcast a clear and unambiguous signal of wealth and social standing.⁴⁷
• The Curated Digital Self: The meticulously edited Instagram feed or professional LinkedIn profile is a modern-day powdering and coiffing. It allows us to present an idealized version of our lives and careers, masking imperfections and projecting an image of constant success and happiness—just as the wig masked the sores and anxieties of the 18th-century body.
• The Professional Uniform, Redefined: The specific styles of wigs that denoted a lawyer or a doctor have been replaced by new subcultural and professional uniforms. The “corporate beard,” a well-groomed but rugged style, signals a certain type of modern, creative masculinity.⁴⁹ The specific brand of outdoor vest worn by a tech venture capitalist or the sleek, minimalist sneakers of a graphic designer are the new “perruques à trois marteaux”—subtle but clear signals of belonging to a specific professional tribe.

My journey to understand the wig began with a simple question and a set of unsatisfying answers.

It led me to a new framework: the wig as a signaling system.

This paradigm reveals that the wig was not just a response to disease or a whim of fashion, but a sophisticated solution to a complex set of social, political, and biological problems.

It was a technology that brought order to its world by making identity visible.

By decoding its signals, we learn to see the same patterns at play around us today.

The technology changes, but the human impulse to signal who we are—and who we aspire to be—is eternal.

The powdered wig may be in the museum, but the system it represents is on our screens, in our closets, and all around us.

We are still, in our own way, adjusting our wigs before we face the world.

Works cited

1. Why Did the Founding Fathers Wear Wigs? | RHRLI, accessed August 12, 2025, https://rhrli.com/blog/why-did-the-founding-fathers-wear-wigs/
2. Thank syphilis for these three major fashion trends – Popular Science, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.popsci.com/story/science/weirdest-thing-cilantro-soap-quarantine-syphilis-fashion/
3. The power and pomp of the wig – Swiss National Museum – Swiss …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://blog.nationalmuseum.ch/en/2023/02/the-power-and-pomp-of-the-wig/
4. Colonial America: Powdered Wigs and lice : r/history – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/history/comments/3uuh2z/colonial_america_powdered_wigs_and_lice/
5. Fashion, status, and wigs: The 18th century’s towering trend – The Mirror, accessed August 12, 2025, https://vnhsmirror.com/226946/featured-articles/fashion-status-and-wigs-the-18th-centurys-towering-trend/
6. The Wig Business was Big Business in Eighteenth Century France …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.lucindabrant.com/blog/the-wig-business-was-big-business-in-18th-century-france
7. Big Hair: A Wig History of Consumption in Eighteenth-Century France, accessed August 12, 2025, https://historycooperative.org/journal/big-hair-a-wig-history-of-consumption-in-eighteenth-century-france/
8. Military Uniform Basics for Friends & Family, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.militaryonesource.mil/military-basics/extended-family-friend/the-basics-of-military-uniforms/
9. U.S. Army Uniforms – Army.mil, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.army.mil/uniforms/
10. rhrli.com, accessed August 12, 2025, https://rhrli.com/blog/why-did-the-founding-fathers-wear-wigs/#:~:text=Powdered%20wigs%20began%20with%20men,unprecedented%20amount%20of%20hair%20loss.
11. france – Did the syphilis epidemic start the 16th and 17th century wig …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/8607/did-the-syphilis-epidemic-start-the-16th-and-17th-century-wig-craze
12. 1700s Hair & Style | chloebritchfordfmp – Wix.com, accessed August 12, 2025, https://chloebritchford.wixsite.com/chloebritchfordfmp/blank-1
13. The Real Reason Why People Wore Powdered Wigs | Ripley’s …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ripleys.com/stories/powdered-wigs
14. A Bad Hair Day? The History of British Wigs and Wig-Curlers – The …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.museumofcambridge.org.uk/2021/06/a-bad-hair-day-the-history-of-british-wigs-and-wig-curlers/
15. The History of Long Hair & Wigs for Men – DiStefano Hair Restoration Center, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.hairman.com/history-of-wigs/
16. Why did people wear powdered wigs in the 17th/18th century? : r/history – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/history/comments/5br42h/why_did_people_wear_powdered_wigs_in_the_17th18th/
17. Peruke | Definition, History, Periwig, & Facts | Britannica, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/peruke
18. Why did men stop wearing long wigs, heels and stocking like what Louis XIV wore in that painting of him? : r/AskHistorians – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1iq2dgy/why_did_men_stop_wearing_long_wigs_heels_and/
19. The Periwig – This is Versailles, accessed August 12, 2025, http://thisisversaillesmadame.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-periwig.html
20. Wig Holes and Other Mysteries of Powdered Hair History Explained – Messy Nessy Chic, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.messynessychic.com/2023/05/04/wig-holes-and-other-mysteries-of-powdered-hair-history-explained/
21. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wig#:~:text=Perukes%20or%20periwigs%20for%20men,among%20men%20since%20the%201620s.
22. Wigs, Frills & High Heels | 17th Century Menswear – YouTube, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcSk3oKNlgw
23. Sketch of Charles II, 1660, showing his prematurely gray hair, by Samuel Cooper. This sketch was to be the basis for royal coinage. Charles began wearing wigs in 1663 to cover up his gray hair. – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/UKmonarchs/comments/1ijh98g/sketch_of_charles_ii_1660_showing_his_prematurely/
24. Fashions of King Charles II (1630- 1685) | historicalfashions – Wix.com, accessed August 12, 2025, https://claraparkdesigns.wixsite.com/historicalfashions/fashions-of-king-charles-ii-1630–1685
25. Bad hair centuries: wigs and powdered hair | Notes from the U.K., accessed August 12, 2025, https://notesfromtheuk.com/2019/08/16/wigs-and-powdered-hair-notes-explores-bad-hair-centuries/
26. Bizarre fashions: wigs and false hair – Dance’s Historical Miscellany, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.danceshistoricalmiscellany.com/bizarre-fashions-wigs-and-false-hair/
27. The Evolution and History of Wigs: From Ancient Times to Modern Trends – UniWigs, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.uniwigs.com/blog/the-evolution-and-history-of-wigs-from-ancient-times-to-modern-trends.html
28. Why Did Men Stop Wearing Wigs? | Gentleman’s Gazette, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.gentlemansgazette.com/why-men-stop-wearing-wigs/
29. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wig#:~:text=Such%20wigs%20were%20expensive%20to,as%20looking%20deformed%20and%20emasculated.
30. Shocking Hair History – POZA Salon, accessed August 12, 2025, https://pozasalon.com/blog/shocking-hair-history/
31. The Secret History of Buying and Selling Hair – Smithsonian Magazine, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/secret-history-buying-and-selling-hair-180961080/
32. Rodama: a blog of 18th-century & Revolutionary France: Wigs of the …, accessed August 12, 2025, http://rodama1789.blogspot.com/2020/01/wigs-of-professions.html
33. eighteenthcenturylit [licensed for non-commercial use only] / Wigs, accessed August 12, 2025, http://eighteenthcenturylit.pbworks.com/w/page/70049413/Wigs
34. Did the British soldiers really wear powdered wigs as part of their uniform during the Revolutionary war? – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/30qp74/did_the_british_soldiers_really_wear_powdered/
35. Boiling, Baking, and Curling 18th-Century Wigs | George Washington’s Mount Vernon, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.mountvernon.org/blog/2018/10/boiling-baking-and-curling-18th-century-wigs
36. Wigmaker – Colonial Williamsburg, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.colonialwilliamsburg.org/events/wigmaker/
37. When did the powdered wig become unfashionable and was its decline in popularity noted?, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2aw908/when_did_the_powdered_wig_become_unfashionable/
38. www.tota.world, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.tota.world/article/3230/#:~:text=Powdered%20wigs%20and%20faces%20became,liberty%20cap%20or%20bonnet%20rouge.
39. The Duty on Hair Powder Act passed – Bitter Grounds Magazine, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bittergrounds.com/cryptoreleases/great-britain-passes-the-duty-on-hair-powder-act/
40. Liberty Equality Fashion: The Women Who Styled the French Revolution | Columbia News, accessed August 12, 2025, https://news.columbia.edu/content/liberty-equality-fashion-women-who-styled-french-revolution
41. Wig – Wikipedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wig
42. 1830s in Western fashion – Wikipedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1830s_in_Western_fashion
43. Dandy – Wikipedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dandy
44. A Hairy Subject – Secrecy, Shame and Victorian Wigs – Untold lives …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://blogs.bl.uk/untoldlives/2013/08/a-hairy-subject-secrecy-shame-and-victorian-wigs.html
45. Evolution of Law Wigs Tradition to Modern Courtrooms – Law Writing, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.lawwriting.co.uk/blog/law-wigs-tradition-to-modern-courtrooms/
46. Why Do Barristers Wear Wigs In Court? – CountyOffice.org – YouTube, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-yGXvqiyI4
47. 10 so-called status symbols that only actually impress the middle class – VegOut, accessed August 12, 2025, https://vegoutmag.com/lifestyle/d-so-called-status-symbols-that-only-actually-impress-the-middle-class/
48. Evolving Status Symbols: Cultural Shifts and Markers of Prestige – Hexn, accessed August 12, 2025, https://hexn.io/blog/what-is-a-status-symbol-1345
49. Cultural Significance: Exploring Beard Styles – The Best Barbering …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.readtheblade.com/the-blade/beard-style-exploring-cultural-significance